Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 9

This article was downloaded by: [University of Nebraska, Lincoln]

On: 29 December 2014, At: 16:27


Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House,
37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK

European Journal of Sport Science


Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information:
http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tejs20

Physical requirements in Olympic sailing


a b c
J. Bojsen-Møller , B. Larsson & P. Aagaard
a
Department of Physical Performance, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway
b
Team Danmark, The Danish Elite Sports Association, Copenhagen, Denmark
c
Institute of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark,
Odense, Denmark
Published online: 18 Sep 2014.

Click for updates

To cite this article: J. Bojsen-Møller, B. Larsson & P. Aagaard (2014): Physical requirements in Olympic sailing, European
Journal of Sport Science, DOI: 10.1080/17461391.2014.955130

To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2014.955130

PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE

Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) contained
in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no
representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the
Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and
are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and
should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for
any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever
or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of
the Content.

This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic
reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any
form to anyone is expressly forbidden. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://
www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions
European Journal of Sport Science, 2014
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2014.955130

REVIEW ARTICLE

Physical requirements in Olympic sailing

J. BOJSEN-MØLLER1, B. LARSSON2, & P. AAGAARD3


1
Department of Physical Performance, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway, 2Team Danmark, The Danish
Elite Sports Association, Copenhagen, Denmark, 3Institute of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of
Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
Downloaded by [University of Nebraska, Lincoln] at 16:27 29 December 2014

Abstract
Physical fitness and muscular strength are important performance parameters in Olympic sailing although their relative
importance changes between classes. The Olympic format consists of eight yacht types combined into 10 so-called events
with total 15 sailors (male and female) in a complete national Olympic delegation. The yachts have different requirements
with respect to handling, and moreover, each sailor plays a specific role when sailing. Therefore physical demands remain
heterogeneous for Olympic sailors. Previous studies have mainly examined sailors where ‘hiking’ (the task of leaning over
the side of the yacht to increase righting moment) is the primary requirement. Other than the ability to sustain prolonged
quasi-isometric contractions, hiking seems to require significant maximal muscle strength especially in knee extensors, hip
flexors and abdominal and lower back muscles. Another group of studies has investigated boardsailing and provided
evidence to show that windsurfing requires very high aerobic and anaerobic capacity. Although data exist on other types of
sailors, the information is limited, and moreover the profile of the Olympic events has changed markedly over the last few
years to involve more agile, fast and spectacular yachts. The change of events in Olympic sailing has likely added to physical
requirements; however, data on sailors in the modern-type yachts are scarce. The present paper describes the recent
developments in Olympic sailing with respect to yacht types, and reviews the existing knowledge on physical requirements in
modern Olympic sailing. Finally, recommendations for future research in sailing are given.

Keywords: Yachting, hiking, endurance, strength, physical requirements

1. Introduction & Ricci, 1980; Niinimaa, Wright, Shephard, &


Clarke, 1977; Shephard, 1990, 1997), but not all
Olympic sailing is a complex sport that comprises
aspects of sail racing have been thoroughly examined.
numerous performance parameters such as the ability
to understand and foresee weather conditions, Most studies have evaluated so-called hiking per-
optimal equipment such as yacht and sails and formance where sailors extend their body outside the
technical and tactical understanding (Bojsen-Møller, boat to increase the righting moment (Blackburn,
Larsson, Magnusson, & Aagaard, 2007; Spurway, 1994; Cunningham & Hale, 2007; De Vito, Di
Legg, & Hale, 2007). In addition, physical fitness of Filippo, Felici, & Marchetti, 1993; Larsson et al.,
the sailor(s) contributes to overall performance, and 1996; Mackie, Sanders, & Legg, 1999; Putnam,
the importance of muscle strength, muscle endurance 1979). Although hiking ability is important in some
and aerobic and anaerobic capacity has continuously yacht types it is far from all sailors that perform hiking
increased in recent years. The physical requirements during sailing. In fact, the current Olympic format
have changed not only due to a more fierce level of consists of eight yacht classes, comprising a total of 15
international competition, but also in consequence of sailor positions/functions of which only 5 involve
changes in the Olympic sailing format. hiking. Since each of these 15 positions has specific
Our knowledge about the specific physical require- roles with distinct physical demands during racing, it
ments for Olympic sailing has improved over the follows that the existing knowledge on the position-
recent years (Aagaard et al., 1998; Larsson, Beyer, specific physical requirements in Olympic sailing
Bloend, Aagaard, & Kjaer 1996; Marchetti, Figura, remains limited.

