Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/
info/about/policies/terms.jsp
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content
in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship.
For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Journal of Philosophy, Inc. is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Journal of Philosophy.
http://www.jstor.org
This content downloaded from 129.96.252.188 on Fri, 04 Dec 2015 14:50:09 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
SCIENCE AND OBJECTIVITY 245
This content downloaded from 129.96.252.188 on Fri, 04 Dec 2015 14:50:09 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
246 THE JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY
This content downloaded from 129.96.252.188 on Fri, 04 Dec 2015 14:50:09 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
SCIENCE AND OBJECTIVITY 247
This content downloaded from 129.96.252.188 on Fri, 04 Dec 2015 14:50:09 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
248 THE JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY
This content downloaded from 129.96.252.188 on Fri, 04 Dec 2015 14:50:09 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
SCIENCE AND OBJECTIVITY 249
This content downloaded from 129.96.252.188 on Fri, 04 Dec 2015 14:50:09 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
250 THE JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY
This content downloaded from 129.96.252.188 on Fri, 04 Dec 2015 14:50:09 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
SCIENCE AND OBJECTIVITY 251
This content downloaded from 129.96.252.188 on Fri, 04 Dec 2015 14:50:09 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
252 THE JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY
This content downloaded from 129.96.252.188 on Fri, 04 Dec 2015 14:50:09 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
SCIENCE AND OBJECTIVITY 253
This content downloaded from 129.96.252.188 on Fri, 04 Dec 2015 14:50:09 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
254 THE JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY
This content downloaded from 129.96.252.188 on Fri, 04 Dec 2015 14:50:09 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
SCIENCE AND OBJECTIVITY 255
say that TX2is empty. Thus, in this and other cases of perception of
midsized objects, our pre-analytic intuition accepts the observation
as reliable information and the analysis of independence concurs
with a ruling of high independence indicating a relatively objec-
tive test.
The worst case, that is, the least independent account, results if
TX1is identical to TX2,which in turn is the whole of {T}, that is, if
{Tx } = {TX2} = {T}. This means that all and only the theory-of-x
and the particular property putatively observed is used to account
for the observational reception of the information about a particular
x having this property. The second link in the equation, the 'only'
part of 'all and only', is unlikely to occur in actual science. It is rare
that no disinterested auxiliary theory, usually a theory of optics or
perception, is used in accounting for the evidence. But as a case that
comes close to the bottom of the scale of independence, consider a
historical account of alleged observation of caloric fluids. More pre-
cisely, we should describe this as a claim of the acquisition of infor-
mation about caloric.
Use as an observing apparatus some solid object such as a block of
metal. The particles of caloric which, according to the caloric theory,
are present in the object will be distributed throughout the object as
a result of the repulsive force between particles. The caloric particles
will surround the particles of the object.'4 As more caloric is added
to the object, the ether-cloaked object particles experience a repul-
sive force between themselves as the ether particles push for distance
between each other. The more caloric, the greater repulsive force
and the object responds by expanding.
In this way, the expanding block displays information about calo-
ric fluid, namely, that caloric is flowing into the block. But the infor-
mational link between the appearance of a block of metal and prop-
erties of caloric is provided almost entirely by the caloric theory
itself. In other words, the set {T} of accounting theories is consti-
tuted almost entirely of claims TX2drawn from ether theory. And any
property of ether, its characteristics of flow or its effects on material
particles, must be described in the theoretical account in order to
support the observational account. To adapt a Wittgensteinian anal-
ogy, we are not even buying another copy of the newspaper to check
its reliability; we are simply accepting the assuring words printed at
the top of each page, "all this is true."
The moral of the story is that, even though the ether theorist can
claim observational evidence for the ether theory, that evidence can
be discounted on the basis of its lacking independence. It is not
14 This piece of caloric lore is adapted from a description in G. Cantor and M.
Hodge, eds., Conceptions of Ether (New York: Cambridge, 1981), pp. 27/8.
This content downloaded from 129.96.252.188 on Fri, 04 Dec 2015 14:50:09 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
256 THE JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY
objective evidence. In this case, again, our intuition (that the ether
evidence is unreliable) parallels the analysis of independence of the
account.
The majority of evidential claims in science fall somewhere in
between the best and worst and are not immediately decidable with
respect to reliability. In these cases the independence of account is
useful as a measure of warrant for belief. To demonstrate this we can
resurrect the DNA molecule as imaged with an electron microscope
which was considered above. The image by the electron microscope
may reveal, for example, that the DNA is denatured (split). In this
case, TX1is that part of the theory of DNA which discusses the causes
and effects of the splitting of the molecule. TX2will not be empty,
since there must be an account of the composition of the molecule to
explain its differential absorption of stain and its properties of scat-
tering electrons. But TX2in this case appears to be disjoint from TJ1.
And, of course, TX2is not the only source of theoretical support for
the observation, since a great deal of electron scattering theory and
electromagnetic theory are invoked to trace the production of
the image.
This demonstrates that subdividing the theory of DNA into the
claims about shape of the molecule (TJ1) and claims about composi-
tion of the molecule (TX2)reveals a degree of independence in the
account of electron-microscopic observation of a DNA molecule.
The image on the screen of the microscope can therefore be re-
garded as objective evidence for the theory of DNA. This assessment,
though, is really only a first-order approximation. The fine structure
of independence in this account could be described through a char-
acterization of the varying degrees of independence as suggested in
the appendix.
V. CONCLUSION
The point of this discussion has been to suggest a characterization of
objectivity. It has been motivated by the claim that objectivity is what
makes science believable and is in part what is scientific about
science. An objective test, we assume, is one that is less likely to
reproduce theoretical artifacts and propagate hidden systematic
error. An objective test, that is, is a more reliable test than is one
administered by the testee. External review is valued for its trust-
worthiness. And objectivity in this sense can be evaluated in terms of
accessible features of a scientific report, namely, independence of an
account. There is no reference to external, inaccessible features such
as truth or facts of the matter, and, for this reason, independence, in
its relevance to objectivity, is a valuable and workable standard for
evaluating warrant for belief.
The relevant concept for this purpose is independence of an ac-
This content downloaded from 129.96.252.188 on Fri, 04 Dec 2015 14:50:09 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
SCIENCE AND OBJECTIVITY 257
Closeness of relation
between TX1 and T, 2 Depth of involvement of TX2 in {T,}
TX2 = O
most independent
This content downloaded from 129.96.252.188 on Fri, 04 Dec 2015 14:50:09 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions