Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
CHAPTER 7 CONSUMERS, PRODUCERS, EFFICIENCY OF MARKETS 2 CHAPTER 7 CONSUMERS, PRODUCERS, EFFICIENCY OF MARKETS 3
WTP and the Demand Curve WTP and the Demand Curve
Q: If price of iPod is $200, who will buy an iPod, Derive the
and what is quantity demanded? P (price
demand who buys Qd
of iPod)
schedule:
A: Anthony & Flea will buy an iPod, $301 & up nobody 0
Chad & John will not.
name WTP name WTP 251 – 300 Flea 1
Hence, Qd = 2
Anthony $250 when P = $200. Anthony $250 176 – 250 Anthony, Flea 2
Chad 175 Chad 175 Chad, Anthony,
126 – 175 3
Flea 300 Flea 300 Flea
John, Chad,
John 125 John 125 0 – 125 4
Anthony, Flea
CHAPTER 7 CONSUMERS, PRODUCERS, EFFICIENCY OF MARKETS 4 CHAPTER 7 CONSUMERS, PRODUCERS, EFFICIENCY OF MARKETS 5
1
WTP and the Demand Curve About the Staircase Shape…
P P This D curve looks like a staircase
$350 $350 with 4 steps – one per buyer.
P Qd
$300 $300 If there were a huge # of buyers,
$301 & up 0 as in a competitive market,
$250 $250
there would be a huge #
$200 251 – 300 1 $200
of very tiny steps,
$150 176 – 250 2 $150 and it would look
$100 $100 more like a smooth
126 – 175 3 curve.
$50 $50
0 – 125 4
$0 Q $0 Q
0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4
CHAPTER 7 CONSUMERS, PRODUCERS, EFFICIENCY OF MARKETS 6 CHAPTER 7 CONSUMERS, PRODUCERS, EFFICIENCY OF MARKETS 7
2
CS and the Demand Curve CS with Lots of Buyers & a Smooth D Curve
P At Q = 5(thousand),
Price P The demand for shoes
$350 The lesson:
the marginal buyer
per pair
Total CS equals $ 60
$300 is willing to pay $50
the area under for pair of shoes. 50
$250 the demand curve
Suppose P = $30. 40
$200 above the price,
from 0 to Q. Then his consumer 30
$150 1000s of pairs
surplus = $20. 20
$100 of shoes
$50 10
D
$0 0 Q
Q
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
0 1 2 3 4
CHAPTER 7 CONSUMERS, PRODUCERS, EFFICIENCY OF MARKETS 12 CHAPTER 7 CONSUMERS, PRODUCERS, EFFICIENCY OF MARKETS 13
CS with Lots of Buyers & a Smooth D Curve How a Higher Price Reduces CS
CS is the area b/w The demand for shoes If P rises to $40,
P P
P and the D curve, CS = ½ x 10 x $20 1. Fall in CS
from 0 to Q. $ 60 60
= $100. due to buyers
50 50 leaving market
Recall: area of h Two reasons for the
a triangle equals 40 fall in CS. 40
½ x base x height
30 30
Height =
20 2. Fall in CS due to 20
$60 – 30 = $30.
10 remaining buyers 10
So, D paying higher P D
CS = ½ x 15 x $30 0 Q 0 Q
= $225. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 0 5 10 15 20 25 30
CHAPTER 7 CONSUMERS, PRODUCERS, EFFICIENCY OF MARKETS 14 CHAPTER 7 CONSUMERS, PRODUCERS, EFFICIENCY OF MARKETS 15
3
Cost and the Supply Curve Cost and the Supply Curve
P
P Qs $40 P Qs
Derive the supply schedule
from the cost data: $0 – 9 0 $0 – 9 0
$30
10 – 19 1 10 – 19 1
$20
20 – 34 2 20 – 34 2
name cost
35 & up 3 $10 35 & up 3
Angelo $10
Hunter 20 $0 Q
Kitty 35 0 1 2 3
CHAPTER 7 CONSUMERS, PRODUCERS, EFFICIENCY OF MARKETS 18 CHAPTER 7 CONSUMERS, PRODUCERS, EFFICIENCY OF MARKETS 19
$0 Q $0 Q
0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3
CHAPTER 7 CONSUMERS, PRODUCERS, EFFICIENCY OF MARKETS 20 CHAPTER 7 CONSUMERS, PRODUCERS, EFFICIENCY OF MARKETS 21
Producer Surplus and the S Curve PS with Lots of Sellers & a Smooth S Curve
P PS = P – cost Suppose P = $40.
Price P The supply of shoes
$40 per pair
At Q = 15(thousand),
Kitty’s Suppose P = $25. 60
cost the marginal seller’s S
Angelo’s PS = $15 50
$30 cost is $30,
Hunter’s PS = $5 40
Hunter’s and her producer
$20 cost surplus is $10. 30
Kitty’s PS = $0
1000s of pairs
Total PS = $20 20 of shoes
$10 Angelo’s cost
10
Total PS equals the
$0 Q area above the supply 0 Q
0 1 2 3 curve under the price, 0 5 10 15 20 25 30
from 0 to Q.
CHAPTER 7 CONSUMERS, PRODUCERS, EFFICIENCY OF MARKETS 22 CHAPTER 7 CONSUMERS, PRODUCERS, EFFICIENCY OF MARKETS 23
4
PS with Lots of Sellers & a Smooth S Curve How a Lower Price Reduces PS
PS is the area b/w The supply of shoes If P falls to $30,
P P 1. Fall in PS
P and the S curve,
from 0 to Q. 60 PS = ½ x 15 x $15 60 due to sellers
50 S = $112.50 50
leaving market S
The height of this
triangle is 40 Two reasons for 40
$40 – 15 = $25. the fall in PS.
30 30
So, h
20 2. Fall in PS due to 20
PS = ½ x b x h
10 remaining sellers 10
= ½ x 25 x $25 getting lower P
= $312.50 0 Q 0 Q
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 0 5 10 15 20 25 30
CHAPTER 7 CONSUMERS, PRODUCERS, EFFICIENCY OF MARKETS 24 CHAPTER 7 CONSUMERS, PRODUCERS, EFFICIENCY OF MARKETS 25
CHAPTER 7 CONSUMERS, PRODUCERS, EFFICIENCY OF MARKETS 28 CHAPTER 7 CONSUMERS, PRODUCERS, EFFICIENCY OF MARKETS 29
5
Efficiency Efficiency
Total Total
= (value to buyers) – (cost to sellers) = (value to buyers) – (cost to sellers)
surplus surplus
An allocation of resources is efficient if it maximizes Efficiency means making the pie as big as
total surplus. Efficiency means: possible.
• Raising or lowering the quantity of a good In contrast, equity refers to whether the pie is
would not increase total surplus. divided fairly.
• The goods are being produced by the producers What’s “fair” is subjective, harder to evaluate.
with lowest cost. Hence, we focus on efficiency as the goal,
• The goods are being consumed by the buyers even though policymakers in the real world
who value them most highly. usually care about equity, too.
CHAPTER 7 CONSUMERS, PRODUCERS, EFFICIENCY OF MARKETS 30 CHAPTER 7 CONSUMERS, PRODUCERS, EFFICIENCY OF MARKETS 31
Evaluating the Market Equilibrium Which Buyers Get to Consume the Good?
Market eq’m: P Every buyer P
P = $30 whose WTP is
60 60
Q = 15,000 ≥ $30 will buy.
50 S 50 S
Total surplus Every buyer
= CS + PS 40 CS whose WTP is 40
Is the market eq’m 30 < $30 will not. 30
efficient? PS
20 So, the buyers who 20
value the good most
10 10
D highly are the ones D
0 Q who consume it. 0 Q
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 0 5 10 15 20 25 30
CHAPTER 7 CONSUMERS, PRODUCERS, EFFICIENCY OF MARKETS 32 CHAPTER 7 CONSUMERS, PRODUCERS, EFFICIENCY OF MARKETS 33
Which Sellers Produce the Good? Does Eq’m Q Maximize Total Surplus?
Every seller whose P At Q = 20,
P
cost is ≤ $30 will cost of producing
60 the marginal unit 60
produce the good.
50 S is $35 50 S
Every seller whose
40 value to consumers 40
cost is > $30 will
of the marginal unit
not. 30 30
is only $20
Hence, the sellers 20 Hence, can increase 20
with the lowest cost total surplus
produce the good. 10 10
D by reducing Q. D
0 Q This is true at any Q 0 Q
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 greater than 15. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30
CHAPTER 7 CONSUMERS, PRODUCERS, EFFICIENCY OF MARKETS 34 CHAPTER 7 CONSUMERS, PRODUCERS, EFFICIENCY OF MARKETS 35
6
Does Eq’m Q Maximize Total Surplus? Evaluating the Market Eq’m: Summary
At Q = 10, The market eq’m is efficient:
P
cost of producing • Eq’m Q maximizes total surplus.
the marginal unit 60
is $25 50 S • Goods produced by the lowest-cost producers.
value to consumers • Consumed by buyers who value them the most.
40
of the marginal unit Govt cannot improve on the market outcome.
is $40 30
Hence, can increase 20
Laissez faire (French for “allow them to do”):
total surplus the govt should not interfere with the market.
10
by increasing Q. D
This is true at any Q 0 Q
less than 15. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30
CHAPTER 7 CONSUMERS, PRODUCERS, EFFICIENCY OF MARKETS 36 CHAPTER 7 CONSUMERS, PRODUCERS, EFFICIENCY OF MARKETS 37
Why Non-Market Allocations Are Usually Bad Adam Smith and the Invisible Hand
Passages from The Wealth of Nations, 1776
Suppose the allocation of resources were instead
determined by a central planner. “Man has almost constant occasion
for the help of his brethren, and it is
To choose efficient allocation, planner must know vain for him to expect it from their
• every seller’s cost benevolence only. He will be more
likely to prevail if he can interest their
• every buyer’s WTP self-love in his favor, and show them
for every good produced in the economy. that it is for their own advantage to do
for him what he requires of them…
This is practically impossible.
It is not from the benevolence of the
Thus, centrally planned economies are never very
butcher, the brewer, or the baker that
efficient. Adam Smith,
we expect our dinner, but from their
1723-1790
regard to their own interest….
CHAPTER 7 CONSUMERS, PRODUCERS, EFFICIENCY OF MARKETS 38 CHAPTER 7 CONSUMERS, PRODUCERS, EFFICIENCY OF MARKETS 39
7
CONCLUSION
CHAPTER SUMMARY
When markets fail, public policy may remedy the
problem and increase efficiency.
The height of the D curve reflects the value of the
good to buyers—their willingness to pay for it.
Welfare economics sheds light on market Consumer surplus is the difference between what
failures and govt policies. buyers are willing to pay for a good and what they
Despite the possibility of market failure, actually pay.
the assumptions in this chapter work well in On the graph, consumer surplus is the area
many markets, and the invisible hand remains between P and the D curve.
extremely important.
CHAPTER 7 CONSUMERS, PRODUCERS, EFFICIENCY OF MARKETS 42 CHAPTER 7 CONSUMERS, PRODUCERS, EFFICIENCY OF MARKETS 43
CHAPTER 7 CONSUMERS, PRODUCERS, EFFICIENCY OF MARKETS 44 CHAPTER 7 CONSUMERS, PRODUCERS, EFFICIENCY OF MARKETS 45