Correspondence: J. Bojsen-Møller, Department of Physical Performance, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Sognsveien 220, 0860 Oslo,
Norway. E-mail: jens.bojsen.moller@nih.no

© 2014 European College of Sport Science


2 J. Bojsen-Møller et al.

Studies on the physiology of sailing are in general (2) Side hikers, who by support of hiking straps
limited by the difficulty to perform valid and con- and a special harness sit prone on the free
sistent on-water data recording. Measurements of board outside the boat (Star crew). It should
physiological responses to actual sail racing have not be noted that there will be no side hikers in
been reported; however, proxy data exist that are the coming Olympic Games, but data on this
based on race simulations conducted either on water group of sailors are nonetheless presented
or by using laboratory-based sailing dynamometers below.
(Blackburn, 1994; Cunningham & Hale, 2007; De (3) Trapezing sailors, who stand on the gunwale
Vito, Di Filippo, & Felici, 1996; De Vito, Di or side wings of the boat supported by a wire
Filippo, Rodio, Felici, & Madaffari, 1997, Larsson that is extended from the rigging (49’er,
et al., 1996; Mackie et al., 1999; Vogiatzis, De Vito, 49’erFX, Nacra 17, 470 crew).
Rodio, Madaffari, & Marchetti, 2002). While meas- (4) Board sailors, who sail on a full planing
urement obtained during sailing remains the most board where the rig and sail is fixed by a
optimal strategy to understand physical require- compliant link to the board, and as such free
ments for competitive sailing, an alternative experi- to move by the sailor (RS:X).
mental approach is to examine a number of elite
Downloaded by [University of Nebraska, Lincoln] at 16:27 29 December 2014

athletes with respect to more standardised measure‐ The profile of the Olympic events has changed
ments. A combination of these methods will likely markedly over the last decades to represent more
provide the most feasible approach to gather valid agile, fast, spectacular yachts, which reflects the
and relevant information. evolution of yacht design and sailing in general.
Therefore, it was the purpose of the present paper Consequently the physiological profile and type of
to review the available scientific data on physical sailors participating in Olympic sailing have also
characteristics of male and female Olympic sailing changed: The number of sailors in a full national
athletes engaged in the modern competition format. Olympic team has increased from 11 in 1969,
The review is based on existing publications, but also topping at 18 in the 2000–2008 games, while in
includes a unique data set that has been made 2012 it was reduced to 16, and in the 2016 games
available to the authors through the Danish Elite the number will be 15. The percentage of hikers has
Sports Association (Team Danmark), where inter- decreased from approximately 65% in 1968 to 33%
national elite sailors routinely have been tested under for the forthcoming Olympic Games. The percent-
highly controlled conditions for more than three age of side hikers has similarly decreased and will be
decades. zero in the 2016 games. Concurrently, the number
of trapeze sailors has increased to now represent
53% of all sailors in a full national Olympic delega-
2. Olympic sailing tion (Figure 1).
Not only the event format but also the Olympic
Current Olympic sailing consists of 10 separate racing format has been amended through recent
events (eight yacht classes), which are all handled years such that regattas now entail more races that
in a different manner, involving either a single- or a are of briefer duration but with higher frequency.
double-handed crew. Furthermore, all events require Moreover, shorter racecourses with more mark
specific anthropometrics, including distinct body roundings, rapid manoeuvres and higher intensity
weight characteristics, gender, muscular strength
and endurance, aerobic/anaerobic capacity and agil- Hikers Side hikers Trapeze Board
ity skills. Even within a single class, sailors may 70

experience different demands depending on their 60


Percentage of all sailors

specific position. Consequently, the assessment of 50


physical requirements in Olympic sailing turns out to
40
be a highly intricate task. To reduce complexity,
attempts have previously been made to classify 30

Olympic sailors (Bojsen-Møller & Bojsen-Møller, 20


1999), and along these principles, sailors in the 10
present paper are divided into four groups based on
0
their specific role during sail racing: 1968 1972 1976 1980 1984 1988 1992 1996 2000 2004 2008 2012 2016
Year
(1) Hikers, who sit on the deck and lean over the
Figure 1. Development in the categories of sailors in a full
side with their feet fixed under so-called national Olympic team from 1968 to present. In recent years,
hiking straps (Laser, Laser Radial, Finn, the percentage of trapezing sailors has increased, while the
470 helmsman). percentage of hikers and side hikers has decreased.
Physical requirements in Olympic sailing 3

have been implemented in many classes, and the seemed similar to observations in elite swimmers
most radical format has been tested in the 49’er class (Niinimaa et al., 1977; Plyley, Davis, & Shephard,
where so-called ‘theatre style racing’ comprises very 1985; Shephard, 1990). More recently, Aagaard
brief races (5–10 min), many laps and manoeuvres, et al. (1998) reported isokinetic strength profiles
short breaks in between races and up to eight races of elite sailors, and found very high eccentric
per day. knee extensor muscle strength and trunk extensor
In consequence of such changes in the rules and strength in Olympic sailors comparable to that of
format of Olympic sailing, the physical demands highly strength-trained elite athletes in explosive-
imposed on sailing athletes will be highly different in type sports. A later study (Bojsen-Møller et al.,
the 2016 Olympic Games in Rio compared to those 2007) supported these findings on extreme maximal
of previous Olympic Games. knee extensor strength in hikers (Figure 2A and B)
and extended these findings by also reporting
dynamic hamstring/quadriceps (H/Q) strength
3. Olympic sailing and physical requirements ratios. Strong hikers displayed relatively low H/Q
ratio, which was suggested to induce potential risk of
3.1. Muscle strength
knee joint overload or injury due to impaired
Downloaded by [University of Nebraska, Lincoln] at 16:27 29 December 2014

Only very few studies have reported strength data capacity for dynamic joint stabilisation (Aagaard
obtained from Olympic sailors. Early papers typically et al., 1997; Bojsen-Møller et al., 2007).
examined muscle strength in isometric handgrip, With respect to hiking performance, moderate to
and during static testing of the elbow flexors/exten- strong positive correlations have been observed
sors and knee extensors, anticipating that these between knee extensor strength and hiking perform-
muscle groups were particularly important for elite ance (Aagaard et al., 1998; Blackburn, 1994; Tan
sailors. In these studies sailors appeared to be et al., 2006), while positive correlations between
markedly stronger in knee extension and handgrip hiking performance and trunk flexor and especially
strength compared to other elite athletes such as trunk extensor strength have also been reported
rowers, while elbow flexor/extensor strength levels (Aagaard et al., 1998).

A Isokinetic muscle strength


Female elite sailors
350 Quad Oct 2002
Quad Barcelona-1992
300
Moment of force (Nm)

Hams Oct 2002


Hams Barcelona-1992
250
200
150
100
50
isom

eccentric concentric
0
–240 –30 30 240
Joint angular velocity (degree / sec)

B Isokinetic muscle strength


Male elite sailors
500 Quad Oct 2002
Quad Barcelona-1992
Moment of force (Nm)

Hams Oct 2002


400 Hams Barcelona-1992

300

200

100
isom

eccentric concentric
0
–240 –30 30 240
Joint angular velocity (degree / sec)

Figure 2. Maximal isokinetic muscle strength (±SEM) of the knee extensors (quadriceps, closed symbols) and knee flexors (hamstrings,
open symbols) in female national team sailors (A) and male national team (B), obtained in 2002 (triangles) and prior to 1992 Olympics
(squares). Note the extreme values recorded for maximal quadriceps strength in the 2002 tests, especially during slow eccentric contraction
(figure from Bojsen-Møller et al. 2007; reprinted with permission).
4 J. Bojsen-Møller et al.

‘Strength endurance’ or ‘muscular endurance’ 400 single physical tests on ∼120 sailing athletes
may be assessed in highly different ways, and examined during a 25-year time period. Parts of
typically repeated bouts of isometric or dynamic these data have been published previously (Bojsen-
muscle actions or sustained submaximal isometric Møller et al., 2007; Larsson et al., 1996) but
contractions have been applied. Olympic sailors a complete overview has not been performed pre-
(hikers) demonstrated high muscular endurance viously. The data corroborate those of previous
compared to other athletes as well as trained control investigations since side hikers have aerobic capacit-
subjects (Niinimaa et al., 1977; Plyley et al., 1985). ies around 50 ml kg−1 min−1, while trapeze sailors
When specific hiking endurance was assessed using a and hikers show somewhat higher capacities (55 ml
custom-built hiking ergometer, hikers were able to kg−1 min−1), and board sailors display even greater
sustain the required hiking position for +100% values (60 ml kg−1 min−1) (Figure 3A). Within these
longer time compared to a control group consisting data, an attempt to compare sailors in more classic
of highly trained individuals (non-sailors; Larsson yachts to those of modern dynamic ‘skiff’ type yachts
et al., 1996). Similar findings were reported by was made, but contrary to what might be expected
Vangelakoudi, Vogiatzis, and Geladas (2007) where no difference in aerobic capacity seemed apparent
elite sailors showed 50–100% longer time to failure (Figure 3B).
Downloaded by [University of Nebraska, Lincoln] at 16:27 29 December 2014

in both static and dynamic muscle endurance con-


traction tasks compared to club level sailors. Anaerobic capacity. Not many studies have examined
anaerobic capacity in elite sailors, but Vangelakoudi
et al. (2007) reported Wingate test data (30-s all-out
3.2. Aerobic and anaerobic capacity
bicycling), suggesting that sailors have a well-
Aerobic capacity of Olympic sailors has been developed capacity to develop high anaerobic power
reported with differing results both within and (mean and peak power of ∼8 and ∼11 W kg−1,
between yacht classes: Larsson et al. (1996) observed respectively) comparable to that of swimmers and
rather high V_ O2max values in a group of Olympic middle distance runners. Notably, the Wingate test
sailors preparing for the 1992 Olympic Games in outcome (maximal and mean power) was positively
Barcelona, especially in those athletes who were correlated with the performance ranking of the
required to hike when sailing (64 mlO2 kg−1 min−1 sailors examined. Larsson et al. (1996) reported
for male hikers, 59 mlO2 kg−1 min−1 for male non- that sailors are superior to otherwise well-trained
hikers and 50 mlO2 kg−1 min−1 for female hikers). control subjects in a 1-min all-out rope-pulling task
V_ O2max values of 62 mlO2 kg−1 min−1 were similarly for the upper extremity (mimicking sail pumping,
reported in national elite level Laser dinghy sailors which is a repetitive pulling task performed to
(Blackburn, 1994) along with values of 55 mlO2 kg−1 increase propulsion forces in the sail). Moreover,
min−1 in high-level Laser sailors (Cunningham & recent data suggest that anaerobic capacity is highly
Hale, 2007). Board sailors appeared to have the relevant in modern type sailing also, where especially
largest aerobic capacity with V_ O2max values up to elite 49’er crewmen reached peak power outputs of
65 mlO2 kg−1 min−1 (Castagna, Vaz Pardal, & 580 W (8 W kg−1) during maximal upper body
Brisswalter, 2007; Castagna, Brisswalter, Lacour, & pulling tasks (resembling spinnaker hoists), along
Vogiatzis, 2008; De Vito et al., 1997; Vogiatzis et al., with 10-s mean values of ∼500 W (7 W kg−1; Bay &
2002), whereas trapezing crews in the very dynamic Larsson, 2013).
type dinghies have demonstrated values between
57 mlO2 kg−1 min−1 and 64 mlO2 kg−1 min−1
3.3. On-water assessments
(Bojsen-Møller et al., 2007). In the opposite range
an average V_ O2max of 43 mlO2 kg−1 min−1 was No physiological data are available from actual sail
recorded in elite sailors which was significantly lower racing, but some studies have carried out physiolo-
than values obtained in athletes recruited from 10 gical testing during simulated on-water racing, or by
other sports disciplines (Tsopanakis, Kotsarellis, & using custom-built sailing simulators situated in the
Tsopanakis, 1986). These early data underscore that laboratory. With respect to force measurements,
physical preparations have not always been an Mackie et al. (1999) reported high average hiking
integrated element in elite sailing, and that at least strap forces during actual upwind Laser dinghy
a few decades ago it was in fact possible to perform sailing corresponding to ∼80% MVC, along with
at high level in sailing despite a limited aerobic mainsheet forces (upper extremity pulling) of about
capacity. 30% MVC. The force loads increased with increas-
The Danish Elite Sports Association (Team Dan- ing wind velocity, and were accompanied by large
mark) has tested and monitored elite sailors since force fluctuations in consequence of the yacht’s
1988 and these unique data were made available for movement in the waves and the sailors’ response to
the present review. The data are based on more than these movements. Seemingly low muscle activation
Physical requirements in Olympic sailing 5
A 70.0

60.0

VO2max (ml kg –1 min–1)


50.0

40.0

30.0

20.0

.
10.0

0.0
Hikers Side hikers Trapeze Board
B 70.0

VO2max (ml kg –1 min–1) 60.0

50.0

40.0
Downloaded by [University of Nebraska, Lincoln] at 16:27 29 December 2014

30.0

20.0
.

10.0

0.0
Classic Skiff

Figure 3. Aerobic capacity (V_ O2max ) evaluated in Danish Olympic sailors in the period 1989–2014. Data are means + SD. Open bars
represent female sailors and black bars represent male sailors. ‘Hikers’ comprise sailors of Laser, Laser Radial, Finn and Europe dinghies
and helmsmen in the 470, Flying Dutchman, Star, Soling, Yngling and Tornado yachts. ‘Side hikers’ are crew men in Star, Soling and
Yngling. ‘Trapeze’ are sailors in the 49’er, 49FX and crew in Flying Dutchman, 470 and Tornado. ‘Board’ are Lechner and RS:X. ‘Classic’
denotes the more classic dinghy/yacht designs such as Finn, Laser, Laser Radial, Europe, Flying Dutchman, Soling and Star, while ‘skiff’
denotes high-performance dinghies 49 and 49FX. Note that a large difference exists in the number of sailors in each category (hikers female
n = 24, male n = 37; side hikers, female n = 3, male n = 5; trapeze female n = 10, male n = 38; board female n = 3, male n = 9; classic female
n = 31, male n = 52, skiff female n = 6, male n = 28).

was observed by Vangelakoudi et al. (2007) where 30-min simulation protocol carried out in a dinghy
rectus femoris electromyographic (EMG) activity ergometer observed mean oxygen uptakes of 58% of
during hiking in a Laser simulator amounted to V_ O2max with heart rates of 150–160 beats min−1
∼45% of maxEMG (recorded in a static MVC corresponding to ∼84% of maxHR. The difference
contraction). In the same study, heart rates of 149 between these studies could be attributed to differ-
beats min−1 and a corresponding mean blood pres- ences in the simulation task with respect to how
sure of 129 mmHg were observed during a 20-min dynamic the hiking movements were performed.
hiking simulation performed with 3-min hiking Combined with previous reports of actual on-water
intervals separated by brief 5-s resting periods. heart rates of up to 145–168 beats min−1 during
Blackburn (1994) carried out hiking simulations upwind hiking in the Laser (Pudenz, Dierck, &
where comparable mean blood pressures were meas- Rieckert, 1981; Vogiatzis, Spurway, Wilson, & Bore-
ured (mean BP: 123 mmHg with systolic and ham, 1995), the data collectively support the notion
diastolic BP of 172 and 110 mmHg, respectively). that hiking in the Laser dinghy requires a more
Concurrent heart rates were 60% of maxHR while dynamic effort than what has previously been
V_ O2 during hiking (upwind sailing) corresponded to believed.
∼25% of V_ O2max , while serum lactate was below 3 In an on-water race simulation for boardsailing
mM after repeated hiking bouts. The high blood Vogiatzis et al. (2002) measured heart rates of 87%
pressure combined with the somewhat lower values and corresponding oxygen uptakes of 77% of
of HR and low oxygen uptake were ascribed to the V_ O2max over successive 4-min periods of sailing.
semi-static nature of muscle work performed during Comparable or greater values for metabolic response
hiking that is in general isometric but also involves have been observed in boardsailing by De Vito et al.
dynamic actions, which enables the sailor to sustain (1996, 1997), and more recently, Castagna et al.
relatively high levels of effort over long time periods. (2007, 2008) reported oxygen uptake values of 65 ml
The early heart rate and oxygen uptake data reported kg−1 min−1, or above 80% of V_ O2max , with heart
by Blackburn (1994) are not strictly in line with rates above 90% of HRmax and serum lactate
those of Cunningham and Hale (2007) who in a exceeding 10 mmol l−1 in elite Olympic board sailors
6 J. Bojsen-Møller et al.
600
recorded during highly taxing conditions on water
[characterised by light-wind and downwind sailing 550

Peak power (W)


where immense sail pumping (i.e. manual repetitive 500
movements with the rig) contributes as a main factor
to propulsion]. Taken together, it seems that Olym- 450

pic boardsailing requires a high contribution of 400


aerobic and anaerobic metabolism, and may in
certain conditions and phases of the race be con- 350
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
sidered as physically demanding as e.g. bicycle Spinnaker hoists
racing or cross-country running (De Vito et al.,
1997; Vogiatzis et al., 2002). It should be noted, Figure 4. Peak power in repeated spinnaker pulls (mimicking
however, that some yacht classes allow free pumping spinnaker hoists/drops) during simulated high-intensity racing
performed in the laboratory. The study simulated three 5-min
in specific wind conditions, and although to the races separated by 5-min pauses. Eight elite 49’er crewmen
authors’ knowledge no physiological data exist on participated, and on average peak power was reduced by 26% by
these sailors, it is likely that very high values of V_ O2 the end of the repeated trials of spinnaker hoisting (Bay &
and HR may be anticipated under such conditions. Larsson, 2013).
Downloaded by [University of Nebraska, Lincoln] at 16:27 29 December 2014

3.4. Fatigue 4. Conclusions


In recent decades Olympic sailing was dominated by In conclusion, the format of Olympic sailing has
long races (1–2 hrs) where sailors upheld quasi-static changed such that more dynamic yachts have been
postures, which resulted in substantial metabolic introduced, and the racing format includes briefer
stress accumulation in isometrically contracting races with more frequent manoeuvres. The con-
muscles during long-term hiking. Previous studies sequence of these changes is that the number of
have observed that hikers demonstrate superior hikers has decreased while the side hikers are no
abilities to sustain isometric contractions compared longer part of the Olympic format. The number of
to non-hikers or controls (Larsson et al., 1996, board sailors has remained constant more or less
Vangelakoudi et al., 2007), but on-water measures since the introduction, while the number of sailors in
of muscular fatigue seem not to have been reported trapeze has increased substantially.
previously. A recent study that examined hiking Present literature suggests that modern Olympic
fatigue, performed on-water measurement of hiking sail racing imposes substantial demands on the
strap forces during upwind sailing with full hiking physical capabilities of the sailors. The demands for
(national level Europe dinghy sailors, n = 9). In this hikers and side hikers in general include very high
study, a 35% reduction in hiking strap forces was levels of knee extensor muscle strength and high
found after 10 min of sailing (Buchardt-Christian- muscle endurance capacity, accompanied by
sen, 2013). The reduced production of force likely medium to high aerobic capacity. The physical
represents development of (neuro)muscular fatigue, demands on the trapeze sailors are less well exam-
and underscores the importance of the ability to ined; however, in addition to great agility and
sustain prolonged muscular contraction in elite balance skills, the requirements seem to involve large
sailors involved in hiking. Although hiking remains aerobic and even anaerobic capacity especially for
an important factor in Olympic sailing, the changes the crewmen. Finally, board sailors seem to be
in yachts and regatta formats per se have introduced exposed to the greatest physical demands, where
more dynamic sailing modes that to a greater extent conditions in some instances may tax the aerobic
exploit both aerobic and anaerobic energy processes. and anaerobic metabolism at maximal levels which
A very recent study illustrated the development of means that boardsailing in intensity is comparable to
fatigue in international elite 49’er sailors by use of a endurance events like cycling, running or cross-
race simulation (on land) that mimicked the theatre- country skiing.
style racing format, which has been applied in this
class: a simulation of three consecutive 5-min races
5. Perspectives/recommendations
that each included six maximal ‘spinnaker pulls’
resulted in an acute 26% reduction in peak power Based on the above, it seems clear that additional
for this task (Figure 4). Towards the end of the studies are warranted to increase current knowledge
simulation race that also contained trapezing, trim- about the physical requirements in Olympic sailing.
ming, tacking tasks, etc., the sailors approached Previously, accurate measurement has been limited
maximal heart rate values, underscoring that aerobic by difficulties pertaining to the harsh sailing environ-
and anaerobic metabolism is highly involved in this ment. However, recent advances in technology such
type of sailing (Bay & Larsson, 2013). as video, GPS, telemetrics and portable physiological
Physical requirements in Olympic sailing 7

measurement devices enable much more detailed performance in elite sailors. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and
Science in Sports, 9, 65–72.
study of sailing compared to what was previously
Aagaard, P., Simonsen, E. B., Beyer, N., Larsson, B., Magnus-
possible. With present technology it is likely that son, P., & Kjaer, M. (1997). Isokinetic muscle strength and
additional steps can be taken in sailing science. capacity for muscular knee joint stabilization in elite sailors.
More specifically, recommendations for future International Journal of Sports Medicine, 18, 521–525. doi:10.
investigation follows the recent developments in 1055/s-2007-972675
Bay, J., & Larsson, B. (2013). Bay testen. En fysiologisk performance
sailing as described above. For hikers and board
test for 49’er gaster [A physiological performance test for 49’er
sailors quite a few reports have been published and crewmen] (Unpublished thesis). Copenhagen: Team Danmark
knowledge on the requirements for fitness and and Department of Nutrition, Exercise and Sports Sciences,
muscle strength in these groups is quite well University of Copenhagen/Team Danmark.
described. But since the fraction of trapeze sailors Blackburn, M. (1994). Physiological responses to 90 min of
simulated dinghy sailing. Journal of Sports Science, 12, 383–
in Olympic sailing has increased markedly, it seems
390. doi:10.1080/02640419408732185
that future research should focus on the physical Bojsen-Møller, F., & Bojsen-Møller, J. (1999). Biomechanics of
requirements in the modern, more dynamic type of sailing. In G. Sjøgaard & J. Bangsbo (Eds.), Book chapter in
sailing. Not only requirements with respect to mus- Sailing and Science – In an interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 77–
cular strength and/or aerobic fitness in trapeze sailors 93). Copenhagen: Institute of Exercise and Sport Sciences,
Downloaded by [University of Nebraska, Lincoln] at 16:27 29 December 2014

University of Copenhagen.
should be examined, but the focus should also be on
Bojsen-Møller, J., Larsson, B., Magnusson, S. P., & Aagaard, P.
agility, precision and balance abilities in general, and (2007). Yacht type and crew-specific differences in anthropo-
combined into situations where the aerobic system is metric, aerobic capacity, and muscle strength parameters
highly taxed. Moreover handling of the yachts is key among international Olympic class sailors. Journal of Sports
to performance on short intensive courses, and thus Sciences, 25, 1117–1128. doi:10.1080/02640410701287115
Buchardt-Christiansen R. (2013). Arbejdskravsanalyse af Europe-
detailed analysis of optimal/economic movement
jollesejlads [Physiological requirements in Europe dinghy sail-
patterns in specific manoeuvres should be investi- ing] (Unpublished thesis). Copenhagen: Institute of Nutrition,
gated. A single previous study examined temporal Exercise and Sport Sciences, University of Copenhagen.
patterns of physical activity in different Olympic Castagna O., Brisswalter, J., Lacour J.-R., & Vogiatzis, I.
classes during sailing (Legg, Mackie, & Smith, (2008). Physiological demands of different sailing techniques
of the new Olympic windsurfing class. European Journal of
1999). That study mainly focused on hikers, but
Applied Physiology, 104, 1061–1067. doi:10.1007/s00421-008-
similar assessments are much needed for trapezing 0863-y
sailors and board sailors. Castagna, O., Vaz Pardal, C., & Brisswalter, J. (2007). The
Finally, the overall increase in the physical assessment of energy demand in the new Olympic windsurf
demands of Olympic sailing and the change towards board: Neilpryde RS:X®. European Journal of Applied Physiology,
100, 247–252. doi:10.1007/s00421-007-0403-1
more dynamic actions in sailing also introduce an
Cunningham, P., & Hale, T. (2007) Physiological responses of
increasingly important aspect of fatigue, which in elite Laser sailors to 30 minutes of simulated upwind sailing.
turn requires development of strategies for optimal Journal of Sport Sciences, 25, 1109–1116. doi:10.1080/02640410
restitution between consecutive races on one day, 601165668
between race days and between regattas within the De Vito, G., Di Filippo, L., Felici, F., & Marchetti, M. (1993).
Hiking mechanics in Laser athletes. Medical Science Research,
season. Knowledge on optimal muscular restitution
21, 859–860.
derived from other sports with similar repetitive and De Vito, G., Di Filippo, L., & Felici, F. (1996). Assessment of
high-intensity formats (e.g. sprint cross-country ski- energetic cost in Laser and Mistral sailors. International Journal
ing) could prove useful for athletes and coaches in of Sport Cardiology, 5, 55–59.
Olympic sailing. De Vito, G., Di Filippo, L., Rodio, A., Felici, F., & Madaffari, A.
(1997). Is the Olympic boardsailor an endurance athlete?
International Journal of Sports Medicine, 18, 281–284. doi:10.
Acknowledgements 1055/s-2007-972634
Larsson, B., Beyer, N., Bay, P., Blønd, L., Aagaard, P., & Kjær,
The authors wish to thank the Danish Elite Sports M. (1996). Exercise performance in elite male and female
Association (Team Danmark) for making test data on sailors. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 17, 504–508.
elite sailors available. Moreover, Jonathan Bay and doi:10.1055/s-2007-972886
Rie Buchardt- Christiansen are thanked for making Legg, S., Mackie, H., & Smith, P. (1999). Temporal patterns of
data from their MSc theses on elite sailing available. physical activity in Olympic dinghy racing. Journal of Sports
Medicine and Physical Fitness, 39, 315–320.
Both theses were conducted at the Department of Mackie, H., Sanders, R., & Legg, S. (1999). The physical demands
Nutrition, Exercise and Sports, University of Copen- of Olympic yacht racing. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport,
hagen, under the supervision of Associate Professor 2, 375–388. doi:10.1016/S1440-2440(99)80010-3
Nikolai Nordsborg. Marchetti, M., Figura, F., & Ricci, B. (1980). Biomechanics of
two fundamental sailing postures. Journal of Sports Medicine and
Physical Fitness, 20, 325–332.
References Niinimaa, V., Wright, G., Shephard, R. J., & Clarke, J. (1977).
Aagaard, P., Beyer, N., Simonsen, E. B., Larsson, B., Magnusson, Characteristics of the successful dinghy sailor. Journal of Sports
S. P., & Kjaer, M. (1998). Isokinetic muscle strength and hiking Medicine and Physical Fitness, 17, 83–96.
8 J. Bojsen-Møller et al.

Plyley, M. J., Davis, G. M., & Shephard, R. J. (1985) Body profile performance in Laser sailors. European Journal of Applied
of Olympic class sailors. Physician and Sportsmedicine, 13, Physiology, 98, 169–176. doi:10.1007/s00421-006-0260-3
152–167. Tsopanakis, C., Kotsarellis, D., & Tsopanakis, A. D. (1986).
Pudenz, V., Dierck, T. H., & Rieckert, H. (1981). Heart rate Lipoprotein and lipid profiles of elite athletes in Olympic
frequency as a reflection of the length of the boat race course – sports. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 7, 316–321.
An experimental study of load imposed during Laser sailing. doi:10.1055/s-2008-1025783
Deutsche Zeitschrift für Sportmedizin, 32, 192–195. Vangelakoudi, A., Vogiatzis, I., & Geladas, N. (2007). Anaerobic
Putnam, C. A. (1979). A mathematical model of hiking positions capacity, isometric endurance, and Laser sailing performance.
in a sailing dinghy. Medicine and Science in Sports, 11, 288–292. Journal of Sports Sciences, 25, 1095–1100. doi:10.1080/02640
Shephard, R. J. (1990). The biology and medicine of sailing. 410601165288
Sports Medicine, 9(2), 86–99. doi:10.2165/00007256-1990090 Vogiatzis, I., De Vito, G., Rodio, A., Madaffari, A., & Marchetti,
20-00003 M. (2002). The physiological demands of sail pumping in
Shephard, R. J. (1997). Biology and medicine of sailing. An Olympic level windsurfers. European Journal of Applied Physi-
update. Sports Medicine, 23, 350–356. doi:10.2165/00007256- ology, 86, 450–454. doi:10.1007/s00421-001-0569-x
199723060-00002 Vogiatzis, I., Spurway, N. C., Wilson, J., & Boreham, C. J.
Spurway, N., Legg, S., & Hale, T. (2007). Sailing physiology. (1995). Assessment of aerobic and anaerobic demands of
Journal of Sports Sciences, 25, 1073–1075. doi:10.1080/02640 dinghy sailing at different wind velocities. Journal of Sports
410601165171 Medicine and Physical Fitness, 35, 103–107.
Tan, B., Aziz, A. R., Spurway, N. C., Toh, C., Mackie, H., Xie,
W., … Teh, K. C. (2006). Indicators of maximal hiking
Downloaded by [University of Nebraska, Lincoln] at 16:27 29 December 2014

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi