Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Atrazine-resistant (AR) weeds have a modified D1 protein performance. The D1 protein mutant plants expressed a
structure, with a Ser264!Gly mutation on the D1 protein, reduced activity of light-stimulated zeaxanthin formation.
near the plastoquinone binding niche. The photosynthetic per- Neither the lower violaxanthin de-epoxidase activity nor the
formance, the light response of the xanthophyll cycle and depletion of ascorbate seems to be the cause of the lower in
chlorophyll fluorescence quenching-related parameters were vivo zeaxanthin formation in the AR plants. All the D1
compared in attached leaves of susceptible (S) and AR bio- mutant weeds had limited light-induced non-photochemical
types of the C3 dicot Chenopodium album L., Epilobium (NPQ) and photochemical (qP) quenching capacities, and dis-
adenocaulon Hausskn., Erigeron canadensis L., Senecio played a higher photosensitivity, as characterized by the ratio
vulgaris L. and Solanum nigrum L. and the C4 dicot Amaranthus (1-qP)/NPQ and a higher susceptibility to photoinhibition.
retroflexus L. grown under natural high-light conditions. Analysis of the chlorophyll fluorescence parameters
No significant difference in CO2 assimilation rate per leaf showed that a lower proportion of excitation energy was
area unit was found between the S and AR biotypes of the allocated to PSII photochemistry, while a higher excess
investigated C3 plants, whereas the AR biotype of of excitation remained in the AR weeds relative to the S
A. retroflexus exhibited a relatively poor photosynthetic plants.
Introduction
Atrazine resistance in weeds is due to a mutation of the ology and competition of weeds that are resistant or
psbA gene protein (Hirschberg et al. 1984, Gressel 1985), susceptible (S) to triazine herbicides have confirmed
which results in a Ser264!Gly substitution in the photo- that in many cases the D1 protein mutation has negative
system II (PSII) reaction centre D1 protein, causing physiological consequences at the whole-plant level.
decreased binding of atrazine and the secondary quinone Despite research on triazine resistance in non- and iso-
acceptor (QB) (Pfister and Arntzen 1979). Additionally, nuclear biotypes, questions remain as concerns the
atrazine resistance is accompanied by pleiotropic effects, mechanism by which mutation affects the whole-plant
including both structural and functional changes in the performance. AR biotypes are generally less productive
PSII complexes in the chloroplasts of atrazine-resistant than S biotypes, especially when the plants are grown at
(AR) biotypes (Bowes et al. 1980, Gressel 1985, Jansen high-light levels (Warwick and Black 1981, Hart and
and Pfister 1990). Numerous studies of the growth, physi- Stemler 1990) and/or at elevated temperatures (McCloskey
Abbreviations – A, antheraxanthin; AR, atrazine-resistant; D, fraction of light absorbed in PSII antennae that is thermally dissipated; Fm,
maximum fluorescence in dark-adapted leaves; Fm0 , maximum fluorescence in illuminated leaves; Fo, initial fluorescence in dark-adapted
leaves; Fo0 , chlorophyll fluorescence immediately after termination of actinic illumination; Fv ¼ Fm–Fo or Fv0 ¼ Fm0 –Fo0 , variable chlorophyll
fluorescence; Fv/Fm or Fv0 /Fm0 , quantum efficiency of charge separation in PSII; NPQ, non-photochemical fluorescence quenching; P, fraction
of light absorbed in PSII antennae that is utilized in photosynthetic electron transport; PPFD, photosynthetically active photon flux density;
qP, photochemical quenching coefficient; S, susceptible; V, violaxanthin; VDE, violaxanthin de-epoxidase; Z, zeaxanthin; X, ultimate excess of
light absorbed by PSII antennae.
10 50
biotypes and at all light intensities. The xanthophyll
–5 –10
cycle de-epoxidation processes at different PPFD levels
in the leaves of the AR and S biotypes of C. album,
Rate of CO2 assimilation per leaf area unit (µmol CO2 m–2 s–1)
100 1.0
C
50 0.5
0 0.0
100 1.0
D
50 0.5
0 0.0
100 1.0
E
50 0.5
0 0.0
100 600 1100 1600 100 600 1100 1600 100 600 1100 1600
Table 1. Pigment composition of the leaves of atrazine-resistant (AR) and susceptible (S) biotypes of Chenopodium album, Epilobium
adenocaulon, Erigeron canadensis, Senecio vulgaris, Solanum nigrum and Amaranthus retroflexus (Chl, chlorophyll; V, violaxanthin; A,
antheraxanthin; Z, zeaxanthin; n ¼ 4–5).
(V 1 A 1 Z)
Chl a + b Total carotenoids V1A1Z per Chl a + b
Species Biotype (mmol m2) Chl a/b ratio (mmol m2) (mmol m2) (mmol mmol1)
Chenopodium album S 308 44 3.22 0.08 107 6 12.4 0.6 40.2 2.1
AR 266 36 3.10 0.09 96 6 15.8 0.9 59.6 3.4
Epilobium adenocaulon S 316 37 2.98 0.05 113 9 29.0 1.1 91.8 3.8
AR 282 35 2.83 0.05 109 5 25.7 1.3 91.1 4.8
Erigeron canadensis S 364 21 3.04 0.05 103 5 17.3 2.1 47.5 4.2
AR 381 25 2.77 0.07 122 3 16.5 1.8 43.3 5.2
Senecio vulgaris S 295 23 2.72 0.01 81 7 12.9 1.4 43.7 6.2
AR 316 24 2.59 0.04 90 5 12.5 0.8 38.2 5.9
Solanum nigrum S 283 29 2.98 0.08 86 6 16.7 0.9 59.0 3.2
AR 292 32 2.88 0.05 88 6 18.2 1.3 63.2 4.6
Amaranthus retroflexus S 236 15 3.75 0.05 73 5 18.6 1.9 78.8 6.1
AR 266 11 3.50 0.05 81 5 16.7 2.1 62.8 7.8
4 1.0 1.0
3 C
2 0.5 0.5
1
0 0.0 0.0
4 1.0 1.0
3 D
2 0.5 0.5
1
0 0.0 0.0
4 1.0 1.0
3 E
2 0.5 0.5
1
0 0.0 0.0
0 500 100 1500 2000 0 500 100 1500 2000 0 500 100 1500 2000
a more or less increased dissipative capacity. The most unknown special regulatory and/or dissipative processes
important fact, however, is that all of the AR biotypes that do not fully match the preconditions of this assess-
unequivocally displayed a diminished photochemical ment.
efficiency. The only well-marked strangeness in the pigment com-
There seems to be a contradiction between this indica- position (Table 1) was the consistently lower chlorophyll
tion of a sometimes much higher assessed energy dissipa- a/b ratio in the leaves of the AR plants relative to the S
tion and the lowered xanthophyll cycle activity (Fig. 3) plants for all the investigated dicots. This may indicate a
and the higher light sensitivity indices of the AR plants shift in the PSII/PSI ratio and/or (similarly as for shade-
(Fig. 5). One possible explanation for this is that AR acclimated leaves, but in contrast not for a shaded habi-
plants might have alternative defence mechanisms, e.g. tat) a relatively larger light harvesting antenna in the AR
a markedly enhanced D1 protein turnover, which may be biotypes, and this latter might result in a higher excess of
another key element of photoprotection in PSII. The excitation energy in the photosynthetic apparatus of
question remains, however, of whether the assessment these D1 protein mutants. This ‘shade-type character’,
of the allocation of the excessive excitation to thermal together with a weak xanthophyll cycle performance,
dissipation is fully adaptable to the AR biotype or not. may well explain the high photosensitivity or excitation
The calculated light sensitivity index works well with the pressure (Fig. 5) in the AR biotypes of some species, even
wild (S) biotypes and also indicates the higher photo- at low PPFDs. At all PPFDs, floated leaf discs (Fig. 3)
sensitivity of the AR plants. However, there is an anomal- showed an unusually high rate of de-epoxidation as
ous region at low PPFDs (around 300 mmol m2 s1) compared with the intact leaves in vivo (Váradi et al.
where some of the AR biotypes exhibit higher sensitivity 1994a, 1994b, Darkó et al. 1996). This may be a conse-
than at higher irradiances. It cannot be excluded, how- quence of the seriously reduced photosynthetic activity,
ever, that these D1 mutant plants may possess as yet due to the much lower diffusion velocities in the liquid
P X
0.5
A P X
0.0
1.5 D D
C D E. adenocaulon 'S'
1.0 E. adenocaulon 'AR'
P X P
X
0.5
B
0.0
D D
1.5 X E. canadensis 'AR'
X
E F E. canadensis 'S'
1.0
P C P
0.5
0.0
D D
0 500 1000 1500 2000 0 500 1000 1500 2000 X S. vulgaris 'AR'
P X P X
phase and, as a consequence, the certainly higher excess E
of excitation in the leaf tissues under these conditions.
However, there was an uncontradictable shortfall in the
de-epoxidation in all the AR biotypes of the dicot weeds D D
as compared with the wild biotypes, even under these A. retroflexus 'S' A. retroflexus 'AR'
extreme circumstances, which may reflect differing avail-
ability of V in the two biotypes in vivo. P
There were no significant and unequivocal differences
P X F X
in xanthophyll cycle pool sizes between the S and AR
plants in the studied dicot species (Table 1), so the differ- Fig. 6. Allocation pattern of excitation energy absorbed in the PSII
ences between the two biotypes in the xanthophyll cycle antennae to PSII photochemistry (P ¼ (Fv0 /Fm0 )*qP, black areas),
performance and the NPQ process should be related to thermal dissipation (D ¼ 1–Fv0 /Fm0 , dark-grey areas) and the
remaining excess excitation (X, light-grey areas) in the leaves of
some regulatory element, possibly to the trans-thylakoid atrazine-resistant (AR, right) and susceptible (S, left) biotypes of
DpH formation and the PsbS dose per PSII unit (Li et al. Chenopodium album (A), Epilobium adenocaulon (B), Senecio
2002a). However, neither the psbS titre nor the extent of vulgaris (C), Solanum nigrum (D), Erigeron canadensis (E) and
Amaranthus retroflexus (F). The data are calculated from the
the light-induced DA535 absorbance change was investi- average values of the results presented in Fig. 4.
gated in these biotypes. Otherwise, even with the same
PsbS levels in the two biotypes, an altered degree of
protonation of PsbS due to restrained DpH formation The xanthophyll cycle activity (V de-epoxidation) has
under high-light conditions in the AR plants cannot be been suggested to be limited by a temporary ascorbate
excluded. Point mutations in psbS affecting the number deficit in vivo (Müller-Moulé et al. 2002). It has also
or the position of the protonatable amino acid residues been shown that the regulation of xanthophyll cycle-
in the PsbS on the luminal side, which might be critical dependent non-radiative energy dissipation in the
for the proper functioning and stability (Li et al. 2002b), pigment bed of PSII is modulated not only by lumen
can also be hypothesized, although this has not been acidification, but also by ascorbate availability (Neubauer
studied yet in these plant species. and Yamamoto 1994). The question arises of whether a
Edited by A. J. Stemler