Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Preface. .........................................................................................................................................................23
SECTION – I
SECTION – II
SECTION – III
Policy Regimes
...contd...
SECTION – IV
SECTION – V
Glossary..........................................................................................................579
Select Bibliography.........................................................................................591
Preface
THIS book is designed for use in courses on Indian Economy at the Undergraduate level, particularly the
restructured course of B.Com (Hons.) at6 the University of Delhi.
Although the contents of the book follow essentially the B. Com (Hons.) course content of Indian
economy paper XVIII the material is sufficiently broad in scope and rigorous in coverage to satisfy any
undergraduate and graduate requirements in the field of Indian economy. The thrust of the book is on the
performance and policies with a brief background of the colonial past.
The book is organised into five sections:
Section 1, covers the basic concepts and issues in economic development, and measures of
development and underdevelopment as well as human development. The environment and development is
also discussed in this section.
Section 2, looks at the basic features of the Indian economy at independence: composition of national
income and occupational structure, the agrarian scene and the industrial structure.
Section 4, deals with the experience of growth, development and structural changes in different
phases of growth, and policy regimes across sectors and regions. The institutional framework and changes in
policy perspective on the role of institutional framework after 1991, are also discussed. This section also
provides a wide coverage of the issues of unemployment and poverty, human development and also the
demographic constraints.
The analyses and discussion, covering these five sections in the various chapters of this book, are
based on the readings recommended for this course. However, wherever required, we have supplemented
from other sources reference to which is given in the footnotes of the various chapters. A select bibliography
is given at the end of the book for reference to the authors cited in the text. A glossary of selected terms is
also given for the benefit of the students.
In writing this book, I have drawn liberally from the relevant articles/papers written by renowned
economists/experts in their respective fields. The analyses have been updated from the latest reports
available such as RBI report on Currency and Finance 2005-2006, Economic Survey 2006-07, Planning
Commission Mid-term Appraisal of the 10th Plan and Approach Paper to the 11th (December 2006).
I owe my deep sense of gratitude to C. H. Hanumantha Rao, C. Rangarajan, Jean Dreze, Amartya
Sen, Kaushik Basu, T. N. Srinivasan, S. D. Tendulkar, V. S. Vyas, K. L. Krishna, Deepak Nayyar, Rakesh
Mohan, Montek S. Ahluwalia, Jagdish Bhagwati, Pravin Visaria (late), Amaresh Bagchi, A. Vaidyanathan,
J. C. Sandesara, Mihir Rakshir, R. RAdhakrishna, Ishar Ahluwalia, T. C. A. Anant, Nagesh Kumar, S. K.
Ray, Ashok Gulati, R. NAgraj, Jim Gordon, Poonam Gupta, Rajesh Chadha and P. D. Jeromi, from whose
writings I have been able to draw to benefit the students.
I am equally grateful to my colleagues teaching in different colleges, who inspired me to write this
book and have been making suggestions from time-to-time to make this book more relevant and easy to
understand by the students.
I hope this thoroughly restructured book on Indian economy will prove handy and useful to students
and teachers on Indian economy.
Introduction
THE world today presents a picture of sharp contrasts between developed/advanced and
backward/underdeveloped/developing countries. At one extreme, there are countries like USA with per
capita GNI of $ 41400 (2004) and on the other extreme are countries like Ethiopia with per capita GNI of $
110.1
According to World Development Report (2006), 15.8 per cent of world population lives in countries
which are classified as high incvome developed countries like USA, Canada, Australia, countries of Western
Europe, New Zealand and some of the Asian countries such as Japan, Singapore, Hong Kong. On the other
hand 84.2 per cent of the populatiuoon lives in countries which are in the category of low income and
middle income developing countries.
The term development may mean different things to different people. In strictly economic terms,
development has traditionally nmeant a sustained annual increase in GNP ( or GDP) at rates varying from 5
per cent to 7 per cent or more. 2
A common alternative economic index of development has been the rates of growth of per capita
GNP i.e., the ability of a nation to expand its output at a rate faster than the growth of population. Thus, per
capita GNP is eual to GNP divided by population. However, it is the real per capita GNP which measures the
overall economic well-being of a population.
Till the 1960s, the term economic development was often used a synonym of economic growth, the
measure for the latter being the rise in per capita GNP in real terms. According to C. P. Kindleberger,3
“Whereas economic growth merely refers to a rise in output, economic development implies changes in
technological and institutional organisation of production as well as distributive pattern of income.” Thus
economic development is a broader concept than economic growth. Compared to the objective of
development, economic growth may be easy to realise. By larger mobilisation of resources and raising their
productivity, output levels can be raised. The process of development is far more extensive. Apart from the
rise in output, it involves changes in the composition of outpout as well as a shift in the allocation of
productive resources to ensure social justice.
In some of the underdeveloped countries, the process of economic growth has been accompanied by
economic development. But this may not be the case always. While there can be growth without
development, development without growth is unconceivable. A substanitial rise in a coubntry’s GNP is
required before it can hope to expand its industries and the services sectors. Nowhere in the world has the
occupational distributional of population changed in the absence of growth.
During the 1950s and 1960s while many of the Third World Nations did realise the economic growth
targets, the respective levels of living of the masses remained unchanged. This resulted in the rejection of the
narrow definition of economic development by an increasing number of ecomists who now clamoured for
the “dethronement of GNP” and advocated direct attack on whidespread absolute poverty, increasingly
inequitable income distribution and rising unemployment. Thus, in the 1970s economic development came
to be redefined within the context of a growing economy. “Redistribution from growth” became a common
slogan. In this context Kindleberger argued that “Economic development is generally defined to include
improvements in material welfare, especially for persons with the lowest incomes, the eradication of mass
poverty with its correlates ofilliteracy, diseases and early death, changes in the composition of inputs and
outputs that generally include shifts in the underlying structure of production away from agriculktural
growth towards industrial activities, the organisation of the conomy in such a way that productive
employment is general among the working age population rather than the situation of a privoilaged minority
and the correspondingly greater participation of broadly based groups in making decisions about the
directions, economic and otherwise , in which they should move to improve their welfare.”4
Dudley Seers5 posed three basic questions about the meaning of the development:
If all three of these have declined from high levels then beyond doubt this has been a period of
development for the country concerened. If one or two of these central problems have been growing worse,
especially if all three have, it would be strange to call the result ‘development’ even if per capita income
doubled.”
This assertion was a hard reality for a number of developing countries which experienced relatively
high rates of growth of per capita income during the 1960s and the 1970s but showed little or no
improvement or even an actual decline in employment, equality and the real income of the bottom 40 per
cent of their population. By the earlier definition of ‘growth’, these countires were developing, but by the
new criteria of poverty, equality and employment, they were not. The situation in the 1980s worsened further
as GNP growth rates turned negative for many less developed countries and the governments, faced with
mounting foreign debt problems, were forced to cut back on their already limited social and economic
programmes.
While during the 1980s, the World Bank championed “economic growth” as the goal of
development, its World Development Report of 1991 asserted that “the challenge of development ... is to
improve the quality of life. For the world’s poor countries, a better quality of life generally calls for higher
income and it involves much more. It encompasses, as ends in themselves, better education, higher standards
of health and nutrition, less poverty, a cleaner environment, more quality of opportunity, greater individual
freedom, and a richer cultural life.”
Sustenance: The life-sustaining basic human needs include food, shelter, health and protection.
When any one of these is absent or in critically short supply, a condition of absolute “underdevelopment”
exists.
Self-esteem: A second universal component of good life is self-esteem---s sense of worth and self-
respect---of not being used as a tool by others for their own ends. Due to the significance attached to
material values in developed nations, worthiness and esteem are now-a-days increasingly conferred only on
countries that possess economic wealth and technological power---those that have developed.
Now-a-days the Third World seeks development in order to gain the esteem which is denied to
societies living in a state of disgraceful ‘underdevelopment’. ... Development is legitimized as a goal because
it is an important, perhaps even an indispensable, way of gaining esteem.8
Freedom from Servitude: To be Able to Chose: Arthur Lewis9 stressed the relationship between
economic growth and freedom from servitude when he concluded that “the advantage of economic growth is
not that wealth increases happiness, but that it increases the range of human choice.” Wealth can enable a
person to gain greater control over nature and his physical environment than they would have if they
remained poor. It also gives them the freedom to chose greater leisure. The concept of human freedom
should encompass various components of political freedom of expression, political participation and equality
of opportunity.
According to Dreze and Sen, “In recent years, development economics has been also taking a much
more inclusive view of the nature of economic development. One way of seeing development is in terms of
the expansion of the real freedoms that the citizens enjoy to pursue the objectives they have reason to value,
and in this sense the expansion of human capability can be, broadly, seen as the central feature of the process
of development.” 10
‘Capability’ refers to the alternative combinations of functionings from which a person can choose.
Thus, the notion of capability is essentially one of freedom—the range of options a person has in deciding
what kind of life to lead. Poverty, in this view, lies not merely in the impoverished state in which the person
actually lives, but also in the lack of real opportunity—given by social constraints as well as personal
circumstances—to choose other types of living.
The basic objective of development as the expansion of human capabilities was never completely
overlooked in the modern literature, but the focus has been mainly on the generation of economic growth, in
the sense of expanding gross national product and related variables.11 The expansion of human capabilities
can clearly be enhanced by economic growth (even in the limited sense of growth of real income per head),
but (1) there are many influences other than economic growth that work in that direction, and (2) the impact
of economic growth on human capabilities can be extremely variable, depending on the nature of that growth
(for example, how equitable and employment-intensive it is, and whether the economic gains from growth
are used to address the deprivations of the most needy).
What is crucial in all this is the need to judge the different policies, ultimately, by their impact on the
enhancement of the capabilities that the citizens enjoy (whether or not this comes about through the growth
of real incomes). This differs sharply from the more standard practice of judging economic policies by their
contribution to the growth of real incomes--- seen a merit in itself.
The recent attempts, in India and elsewhere, to open up market opportunities without being thwarted
by bureaucratic barriers has been justified primarily in terms of the expected impact of this change on
economic explansion, enhancing outputs and incomes in the economy. To quote from the report by Bhagwati
and Srinivasan(1993), “These structural reforms were necessary because we had evidently failed to generate
adequate rates of growth of income and of per capital income” (p.2).12 This is indeed a significant direction
of casual analysis. On the other side, the justification for focusing on outputs and incomes lies ultimately in
the impact that their augmentation may have on the freedoms that people actually enjoy to lead the kind of
lives they have reason to value. The analysis of economic development must take note of both the casual
connections, and also of other policies and institutional changes that contribute to the enhancement of human
capabilities. The success of development programmes cannot be judged merely in terms of their effects of
incomes and outputs, and must, at a basic level, focus on the lives that people can lead. This applies as much
to the assessment of economic reforms and current economic policies in India today as it does to evaluation
of development programmes anywhere else in the world.
Human Development
The UNDP Human Development Report (1994) focuses on the new paradigm of development that
puts people at the centre of development, regards economic growth as a means and not an end, protects the
life opportunities of future generations as well as the present generations and respects the natural systems on
which all life depends.
Such a paradigm of development enables all individuals to enlarge their human capabilities to the full
and to put these capabilities to their best use in all fields—economic, social, cultural and political. It also
protects the options of the unborn generations. It does not run-down the natural resource base needed for
sustaining development in the future.
The strongest argument for protecting the environment is the ethical need to guarantee the future
generations opportunities similar to the ones previous generations have enjoyed. This guarantee is the
foundation of ‘Sustainable Development’.
The principal goal of development policy is to create sustainable improvements in the quality of life
for all people. Sustainable development has many objectives. Insofar as raising per capital income improves
people’s living standards, it is one among many development objectives. The aim of lifting living standards
encompasses a number of more specific goals, bettering people’s s health and educational opportunities,
giving every one the change to participate in public life, helping to ensure a clean environment, promoting
inter-generational equity and much more.13
When increase in GNP is brought about through depletion of resources under unhealthy
environmental conditions by the present generation, the future generations will be left with much depleted
resource to produce output under polluted environmental conditions adversely affectingtheir health and
efficiency. Under such circumstances the rate of economic development in future is bound to fall. Thus,
when we are producing more at the cost of future generations the present level of development is not
sustainable i.e., we will not be able to maintain it in future.
Even if scarcity of natural resources increases, natural resources and environments can be adequately
preserved by investment in conservation and anti-pollution activities such as reforestation, soil erosion
prevention ( such as terracing), and purification of gas emission. In order to promote these activities,
institutional innovations are required, such as setting property rights where applicable, regulating and taxing
natural resource utilisation, and organising governmental and non-governmental bodies for environmental
monitoring.
HDI is a quality of life index prepared by UNDP and published in Human Development Reports
since 1990. It takes into account the three most basic human capabilities.
(i) Longevity measured by life expectancy at birth.
(ii) Educational attainment as measured by adult literacy rate and gross enrolment ratio
GER(primary, secondary and tertiary level combined)
(iii) Adjusted real GDP per capita---PPP stands for purchasing power parity, PPP GDP is
calculated after eliminating price differences among countries.
The HDI value indicated how far a country has gone to attain certain defined goals; an average life
span of 85 years, access to education for all and a decent standard of living. The maximum and
minimum values for each variable, which are fixed, are reduced to scale between 0 and 1.
(1) High human development countries---Countries with HDI values of 0.8000 and above.
(2) Medium human development countries---Countries with HDI values of 0.500 to 0.799
(3) Low human development countries---Countries with HDI values below 0.500
Human Development Report 2005 states, “Fifteen years after the launch of the first Human
Development Report