UNIVERSITI SAINS MALAYSIA
PUSAT PENGAJIAN ILMU PENDIDIKAN
Rubrik / Matriks Penilaian
(Evaluation rubrics / matrix)
ARTICLE REVIEW
Komponen (Component)
INTRODUCTION
DESCRIPTION OF THE
RESEARCH
COMMENTS/CRITIQUE
PLG 723 / PLG 728 – ICT Dalam Pengajaran (ICT in Instruction)
Cemerlang (Excellent) (A)
Introduction is highly relevant
in describing the article (title,
author, year, journal and
main topic/background).
Description states very clearly
and orderly the details (RQs,
methodology, findings).
Comments/critique are very
comprehensive, relevant, and
structured (RQs,
methodology, findings); and
Semester 1, 2018/2019
Baik (Good) (A-)
Introduction is relevant in
describing the article (title,
author, year, journal and
main topic/background).
Description states clearly and
orderly the details (RQs,
methodology, findings).
Comments/critique are
comprehensive, relevant, and
structured (RQs,
methodology, findings); and
Sederhana (Average) (B+)
Introduction is somewhat
relevant in describing the
article (title, author, year,
journal and main
topic/background).
Description states somewhat
clearly and orderly the details
(RQs, methodology, findings).
Comments/critique are
somewhat comprehensive,
relevant, and structured (RQs,
methodology, findings); and
Memuaskan (Satisfactory)
(B)
Introduction is not quite
relevant in describing the
article (title, author, year,
journal and main
topic/background).
Description does not clearly
state the details (RQs,
methodology, findings).
Comments/critique are not
quite comprehensive,
relevant, and/or structured
(RQs, methodology, findings);
 supported with relevant
references.
CONCLUSION Conclusion is very well
summarized (agreement of
findings, justification, and/or
suggestion).
RESEARCH PROJECT
Komponen (Component) Cemerlang (Excellent) (A)
INTRODUCTION Introduction states very
clearly the problem
statement, ROs, and RQs.
LITERATURE REVIEW Literature review is current,
very appropriate and highly
relevant. Establishes an
advanced
theoretical framework for the
research
project.
supported with relevant
references.
Conclusion is well
summarized (agreement of
findings, justification, and/or
suggestion).
Baik (Good) (A-)
Introduction states clearly the
problem statement, ROs, and
RQs.
Literature review is current,
appropriate and relevant.
Establishes a sound
and proficient theoretical
framework for
the research project.
supported with relevant
references.
Conclusion is somewhat
summarized (agreement of
findings, justification, and/or
suggestion).
Sederhana (Average) (B+)
Introduction states the
problem statement, ROs, and
RQs.
Literature review is
appropriate and relevant.
Establishes a basic
theoretical framework
for the research
project.
and/or supported with
relevant references.
Conclusion is poorly
summarized (agreement of
findings, justification, and/or
suggestion).
Memuaskan (Satisfactory)
(B)
Introduction lacks some
crucial information (eg,
problem statement, ROs, and
RQs).
Literature review is
somewhat appropriate and
relevant. Fails to establish
an
appropriate theoretical
framework
for the research project.
 Komponen (Component) Cemerlang (Excellent) (A)
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY Research methodology
chosen is highly appropriate
(addresses RQs).
DATA ANALYSIS Data analysis (for
quantitative research) is
presented in a highly accurate
and detailed manner; (for
qualitative research) is
presented in a highly detailed
and insightful manner.
DISCUSSION Discussion is very thorough,
accurate, and clearly based
on the findings.
REFERENCES References are correctly cited
according to APA style, well-
organized and perfect (with
no missing references).
0129807058
Baik (Good) (A-)
Research methodology
chosen is appropriate
(addresses RQs).
Data analysis (for quantitative
research) is presented in an
accurate and detailed
manner; (for qualitative
research) is presented in a
detailed and insightful
manner.
Discussion is thorough,
accurate, and clearly based
on the findings.
References are correctly cited
according to APA style, well-
organized and with some
missing references.
Sederhana (Average) (B+)
Research methodology
chosen is somewhat
appropriate (addresses RQs).
Data analysis (for quantitative
research) is presented in a
somewhat accurate and
detailed manner; (for
qualitative research) is
presented in a somewhat
detailed and insightful
manner.
Discussion is somewhat
thorough, accurate, and
based on the findings.
References are correctly cited
according to APA style,
somewhat organized and
with some missing
references.
Memuaskan (Satisfactory)
(B)
Research methodology
chosen is not quite
appropriate (addresses RQs).
Data analysis (for quantitative
research) is not quite
presented in an accurate and
detailed manner; (for
qualitative research) is not
quite presented in a detailed
and insightful manner.
Discussion is not quite
thorough, accurate, and
loosely based on the findings.
References do not conform to
APA style, and/or not well-
organized.