Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Positive when the cash that will be received over the next 12 months exceeds the cash that will be paid
out. Usually positive in a healthy firm.
Liquidity - Ability to convert to cash quickly without a significant loss in value
- Liquid firms are less likely to experience financial distress
- However, liquid assets earn a lower return
- Trade-off between liquid and illiquid assets
Cash Flow from Assets (CFFA) = Cash Flow to Bondholders + Cash Flow to Shareholders
CF to Creditors (B/S and I/S) = interest paid - net new borrowing
CF to Stockholders (B/S and I/S) = dividends paid - net new equity raised
Taxes
• Marginal vs. average tax rates
– Average – the tax bill / taxable income
– Marginal – the percentage paid on the next dollar earned
• Taxes on investment income
– Individual investors benefit from a tax credit on dividends paid by Canadian
corporations
• Effective tax rate on dividends in Ontario: 1.45((federal tax rate-
18.98%)+(provincial tax rate-7.40%))
– Individual investors also benefit from a tax reduction for capital gains, which are taxed
at 50% of the applicable marginal tax rate
Corporate taxes
- Interest received by corporations is fully taxed but dividends received by corporations are fully
exempted from taxes
- Capital gains received by corporations are taxed at 50% of the marginal tax rate
- Capital losses can be carried back 3 years to reduce taxes on capital gains. They can also be
carried forward indefinitely for the same purpose.
Scenario Analysis
• What happens to the NPV under different cash flow scenarios?
• At the very least look at:
– Best case – revenues are high and costs are low
– Worst case – revenues are low and costs are high
– Measure of the range of possible outcomes
• Then?
– If most of the plausible scenarios lead to positive NPVs, we become more confident
about the project’s outcome
– If most scenarios lead to negative results, the degree of forecasting risk is high and
serious investigation is needed
Sensitivity Analysis
• This is a subset of scenario analysis where we are looking at the effect of specific variables on
NPV
– We examine what happens to NPV when we vary one variable at a time
– Variables most commonly used in sensitivity analysis are unit sales and variable costs
(i.e. fuel for airline companies)
• The greater the volatility in NPV in relation to a specific variable, the larger the forecasting risk
associated with that variable and the more attention we want to pay to its estimation
Simulation Analysis
• Simulation is really just an expanded sensitivity and scenario analysis, usually with multiple
variables changing simultaneously
• Monte Carlo simulation can estimate thousands of possible outcomes based on conditional
probability distributions and constraints for each of the variables
• The output is a probability distribution for NPV with an estimate of the probability of obtaining a
positive net present value
• The simulation only works as well as the information that is entered and very bad decisions can
be made if care is not taken to analyze the interaction between variables
Making a Decision
• Beware of “Paralysis of Analysis”
• At some point you have to make a decision
– If the majority of your scenarios have positive NPVs, then you can feel reasonably
comfortable about accepting the project
– If you have a crucial variable that leads to a negative NPV with a small change in the
estimates, then you may want to forego the project
Break-Even Analysis
• Common tool for analyzing the relationship between sales volume and profitability
• Break-even analysis measures the minimum amount of sales required to break-even
• There are three common break-even measures
– Accounting break-even – sales volume where net income = 0
– Cash break-even – sales volume where operating cash flow = 0
– Financial break-even – sales volume where net present value = 0
• To apply the break-even analysis we need to know the following: sales price, variable costs, and
fixed costs
Accounting Break-Even
• The quantity that leads to a zero net income
– NI = (Sales – VC – FC – D)(1 – T) = 0
– QP – vQ – FC – D = 0
– Q(P – v) = FC + D
– Q = (FC + D) / (P – v)
• It is often used as an early stage screening number
• If a project cannot break-even on an accounting basis, then it is not going to be a worthwhile
project
• Accounting break-even gives managers an indication of how a project will impact accounting
profit
• We are more interested in cash flow than we are in accounting numbers
• As long as a firm has non-cash deductions, there will be a positive cash flow
• If a firm just breaks-even on an accounting basis, cash flow = depreciation, NPV < 0
Cash Break-Even
Financial Break-Even
Operating Leverage
Managerial Options
• Investment projects are not static and can be affected by many factors that change over the life
of the project
• Managers have opportunities that they can exploit if certain things happen in the future
• Different contingencies need to be reflected in the planning process
– Option to expand
– Option to abandon
– Option to wait
Capital Rationing
• Capital rationing occurs when a firm has profitable investment opportunities available but
cannot get the needed funds to undertake them
– Soft rationing – the limited resources are temporary, often self-imposed
– Hard rationing – capital will never be available for this project
• The profitability index is a useful tool when faced with soft rationing
Cost of Equity
• The cost of equity is the return required by equity investors given the risk of the cash flows from
the firm
• There are two major methods for determining the cost of equity
– Dividend growth model
– SML or CAPM
D1=D0(1+g)
Alternative Approach to Estimating Growth
• If the company has a stable ROE, a stable dividend policy and is not planning on raising new
external capital, then the following relationship can be used:
– g = Retention ratio x ROE
• XYZ Co has a ROE of 15% and their payout ratio is 35%. If management is not planning on raising
additional external capital, what is XYZ’s growth rate?
– g = (1-0.35) x 0.15 = 9.75%
Advantages and Disadvantages of Dividend Growth Model
• Advantage – easy to understand and use
• Disadvantages
– Only applicable to companies currently paying dividends
– Not applicable if dividends aren’t growing at a reasonably constant rate
– Extremely sensitive to the estimated growth rate – an increase in g of 1% increases the
cost of equity by 1%
– Does not explicitly consider risk
OR
Divisional and Project Costs of Capital
• Using the WACC as our discount rate is only appropriate for projects that have the same risk as
the firm’s current operations
• If we are looking at a project that is NOT the same risk as the firm, then we need to determine
the appropriate discount rate for that project
• Divisions often require separate discount rates because they have different levels of risk
• So how do we determine the cost of capital for the different divisions?
Pure play approach
Subjective approach
Subjective Approach
• Consider the project’s risk relative to the firm overall
• If the project is more risky than the firm, use a discount rate greater than the WACC
• If the project is less risky than the firm, use a discount rate less than the WACC
• You may still accept projects that you shouldn’t and reject projects you should accept, but your
error rate should be lower than not considering differential risk at all