Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
bite, indicating a particularly severe cold cold season. The association with cold and
exposure. A biopsy of one of the lesions spontaneous resolution are well known to
showed normal epidermis and dermis, but them. Since inspection of two major pedi¬
necrosis, fibrosis, and lymphocytic infil¬ atrie texts 5,e revealed no mention of this
tration of the subcutaneous fat. He, too, rather common pediatrie problem, and
compared this condition to neonatal subcu¬ since most studies of it have been in the
taneous fat necrosis, and emphasized the dermatological literature, the following
similarity of the microscopic pictures. cases are presented.
In 1966, two further studies appeared in
the dermatological literature, one of an Report of Cases
8-month-old girl and a 5-month-old boy,3 Case 1.—A 7-month-old Negro boy was seen
and the other of a 6-month-old boy.4 In in the New York Hospital Dermatology Clinic in
these patients, the presenting lesion was February 1967, with the presenting complaint of
a "growth" in the left cheek. Two days after
reproduced on the volar aspect of the having been out for several hours on a par¬
Received for publication Oct 23, 1967. ticularly cold and windy day, he had developed
From the departments of dermatology and pedi- erythema and swelling of the left cheek, which
atrics, Cornell University Medical College, New was firm and nontender (Fig 1). Physical exami¬
York.
Reprint requests to 1300 York Ave, New York nation revealed a chubby child with well-
10021 (Dr. Lowe). developed fat pads in both cheeks, and a 1 X 1
of the patient and three infant controls sensitivity the basis of the delayed na¬
on
was less liquid than that of the adult ture of the reaction and failure to dem¬
control, while at 75 C the physical state of onstrate passive transfer, cryoproteins or
At all events, in defense of the case report and conclusions based on meager data,
"In science one must choose between being absolutely safe but entirely sterile on the one
hand and on the other having the courage to think beyond one's facts. The conclusions of
the latter method may require revision; it will certainly entail some mistakes and is bound
to expose one to the ridicule or suspicion by those who would rather be safe than con¬
structive. Nevertheless most of the great discoveries of science have been made with the
inductive rather than the deductive method."—Source unknown.