CASE TITLE GR NO DATE PONENTE ISSUE Subject

MARK MONTELIBANO v DEC 6, 2017 MARTINES J PROPER APPLICATION OF Civ Pro

LINDA YAP RULES OF PROCEDURE
197475

Ophelia Hernan v. Sandigan 217874 Dec 5, 2017 Peralta J THE SANDIGANBA YAN Civ Pro
bayan GRAVELY ERRED AS IT
ACTED WITH GRAVE
ABUSE OF DISCRETION
AMOUNTING TO LACK
OR EXCESS OF
JURISDICTION IN
CONCLUDING THAT THE
MOTION TO REOPEN
WAS FILED OUT OF TIME
CONSIDERING THE
EXTRAORDINARY AND
EXCEPTIONAL
CIRCUMSTANCES
SURROUNDING THE
CASE.
227124 DEC 6 , 2017 PERLAS - RTC had no jurisdiction over CIV PRO
HEIRS OF VICTOR BERNABE the complaint in Civil Case
AMISTOSO v VALECER No. L-298, considering that
what is sought to be cancelled
is their CL T; hence, an
agrarian dispute falling within
the jurisdiction of the
DARAB.
JOSE DIAZ JR. v SALVADOR 209376 DEC 6, 2017 PERALTA J whether petitioners' CIV PRO
VALENCIANO subsequent unlawful detainer
case against Salvador Jr.
involving the same property
is barred by res judicata and
estoppel by !aches due to a
previous unlawful detainer
case they had filed against his
father, which was subject of a
judicially-approved
Compromise Agreement that
was never executed by mere
tolerance of petitioners
Teresita Bugayong-Santiago, et G.R. No. DEC 6 , 2017 CARPIO J Whether or not the CA erred Civ Pro
al. Vs. Teofilo Bugayong 220389 in affirming the decision of
the RTC which dismissed the
unlawful detainer case against
respondent.
Heirs of Fermin Arania, et al. Vs. G.R. No. Dec 13, 2017 Martires j CIV PRO
Intestate Estate of Magdalena R/. 193208 Propriety of the
Sangalang, et al.
remedy of
annulmentofjudgment
Douglas F. Anama Vs. Citibank, N.A G.R. No. DEC 13, 2017 JARDELEZA, J CIV PRO
192048 An action to revive a
judgment is an action
whose exclusive
purpose is to enforce
a judgment which
could no longer be
enforced by mere
motion.
Joseph O. Regalado Vs. Emma Dela G.R. No. DEC 13, 2017 DEL CASTILLO J. JURISDICTION OF RTC CIV PRO
Rama Vda. Dela Pena, et al 202448
ON CASES INVOLVING
RECOVERY OF
POSSESSION
Magdalena C. Dillena Vs. Mariano G.R. No. DEC 14, 2017 DEL CASTILLO J. CIV PRO
Alcaraz, et al. 204045
whether or not the P
ARAD and DAR.AB
have jurisdiction over
the action filed by
(petitioner] for
maintenance of
peaceful possession of
the subject fishpond.