Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 9

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

Name of Employee: DENELYN F. PRODIGALIDAD Name of Rater: RUPERTO R. DE BORJA


Position: TEACHER I Position: PRINCIPAL IV
Review Period: JUNE 2015- MARCH 2016 Date of Review: MARCH 2016
Division: DepEd Cavite Province

Weight per ACTUAL RESULTS


MFO's KRA's OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING SCORE
KRA
Q E T
Daily Logs and plans were appropriately prepared
daily with appropriate instructional materials,
lessons were modified according to pupils' level and
with the utlization of technology, localization and
contextualization(Q). 5

Prepared lesson plans of DLL attained the desired learning competencies


1. TEACHING activities including
JUNE based on the budget of work (Q) 5
2015-
LEARNING appropriate adequate and
MARCH
10% 5 0.500
PROCESS (30) updated instructional
2016 Lesson Plans or DLL prepared were achieved by all
materials. 5
pupils with at least 75% proficiency (E ).
Approriate interventios were provided to improve
teaching and learning process (Q ). 5

The extent of implementation of the recommended


practices in improving teaching learning process was
monitored on regular basis(T ). 5

IM's and teaching strategies were utilzed on daily


basis in the course of the lesson (T). 5

Proper utilization of localized, contextualized material


were applied and appropriate innovation and
teaching strategies were implemented. (E). 5

Utilized appropriate IM's and


Teaching strategies
10% 5 0.500
Proper utilization of IM's and teaching strategies
Utilized appropriate IM's and were employed on daily basis in the context of the
Teaching strategies
10% learners. (T ).
5 5 0.500
Localized materials and modules were benchmark at
school level among 30% of the class at the particular 5
level (Q).

Effectiveness of IM's and teaching strategies was


regularly monitored and interpreted. ( E).
5

All the indicators were evident on daily basis(T).


5

All indicators were strictly done and were given


recognitions (Q ). 5
Monitored attendance,
diversity appreciation, safe, Documents pertaining to attendance, school
positive and motivating JUNE environment, cleanliness and orderliness and proper
environment, overall 2015-
physical atmosphere, MARCH
10% waste disposal were submitted promptly (E). 5 4.8 0.480
cleanliness and orderliness 2016
of classroom including
proper waste disposal. School and classroom management adhered positive
working environment (Q). 5

Effective practices on classroom management were


provided and followed (T). 4

Result analysis reports assessment was done


periodically. (T)
4

Documents pertaining to pupils' progress were


submitted on or before deadline (T)
5
JUNE
Monitored and evaluated
2.Pupils Outcomes 2015-
( 40%)
and maintained pupils' MARCH
20% Pupils’ progress were evaluated and analyzed with 4.5 0.900
progress evidences (Q) 5
2016

• Evidences showed that the teacher purposely plans


assessments and varies assessment choices to match
the different student needs, abilities, and learning
styles ( E) 4
Remediation classes were done regularly (T)
5

Remediation/Enrichment Program was properly


planned, conducted, based on the formative and 5
summative test.(Q)

Remediation / Enrichment program was conducted


Conducted remediation/ JUNE which are supported with properly planned
enrichment programs to 2015-
improve performance MARCH
10% remediation, formative/ summative test analysis, IM's 5 0.500
& activities and CAI (Q) 5
indicators 2016

Innovation, strategies and IM's used in the


intervention were appropriate to the level of pupils
and employed for pupils improvement. (E) 5

Completeness of pupils' records was regulary


checked and maintained to update pupils' 5
progress. (T)

All documents pertaining to pupils records were


regularly updated such as SF1,SF2,Form138, 5
F137, grading sheets,LIS online updating and
JUNE
Maintained updated pupils' 2015- alike.(T)
school records MARCH
10% 4.5 0.450
2016 Pupils records were submitted on or before the 4
set date for submission (T)

All pupils' records were updated and submitted


to guidance, LIS coordinator making no pending 4
case on online LIS updating (E) .
Teacher-parent conferences were conducted
every quarter and home visitations were done 4
3. COMMUNITY reguarly with pupils who need it (T)
INVOLVEMENT (20%

Information on school events, achievements,


and school policies were conducted properly to
parents and participated by the parents thus 5
achieving 75% participation in all activities in
JUNE school . (E)
Conducted teacher-parent 2015-
conference and home MARCH
10% 4.75 0.475
visitation 2016 Visited parents of students needing academic
monitoring/follow-up within the rating period
5

Rapport and cooperative working relationship


were estbalished with parents attaining zero 5
complaint in the school level (Q)..

5
Dynamics of community networking and information
dissemination were implemented and supported with
documents on the target date (T)

Communicated the school events/achievements


JUNE through community networks with minutes of 5
Uses community networks to 2015-
publicize school events and MARCH
5% the meeting or conferences ( Q) 4.75 0.238
achievements 2016

5
Shared information on school events/achievements to the
community ( E)
achievements 2016

4
Implemented/served project, event actively within the
target date. (T)

Initiation of projects/programs with 100% 5


support coming from the community. (Q)

Implementation of the said projects with full 5


documentation report. (E)
JUNE
Participated in community Accomplishments of set projects within the school
2015-
programs/ activities within MARCH
5% year. (T) 5 5 0.250
the school year 2016
Linked with sectors for involvement in community
work (Q) 5

Showed sensitivity to the needs of the community (E)


5

Plan for harmonious relationships was developed/


completed (Q). 4

Developed programs were implemented with best 5


possible use of resources (E).
Maintained harmonious JUNE
relationships with superiors, 2015- Activities for the maintenance of harmonious 4
pupils, local and public MARCH
2% relationships were done on time (T). 4.2 0.084
officials and co-teachers 2016
Completion report on the conduct of programs was 4
submitted for feedbacking (E).

Good practices for the maintenance of harmonious 4


relationships were benchmarked and adopted (Q).

Demonstration of proper decorum was observe all the 5


time (T).

Decorum was based on the Code of Professional 5


JUNE Ethics for Teachers. (Q)
2015-
Observed proper decorum
MARCH
2% 5 0.100
4. PROFESSIONAL 2016
ETHICS (5%)
JUNE
2015-
Observed proper decorum
MARCH
2% Performance of proper decorum in/out of the school 5 0.100
5
4. PROFESSIONAL 2016 was exemplified.(Q)
ETHICS (5%)
Influences of proper decorum were manifested and 5
imbibed by co-teachers. (Q)
Feedbacking was done to improve one's value.(E) 5

Intervention plan for the maintenance of discipline


using positive and non-violent discipline were 5
developed.(Q)

Maintenance of discipline was fully implemented as 5


Monitored the maintenance JUNE planned. (T)
of discipline between and 2015-
among teachers and MARCH
1% 5 0.050
learners 2016 Finished plan for the maintenance of discipline was 5
distributed before the start of the school year. ( E)

Standard monitoring tools were provided and 5


explained to internal stakeholders.(Q)

Cases on discipline were monitored regularly. (T) 5

Served as facilitator/working
committee/lecturer during
school/community
activities.

Served / member of the CIP


Team 2.5

Served as winning coach in JUNE


the division, region & 2015-
5. Plus Factor (5%) National level competition 5% 5.0 0.250
MARCH
2016
JUNE
2015- 5% 5.0 0.250
5. Plus Factor (5%) MARCH
2016

Proposed/ made an action


research that is needs-based
and for teachers'
development.

Allocates time for personal


and professional 2.5
development through
enrolling in higher degree
course

OVERALL RATING FOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS 63 4.777

Rated by: Conforme: Approved:

EDITHA J. JAVIER DENELYN F. PRODIGALIDAD RUPERTO R. DE BORJA


Master Teacher I Teacher I Principal IV
PART III: SUMMARY OF RATINGS FOR DISCUSSION

Numerical Adjectival
Final Performance Results
Rating Rating

Accomplishments of KRAs and Objectives 4.777 OUTSTANDING

Rater-Ratee Agreement

The signatures below confirm that the employee and his/her superior have agreed on content of this appraisal form and the performance rating.

Name of Employee: DENELYN F. PRODIGALIDAD NAME OF SUPERIOR: RUPERTO R. DE BORJA


Signature: SIGNATURE:
Date: DATE:

PART IV: DEVELOPMENTAL PLANS

Action Plan
Strengths Development Needs Timeline Sources Needed
(Recommended Developmental Intervention)

Teaching and Innovation and Utilization of localized and contextualized learning materials Year Round Seminar Workshop
Learning Process Localization of IMs Utilization of Powerpoint presentations and other ICT-aided
instructional materials

Rated by: Conforme: Approved:

EDITHA J. JAVIER DENELYN F. PRODIGALIDAD RUPERTO R. DE BORJA


Master Teacher I Teacher I Principal IV
Conforme:

DENELYN F. PRODIGALIDAD
Teacher I

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi