Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Contract grant sponsor: Qatar National Research Fund (a member of The Qatar Foundation), Doha,
Qatar; Contract grant number: NPRP 7-1189-3-304
†
This article has been accepted for publication and undergone full peer review but has not
been through the copyediting, typesetting, pagination and proofreading process, which may lead to
differences between this version and the Version of Record. Please cite this article as doi:
[10.1002/jcp.25598]
Diabetic nephropathy (DN) is one of the serious complications of diabetes mellitus and
accounts for 40% of all new end-stage renal disease cases in the United States. DN is characterized by
progressive albuminuria followed by a gradual decline in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) leading to
kidney failure accompanied by podocyte loss, progressive glomerulosclerosis and ultimately to
progressive tubulointerstitial fibrosis (Lieberthal and Levine, 2009). Hence, DN can be categorized into
three different stages (Figure 1). In stage I of DN, there will be no signs of microalbuminuria and the
blood pressure will be normal in patients. The plasma flow and GFR increases leading to a reduced
serum creatinine level. The stage II of DN is characterized by stabilized serum creatinine levels, the
absence of proteinuria, and normal GFR except few morphological changes that include increased
thickness of basement membrane and mesangial expansion. Currently, there are no clinical markers to
identify DN at early stages. DN is most evident at stage III where patients are diagnosed with
microalbuminuria, hypertension and a declining GFR with the appearance of glomerulosclerosis
(Appel, 2013).
Metformin, a biguanide derivative, is the first-line of oral therapy in patients with type 2
diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Metformin decreases hepatic gluconeogenesis with less risk of causing
hypoglycemia, decreases intestinal absorption of glucose and increases insulin sensitivity in peripheral
tissues (Sena et al., 2010). Furthermore, metformin decreases the levels of LDL cholesterol and
triglycerides, and promotes weight loss in patients with obesity (Bailey, 2008; Bodmer et al., 2008)
Clinical trial evidence supports metformin’s ability to reduce the incidence of macrovascular
complications such as myocardial infarction, angina, sudden death, stroke and peripheral vascular
disease in patients with T2DM-diabetes (Kim et al., 2015). The UK Prospective Diabetes Study
(UKPDS) Group demonstrated that metformin reduces the risks for any diabetes-related endpoint in
diabetes patients by 32%, diabetes-related death by 42% and all-cause mortality by 36% when
compared to treatment with sulfonylurea or insulin (Group, 1998). A meta-analysis by Salpeter et al.
aggregating results from 31 trials with 4,570 participants followed for 8,267 patient-years showed
metformin treatment reduced the incidence of new-onset of diabetes by 40% in patients at risk for
diabetes. This study suggests that metformin is capable of preventing the onset of diabetes in at-risk
patients. (Salpeter et al., 2008).
Recent reports support the use of metformin even in patients with renal disease based on the
estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFRs), which is a better measure of renal function than the
Before this report from US FDA, metformin was contraindicated in a large population of T2DM
patients mainly due to concerns over metformin-associated lactic acidosis (MALA). Metformin is
eliminated unchanged via kidney and patients with existing renal dysfunction or insufficiency will have
reduced glomerular filtration rate (GFR) thus, increasing the risk of lactic acidosis. Metformin
enhances anaerobic metabolism by reducing pyruvate dehydrogenase activity and transport of reducing
agents by mitochondria (Ncomanzi et al., 2014). The anaerobic metabolism along with reduced insulin
in the body impairs the ability of cells to shift to aerobic metabolism and results in an increased
production of lactic acid (Ncomanzi et al., 2014). But evidence supports the fact that lactic acidosis is
not being induced by metformin per se. In a meta-analysis by Salpeter et al. on T2DM-diabetic
patients, there were no cases of fatal or nonfatal lactic acidosis in 36,893 patient-years in the metformin
group, or in 30,109 patient-years in the non-metformin group in 194 cases considered (Salpeter et al.,
2003). The Comparative Outcome Study on Metformin Intervention vs Convention (COSMIC)
approach study conducted by Bristol-Myers Squibb on about 9,000 patients out of which 7,227 patients
received metformin concluded that there was no incidence of lactic acidosis (Cryer et al., 2005).
Therefore, metformin can be administered according to the regulations listed by the US FDA without
being concerned about developing lactic acidosis.
In peripheral tissues such as skeletal muscle, metformin improves insulin sensitivity by various
mechanisms including increased insulin receptor tyrosine kinase activity, glycogen synthesis,
recruitment and activation of GLUT4 glucose transporters. In adipocytes, metformin promotes the
reduction of free fatty acids and inhibits lipolysis. This may indirectly improve insulin sensitivity
through reduced lipotoxicity (Giannarelli et al., 2003; Stephenne et al., 2011).
Metformin is mostly absorbed in the small intestine and has an oral bioavailability of 50 to
60%. Metformin does not appear to bind to any hepatic or plasma proteins (Graham et al., 2011).
About 90% of the absorbed fraction is excreted unchanged in the urine by filtration and active tubular
secretion. The mechanism of transport of metformin into the intestinal cell is still not elucidated. A
study by Zhou et al. shows that intestinal absorption of metformin is primarily mediated by the plasma
membrane monoamine transporter (PMAT), which is mainly expressed on the luminal side of the
enterocytes (Zhou et al., 2007). Metformin regulates glucose uptake by regulating sodium/glucose
symporter SGLT1 on the luminal side of the intestine and the glucose uniporter GLUT2 on the blood
side through rapid activation of AMPK (Sakar et al., 2010).
AMPK/mTOR pathway
The mammalian target of Rapamycin (mTOR) is a serine-threonine kinase that plays a major
role in cell proliferation and survival. Numerous studies have demonstrated that hyperglycemia triggers
the activation phosphoinositide-3 kinase (PI3K) and AKT pathways, which subsequently lead to the
activation of mTOR. Activated mTOR induces the synthesis of matrix proteins associated with
basement membrane thickening and mesangial matrix accumulation (Estacio and Schrier, 2001). In
Many reports also demonstrate that mTOR contributes to renal tubular cell apoptosis and
damage in diabetes (Sakaguchi et al., 2006; Velagapudi et al., 2011). Inhibition of mTOR by rapamycin
treatment in animal models has shown amelioration of the above events (Sakaguchi et al., 2006;
Velagapudi et al., 2011). In addition, mTOR signaling pathway plays an important role in the
regulation of autophagy, a cellular defense mechanism, in the kidney. mTOR activation suppresses
autophagy initiation in kidney cells thus, leading to apoptosis and necrosis in kidney cells causing
irreversible damage (Xiao et al., 2014). Thus, it is evident that mTOR plays a central role in the
development of the major features of DN, although additional mechanisms are likely to be involved.
Thus, inhibition of mTOR would prevent the pathophysiological and structural alterations in the DN
(Lieberthal and Levine, 2009).
AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) is a fuel sensor present in cells and is mainly involved
in cellular metabolisms such as regulation of fatty acid oxidation and ATP synthesis. AMPK consists of
an alpha (α), a beta (β), and a gamma (γ) subunit and is activated by the upstream kinases such as
calcium-calmodulin-dependent protein kinase kinase (CaMKK) and serine/threonine kinase 11 (LKB1)
via phosphorylation of threonine residue 172 (Kume et al., 2012; Long and Zierath, 2006). A fall in
ATP levels leads to activation of AMPK and subsequent phosphorylation of its multiple substrates, in
an effort to enhance catabolism and suppress anabolic energy consumption. For instance, glucose
deprivation leads to an increase in AMP:ATP ratio and subsequently leads to activation of AMPK and
inhibition of mTOR by phosphorylation (Lieberthal and Levine, 2009; Long and Zierath, 2006).
Conversely, when there is an energy surplus, AMPK activation is reduced and mTOR is activated,
which in turn stimulates protein synthesis, cell growth, and storage.
Multiple studies support the fact that high glucose levels inhibit AMPK signaling in both
glomerular and tubular compartments of the kidney. Moreover, the restoration of AMPK activity using
AMPK activators such as metformin and 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide-1-riboside (AICAR) has
been shown to attenuate renal injury induced by hyperglycemia (Lee et al., 2013; Lee et al., 2007;
Takiyama et al., 2011). A study by Lee et al. revealed the role of AMPK inactivation and mTOR
activation in glomerular hypertrophy induced by high glucose levels in vitro and in vivo. The study also
highlighted that the effects of metformin to inhibit renal hypertrophy is independent to that of its effects
on hyperglycemia (Lee et al., 2007). Similarly, a study by Kim et al. documented low levels of
phosphorylated AMPK in renal podocytes of diabetic mice. Consistent with other studies, metformin-
mediated restoration of AMPK pathway in renal podocytes rendered protection from diabetes-induced
injury (Kim et al., 2012).
The interplay between mTOR and AMPK is also documented in other kidney diseases. Liu et
al. demonstrated that metformin inhibits cell proliferation in renal carcinoma cells in vitro and in vivo
by down-regulating cyclin-D1 (a protein involved in cell cycle progression) and inducing G0/G1 cell
cycle arrest. The study also showed that metformin upregulates AMPK activity and inhibits
mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway (Liu et al., 2013). Therefore, activation of AMPK
could be associated with cell cycle arrest leading to phosphorylation and inactivation of mTOR that
will further lead to downregulation of cell metabolism, cell growth, cell proliferation and survival.
Another study by Takiar et al. evaluated the effect of metformin in autosomal dominant polycystic
kidney disease (ADPKD). ADPKD is an inherited systemic disorder affecting the kidneys and mainly
involves both fluid secretion and abnormal proliferation of cyst-lining epithelial cells. The chloride
channel of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) plays an important role in
the fluid secretion and mTOR is involved in the proliferation of cyst epithelial cells and both are
negatively regulated by AMPK. The study found that metformin induces AMPK resulting in the
inhibition of both CFTR and mTOR, thereby ameliorating cyst fluid secretion and epithelial cell
proliferation (Takiar et al., 2011).
Altogether, these reports suggest that restoration of AMPK signaling and/or inhibition of
mTOR pathway with metformin treatment may serve as viable therapeutic strategies to preserve renal
function in patients with DN and other forms of CKD.
1) Protein kinase R-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK): PERK is usually bound to
the ER chaperone GRP78/BiP. The accumulation of unfolded proteins within ER leads to dissociation
and activation of PERK. Activated PERK phosphorylates eukaryotic initiation factor 2α (eIF-2α), and
ultimately results in general inhibition of protein translation and synthesis (Cameron, 2013).
In DN, the abnormal levels of glucose serve as the principal stimulus for initiation of ER stress
in renal cells. Nevertheless, analyzing the UPR response in kidney cells is quite challenging owing to
the heterogeneity of the renal architecture and the complexity of the ER stress pathways. It is still
unclear whether activation of one the UPR sensors is enough, or all the three sensors need to be
activated to evoke a full-fledged ER stress. However, studies in experimental models of DN (Liu et al.,
2008; Wu et al., 2010) and in human kidney biopsies from patients with DN (Lindenmeyer et al., 2008)
have consistently documented the presence of ER stress in diabetic kidneys.
Studies show that both the PERK/eIF2α and IRE1/JNK pathways are activated in DN (Liu et
al., 2008; Wu et al., 2010). One possible mechanism by which hyperglycemia and proteinuria (a
diagnostic and prognostic marker of DN) initiate ER stress in renal cells is via generation of reactive
oxygen species (ROS). Increased ROS generation necessitates increased synthesis of antioxidants and
membrane proteins in the kidney to combat oxidative stress and repair oxidative membrane damage.
This increased protein synthesis may overwhelm the ER and result in ER stress (Lindenmeyer et al.,
2008). Other mechanisms such as the activation of growth factor receptors may also contribute to the
Emerging evidence indicate the protective role of metformin against ER stress induced by
multiple factors in the kidney (Kim et al., 2015; Lee et al., 2012; Theriault et al., 2011). In a study by
Lee et al., albumin-induced ER stress in human proximal tubular cells was shown to be mediated
through the reactive oxygen species-Src Kinase-mTOR pathway. The study also indicated that
metformin reduces ER stress and caspase 3-dependent apoptosis induced by albumin and thereby
decreases tubulointerstitial injury in proximal tubular cells (Lee et al., 2012). In a recent study by Kim
et al., metformin treatment was shown to attenuate ER stress and fibrosis induced in renal cells by
various noxious stimuli including high glucose (Kim et al., 2015). It was shown that metformin
abrogated ER stress via suppression of GRP78 induction and induction of antioxidant protein heme
oxygenase 1. Interestingly, both studies also indicate that the ability of metformin to alleviate ER stress
is mediated via AMPK activation, as chemical inhibition and genetic silencing of AMPK have blocked
the protective effects of metformin. Contrary to these findings, a study by Thériault et al., indicate that
the metformin-mediated attenuation of UPR response occurs independently of the AMPK pathway in
renal tubular epithelial cells (Theriault et al., 2011). Nonetheless, it is clear that metformin has the
potential to curb ER stress - with or without activation of AMPK - in renal cells (Figure 3).
In kidneys, epithelial cells are polarized with their basal surface attached to a basement
membrane and their apical side facing the lumen of a tubular structure. They interact with adjacent
epithelial cells through adherens junctions, desmosomes, and tight junctions laterally. Mesenchymal
cells have two key characteristics that are important in embryonic development; they can migrate
through an extracellular matrix and subsequently differentiate into divergent cell types of the
mesenchymal cell lineage like fibroblasts (Fragiadaki and Mason, 2011). In DN, the conversion of
mesenchymal cells into myofibroblasts is driven by factors released from surrounding kidney cells (in
response to hyperglycemia, proteinuria and/or hypoxia), and from inflammatory and immune cells,
Hyperglycemia is one of the primary factors that stimulates EMT in the renal cells of diabetes
patients, thus leading to DN. In a recent study by Zhang et al., exposure of rat renal proximal tubular
cells to high glucose was sufficient to induce EMT, evidenced by a decrease in epithelial markers - E-
Cadherin and cytokeratin19, and an increase in mesenchymal markers - α-SMA and vimentin (Zhang et
al., 2015). However, a study by Xu et al., indicate that lipid (triglyceride and fatty acid) accumulation
occurs ahead of EMT in DN (Xu et al., 2014). Thus, lipotoxicity caused by high glucose levels prior to
EMT, if inhibited, could be a potential therapeutic target in the treatment of DN. In addition, the
advanced glycosylation end products (AGE) formed under hyperglycemic conditions are shown to
activate the receptor of advanced glycation end products (RAGE) and promote the expression of
growth factors such as TGF-β1 and CTGF in renal proximal tubular cells and result in renal fibrosis
(Cheng et al., 2015).
Studies in non-diabetic forms of kidney diseases implicate the involvement of additional factors
such as oxidative stress and epigenetic modifications in the pathogenesis of EMT (Rhyu et al., 2005;
Rodriguez-Romo et al., 2015). Using an experimental model of TGF-β-induced EMT in renal tubular
cells, Rhyu et al. demonstrated that TGF- induces reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation in renal
cells. Scavenging of ROS with antioxidants prevented TGF- mediated activation of MAPK pathway,
which plays a central role in the induction of EMT (Rhyu et al., 2005). In a recent study by Rodriguez
et al., the team reported that epigenetic modifications such as chromatin compaction, DNA
methylation, and histone acetylation/deacetylation increase the production of proinflammatory and
profibrotic cytokines such as monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), complement protein 3 (C3)
and TGF-β, which play a major role in induction of EMT and fibrosis in the kidney (Rodriguez-Romo
et al., 2015). Together, suppression of ROS generation and/or epigenetic modification would inhibit the
transition of renal epithelial cells into mesenchymal cells and prevent renal fibrosis.
The anti-fibrotic effects of metformin have been well-documented in both diabetic and non-
diabetic models of CKD. Cufi et al. studied the effect of metformin on MDCK cells against TGF-β,
which is a major driving force in EMT. Their study concluded that metformin attenuates the activity of
TGF-β by reducing the accumulation of mesenchymal marker vimentin in MDCK cells (Cufi et al.,
2010). A study by Lee et al. further demonstrated that metformin inhibits EMT induced by diverse
stimuli including TGF-β and high glucose. Interestingly, the anti-fibrotic effects of metformin were
diminished in the presence of chemical inhibitors and small interference RNA of AMPK, indicating
that metformin exerts its nephroprotective effects through AMPK dependent pathway (Lee et al.,
2013). These findings suggest that metformin could prevent renal cells from undergoing fibrosis, which
plays an important role in the progression of DN and other forms of CKD (Figure 4).
mTOR is one of the most important nutrient-sensing pathways within cells. mTORC1 and
mTORC2 complexes of mTOR negatively regulate autophagy by inhibiting the initiation of formation
of PAS via direct phosphorylation of ULK1 (Kim et al., 2011; Lee et al., 2010). Under the conditions
of nutrient starvation, ER stress or hypoxia, autophagy is activated and acts as a protective mechanism
for renal tubular cells (Ding and Choi, 2015; Inoki, 2014). For example, in a study conducted by Xiao
et al., inhibition of mTOR with rapamycin restored autophagy and inhibited apoptosis in the podocytes
of diabetic mice and ultimately delayed the progression of DN (Xiao et al., 2014).
Unlike mTOR, activated AMPK has been shown to positively regulate autophagy (Ding and
Choi, 2015). For instance, activation of AMPK (and consequent inhibition of mTOR) by metformin has
been shown to induce autophagy via phosphorylation of key autophagy proteins such as ULK1, VPS34
and Beclin 1 (Kim et al., 2011). A study conducted by Kim et al. revealed how phosphorylation of
ULK1 at different serine residues by mTOR and AMPK modulates ULK1 activity and consequently
autophagy. Glucose-starvation induced AMPK activation has been shown to phosphorylate ULK1 at
Ser-317 and Ser-777 and induce autophagy. Whereas conditions that favor high mTOR activity such as
nutrient excess caused phosphorylation of ULK1 at Ser-757 and subsequently hindered the interaction
of ULK1 with AMPK and prevented autophagy induction. A similar modulation by mTOR and AMPK
on ULK1 and autophagy activation has been demonstrated in albumin-induced renal cell injury – an in
vitro model of non-diabetic CKD (Lee et al., 2011). Furthermore, the effects of activated AMPK on
autophagy induction was also shown in experimentally-induced renal ischemia-reperfusion injury, a
model of acute kidney injury (Decleves et al., 2014). These studies provide compelling evidence that
Under hyperglycemic conditions, glucose combines with amino groups in proteins, nucleic
acids and lipids in circulation through an irreversible, non-enzymatic process to form AGEs (Wolf,
2004). Studies have shown that formation of AGEs are increased in diabetes patients and doubled in
diabetes patients with ESRD compared to diabetes patients with no renal disease. This accumulation of
AGEs in patients with DN is due to enhanced formation of AGEs and decreased renal clearance
(Makita et al., 1991).
AGEs exerts intracellular effects via its receptor, RAGE in renal cells leading to the activation
of NF-κB. This would increase the generation of ROS leading to oxidative stress. AGEs induce the
expression of growth factors and cytokines such as TGF-β and connective tissue growth factor (CTGF).
AGEs also stimulate the production of extracellular matrix proteins and interact with the renin-
angiotensin system (Forbes et al., 2003). Thus, AGEs and its receptor RAGE play an important role in
the development of tubulointerstitial damage in DN.
Metformin treatment was shown to inhibit the deleterious effects of AGEs by down-regulating
the expression of RAGE and subsequently suppress ROS production. A study by Ishibashi et al.
revealed that metformin inhibits the generation of hyperglycemia-induced ROS and other
profibrotic/proinflammatory factors such as TGF-β, intercellular adhesion molecule-1 and monocyte
chemoattractant protein-1 in the proximal tubule, all of which are activated through AGE-RAGE
interaction. This study also indicated that the antioxidant effects of metformin are mediated through
AMPK activation (Ishibashi et al., 2012).
Moreover, incubation of renal podocytes with metformin has been shown to decrease ROS
generation via suppression of NADPH oxidase, a pro-oxidant enzyme system that generates superoxide
anions (Piwkowska et al., 2010). This antioxidant effect of metformin is also shown to be AMPK
dependent. In a study by Kim et al., metformin prevented podocyte loss by decreasing oxidative injury
Studies in models of acute kidney injury (AKI) also indicate that metformin exerts antioxidant
effects on the kidney. A study by Morales et al. revealed that metformin prevents acute renal failure
induced by gentamycin in rats. The improvements in the in vivo markers of AKI observed with
metformin treatment is accompanied by decreases in the levels of mitochondrial ROS and lipid
peroxidation and an increase in antioxidants levels (Morales et al., 2010). Another study by Sahu et al.,
tested the nephroprotective effects of metformin against cisplatin-induced AKI in rats. Although
metformin did not prevent the renal damage induced by cisplatin, it was shown to significantly reduce
the levels of ROS and increase the antioxidant pool in the kidney (Sahu et al., 2013). Thus, it is clear
that metformin inhibits ROS generation via multiple pathways and the resultant reduction in oxidative
stress contributes to its nephroprotective effects in DN (Figure 6).
HIF-1α plays an important role in wound healing via expression of multiple angiogenic growth
factors, recruitment of progenitor cells and cell motility (Botusan et al., 2008). At low oxygen levels,
HIF-1α acts as the key regulator in many cells by activating several pathways to adapt and survive
hypoxic conditions (Nangaku et al., 2013). Active HIF-1 is a heterodimer composed of HIF-1β and
HIF-1α subunits. HIF-1β is stable under hypoxic and normoxic conditions, whereas HIF-1α is highly
induced by hypoxia. Under normoxic conditions, HIF-1α is rapidly degraded by ubiquitin-proteasome
pathway due to hydroxylation of its proline residues by prolyl hydroxylases. In its hydroxylated form,
HIF-1α binds to the tumor suppressor protein, von Hippel-Lindau (VHL), which is part of an E3
ubiquitin ligase complex and subjected to proteasomal degradation. Under hypoxia, proline residues on
HIF-1α are no longer hydroxylated and HIF-1α is stabilized against degradation. Accumulated
unmodified HIF-1α in the cytosol translocates to the nucleus where it heterodimerizes with HIF-1β and
up-regulates the transcription of target genes (Botusan et al., 2008; Nangaku et al., 2013).
Although activation and upregulation of HIF-1α have been shown to be associated with
protective effects in acute ischemic injury, prolonged HIF-1α activation is considered pathogenic in
Similar to the findings from various models of CKD, a study by Takiyama et al. in a genetic
model of type-2 diabetes showed increased expression of HIF-1α in conjunction with
glomerulosclerosis and tubulointerstitial injuries in the kidney (Takiyama et al., 2011). Metformin
treatment significantly decreased expression of HIF-1α and ameliorated tubular injury compared to
insulin-treated rats; however, in an AMPK-independent manner (Takiyama et al., 2011). The study
further indicated that metformin inhibits HIF-1α levels through inhibition of mitochondrial respiratory
chain complex I, thereby inhibiting oxygen consumption and ATP production. The resultant increased
intracellular oxygen redistributes to prolyl hydroxylase, leading to proteasomal degradation of HIF-1α.
Thus, the beneficial effects of metformin in ameliorating this progression of DN are partly attributed to
its ability to inhibit HIF-1 expression in renal cells under diabetic milieu.
Lipotoxicity
Accumulation of lipid deposits can also cause renal injury leading to DN. The underlying
mechanism that promotes accumulation of lipids in diabetic kidneys in not fully understood. Studies
implicate that sterol regulatory element binding protein-1 (SREBP-1), a transcription factor that
regulates fatty acids and triglycerides, plays a critical role in lipid deposition into the kidney.
Specifically, an in vitro study by Jun et al. indicated that hyperglycemia can induce the expression of
SREBP-1 in human kidney cells. Increased SREBP-1 expression can therefore lead to lipid
accumulation in renal cells by up-regulating the accumulation of extracellular matrix cells and
expression of fatty acid synthase (FAS) by inducing TGF-β1 (Jun et al., 2009). An in vivo study by
Wang et al. not only confirmed that DN is associated with accumulation of triglycerides and lipids in
the kidney, but also demonstrated that this renal lipotoxicity can be ameliorated by metformin therapy.
The study indicated that metformin reduces fat content by down-regulating the expression of SREBP-1,
FAS and acetyl-CoA carboxylase or ACC (an enzyme involved in the biosynthesis of fatty acids)
(Wang et al., 2006) as shown in Figure 8.
Conclusion
The therapeutic use of metformin in DN and other non-diabetic kidney diseases was restricted
by the US FDA due to the risk of patients developing lactic acidosis on its administration.
Nevertheless, multiple studies have shown that incidence of lactic acidosis is very rare and is often
triggered by other underlying conditions. Hence, the US FDA has recently revised their guidelines and
This review highlights that metformin not only activates AMPK signaling but also modulates
other signaling pathways described earlier, thus protecting renal cells from damage-induced by high
glucose. For instance, activation of mTOR leads to inhibition of AMPK, thus leading to cell
proliferation and nephropathy. Metformin has been shown to effectively activate AMPK in renal cells
(Lee et al., 2007) but does it directly inhibit mTOR pathway independent of AMPK activation
(Kalender et al., 2010) is an area to be researched on. As mTOR signaling is activated by nutrients such
as glucose and amino acids, and growth factors, it opens the door for investigation into other pathways
that are regulated similarly such as PIP3/AKT pathway. Moreover, when AKT is activated by PIP3, it
leads to activation of mTORC1. So, more research needs to be done to understand how the activation
of AMPK by metformin inhibits pathways such as mTOR and PIP3/AKT, and protects the renal cells
from cell damage induced by high glucose levels.
Studies have also shown that metformin prevents ER stress induced by chemicals such as
tunicamycin and thapsigargin and other non-chemical inducers such as TGF-β, ANG II, aldosterone
and high glucose (Lee et al., 2013; Theriault et al., 2011). Interestingly, majority of the evidence
suggest that this reduction in ER stress is due to activation of AMPK by metformin (Hou et al., 2010;
Kim et al., 2015; Lee et al., 2012). This raises a question that how AMPK activation by metformin
changes the expression of other UPR markers. It is still unclear as to when the cells divert from UPR
and undergo ER stress as the three pathways in UPR have their own temporal dynamics and functions.
Hence, concluding on metformin’s effects on UPR specifically may be difficult as all the pathways are
highly intertwined with each other. However, if metformin can reduce the vicious UPR response in
renal cells that are growing in an abnormal physiological milieu, then it would prevent the cells from
marching towards ER stress and promote cell survival.
As mentioned earlier, EMT culminates in tubulointerstitial fibrosis during the onset of DN.
Studies have shown that metformin possess anti-fibrotic properties as it decreases the induction of
EMT induced by cytokines and growth factors such as TGF-β by activating AMPK (Cufi et al., 2010;
Lee et al., 2013; Lu et al., 2015). Metformin could also reduce EMT by reducing renal lipotoxicity as
studies suggest that lipid accumulation occurs in early stages of DN before the onset of EMT (Xu et al.,
2014).
During DN, mTORC1 is activated in renal cells and this leads to inhibition of autophagy, a
defense mechanism within cells. Since metformin inhibits mTORC1 and activates AMPK in renal
cells, it could also be used as means to induce autophagy in the kidney and to restore the cell repair
machinery. Thus, metformin therapy would help the kidney to remove damaged cells and protect the
healthy cells from further cell injury in case of DN and CKD.
Lipid accumulation in renal cells is another factor that contributes to renal injury in diabetes
patients (Jun et al., 2009). Metformin is effective in reducing fat content in kidneys by reducing the
expression of SREBP-1, FAS and acetyl-CoA carboxylase, all of which involved in lipid accumulation
(Wang et al., 2006).
In summary, metformin, apart from its use as an anti-diabetic drug, possess nephroprotective
properties owing to its pleiotropic effects (as shown in Table 2) on multiple signaling pathways (Figure
9), which warrants additional studies to be conducted to employ it as a nephroprotectant to treat
patients with DN and non-diabetic kidney diseases.
Figure 2: Effect of metformin on AMPK and mTOR pathway in diabetic nephropathy. Hyperglycemia
leads to uncontrolled cell proliferation and hypertrophy of kidney cells due to high levels of mTOR
activity and inactivation of AMPK. Metformin treatment stimulates AMPK phosphorylation and
subsequently reduces the expression of mTOR. This augments autophagy and prevents the renal cells
from undergoing fibrosis, hypertrophy, EMT and apoptosis. Upward and downward arrows indicate
stimulation and inhibition of the parameter respectively by metformin. PI3K: Phosphatidylinositol-3-
kinase, AKT: Protein kinase B, mTOR: Mammalian target of Rapamycin, AMPK: Adenosine
monophosphate- activated protein kinase.
Figure 3: Effect of metformin on endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress in diabetic nephropathy. ER stress
is induced under hyperglycemic conditions through accumulation of proteins, ROS generation and
activation of mTOR in the renal cells. Activation of AMPK by metformin protects the renal cells from
ER stress via inhibition of sustained unfolded protein response, ROS generation and mTOR mediated
signaling. GRP78: Upward and downward arrows indicate stimulation and inhibition of the parameter
respectively by metformin. Glucose-regulated protein 78, CHOP: CAAT/enhancer-binding protein
homologous protein, p-eIf2α: phosphorylated Eukaryotic Initiation Factor-2, ROS: reactive oxygen
species.
Figure 9: Summary of the effects of metformin on various signaling pathways in diabetic nephropathy.
Metformin protects renal cells under hyperglycemic and hypoxic conditions through mechanisms
dependent and independent of phosphorylation of AMPK. Upward and downward arrows indicate
stimulation and inhibition of the parameter respectively by metformin.