Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 3

Research letter

Comparing the effect of bleach and water water or 0005% dilute hypochlorite solution bath expo-
baths on skin barrier function in atopic sure.3,12,13 The randomization was performed prior to recruit-
dermatitis: a split-body randomized controlled ment by the study coordinator, and stored in sealed envelopes
trial that were not opened until the patient was recruited by the
investigators. Participants remained blinded to the water or
DOI: 10.1111/bjd.14483 dilute hypochlorite immersion. Each arm was immersed for
10 min. None of the patients bathed or applied topical mois-
turizers or medications for 12 h prior to the study session.
DEAR EDITOR, Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory
Skin barrier function parameters, including hydration (Mois-
skin disease associated with defective epidermal barrier func-
tureMeter SC; Delfin Technologies, Stamford, CT, U.S.A.),
tion, characterized by decreased stratum corneum (SC) hydra-
TEWL (Tewameter; Courage and Khazaka, Cologne, Germany)
tion, and increased transepidermal water loss (TEWL) and pH.
and pH (Dry Skin pH Meter; Hanna Instruments, Woonsocket,
Staphylococcus aureus skin colonization is present in nearly all
RI, U.S.A.), were measured at baseline, immediately postim-
cases of AD exacerbation and correlates with disease severity,1
mersion, and 15, 30 and 60 min postimmersion. Patients
suggesting an infection–inflammation cycle. The use of a
were asked to report skin discomfort, including itching, burn-
sodium hypochlorite (bleach) bath alone and as an adjunct to
ing or pain during the 10-min immersion and throughout the
intranasal mupirocin ointment is associated with a reduction
postimmersion period. All recruited patients completed the
in AD severity,2,3 and decreases annual skin infection cases
study. A priori power analysis showed that evaluation of 10
10-fold.4 In a Cochrane review on various interventions to
patients with AD and 10 healthy controls would yield > 90%
reduce S. aureus colonization, including oral antibiotics, topical
power at a = 005 to detect a difference of 15% in TEWL
steroids and antibiotic ointments, only bleach bath showed a
(primary end point) after bleach immersion compared with
significant improvement in AD severity.5 Bleach bath appears
water immersion. Intra- and interindividual comparisons were
to be a low-cost and effective adjuvant treatment for AD, and
performed by ANOVA with a paired analysis performed for
is recommended by the American Academy of Dermatology
intraindividual comparisons.
and American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunol-
ogy,6,7 particularly for patients with moderate-to-severe AD
and frequent bacterial infections. Although bleach bath is gen- Table 1 Demographic data of study participants
erally well-tolerated, with no existing report on skin irritation,
it may be difficult to convince patients and parents that a Healthy
potential irritant is beneficial for the sensitive skin of patients participants Patients with AD
with AD.8 The goal of this study was to compare the effect of Upper
bleach bath vs. water bath exposure on skin barrier function Age Age GLOBAL limb Overall
by measuring SC hydration, TEWL and pH in patients with (years) Sex (years) Sex EASI11 EASIa severity
AD and healthy subjects. 27 F 32 M 550 110 Severe
The study was approved by the institutional review board 31 M 24 F 61 16 Mild
of University of California, Davis (# 523979). The study was 33 M 13 F 152 32 Mild
registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02594969). Ten patients 22 M 45 F 220 64 Moderate
with concurrent AD (mean age 263 years, range 120–450) 31 F 18 M 164 42 Mild
25 F 12 F 64 0 Mild
and 10 healthy subjects (mean age 285 years, range 220–
27 M 28 F 48 12 Mild
340) were enrolled between 2014 and 2015. The entire 25 M 43 M 600 120 Severe
study was performed at University of California, Davis. Demo- 34 F 27 M 349 128 Moderate
graphic data are summarized in Table 1. Testing was con- 30 M 21 M 500 192 Moderate
ducted on the volar surfaces of the forearms, a commonly
AD, atopic dermatitis; EASI, eczema area severity index; F,
used study site for topical applications.9,10 AD severity was
female; M, male. a(Erythema + induration/population + excoria-
determined by the global eczema area severity index (EASI)
tion + lichenification) 9 02 (area is defined on a 7-point ordi-
and modified local EASI for upper limbs.11 Each patient served nal scale: 0 = no eruption; 1 = 1–9% eruption; 2 = ≤ 10–29%;
as their own control and a priori binary randomization was 3 = ≤ 30–49%; 4 = ≤ 50–69%; 5 = ≤ 70–89%; 6 = 90–100%).
performed to determine which forearm would receive tap

© 2016 British Association of Dermatologists British Journal of Dermatology (2016) 1


2 Research letter

Outcome measures are presented in Figure 1. Strikingly, This study attempted to understand the evidence of the
bleach bath exposure did not disrupt barrier function any safety for the recommendation of bleach bath use for patients
more than exposure to tap water. There was no statistical dif- with AD. The study clearly showed that bleach baths are well
ference in mean hydration, TEWL and pH status between tap tolerated, safe and pose no negative effect on SC hydration,
water and bleach bath exposures in patients with AD and TEWL or pH. Practitioners can educate patients that a bleach
healthy participants at all time points measured. In patients bath provides antimicrobial benefits without damaging the
with AD, bleach and water baths resulted in an immediate and skin barrier any more than bathing with water alone. As
drastic increase in mean SC hydration (285% for bleach and bleach baths are typically taken more than once weekly, the
313% for water bath), TEWL (328% for bleach and 427% for effect of repeated bleach bath exposure on skin barrier func-
water bath) and pH (107% for both bleach and water baths), tion is unknown. This study did not rinse off the dilute
followed by recovery to near baseline levels by 15 min hypochlorite water prior to testing. However, it would be use-
postimmersion, and maintained for 60 min. Healthy partici- ful to study the effect of bleach baths followed by rinsing
pants had very similar trends. None of the participants with tap water, as recommended in real-life practice. There-
reported discomfort. The investigators did not observe fore, our methodology has higher potential for irritation and,
increased erythema or signs of irritation in any of the partici- despite this, the protocol was well tolerated. Exposure to 1%
pants. sodium hypochlorite can cause immediate contact urticaria;8
This study indicated no statistical change in skin barrier therefore, patients should be counselled on proper bleach
function between bleach bath and water bath. Bathing tem- dilution techniques to achieve approximately 0005% sodium
porarily introduces moisture to the skin, presented by a peak hypochlorite [1/2 cup (036 L) of common household bleach
in hydration status immediately postimmersion. TEWL and pH into a standard 40-gallon (150 L) bathtub full of water] in
status peaked at 15 min, likely due to increased local water order to prevent skin irritation and hypersensitivity reaction
concentration and evaporation. None of the participants that may develop with higher bleach concentrations. Emollient
reported irritation associated with bleach baths. use after bathing has been demonstrated to improve skin

(a) (b)

(c)

Fig 1. Changes in skin barrier function due to bleach and water baths. Hydration and transepidermal water loss (TEWL) Values are normalized to
baseline reading. Percentage baseline, (a) hydration, (b) TEWL and (c) pH vs. time are graphed for patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) and
healthy participants. All three parameters were measured three times to achieve an average value with SD. pH values for patients 1–3 were not
obtained owing to equipment malfunction.

British Journal of Dermatology (2016) © 2016 British Association of Dermatologists


Research letter 3

hydration.10 Future studies are needed to examine the effect recurrent, cutaneous Staphylococcus aureus superinfection among sus-
of emollient application after water and bleach bath on skin ceptible populations. Poster presentation at the Society for Pediatric
barrier function. Dermatology Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL, U.S.A., 12–15 July 2007.
5 Bath-Hextall FJ, Birnie AJ, Ravenscroft JC, Williams HC. Interven-
1 1 tions to reduce Staphylococcus aureus in the management of atopic
Department of Dermatology, University of V.Y. SHI eczema: an updated Cochrane review. Br J Dermatol 2011; 164:228.
California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, U.S.A. N. FOOLAD1 6 American Academy of Dermatology. Eczema: bleach bath therapy.
2
University of California, Davis, School of J.N. ORNELAS2 Available at: www.aad.org (last accessed 31 May 2016).
Medicine, Sacramento, CA, U.S.A. L.A. HASSOUN2 7 American Academy of Allergy Asthma & Immunology. Bleach bath
3
Departments of Pediatrics and Dermatology, G. MONICO2 recipe for skin conditions. Available at: https://
University of California, San Diego, School N. TAKEDA2 www.aaaai.org/conditions-and-treatments/library/allergy-library/
bleach-bath-recipe-for-skin-conditions.aspx (last accessed 31 May
of Medicine, San Diego, CA, U.S.A. S. SARIC2
4 2016).
Pediatric and Adolescent Dermatology, Rady N. PRAKASH1 8 Hostynek JJ, Wilhelm KP, Cua AB, Maibach HI. Irritation factors
Children’s Hospital, San Diego, CA, U.S.A. L.F. EICHENFIELD3,4 of sodium hypochlorite solutions in human skin. Contact Dermatitis
E-mail: rksivamani@ucdavis.edu R.K. SIVAMANI1 1990; 23:316–24.
9 Sivamani RK, Wu GC, Gitis NV, Maibach HI. Tribological testing
of skin products: gender, age, and ethnicity on the volar forearm.
Skin Res Technol 2003; 9:299–305.
10 Chiang C, Eichenfield LF. Quantitative assessment of combination
bathing and moisturizing regimens on skin hydration in atopic
References dermatitis. Pediatr Dermatol 2009; 26:273–8.
1 Guzik TJ, Bzowska M, Kasprowicz A et al. Persistent skin coloniza- 11 Hanifin JM, Thurston M, Omoto M et al. The eczema area and
tion with Staphylococcus aureus in atopic dermatitis: relationship to severity index (EASI): assessment of reliability in atopic dermatitis.
clinical and immunological parameters. Clin Exp Allergy 2005; EASI Evaluator Group. Exp Dermatol 2001; 10:11–18.
35:448–55. 12 Craig FE, Smith EV, Williams HC. Bleach baths to reduce severity
2 Hon KL, Tsang YC, Lee VW et al. Efficacy of sodium hypochlorite of atopic dermatitis colonized by Staphylococcus. Arch Dermatol 2010;
(bleach) baths to reduce Staphylococcus aureus colonization in child- 146:541–3.
hood onset moderate-to-severe eczema: a randomized, placebo- 13 Krakowski AC, Eichenfield LF, Dohil MA. Management of atopic
controlled cross-over trial. J Dermatolog Treat 2016; 27:156–62. dermatitis in the pediatric population. Pediatrics 2008; 122:812–24.
3 Huang JT, Abrams M, Tlougan B et al. Treatment of Staphylococcus
aureus colonization in atopic dermatitis decreases disease severity. Funding sources: none.
Pediatrics 2009; 123:e808–14.
4 Metry D, Browning J, Rousseau A et al. Sodium hypochlorite Conflicts of interest: none declared.
(bleach) baths: a potential measure to reduce the incidence of

© 2016 British Association of Dermatologists British Journal of Dermatology (2016)

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi