Appendix 5: Cover Page

CENTRE FOR UNIVERSITY OF HERTFORDSHIRE PROGRAMMES

Assignment Cover Page

Module Module
Title: Code:
Assignment
Date:
Title:
Student Information: (Do not include your name unless your tutor has told you to do so.)
Name* Student ID*

☐
☐
☐
☐
☐

 I (we) have submitted one printed copy of my (our) assignment bound together ☐
AND one electronic version via Black Board.
 I (we) have read through my (our) work and to check for errors in spelling and ☐
grammar.
 I (we) are happy for my (our) work to be shared with future students. ☐

*Tick () the box next to your name, agreeing to the ‘Academic Conduct’ Statement.

I (We) certify that this piece of in-course assignment is my (our) own work, that it has not
been copied from elsewhere, and that any extracts from books, papers or other sources
have been properly acknowledged as references or quotations. In addition, I(we) agree
that the electronic version of this assignment may be subject to electronic analysis for the
detection of collusion, plagiarism and other forms of unfair advantage.
Appendix 2: Undergraduate Grading Criteria for Journal Logs
ESSAY Presentation & structure
Task details Follows summary structure & keeps to
word limit of 400 words for each journal
80-100 Outstanding... Presentation & essay
structure, with flowing paragraphs.
Outstanding Articulate & fluent academic writing style
No grammatical / spelling errors.
70-79 Excellent ... Presentation & essay structure,
with flowing paragraphs.
Excellent Articulate & fluent academic writing style.
Only a minor error.
60-69 Very good... Presentation & essay
structure, with flowing paragraphs.
Very Good Fluent academic writing style.
Very few grammatical errors & spelling
mistakes.
50-59 Good... Clear presentation & essay
structure with paragraphing.
Good Writing is mainly clear but some spelling &/
or grammatical errors.
40-49 Satisfactory... Basic essay structure.
Not always written clearly & has
Satisfactory grammatical & / or spelling errors.
30-39 Weak... Essay format, limited or poor
structure.
Marginal Fail Muddled work with many spelling & / or
grammatical errors.
20 – 29 Inadequate... Essay format & poor
paragraphing / signposting.
Clear Fail Inappropriate writing style
Poorly written &/or poor spelling &
grammar. Must see CASE
1 – 19 Nothing of merit... Poorly written work,
lacking structure, paragraphing /
Little or signposting.
Nothing of Many inaccuracies in spelling & grammar.
merit Must see CASE
Use & presentation of Harvard Referencing
Follows Harvard style for in-text citation
and reference list.
Outstanding... Standard of referencing
within text & consistent use of Harvard
referencing system.
Accuracy of in-text references & full details
shown in Reference list.
Excellent... Standard of referencing within
text & consistent use of Harvard referencing
system.
Accuracy of in-text references & full details
shown in Reference list.
Very good... Standard of referencing within
text & consistent use of Harvard referencing
system.
Accuracy of in-text references & full details
shown in Reference list.
Good... Standard of referencing within text
& consistent use of Harvard referencing
system.
Accuracy of in-text references & full details
shown in Reference list.
Satisfactory... Basic referencing within text
& consistent use of Harvard referencing
system.
Accuracy of in-text references & full details
shown in Reference list.
Weak...Use of Harvard referencing system
with errors & inconsistently applied. Limited
referencing within the text. Limited
accuracy of in-text references compared to
those in the final Reference list.
Inadequate... Use of Harvard referencing
with many errors &/or inconsistencies.
Must see CASE
Nothing of merit... No or little attempt to
use the recommended Harvard referencing
system.
Must see CASE
Content/ Terms/ Findings/ Definitions/
Calculations
Content included - specify task
requirements as in coursework
Outstanding... Exploration of topic showing
excellent knowledge & understanding
through thorough & appropriate research.
Impressive choice and range of appropriate
content.
Excellent ... Level of knowledge &
understanding demonstrated.
Evidence of appropriate reading.
Covers all relevant points & issues.
Very good... Level of knowledge &
understanding demonstrated.
Covers most relevant points & issues.
