Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 6

Introducing Comparative Politics Concepts and Cases in Context 4th Edition Orvis Test Bank

Download full link:

more news on internet:
The latest polling in Utah’s senate race has Mitt Romney up by some 36 points
over Jenny Wilson, his Democratic opponent. Barring an enormous upset, Mr.
Romney will join the United States Senate. This will put him a few checks and
balances away from a president — the leader of his party — whom he once called
“terribly unfit for office.”

Mr. Romney has unmistakably muted his resistance to President Trump during the
senate campaign. But just when he seems to have signed on with the Republicans’
quiet chorus of enablers, he sounds another critical note — like last Thursday’s
essay on freedom of the press, in which he called out the president explicitly and
his misguided political base by implication.

As Mr. Romney prepares for Washington and Senator Jeff Flake of Arizona
concludes his congressional service for Arizona, I keep getting questions about
what it means for devout Latter-day Saints to participate in American governance.

I suppose these questions come to me because I am a scholar of American religion

and because, as a Latter-day Saint, I share Mr. Romney’s and Mr. Flake’s religious
faith. People seem to think I have the inside scoop on how these men relate their
devotional lives to their public service.

Please disable your ad blocker.

Advertising helps fund Times journalism.
Unblock ads
Perhaps the only responsible answer to such questions is that religious identities
and their political implications cannot be so simplistically reduced. Political
orientations are shaped at the intersections of race, class, geography and history
and a tangle of other currents with which religious commitments become
inextricably intertwined. For many people, the role of religion in politics is less
about a set of prescriptions to which decisions can be confidently ascribed and
more about a set of resources that individuals can choose to bring to bear on their
decision-making process.

Individual Latter-day Saints make these decisions differently. Mr. Romney, Mr.
Flake and I share a theology but not a political party.

Exclusive election coverage. And beyond.

Subscribe to The Times today.

Latter-day Saint responses to Donald Trump underscore the tensions of our faith’s
political implications. During the 2016 campaign, exit poll numbers from the Pew
Research Center suggested that Latter-day Saints reacted more negatively to Mr.
Trump than other faith groups normally receptive to Republicans. Church
members’ support for Republican presidential candidates, which had been
hovering around 80 percent in previous elections, fell by 17 points.

In 2016, Mr. Romney gave a high-profile speech against the Trump candidacy:
“Let me put it very plainly,” he said at the University of Utah. “If we Republicans
choose Donald Trump as our nominee, the prospects for a safe and prosperous
future are greatly diminished.” Jeff Flake later took to the Senate floor to cast the
newly elected president as the enemy of decency, democracy and truth.

There certainly are aspects of Latter-day Saint culture that help account for this
resistance. A collective memory of religious persecution has generated a sense of
solidarity with the Muslims that Mr. Trump has vilified. Missionary service in
early adulthood often gives church members like Mr. Flake and Mr. Romney a
commitment to God’s global family that is at odds with the president’s splenetic
nativism. A unique theological emphasis on human agency makes many Latter-day
Saints nervous about Mr. Trump’s autocratic instincts. Our religious community’s
ideals of kindness have been offended by the vulgar cruelty of Mr. Trump’s


Gayle King Has the Spotlight All to Herself

A Dark Consensus About Screens and Kids

U.S. Law Enforcement Failed to See the Threat of White Nationalism. Now They
Don’t Know How to Stop It.
Please disable your ad blocker.
Advertising helps fund Times journalism.
Unblock ads
Like everything else in this country, however, that portrait of principles over
partisanship has been battered by the winds that swirl around this presidency. In a
poll earlier this year, Latter-day Saint approval of President Trump stood highest of
all religious groups. Senator Flake demonstrated that his rhetorical denunciations
of President Trump would not translate into effective opposition to administration
policy. Mr. Romney has repeatedly proved willing to make peace with the
president and the powers that be. His most recent rhetorical contortions on
immigration — which he has variously described as more “compassionate” and
more hawkish than the president’s — exemplify the difficulty of pinning down Mr.
Romney’s politics generally let alone of drawing straight lines between his
religious identity and his relationship to this administration’s agenda.
When people ask me about Mr. Romney and Mr. Flake, they are often well aware
of these severe limitations on Latter-day Saint opposition to the White House. Still,
at the very least, they want to make sense of the rhetoric.

The politically charged resources that we share can push in multiple directions.
The same memory of religious persecution that recoils at Mr. Trump’s
Islamophobia also generates profound states-rights distrust of a federal government
that once sent armed troops into Utah. The same theology of eternal family bonds
that balks at Mr. Trump’s misogynistic lechery can only with great difficulty
accept his opponents’ pro-choice platforms. Despite appearances in the “reddest of
red states,” Latter-day Saint values have never fit perfectly with the political
divisions of the two-party system, but the age of Trump has made that
misalignment much more pronounced.

Midterm Elections 2018

Read more commentary and analysis on the coming elections from the Opinion
OpinionDavid Leonhardt
How to Follow the Election, in Eight Steps
Nov. 6, 2018
How to Follow the Election, in Eight Steps
OpinionRachel L. Harris and Lisa Tarchak
Riled Up and Ready to Vote
Nov. 6, 2018
Riled Up and Ready to Vote
OpinionGail Collins and Bret Stephens
One Wave, Two Waves, Red Wave, Blue Wave
Nov. 6, 2018
One Wave, Two Waves, Red Wave, Blue Wave
OpinionJames Comey
James Comey: Let’s Vote to Uphold Our Nation’s Values
Nov. 6, 2018
James Comey: Let’s Vote to Uphold Our Nation’s Values
Brett Kavanaugh’s hearing publicly displayed some of the choices Latter-day
Saints face in the age of Mr. Trump. Mr. Flake’s very public agonizing over the
nomination became a vivid symbol of the struggles many of my coreligionists feel
when they allow the current political moment to incite deeper forms of civic soul

At the same time, Orrin Hatch’s conspicuous absence of agony symbolizes the
decisions of many of my coreligionists not to allow any such thing.

Assuming Mr. Romney wins a seat in the United States Senate, he will have to
decide when and how to make common cause with the leader of his party. Will he
draw on his experience as a missionary in France to resist isolationism and
xenophobia? Will he utilize his memories as a lay church leader in Boston, where
he devoted untold hours of ministry to vulnerable individuals and communities, to
temper the president’s brutalizing rhetoric of winners and losers? Will he let a
distinctly Latter-day Saint reverence for the United States Constitution embolden
him to check abuses of executive power?

If he wants to counteract the man to whom he once attributed the potential

“unraveling of our national fabric,” he will have plenty of religious resources to
bring to bear. Whether he will use them is up to him.