Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 2

Brandeis Journal of Cervantes Studies

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Dear Assessor,
The model for assessment below is intended to aid the assessment process and not limit it. You
are perfectly free to add additional comments if these do not fit into one of the boxes. The aim is
to provide useful comments and helpful direction to the author if the article is deemed to be
publishable but in need of revision, or to provide an explanation if it is to be rejected.

Once you have carried out your assessment, please return it to the Editor-in-Chief, Professor
James Mandrell, at:

mandrell@brandeis.edu

Instructions: you are asked to fill in the boxes below, with a tick where appropriate. If you are
unsure of the options available, you may leave a box blank, but please indicate at the end your
reasons for doing so, in the final box, which is for your overall comments. Please note that your
comments and recommendations, suitably anonymised, will be passed on, to the author.

TITLE OF THE ARTICLE SUBMITTED


Los dos desenlaces del Quijote

FULL NAME OF THE ASSESSOR PLUS INSTITUTION


Jessica Maldonado, Brandeis University

DATE OF RECEIPT OF THE MANUSCRIPT


11/14/18

REVIEW OF THE MANUSCRIPT


STRUCTURE AND STYLE: YES NO
Is the title adequate (clear, concise and informative)? YES
Do the abstracts and keywords reflect the content of the manuscript? N/A
Is the structure of the manuscript coherent; does it follow a logical sequence? YES
Is the style appropriate (clear, concise, and relevant)? YES
Is the manuscript well written and of a sufficient standard for HRJ? YES
Are the illustrations, graphs and diagrams (if present) of sufficient quality and relevance? YES
BASIC PREMISES, METHODOLOGY, RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: YES NO
Is the theme, thesis or general problem of the piece identified immediately and clearly? YES
Are the objectives clearly expressed? YES
Is there a clear relation between the development of the discussion and the objectives set
N/A
out in the abstract?
Are the data, sources and other matter referred to sufficient in relation to the conclusions? YES
Could some parts of the manuscript be omitted without affecting the structure and central
NO
aim of the article?
Are the bibliographical references sufficient, appropriate and up to date? YES
Do you think that the contents of the manuscript will be of interest to a reader of Hispanic
YES
Research Journal?

HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE ORIGINALITY AND SIGNIFICANCE OF THE MANUSCRIPT?
ORIGINALITY:
Very high High Medium Low
X
SIGNIFICANCE:
Very high High Medium Low
X

GLOBAL EVALUATION OF THE QUALITY OF THE PIECE OF WORK


Excellent Good Moderate Poor
X

RECOMMENDATION (PLEASE TICK ONE):


Accept its publication with no changes. X
Accept its publication, once the author(s) has carried out the minor corrections suggested,
with no need for further review.
For a definitive acceptance, substantial corrections are necessary and a new assessment will
be required.
Reject for failing to meet the journal’s standards.

YES NO
If necessary I am prepared to review a new version of the manuscript X

COMMENTS AND OBSERVATIONS TO AID THE AUTHOR IN HIS/HER REVISIONS


If you believe that this article should be returned to the author for revision and rewriting, please indicate the
changes and corrections required (the box will expand to take your comments):

DATE OF ASSESSMENT
11/14/18

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi