Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 2

7. The one year interest rate over the next 10 years will be 3%, 4.5%, 6%, 7.

7.5%, 9%, 10.5%, 13%, 14.5%, 16%


Chapter 5 Quantitative Problems and 17.5%. Using the expectations theory, what will be the interest rates on a 3-year, 6-year and 9-year
1. Assuming that the expectations theory is the correct theory of the term structure, calculate the interest rates in bond? This can be solved by taking the average of the appropriate rates
the term structure for maturities of 1 to 5 years and plot the resulting yield curves for the following series of 1- 3-year bond [(3 4.5 6)]/(3) 4.5%
year interest rates over the next 5 years: 6-year bond [(3 4.5 6 7.5 9 10.5)]/(6) 6.75%
a. 5%, 7%, 7%, 7%, 7% The yield to maturity for a 1 year bond would be 5%, 5.9953% for a 2 year bond, 9-year bond [(3 4.5 6 7.5 9 10.5 13 14.5 16)]/(9) 9.333%
6.3291% for a three-year bond, 6.4965% for a four year bond and 6.5970% for a 5-year bond, Alternatively doing the mathematics correctly one finds
b. 5%, 4%, 4%, 4%, 4% The yield to maturity would be 5% for a one-year bond, 4.4988% for a two-year (1+r)^3=(1.03)*(1.045)*(1.06) r=4.4928% for the 3 year bond, r=6.7193% for the 6-year bond and 9.2502%
bond, 4.3323% for a three-year bond, 4.2491% for a four-year bond, and 4.1992% for a five-year bond for the 9-year bond.
How would your yield curves change if people preferred shorter-term bonds over longer-term bonds? The 8. Using the information from the previous question, now assume that investors prefer holding short-term
upward-sloping yield curve in (a) would be even steeper if people preferred short-term bonds over long-term bonds. A liquidity premium of 10 basis points is required for each year of a bond’s maturity. What will be
bonds because long-term bonds would then have a positive risk premium. The downward-sloping yield curve in (b) the interest rate on a 3-year, 6-year and 9-year bond? Using the textbook approximation the liquidity
would be less steep and might even have a slight positive upward slope if the long-term bonds have a positive risk premium is added to the interest rates thus the results are 4.8%, 7.35% and 10.233%. The more standard
premium. formula gives
2. Government economists have forecasted one-year T-bill rates for the following 5 years: (1+r)^3 = (1.03)*(1.045)*(1.06)+.003r=4.5843%. The six period bond has a rate of 6.7914% and the 9 year
Year 1-year rate % has a rate of 9.2993%. Note these are significantly different because the liquidity premium is not scaled
1 4.25 properly between the two formulas.
2 5.15 9. Which bond will produce a greater return if the expectations theory were to hold true, a two-year bond with
3 5.50 an interest rate of 15% or two 1-year bonds with sequential interest payments of 13% and 17%? According
4 6.25 to the textbook’s approximation these two bonds will produce the same return. In reality the two year bond
will yield (1.15)^2=1.3225 and the two 1-year sequential bonds will yield (1.13)(1.17) = 1.3221. Thus the two
5 7.10
year bond produces a greater return.
You have a liquidity premium of 0.25% for the next two years and 0.50% thereafter. Would you be willing to purchase a
10. Little Monsters Inc., borrowed $1,000,000 for two years from NorthernBank Inc., at an 11.5% interest rate.
4-year T-Bond at a 5.75% interest rate? For this problem we will assume that T-Bonds have annual coupons. On the
The current risk-free rate is 2%, and Little Monsters’ financial conditions warrants a default risk premium of
other hand we will assume that the problem is talking about discount rates for the T-bills that need to be converted into
3% and a liquidity risk premium of 2%. The maturity risk premium for a two-year loan is 1%, and inflation is
yields to maturity. The formula for converting these is
1 expected to be 3% next year. What does this information imply about the rate of inflation in the second
𝑟= −1 year? Apologies for this but this question is not well worded. Please ignore.
364
1 − 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑐𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑡𝑅𝑎𝑡𝑒 11. One year T-bill rates are 2% currently. If interest rates are expected to go up after three years by 2% every
360
The new rates become 4.4902%, 5.4933%, 5.8886 and 6.7457% (we do not need the rate for year 5.) We then use the year, what should be the required interest rate on a 10-year bond issued today? Assume that the
formula for liquidity premium to back out the rate. expectations theory holds. Using the approximation from the text book one needs to take an average of
(1 + 𝑟)4 = 1.044902 × 1.054933 × 1.58886 × 1.067457 + .005 (2+2+2+2*(1.02)+2*(1.02)^2+…+2*(1.02)^7)/10 = 2.1166%. Doing this correctly one computes the interest
this implies r=5.7572%. As the bond has a yield slightly below the expected rate you should not buy the bond. over 10 years as
[(1.02)3 (1 + 0.02 × 1.02)(1 + 0.02 × 1.022 ) × ⋯ × (1 + 0.02 × 1.027)]0.1 − 1 = 2.1165
3. How does the after-tax yield on a $1,000,000 municipal bond with a coupon rate of 8% paying interest 12. One year T-bill rates over the next four years are expected to be 3%, 4%, 5% and 5.5%. If four-year T-Bonds
annually, compare with that of a $1,000,000 corporate bond with a coupon rate of 10% paying interest are yielding 4.5%, what is the liquidity premium on this bond? Using the approximations in the text book -
annually? Assume you are in the 25% tax bracket. Municipal bond coupon payments equal $80,000 per the expectations theory would give a yield of 17.5%/4 = 4.375% which implies that the liquidity premium is
year. No taxes are deducted; therefore, the yield would equal 8%. The coupon payments on a corporate 0.125%. If we do the problem correctly then we need to convert the T-bill rates into yields to maturity. This
bond equal $100,000 per year. But you only keep $75,000 because you are in the 25% tax bracket. Therefore gives us rates of 3.1282%, 4.2149%, 5.3248% and 5.8888%. This then becomes a problem like 8 and the
your after-tax yield is only 7.5% liquidity premium is -0.6116%.
4. Consider the decision to purchase either a 5-year corporate bond or a 5-year municipal bond. The corporate 13. At your favorite bond store, Bonds-R-Us, you see the following prices
bond is a 12% annual coupon bond with a par value of $1,000. It is currently yielding 11.5%. The municipal a. 1 year $100 zero selling for $90.19
bond has an 8.5% annual coupon and a par value of $1,000. It is currently yielding 7%. Which of the two b. Three-year 10% coupon $1,000 par bond selling for $1,000
bonds would be more beneficial to you? Assume that your marginal tax rate is 35%. Using the PV function in c. Two-year 10% coupon $1,000 par bond selling for $1,000
excel PV(7%,5,-85,-1000) gives a price of $1061.50. The corporate bond has a PV of 1018.25. The 35% tax Assume that the expectations theory for the term structure of interest rates holds, no liquidity premium
rate changes the coupon on the corporate bond to $78. This gives a yield of 7.35%. Thus the corporate exists, and the bonds are equally risky. What is the implied one-year rate two years from now? From the
bond is better value. first bond we can see that the 1 year interest rate is (100-90.19)/90.19 = 10.8770%. Now we can value the
5. Debt is issued by Southeastern Corporation currently yields 12%. A municipal bond of equal risk currently two year bond as 1000=100/(1.10877)+1100/(1+r)^2. This implies the two year rate is 9.9565%. We can
yields 8%. At what marginal tax rate would an investor be indifferent between these two bonds? The then value the three year bond as 1000=100/(1.10877)+100/(1.09957)^2+1100/(1+r)^3. This implies that
corporate bond yield is adjusted by (1-marginal tax rate). Thus the marginal tax rate is 33% the three year rate is 9.9710. We can then back out the forward rates. The one year rate one year forward
6. One year T-bill rates are expected to steadily increase by 150 basis points per year over the next six years. is 9.0436%. The one year rate two years from now is 10.0000%.
Determine the required interest rate on a three-year T-bond and a six-year T-bond if the current 1-year 14. You observe the following market interest rates for both borrowing and lending:
interest rate is 7.5%. Assume that the expectations hypothesis for interest rates holds. Assuming that the T- a. One year rate = 5%
Bill rates are discount rates and that the T-bonds are annual coupon paying. See problem 2 for the T-bill b. Two year rate = 6%
yield to maturity conversion formula. The expected forward rates become 8.23%, 10.04%, 11.19%, 13.85%, c. One year rate one year from now = 7.25%
15.85% and 17.94%. The three year bond has a yield to maturity of 10.0515% and the 6 year bond has a How can you take advantage of these rates to earn a riskless profit? Assume that the expectations theory of
yield to maturity of 12.9233%. interest rates holds. According to the expectations theory of interest rates you can see that the one year
rate on year from now is too high. You wish to earn interest on this forward rate. Thus you need to lend
money one year from now. In order to capture the risk free profit you borrow x dollars for two years, and
lend x dollars for one year. You enter into a contract to lend x*(1.05) dollars in one years time at 7.25%. Banking System
Today you require no up-front cash as you are borrowing x dollars and lending x dollars. In two years you
will receive x*(1.05)*(1.0725) = 1.126125*x dollars and owe x*(1.06)^2 = 1.1236*x dollars. You earn Assets Liabilities
0.2525*x dollars on this trade. Reserves $500,000 Discount Loans $500,000
15. If the interest rates on 1 to 5 year bonds are currently 4%, 5%, 6%, 7% and 8%, and the term premiums for 1
to 5 year bonds are 0%, 0.25%, 0.35%, 0.4% and 0.5%, predict what the one-year interest rate will be two
years from now. We will assume the term premiums are the liquidity premiums. The one year rate one Federal Reserve System
year from now is ((1.05)^2-0.25%)/1.04-1=5.5769%. The one year rate two years from now is ((1.06)^3-
Assets Liabilities
0.35%)/(1.04*1.057692)-1 = 7.9560%. Note – these are my formulas for these results rather than the book’s
formulas. Discount Loans $500,000 Reserves $500,000
5. The short-term nominal interest rate is 5%, with an expected inflation of 2%. Economists forecast that next
Chapter 10 – Quantitative Problems
year’s nominal rate will increase by 100 basis points, but inflation will fall to 1.5%. What is the expected
1. Consider a bank policy to maintain 12% of deposits as reserves. The bank currently has $10m in deposits
change in real interest rates?
and $400,000 in excess reserves. What is the required reserve on a new deposit of $50,000?
nominal rate = real rate + expected inflation
The bank policy is to maintain 12% of deposits as total reserves. The excess reserves of
Year 1: 5% = real rate + 2%, or the real rate = 3%
$400,000 is 4% of 10m. The total reserves is 12% which equals the required reserves plus the
Year 2: 6% = real rate + 1.5%, or the real rate = 4.5%
excess reserves. Thus the required reserves are 8%. Thus the required reserves on a $50,000
Real rates have increased by 150 basis points.
deposit is $4,000.
For problems 6-8 recall from introductory macroeconomics that the money multiplier = 1/(required reserve ratio).
2. Estimates of unemployment for the upcoming year have been developed as follows. What is the expected
6. If the required reserve ratio is 10%, how much a new $10,000 deposit can a bank lend? What is the
unemployment rate? What is the standard deviation?
potential impact on the money supply?
Economy Probability Unemployment Rate (%)
The bank must retain $10,000 × 10%, or $1,000 of the new deposit. The remaining $9,000 can be
Bust .15 20 lent to, for example, mortgage borrowers, commercial borrowers, etc. Since the reserve
Average .5 10 requirement is 10%, the potential money multiplier is 1/0.10 or 10. The $10,000 deposit can
Good .2 5 potentially increase the money supply by $100,000.
Boom .15 1 7. A bank currently holds $150,000 in excess reserves. If the current reserve requirement is 12.5%, how much
One can set up the problem as follows: could the money supply change? How could this happen?
Unemployment Squared The money supply could increase if the bank lent its excess reserves. Since the reserve
requirement is 12.5%, the potential money multiplier is 1/0.125, or 8. If the bank lends all of the
Economy Probability Rate Expectation Deviation excess reserves, the money supply could increase by $150,000  8  $1,200,000.
8. The trading desk at the Federal Reserve sold $100,000,000 in T-bills to the public. If the current reserve
Bust 0.15 20% 0.03 0.001765838 requirement is 8.0%, how much could the money supply change?
Average 0.5 10% 0.05 0.000036125 Since the reserve requirement is 8.0%, the potential money multiplier is 1/0.08, or 12.5. The sale
Good 0.2 5% 0.01 0.000344450 of T-bills will act to decrease the money supply. The contraction will be on the order of
$100,000,000 × 12.5 = 1,250,000,000. However, if there are excess reserves in the system, it may
Boom 0.15 1% 0.0015 0.000996338 not be this high.
Sum 0.0915 0.00314275
Thus the expected unemployment rate is 9.15% and the standard deviation is the square root of
the squared deviation or 5.6%.
3. The Federal Reserve wants to increase the supply of reserves, so it purchases 1m USD worth of bonds from
the public. Show the effect of this open market operation using T-accounts.
Banking System
Assets Liabilities
Reserves $1 million Checkable Deposits $1 million

Federal Reserve System


Assets Liabilities

Securities $1 million Reserves $1 million

4. Use T-accounts to show the effect of the Federal Reserve being paid back a $500K discount loan from a
bank.

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi