Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Outline
1. Definition
2. Risk Management Process
1
3/10/2017
Definisi
2
3/10/2017
No costly surprise because you are preventing what is undesirable from occurring.
A better preparedness for a facilitation of positive outcomes from internal and external
review and audit processes.
3
3/10/2017
4
3/10/2017
5
3/10/2017
For each stage of the process records should be kept to enable decisions to be
understood as part of a process of continual improvement.
6
3/10/2017
7
3/10/2017
8
3/10/2017
9
3/10/2017
Pengukuran
Untuk mengetahui besaran bahaya dan risiko tertentu diperlukan
pengukuran dengan menggunakan alat ukur menurut jenis bahaya
dan risiko yang ada
Contoh:
Tingkat kebisingan, getaran, radiasi, pencahayaan, temperatur
Konsentrasi gas/uap kimia di udara lingkungan kerja
dll
10
3/10/2017
Risk Analysis
The purpose of risk analysis is to gain a better understanding of risks so
as to be able to reduce adverse consequences.
ANALYSE RISK
Determine Existing Controls
Monitor
and
Determine Determine review
Likelihood Consequences
11
3/10/2017
Types of analysis
• Qualitative analysis
• Qualitative analysis uses words to describe the magnitude of potential consequences and
the likelihood that those consequences will occur. These scales can be adapted or
adjusted to suit the circumstances, and different descriptions may be used for different
risks.
• Qualitative analysis should be informed by factual information and data where available.
Types of analysis
• Semi-quantitative analysis
• The objective is to produce a more expanded ranking scale than is usually
achieved in qualitative analysis, not to suggest realistic values for risk such as is
attempted in quantitative analysis.
• Care must be taken with the use of semi-quantitative analysis because the
numbers chosen may not properly reflect relativities and this can lead to
inconsistent, anomalous or inappropriate outcomes
12
3/10/2017
Types of analysis
Quantitative analysis
Quantitative analysis uses numerical values (rather than the descriptive scales
used in qualitative and semi-quantitative analysis) for both consequences and
likelihood using data from a variety of sources
The quality of the analysis depends on the accuracy and completeness of the
numerical values and the validity of the models used
13
3/10/2017
Severity Categories
Category Degree Description
I Minor Functional failure of part of machine or process –
no potential for injury
II Critical Failure will probably occur without major damage
to system or serious injury
III Major Major damage to system and/or serious injury
potential to personnel
IV Catastrophic Failure cause complete system loss and/or potential
for fatal injury
Likelihood Categories
Level Description Individual Failure Mode
A Frequent Likely to occur frequently
B Probable Will occur several times in the life of an item
C Occasional Likely to occur some time in life of an item
D Remote Unlikely but possible
E Improbable So unlikely that occurrence may not be experienced
14
3/10/2017
Risk Chart
A
High Risk
B
Probability Level
Priority 1
C
Medium
Risk
D
Low Risk Priority 2
E
Priority 3
I II III IV
Severity Category
(from US Military standard)
15
3/10/2017
Risk Chart
Australian Standard 4360 Risk Management
Consequences
Insignificant Minor Moderate Major Catastrophic
Likelihood 1 2 3 4 5
Almost Certain A S S H H H
Likely B M S S H H
Moderate C L M S H H
Unlikely D L L M S H
Rare E L L M S S
H = High Risk , detailed research and management planning required at senior level
S = Significant risk, Senior management attention needed
M = Moderate Risk, management responsibility must be specified
L = Low Risk, manage by routine procedures
16
3/10/2017
17
3/10/2017
18
3/10/2017
Nilai risiko yang diperoleh dari hasil analisis dibandingkan dengan kriteria
yang ditetapkan tentang batasan risiko yang bisa ditolerir dan tidak.
19
3/10/2017
Kriteria
Dalam melakukan evaluasi terhadap bahaya dan risiko diperlukan
kriteria untuk menentukan prioritas
Tingkat risiko yang bisa di terima (tolerable risk) merupakan salah satu
kriteria yang umum digunakan dalam mengevaluasi bahaya dan risiko
The same risk may seem negligible to one person and very high to another.
20
3/10/2017
Social Evaluation
◦ Characterizing the social issues that reflect value judgments and societal preference, as
well as the factors that influence political perceptions of equity and fairness
21
3/10/2017
Risk Treatment
22
3/10/2017
Terima Kasih
23