Few errors / omissions in
content/calculations.
Good... Grasp of the topic & some of its
implications presented.
Knowledge & understanding is
demonstrated.
Minor errors / omissions in content/
calculations.
Satisfactory... Content / level of knowledge
of the topic. Addresses part of the task.
Some errors / omissions in content/
calculations. May benefit from further
research.
Weak... Limited content / knowledge/
calculations. Limited or muddled
understanding of the topic/question.
Does not meet all the learning outcomes.
Inadequate... Lacking in relevant content/
knowledge/calculations. Content irrelevant
/ inaccurate. Does not meet all the learning
outcomes.
Nothing of merit... Unsatisfactory level of
knowledge demonstrated.
Content used irrelevant / not appropriate/
to the topic. Does not meet the learning
outcomes.
Breadth / Depth / Integration of Literature
Integration & application of information -
specify task requirements as in coursework.
Outstanding... Business insight &
application.
Breadth, depth & integration of
literature/data into work.
Excellent ... Business insight & application.
Breadth, depth & integration of
literature/data into work.
Very good... Business insight & application.
Breadth, depth & integration of
literature/data into work.
Good... Business insight & application.
Breadth, depth & integration of
literature/data into work.
Satisfactory... Business insight & application.
Limited integration with literature/ data.
Use of literature/data but limited in breadth
OR depth.
Weak... Unsatisfactory evidence of business
application & insight
Work needs to show better links between
practical application & theory.
Inadequate... Lacks evidence of business
application & insight. Some literature
irrelevant to topic.
Nothing of merit... No evidence of
appropriate business application & insight.
Analysis /Critical evaluation /Discussion
/Exposition/Reflection
Line of argument, development of
discussion supported with evidence.
Outstanding... Level of discussion/analysis/
critical evaluation &/or reflection.
Highly developed/ focused work.
Excellent... Level of discussion/analysis/
critical evaluation &/or reflection clearly
developing points in the appropriate way
with thorough consideration of all
possibilities.
Very good... Level of discussion/analysis/
critical evaluation &/or reflection & a few
ideas/points could benefit from further
development &/or evaluation/comparison.
Good... Level of discussion/analysis/ critical
evaluation &/or reflection but more
ideas/points could be addressed /developed
further.
Satisfactory... Basic evidence of
discussion/analysis/ critical evaluation &/or
reflection but some points superficially
made so need further development.
Weak... Limited evidence of
discussion/analysis/ critical evaluation &/or
reflection.
More development & comment needed.
May need to do more than describe.
Inadequate... Lacking / inadequate level of
discussion/ analysis/critical evaluation & /or
reflection. Descriptive.
Must see CASE
Nothing of merit... Unsatisfactory level of
discussion/analysis/critical evaluation &/or
reflection
Must see CASE
Appendix 2: Individual Journal Logs

Module Code & Title

Topic Deadline
Name ID No.

Please refer to Grading Criteria for Essay when awarding marks (upon 100). Each criteria weightage is given below (X%).
Grading Criteria 100m X% Comments / Feedback / Feed Forward
C1. Presentation & structure:
Follows logical structure with good flow; meet the format requirements
outlined in the instruction, articulate and fluent academic writing. /100 /10
C2. Use Academic Recourses with Harvard Referencing
Use a minimum of 4 sources; in-text citations done properly and use Harvard
referencing style. /100 /10
C3. Content / Reflections
Perform an accurate information and rich in content. /100 /20
C4. Business Application & Integration of Data/Literature
Articulate knowledge & understanding: Inclusion of appropriate and relevant
theories; accurate and relevant application of data/ theory/practice/
examples /100 /40
C5. Discussion /Analysis /Critical evaluation &/or Reflection
Express insightful analysis, supported ideas effectively by relevant evidence. /100 /20

Total (Assessor) /100

Total (Reviewer/Moderator) /100

UH Internal Moderator Comments External Examiner Comments (if applicable)

Journal
Reference list
Turnitin result