Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 5

Selective and Total Vagotomy Plus Pyloroplasty:

A Comparative Study of Gastric Secretion and


Motility in Dogs
M. T. EvEshT,* M.B., B.S., F.R.C.S., CHARmL A. GRmm,** M.D., M.Sc., F.A.C.S.
From the Department of Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine,
Seattle, Washington 98105

IN a previous study of Heidenhain pouch A Finney pyloroplasty was constructed at


dogs it was found that pouch secretion Stage I in dogs ME13 and ME19, and at
after total vagotomy without drainage was Stage II in dogs ME2 and ME3. The op-
almost twice as great as after selective va- erative technics and methods were the
gotomy without drainage.18 The mecha- same as described in the previous study'8
nism for this difference in pouch secretion without pyloroplasty.
was unexplained, and it was postulated Selective vagotomy was performed at the
that the hepatic and celiac vagi in some gastric cardia with transection of the gas-
way inhibit gastric secretion. Evidence in tric vagi and preservation of the hepatic
support of this postulate is the recent find- and celiac vagi. Total vagotomy was per-
ing that insulin inhibits the feeding re- formed by transecting the hepatic and
sponse of Heidenhain pouches in dogs with celiac vagi; the vagal trunks were not dis-
selective vagotomy.1 The present study was turbed so that a possibly incomplete gas-
undertaken to determine the additional ef- tric vagotomy by the initial selective tech-
fect of pyloroplasty and its possible clini- nic was not converted into a complete gas-
cal significance. tric vagotomy by the truncal technic.
A minimum of thirty 24-hour Heiden-
Material and Methods hain pouch secretions were obtained after
each stage. Collections were not started
Four adult mongrel dogs weighing be- until the pouch secretions had stabilized
tween 11 and 18 Kilos underwent three approximately 4 weeks after operation. Re-
staged procedures: Stage I, Heidenhain sults were expressed as mEq. of total (pH
pouch; Stage II, selective gastric vagotomy; 7) titratable acid.
and Stage III, total abdominal vagotomy. Two insulin tests were performed on
each animal after selective vagotomy, but
Submitted for publication April 7, 1969. absolute reliance could not be placed on
* Visiting Scientist from United Cardiff Hos- these tests owing to the occasional occur-
pitals and in receipt of a Wellcome Research rence of neutralizing duodenal regurgita-
Travel Grant. tion. Accordingly, as an additional test
** Clinical Associate Professor of Surgery.
This study was aided by funds accruing from after total vagotomy, the vagal trunks were
National Institutes of Health Grant AM08094. stimulated electrically in the presence of
31
32 EVERETT AND GRIFFITH Annals of Surgery
January 1970
TABLE 1. Results of Completeness of Vagotomy

Residually
Insulin Tests Innervated Mucosa
Dog Hollander's Stempien's Secreting Neutral
No. Criteria Criteria Red

1st test neg neg


ME2 2nd test neg neg 2.2%
1st test neg neg
ME3 2nd test neg neg 12.0%
1st test neg pos
ME13 2nd test neg pos 1.4%
1st test neg neg
ME19 2nd test neg neg None

The positive insulin tests in dog ME13 were small and delayed responses indicative of small areas of residual
innervation and adequate vagotomy.
The residually innervated mucosa in dogs ME2, ME3 and ME13 that secreted neutral red were in the proximal
fundus. The percentage figures relate the size of the area of residually innervated mucosa to the entire mucosal
surface.

circulating neutral red to demonstrate any Results


residual gastric innervation.15 Lastly, the All four dogs remained in good health
abdominal vagi were dissected at post- throughout the period of study, and weight
mortem examination.
loss was minimal.
Gastric emptying time and small intes- Results of the tests for completeness of
tinal transit time (time for head of meal gastric vagotomy are presented in Table 1.
to pass from pylorus to cecum) were re-
corded at each stage of the study. Control The insulin tests after selective vagotomy
were negative in all dogs by Hollander's
films were taken at the end of the control criteria,7 and in three of the four dogs
pouch collection period (2 months postop- negative also to Stempien's criteria.21 The
erative Stage I), and films taken at both
response in the four dog (ME13) was of
start and finish of the subsequent collec-
tion periods (one and two months postop-
the small and delayed type. In this animal,
erative Stages II and III). Following 24
and in two others, a small fundic area of
hours starvation, during which water was residual gastric innervation was demon-
allowed, dogs ME2 and 3 were fed a well strated by the method of neutral red. The
site of these areas, and their small size ex-
mixed meal of 105 Gm. Gerber's beef liver pressed as a percentage of whole stomach
and 80 Gm. barium sulphate. The two area by the method of pattern-weight 14
other smaller dogs had exactly half; 52.5 denote the presence of an intact fundic
Gm. and 40 Gm. The resultant mixture branch with complete gastric denervation
was semisolid. Each individual animal was of the antrum and remaining corpus.'5
given the same size meal throughout the Postmortem dissections confirmed the sec-
study. Films were taken at 15 min. inter- tion of the major anterior and posterior
vals after the feed until radio-opaque ma- gastric divisions in all dogs, and demon-
terial was seen to start leaving the stomach. strated an intact posterior fundic branch
Thereafter, films were taken at 1/2 hourly in dogs ME2 and 3; in dog ME13 postop-
intervals. erative adhesions thwarted identification of
Volume 171 SELECTIVE AND TOTAL VAGOTOMY PLUS PYLOROPLASTY
Number 1 33
H.P control Selective gastric
vagotomy Total vagotomy
i- 7- Finney pyloropi.
6-
FIG. 1. Gastric empty- 5-
ing times (top) and small .0Z
, 4-
intestinal transit times
(bottom) after each op- 3-
erative stage. Left: Dogs
ME2 and ME3 with .t1
-
I
Heidenhain pouch at * ME 2 - - I
Stage I. Right: Dogs o ME3
ME13 and ME19 with
Heidenhain pouch plus A
Finney pyloroplasty at .k0~Iz
Stage I. 7 4 _
, 2
I
Monthpost.op.2 1 2 1 2
4 Mean of Mean of Mean of Mean of 1
value
2 values 2values 2values 2volues

an intact fundic branch. The anterior and and MEl9 (p < 0.001) and a questionably
posterior vagal trunks and the origins of significant decrease in dog ME2 (p <
their hepatic and celiac divisions were in- 0.05). The grouped data show that secre-
tact in all dogs, which finding indicates tion after total vagotomy is almost twice as
their preservation at the stage of selective great as after selective vagotomy (Fig. 2).
vagotomy. The peripheral hepatic and
celiac vagi were completely transected in Discussion
all dogs, thus confirming that complete he- As in the previous study without drain-
patic plus complete celiac vagotomy was age, Heidenhain pouch secretion in the
successfully accomplished at the subse- present study with pyloroplasty was sig-
quent stage of total vagotomy. nificantly greater after total vagotomy than
Gastric emptying time was reduced after
selective vagotomy plus pyloroplasty in
dogs ME2 and ME3. In dogs ME13 and Control Selective Total
MEl9 the addition of selective vagotomy 47.2 Vagotomy Vagotomy
to pyloroplasty did not result in gastric
stasis. The addition of total vagotomy did 000.0
0.000
00 00

not alter the rate of gastric emptying or 000.0


intestinal transit time in any dog (Fig. 1). 000
* 0tSE0
No intestinal dilatation was seen. At post- .....
mortem examinations all pyloroplasties
00 00

were adequate and patent.


00
@00060
00
21.8
00.00
00
0z
*000060
00

S....
.....
The changes in Heidenhain pouch secre- *
00

5z
5000
00

tions (Table 2) after selective vagotomy .....


* 0*
were a significant decrease in dogs ME3
and ME13 (p < 0.001) a questionably sig-
nificant decrease in dog ME2 (p < 0.05),
and an insignificant increase in dog ME19. mEq
The changes after total vagotomy were a FiG. 2. Grouped data of Heidenhain pouch se-
cretion (mean mEq. of 30 day collections) after
significant increase in dogs ME3, ME13, each operative stage.
34 EVERETT AND GRIFFITH Annals of Surgery
January 1970
TABLE 2. 30-day Means of Heidenhain Pouch Acid Heidenhain pouch secretion before and
Output in Total mEq. after hepatic and celiac vagotomy. The
Stage I Stage II Stage III serotonin mediated inhibitory mechanism
by acid in the jejunum, recently reported
Dog ME2 22.2 4- 7.8 17.5 4 4.5 14.7 4 4.8 by Schuck et al.,18 was shown by these au-
Dog ME3 68.7 i 20.2 26.5 :1 10.8 41.2 4 17.0 thors to be unchanged by total vagotomy;
Dog ME13 78.1 i 17.0 31.6 A 6.4 66.5 4 18.4
Dog ME19 9.95 4 2.0 11.7 4 5.5 33.5 4 10.9 the effect of hepatic and celiac section
alone, however, was not determined. The
fourth possible mode of action, an en-
after selective vagotomy. This difference hanced release or action of intestinal gas-
occurred in three of the four dogs studied. trin by intestinal distention,'3 19 would
Why the fourth dog (ME2) did not show seem to be excluded by the finding that
this difference is unknown. neither intestinal stasis nor distention oc-
Although the mechanism for different curred after hepatic and celiac vagotomy
pouch secretions after selective and total in this study. If, as we postulate that the
vagotomy is also unknown, the results of
hepatic and celiac vagi inhibit gastric se-
this study indicate that gastric stasis is not cretion, it is clear from all evidence to date
a factor. Furthermore, as in previous study,
that the inhibition is at least partially
the difference occurs when the gastric va- mediated through the mid gut. Whether
gotomy is complete or virtually complete
the antrum also participates is unknown.
with only a small percentage of residual The results of this and all other studies
fundic innervation. This type of incom- imply that selective vagotomy lowers gas-
plete vagotomy reduces gastric acid secre- tric secretion more effectively than total
tion almost as much as complete vagot- vagotomy, and therefore may provide bet-
omy."1 Therefore, the difference in pouch ter protection against recurrent ulcer. This
secretion cannot be explained by differ- suggestion is neither proven nor disproven
ences in completeness of vagotomy or gas-
by the available clinical evidence. On the
tric secretion. one hand, Bank et al.2 concluded from
There is unquestioned evidence that an
their results with insulin and histamine
tests that the reduction in gastric acidity
intestinal mechanism exists. Kelly et al.8 by selective and total vagotomy in man is
demonstrated an enhanced Heidenhain the same. In support of their conclusion
pouch output after hepatic and celiac va- are the results of Kraft et al.9 and Smith
gotomy in the total absence of the stomach and Farris,20 who reported comparable
(bar the pouch); Middleton et al.12 con- rates of recurrent ulcer after selective and
firmed this finding, and added the primary total vagotomy. On the other hand, the re-
importance of the celiac division. Landor'0 ports of Herrington," Burge,3 Scott17 and
also showed that hepatic and celiac va- Griffith4 suggest that, in patients with com-
gotomy augmented Heidenhain pouch dogs plete or adequate vagotomy plus adequate
with antrectomy. Of the four known mecha- drainage by pyloroplasty, recurrent ulcer
nisms that could explain this augmentation, after selective vagotomy is less than after
none seem to be responsible. Duodenal
total vagotomy. Further experimental and
acid inhibition was nonoperative in the clinical investigation seems warranted.
preparation used by Kelly et al. and Mid-
dleton et al. above. Halvorsen et al.6 using Summary and Conclusions
a similar total gastrectomy preparation to
study enterogastrone release, found no dif- The effects of selective and total va-
ference in the effect of duodenal fat upon gotomy plus pyloroplasty upon gastric se-
Volume 171 SELECTIVE AND TOTAL VAGOTOMY PLUS PYLOROPLASTY 35
Number 1
cretion and gastrointestinal motility were Phase of Gastric Secretion. Gastroenterology,
46:163, 1964.
compared in four Heidenhain pouch dogs. 9. Kraft, R. O., Fry, W. J., Wilhelm, K. G. and
Whereas there was no difference in gastro- Ransom, H. K.: Selective Gastric Vagotomy:
intestinal motility, the grouped data of A Critical Reappraisal. Arch. Surg., 95:625,
1967.
pouch secretion was almost twice as great 10. Landor, J. H.: The Effect of Extragastric Va-
after total vagotomy as after selective va- gotomy on Heidenhain Pouch Secretion in
Dogs. Amer. J. Dig. Dis., 9:256, 1964.
gotomy. The explanation for this difference 11. Legros, G. and Griffith, C. A.: The Anatomic
in pouch secretion is unknown, and it is Basis for the Variable Adequacy of Incom-
postulated that the hepatic and celiac vagi plete Vagotomy, Parts I and II. Ann. Surg.,
168:1030, 1968.
inhibit gastric secretion. If applicable to 12. Middleton, M. D., Kelly, K. A., Nyhus, L. M.
man, selective vagotomy may lower gas- and Harkins, H. N.: Selective Vagal Effects
on the Intestinal Phase of Gastric Secretion.
tric secretion more effectively and provide Gut, 6:296, 1965.
better protection against recurrent ulcer 13. Nagano, K., Johnson, A. N., Cobo, A. and
Oberhelman, H. A.: Effect of Distention of
than total vagotomy. the Duodenum on Gastric Secretion. Surg.
Forum, 10:152, 1959.
References 14. Olch, P. D. and Harkins, H. N.: Quantitative
Assessment of Extent of Gastric Resection.
1. Amdrup, B. M. and Griffith, C. A.: The Ef- Surgery, 48:155, 1960.
fects of Insulin and Hexamethonium upon 15. Pritchard, G. R., Griffith, C. A. and Harkins,
the Feeding Response of Heidenhain Pouches H. N.: A Physiologic Demonstration of the
in Dogs with Selective Vagotomy of the Pa- Anatomic Distribution of the Vagal System
rietal Cell Mass. Submitted for Publication to the Stomach. Surg. Gynec. Obstet., 126:
to Scand. J. Gastroenterology. 791, 1968.
2. Bank, S., Marks, I. N. and Louw, J. H.: His- 16. Schuck, M., Santillana, M., Wise, L. and
tamine- and Insulin-Stimulated Gastric Acid Ballinger, W. F.: Studies on the Inhibition
Secretion after Selective and Truncal Va- of Gastric Secretion by the Small Intestine.
gotomy. Gut, 8:36, 1967. Surg. Gynec. Obstet., 127:1295, 1968.
3. Burge, H.: Personal Communication, 1968. 17. Scott, H. W., Jr.: Personal Communication,
4. Griffith, C. A.: Significant Functions of the 1968.
Hepatic and Celiac Vagi. Amer. J. Surg., 18. Shiina, E. and Griffith, C. A.: Selective and
118: (Aug.) 1969. Total Vagotomy without Drainage: A Com-
5. Halvarson, H. C., Middleton, M. D., Bibler, parative Study of Gastric Secretion and Mo-
D. D., Harkins, H. N. and Nyhus, L. M.: tility in Dogs. Ann. Surg., 169:326, 1969.
Influence of the Vagus Nerve on the In-
hibitory Effect of Fat in the Duodenum. 19. Sircus, W.: The Intestinal Phase of Gastric
Amer. J. Dig. Dis., 11:911, 1966. Secretion. Quant. J. Exp. Physiol., 38:91,
6. Herrington, J. L., Jr.: Vagotomy-Pyloroplasty 1953.
for Duodenal Ulcer: A Critical Appraisal of 20. Smith, G. K. and Farris, J. M.: A Re-Ap-
Early Results. Surgery, 61:698, 1967. praisal of the Long Term Effects of Selec-
7. Hollander, F.: Insulin-Acidity Test for Deter- tive Vagotomy. Amer. J. Surg., 117:(Feb.)
mining Integrity of Vagal Influence on the 1969.
Stomach. Meth. Med. Res., 4:166, 1951. 21. Stempien, S. J.: Insulin Gastric Analysis:
8. Kelly, K. A., Nyhus, L. M. and Harkins, Technic and Interpretations. Amer. J. Dig.
H. N.: The Vagal Nerve and the Intestinal Dis., 7:138, 1962.

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi