Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 14

Rodriguésia 66(4): 947-960.

2015
http://rodriguesia.jbrj.gov.br
DOI: 10.1590/2175-7860201566415

The flora of Malaysia projects

L.G. Saw1,2 & R.C.K. Chung1

Abstract
Malaysia has an estimated 15,000 species of vascular plants. Located in the Malesian region, its affinity is
Sundaic, having common elements with Sumatra, Java and Palawan. The two halves of Malaysia, Peninsular
Malaysia extending from mainland Asia and East Malaysian states of Sabah and Sarawak on the island of
Borneo have their own distinct floristic components. Peninsular Malaysia has about 8,200 species of vascular
plants and Sabah and Sarawak have an estimated 12,000 species. The flora of Sabah and Sarawak is generally
richer than that of Peninsular Malaysia. Due to historical reasons, the flora of Malaysia project is planned
in a phased approach. The Tree Flora of Sabah and Sarawak project, initiated in 1991, represents the first
systematic modern attempt to document some of the important plant families of these two states. It would
take at least another ten years to complete this project. It is estimated that the Flora of Peninsular Malaysia
project, initiated in 2005, will take at least 20 years to complete. To achieve these ambitions, there must be
continual support in skilled manpower and fund allocations.
Key words: Flora, Malaysia, botanical revisions.
Resumo
A Malásia tem um número estimado de 15.000 espécies de plantas vasculares. Localizada na região da Malesia, possui
afinidade com a região conhecida como Sundaica, dividindo elementos em comum com a Sumatra, Java e Palawan.
A Malásia é constituída por duas partes, sendo que a Malásia peninsular se estende a partir da Ásia continental,
enquanto os estados malaios orientais de Sabah e Sarawak, localizados na ilha de Bornéu, têm componentes florísticos
particulares e distintos. A Malásia peninsular tem cerca de 8.200 espécies de plantas vasculares e Sabah e Sarawak
têm um número estimado de 12.000 espécies. A flora de Sabah e Sarawak é geralmente mais rica do que a península
da Malásia. Devido a razões históricas, o projeto flora da Malásia preve uma abordagem em fases distintas. O Projeto
Flora Arbórea de Sabah e Sarawak, iniciado em 1991, representa a primeira tentativa moderna e sistemática para
documentar algumas das famílias de plantas importantes destes dois estados. Estima-se que sejam necessários de pelo
menos mais 10 anos para concluir este projeto. Enquanto isso o Projeto Flora da Maláisa peninsular, iniciado em
2005, vai demorar pelo menos 20 anos para ser concluído. Para concretizar estes planos, deve haver apoio contínuo
para treinar e manter mão de obra qualificada e obtenção de financiamento.
Palavras-chave: Biodiversidade, ficologia, lista de plantas e fungos do Brasil.

Introduction halves of Malaysia pose interesting challenges


towards documenting the Flora of Malaysia.
Malaysia is located just north of the equator,
Peninsular Malaysia, part of the Malay Peninsula
straddling between 0°51’N and 7°25’N with a
(here includes Singapore and Peninsular Thailand)
total landmass of 329,847 square kilometres. The
contains the floristic elements of the Sunda Self
country is separated by the South China Sea into and also of the mainland Asiatic species from
two regions of similar size; Peninsular Malaysia seasonal climates (Wong 1998). Borneo, with its
connected to mainland Asia on the western half greater isolation from Malay Peninsula, has a flora
and the states of Sabah and Sarawak on the island of Sundaic element; however it has local floristic
of Borneo on the east. It has a warm equatorial influences. Therefore these two regions result from
climate with little seasonality, hot and humid quite different botanical past histories. A very brief
throughout the year (Fig. 1). The two geographical historical perspective is provided here, highlighting

1
Forest Research Institute Malaysia, 52109 Kepong, Selangor, Malaysia.
2
Author for correspondence: sawlg@frim.gov.my
948 Saw, L.G. & Chung, R.C.K.

Figure 1 – Map of Malaysia.

only the major works that are significance to the Its botanical history dates back to the first British
flora of these two regions. A more detailed account settlement in the early 1800’s in Penang, when the
of the historical works relating to the flora of both island was important for the spice trade. One of the
Borneo and Malay Peninsula can be obtained from most important collectors during this period include
the introductory volumes of Flora Malesiana (de N. Wallich whose collection, organized in a catalogue
Wit 1949, van Steenis-Kruseman 1950, van Steenis, (Wallich’s catalogue), included contributions from
1955). Wong (1987, 1995a) and Soepadmo (1999) G. Porter, W. Jack and G. Finlayson. Numbering
also provided reviews with additional updates from about 8,000 species, Wallich’s catalogue became
de Wit, van Steenis and van Steenis-Kruseman of the basis of many plant names for Penang and
the botanical collection and documentation of the Singapore in Malaya (British colonial boundaries of
flora of both Peninsular Malaysia and Borneo. We present day Peninsular Malaysia and Singapore), and
present here an updated paper in 2005 describing India (van Steenis-Kruseman 1950; or see <http://
the modern floristic projects we have implemented www.biodiversitylibrary.org/bibliography/40744#/
in Malaysia (see Saw & Chung 2007). summary>). W. Griffith, Wallich’s predecessor,
collected large numbers of specimens particularly
Methods from Malacca and also form the basis of botanical
This paper reviewed botanical collections, work in Malaya. Many collectors followed included
research, administration and history based on L. Wray Jr., Father Scortechini, H. Kunstler (often
literature, experience for the flora of Malaysia. labelled as King’s Collector), A.C. Maingay,
Acronym of herbaria mentioned in the paper follows C. Curtis, C.B. Kloss, R. Derry, T. Oxley, J.S.
Index Herbariorum (Thiers 2015 <http://sciweb. Goodenough, I.H. Burkill, Mohamad Haniff, N.
Cantley, F.W. Foxworthy, etc.). A full list of these
nybg.org/science2/IndexHerbariorum.asp>).
collectors has been presented by Burkill (1927)
with some details of their background while their
Results and Discussion collection itineraries can be obtained from van
Botanical History of Peninsular Malaysia Steenis-Kruseman (1950).
Peninsular Malaysia, with a more direct former H.N. Ridley’s arrival to Malaya is a very
British Colonial rule had a longer and more sustained significant moment for Malayan botany. Between
period of botanical exploration and enumeration. 1888 and 1900, he was appointed as Director of

Rodriguésia 66(4): 947-960. 2015


The flora of Malaysia projects 949

Gardens and Forests, Straits Settlements and in war many of the specimens were badly damaged
1901-1912, Director of the Gardens, Singapore. when looters plundered the herbarium. With the
Ridley was a man of great ability who contributed internment of the British officers, V.L. Bain, a
most significantly towards the botany of Peninsular Eurasian being exempted from detention was
Malaysia. In his career, he described over 4,200 appointed acting State Forest Officer of Selangor.
plant species. He amassed a huge collection He was able to reappoint several local staff
amounting to about 50,000 numbers, of which the members at Kepong. Aziz Budin went on to restore
main set is at Kew with duplicates in Singapore the damaged collection and attempted to replace
and other herbaria (van Steenis-Kruseman 1950). some of the lost specimens either by obtaining
No other collector has amassed collections at that duplicates from other herbaria or by making new
rate for for Malaya ever since. Subsequent directors collections.
and curators of the herbarium at Singapore Botanic After the war, J. Wyatt-Smith took charged of
Gardens continued to build upon the foundation set the herbarium and the collection gained momentum.
up by Ridley. Of particular importance were the With the formation of the Federation of Malaya in
contributions from I.H. Burkill, M.R Henderson, 1957 and subsequently the Federation of Malaysia
E.H.J. Corner, R.E. Holttum and C.X. Furtado. in 1963, the transition towards Malaysianisation
All of them contributed in the exploration, carried came into being. K.M. Kochummen who joined
out collections and publications, giving us a better FRI as Assistant Botanist in 1953 subsequently took
understanding of the flora of Peninsular Malaysia. charge of the herbarium in 1960. In his career, he
At the turn of the twentieth century, A.M. collected over 5,000 specimens; Kochummen was
Burn-Murdoch set up a forest herbarium in Kuala an important contributor towards many tree family
Lumpur, with the aim of producing an account revisions for both the Tree Flora of Malaya and
of the commercially important tree species of Tree Flora of Sabah and Sarawak. In 1964, F.S.P.
Malaya (Wong 1987). The specimens were Ng was recruited as Forest Botanist. By 1965, the
collected as reference specimens and duplicates collection at FRI numbered over 74,000 specimens
were submitted to H.N. Ridley for identification. (Wong 1987). In 1965, T.C. Whitmore was engaged
The small herbarium was at the office of the under the Colombo Plan to lead the Tree Flora of
Conservator of Forests, Strait Settlements and Malaya project (Whitmore 1972). In the years
Federated Malay States. His successor, G.E.S. following, Whitmore conducted large collecting
Cubitt continued with the collection although at expeditions into many parts of Peninsular Malaysia,
a slower rate. In 1916, the Wray Herbarium of in particular places not collected previously. The
the Agriculture Department was transferred to Tree Flora project completed its last volume with
the Forest Department in Kuala Lumpur (Cubitt the publication of Volume 4 in 1989 (Ng 1989).
1919). In 1918 Cubitt secured the services of F.W. By then the herbarium has accumulated about
Foxworthy, as the first Forest Research Officer of 130,000 specimens. In 1980, K.M. Wong joined
the Federated Malay States and Straits Settlements. Kochummen managing the FRI collection. L.G.
Under Foxworthy the herbarium grew quickly. Saw joined the institute in 1982 as Hill Forest
By the end of 1920, the herbarium contained over Silviculturist, later in 1985 joined the herbarium to
6000 numbers (Wong 1987). With the decision to study under Kochummen as he was soon to retire.
form a Forest Research Institute (FRI), an area In 1985, the Forest Research Institute Malaysia
of about 324 hectares was acquired at Kepong in (FRIM) was formed as a statutory body from FRI
1926 and the main office building was constructed and in the years following; the mandate of FRIM
in 1929 with the herbarium moving into the east was to expand beyond the forestry related flora
wing of the building. C.F. Symington joined FRI research it traditionally worked on to now include
in 1929 and began to assist the running of the the study of the entire flora of Malaysia.
herbarium. He contributed a large collection to In this much summarised collections survey
the Kepong herbarium focusing on the important we had to leave out many collectors which would
timber family Dipterocarpaceae for which he was feature in a wider review. Later botanists to join the
preparing a foresters’ manual. By the time second much expanded role of FRIM included Farah Ghani
World War broke out in Malaya with J.G. Watson (deceased), Idris Mohd. Said (since left), L.S.L.
having succeeded Foxworthy, the herbarium had Chua, R.C.K. Chung, Y.Y. Sam, E. Soepadmo and
about 43,000 specimens. Unfortunately, during the Ruth Kiew. Since the initiation of the Tree Flora of

Rodriguésia 66(4): 947-960. 2015


950 Saw, L.G. & Chung, R.C.K.
Sabah and Sarawak and later the Flora of Peninsular foundation for the Flora of the Malay Peninsula,
Malaysia projects, the herbarium at the Forest Ridley upon his retirement completed the Flora of
Research Institute Malaysia has seen a tremendous Malay Peninsula and published them in 5 volumes
increase in its botanical staff and capabilities. between 1922 and 1925 (Ridley 1922-1925) for the
  angiosperms and a separate final fern instalment
Bibliography of the Flora of Peninsular in 1926 (Ridley 1926).
Malaysia Following Ridley’s publication of the Flora
In the following account, we have restricted of Malay Peninsula, botanical work continued
the discussion to the main floristic publications in more detail and from different perspectives.
that pertain to the flora of the Malay Peninsula. Burkill (1935), succeeding Ridley, subsequently
Other incidental accounts of local checklists produced two volumes of A Dictionary of the
and revisions of genera can be obtained from Economic Products of the Malay Peninsula.
the bibliography found in the general chapter of Other important publications from Singapore
Flora Malesiana Volume 5 (van Steenis 1955) included Corner’s (1940) Wayside Trees of
and Turner (1997). The Flora of British India was Malaya, Henderson’s (1959, 1954) Malayan Wild
the first major account covering all the families Flowers. By the 1950s, a revised Flora of Malaya
of Malay Peninsula. The scope of the volumes was initiated as knowledge of the Malayan flora
was to include plants within the British territories improved with more explorations and collections.
of India, together with those of Kashmir and A number of publications followed, mainly
Western Tibet, and Malaya (Hooker 1872-1897 Zingiberaceae (Holttum 1950), Marantaceae
in 7 volumes) as part of the British colony. Plants (Holttum 1951), bamboos (Holttum 1958), orchids
from Borneo however, were not included in the (Holttum 1964) and ferns (Holttum 1968). The
revisions. Although the Flora of India included volume on grasses was published by Gilliland
treatment of the Flora of the Malay Peninsula, it (1971). Following the retirement of Holttum from
became apparent that it was not warranted from a active research due to his old age, the revised Flora
phytogeographic perspective and the manner of of Malaya was more or less discontinued. Piggott
treatment produced from limited data available at (1988) produced a popular photographic account
the time had produced an unsatisfactory revision for ferns. The orchid flora was again subjected to
(de Wit 1949). As a result, King (1889), working another revision by Seidenfaden & Wood (1992).
from the Calcutta Herbarium, initiated the series Turner (1997) collated a checklist of Peninsular
Materials for a Flora of the Malayan Peninsula. Malaysian flora based on literature. More recently,
The revisions, written by various authors, were Clarke (2001) published the Nepenthes of Sumatra
originally published as separate papers in the and Peninsular Malaysia and Kiew (2005) revised
Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal. King and the Begonias of Peninsular Malaysia in richly
Gamble subsequently compiled these instalments illustrated volumes.
into 4 volumes. King died after completion of At the Forest Research Institute, Kepong,
Volume 4 and the work of editorship was passed interest was towards tree species and identification
on to J.S. Gamble who continued the series to manuals for foresters for the more important timber
instalment 26 which were, together with the tree families and other minor forest products.
last instalment published in 1936 (Ng & Jacobs Burn-Murdoch (1911, 1912) initiated the first
1983) compiled into Vol. 5. Nevertheless, these publications of such foresters’ manual with the
volumes covered only the dicotyledonous families publication of the Trees and Timbers of the Malay
and even so, the Urticales  viz. Cannabinaceae, Peninsula. The Malayan Forest Records series
Moraceae, Ulmaceae, Urticaceae and most of the was started and Foxworthy published a number of
Euphorbiaceae never appeared in print (Ng & volumes on commercial timbers and minor forest
Jacobs 1983). Ridley (1907) published separately products (Foxworthy 1921, 1922, 1932).   In 1934,
in Singapore, in three parts, the Materials for a C.F. Symington was appointed the first Forest
Flora of the Malayan Peninsula completing the Botanist and he envisaged producing a foresters’
monocotyledons. These publications were very tree manual comprising all the Malayan timber-
important ground-breaking works and they become producing families. However, it was obvious that
the basis for subsequent work on the Flora of the much research was still required and that a great
Malayan Peninsula. Using the “Materials” as deal of instability still existed in the botanical

Rodriguésia 66(4): 947-960. 2015


The flora of Malaysia projects 951

nomenclature. He then concentrated on the most bibliography of Bornean flora in the introductory
important timber family, the Dipterocarpaceae, chapters of the Tree Flora of Sabah and Sarawak
which he completed in 1940 and was published Volume 1 and we shall not elaborate further here.
as the Foresters’ Manual of Dipterocarps in 1943 Suffice to add since that review, the Tree Flora of
in his absence (Symington 1943). Symington Sabah and Sarawak has published eight volumes
had since left Malaya just before the Japanese (Soepadmo & Wong 1995; Soepadmo et al.1996;
occupation of Malaya during the Second World Soepadmo & Saw 2000; Soepadmo et al. 2002,
War (Symington 1974). 2004, 2007, 2011, 2014). The Plants of Kinabalu
After the War, John Wyatt-Smith served project led by Beaman published five volumes
as Forest Botanist. Wyatt-Smith also saw the (Parris et al. 1992; Wood et al. 1993; Beaman &
importance of Symington’s work and the need to Beaman 1998; Beaman  et al. 2001; Beaman &
document similar information on timber trees of Anderson 2004). Modern identification manuals,
other families. However, it became evident that the amounting to floristic enumerations, of the rattans
botanical knowledge of the many non-Dipterocarp of Sabah and Sarawak ( Dransfield 1984, 1992), and
trees was inadequate for a similar treatment. the bamboos of Sabah ( Dransfield 1992) have been
In the interim, Wyatt-Smith (1952) produced a published. More charismatic groups such as orchids
booklet listing the more common timber species and  Nepenthes continue to attract interest with
found in Malaya. K.M. Kochummen subsequently publication of checklist of the Orchids of Borneo
revised this “Pocket Check List” three times (Wood & Cribb 1994), Slipper Orchids of Borneo
to include new information. The Pocket Check (Cribb 1997) and the Orchids of Borneo (Beaman
List has now become an important identification et al. 2001), and Nepenthes of Borneo (Clarke
reference for students and foresters for the common 1997). Richly illustrated Etlingera (Zingiberaceae)
Peninsular Malaysian timber species. The book also of Borneo (Poulsen 2006) and Rhododendron
standardized vernacular names for timber species. (Ericaceae) of Sabah (Argent et al. 2007) were also
Wyatt-Smith also produced a series of other more recently published.
taxonomic publications on some of the important
timber families such as Burseraceae (Wyatt-Smith The Flora of Malaysia - What Do We
1953a), Leguminosae (Wyatt-Smith 1953b), Know?
Myristicaceae (Wyatt-Smith 1953c), Sapotaceae Currently there is no comprehensive and
(Wyatt-Smith 1954a), Lauraceae (Wyatt-Smith up-to-date checklist for the flora of Malaysia.
1954b) and Sapindaceae (Wyatt-Smith 1954c), and A number of checklists exist as a result of the
the genus Calophyllum (Guttiferae, Henderson & different botanical history of the two main regions
Wyatt-Smith 1956). of Malaysia. For Peninsular Malaysia, the now
The Tree Flora of Malaya project under outdated work of Ridley (1922-1926) provided the
T.C. Whitmore as editor published two volumes first complete enumeration of the vascular plants
(Whitmore 1972, 1973) followed by another two of the Malay Peninsula; the angiosperms were
volumes with Ng (1978, 1989) as editor. The published in the five volumes between 1922 and
final four volumes covered over 2,800 species of 1925. Subsequently, Ridley published a separate
trees found in Malaya. Interests in non-timber but checklist of the ferns (Ridley 1926). Turner’s
commercially important groups resulted in the (1997) publication of “A Catalogue of the Vascular
production of Dransfield’s (1979) A manual of the Plants of Malaya” serves as the most recent
rattans of the Malay Peninsula and K.M. Wong’s checklist for Peninsular Malaysia based on an
(1995b) The bamboos of Peninsular Malaysia. existing literature survey. In this catalogue Turner
  enumerated 8,198 species (Tab. 1). Parris & Latiff
Botanical History of Sabah and (1997) published a further update on the ferns and
Sarawak (and Borneo) fern allies with some additions and nomenclatural
Sabah and Sarawak lacked the collection changes to the group (Tab. 2). In this checklist,
intensity of Malaya in the early years. However, ferns and fern allies of Sabah and Sarawak were
recent years saw both herbaria at the Forest included to provide the first complete checklist of
Research Centres of Sandakan and Kuching the group for Malaysia.
steadily increasing their collections. Wong (1995a) For Sabah and Sarawak, no checklist exists
has amply summarised the collection history and but two important compilations were made for

Rodriguésia 66(4): 947-960. 2015


952 Saw, L.G. & Chung, R.C.K.

Table 1 – Summary of the checklist of the flora of Peninsular Malaysia comparing Ridley’s (1922-1925, 1926)
enumeration and Turner’s (1997) catalogue.
Enumeration Groups Families Genera Species
Ferns 16 86 417
Gymnosperms 3 5 23
Ridley (1922-1925, 1926) 
Dicots 132 1,048 5,009
Monocots 31 354 1,734
  Total 182 1,493 7,183
Ferns & fern allies 34 133 632
Gymnosperms 4 8 27
Turner (1997) 
Dicots 165 1,092 5,529
Monocots 45 418 2,010
  Total 248 1,651 8,198

Borneo (Merrill 1921; Masamune 1942, 1945). Borneo as a whole Merrill (1921) estimated about
Masamune’s compilations provided a more 9,000 species, Masamune (1942, 1945) enumerated
critical checklist and in that enumeration, 8,164 about 8,200 species and more recently Wong
species of Bornean vascular plants were listed (1995a) estimated a flora of between Merrill’s
(Tab. 3). Other and more current accounts for the 9,000 and 15,000 species. Kiew (1984) stressed the
flora of Borneo were mostly foresters’ manuals urgency for projects addressing the yet not studied
and checklists often on selected groups in the and little understood Bornean flora. At present
region or states of Brunei, Kalimantan, Sabah the Tree Flora of Sabah and Sarawak is the most
and Sarawak (e.g. Anderson 1980; Argent et al. important modern taxonomic project for Borneo.
1997; Ashton 1964, 1968, 1988;   Browne 1955; Since its inception in 1991, eight volumes have
Burgess 1966; Cockburn 1976, 1980; Hasan & been published and provide an indication of the
Ashton 1964; Keith 1947; Kessler & Sidiyasa diversity of the Bornean flora. Table 4 provides a
1994; Newman et al. 1996; Primack 1983; comparison of the tree flora of Sabah and Sarawak
Smythies 1965; Whitmore et al. 1990a, 1990b, with the tree flora of Malaya comparing families
1990c; Wood & Agama 1956; Wood & Meijer and their enumeration.
1964). The other checklists and revisions have On average, the tree flora of Sabah and
been reviewed in the previous section. The launch Sarawak contain about 38.5% more species than the
of the Tree Flora of Sabah and Sarawak in 1991 tree flora of Malaya. If this proportion is maintained
was very significant and for the first time, used for the rest of the tree flora, considering that the
a modern systematic approach to enumerate the tree flora of Malaya counts with 2,830 species
trees species (Soepadmo & Wong 1995). Apart (Ng et al. 1990), it is estimated that the tree flora
from these enumerations, the other sources of of Sabah and Sarawak will contain about 4,000
information on the Flora of Malaysia are from the species. Based upon this estimation also, with
Flora Malesiana Series I & II for seed plants and about 8,300 species of vascular plants in Peninsular
ferns and other scattered publications. Malaysia, it is estimated that the flora of Sabah
Based upon the information above, the flora and Sarawak will contain about 11,500 species.
of Peninsular Malaysia now stands over 8,300 In Table 4, there are 889 species common to both
species with recent updates from Turner (1997) Sabah and Sarawak, and Peninsular Malaysia (i.e.,
(e.g., Turner 2000; Latiff & Turner 2001a, 2001b, 55.1% overlap with Peninsular Malaysia). Based
2001c, 2001d, 2002a, 2002b, 2003; Kamarudin & upon this overlap and using the estimated ratios,
Turner 2004). This is probably an accurate estimate. the total tree flora of Malaysia is estimated to be
For Sabah and Sarawak it is more difficult to arrive around 5,200 species and the total flora of vascular
to an accurate figure with most estimates being for plants of Malaysia around 15,200 species.

Rodriguésia 66(4): 947-960. 2015


The flora of Malaysia projects 953

also as there is a general tendency in many revisions


Table 2 – Ferns and fern allies checklist of Parris & to maintain the two regions as separate. We have
Latiff (1997). compiled a review of published revisions against
Region Species Total the families such as those included in the Flora
Malay Peninsula 647 Malesiana series, Tree Flora of Malaya, the revised
Sabah 750 Flora of Malaya, Tree Flora of Sabah and Sarawak,
Sarawak 615 and other journal articles or series. In the analysis,
out of the 250 families occurring in Peninsular
Total 1,165*
Malaysia, 207 families (83%) have revisions. For
* Species distribution overlap between the regions; as a result the total is smaller. 
Sabah and Sarawak, the coverage is much lower with
164 families out of 253 (64%) having revisions. In
recent years, world checklists are being generated
Herbaria, Collections and Specimens and these are being made available on the internet,
Specimens are essential for the documentation for example, the checklists available from Royal
of the Flora of Malaysia. Today, the collection at the Botanic Gardens, Kew (<http://www.kew.org/
herbarium of the Forest Research Institute Malaysia wcb/>). Such checklists provide a useful preliminary
(KEP) comprises about 400,000 specimens. The starting point for flora accounts, especially for
other large herbarium holdings include the Forest Borneo where existing list by Masamune (1942,
Research Centre at Sandakan (SAN) with 300,000 1945) have long become obsolete.
specimens and the Forest Research Centre at  
Kuching (SAR) with about 300,000 specimens Towards a Flora of Malaysia
(Tab. 5). Other important Malaysian collections In the last two decades, Malaysia has been
are found at the herbaria at University of Malaya very fortunate in terms of the resources available
(KLU) and Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia to document its floristic diversity. The Tree Flora
(UKMB). The herbarium at the Singapore Botanic of Malaya published its final volume in 1989 (Ng
Gardens (SING) is particularly important for the 1989), but it was clear that the botanical work
Peninsular Malaysian flora. Many type specimens of documenting the flora of Malaysia needed to
for plants described from Peninsular Malaysia continue. It was an obvious decision to extend the
are found amongst its 750,000 specimens (Tab. well tested formula of the Tree Flora of Malaya
5). Other important collections for the Malaysian and to extend it to Sabah and Sarawak. L.G.
flora include Brunei Forest Department (BRUN), Saw, the first author of this paper, was asked to
Herbarium Bogoriense (BO), the Forest Herbarium prepare proposals for funding towards a Tree
(BKF), Bangkok, Thailand, National Herbarium of Flora of Sabah and Sarawak project. The project
Netherlands, Leiden (L), Royal Botanic Gardens, was launched in 1991 with five years funding
Kew (K), Royal Botanic Garden, Edinburgh (E), from the Malaysian Government, the Overseas
UK, Arnold Arboretum (A), Harvard University, Development Administration (ODA) of the United
USA, and Central National Herbarium (CAL), Kingdom and the International Tropical Timber
Calcutta, India. For Sabah and Sarawak, O. Organisation (ITTO). It was originally estimated
Beccari’s collection in the Herbarium Beccarianum that the project would run for ten years, cover about
(FI-B), Florence, Italy is particularly important. 3,000 species (Soepadmo 1995) and be published
  in eight volumes. Having already completed eight
State of Knowledge for a Flora of volumes of the tree flora (Soepadmo & Saw 2000;
Malaysia Soepadmo & Wong 1995; Soepadmo et al. 1996,
Among the key resources for speeding up 2002, 2004, 2007, 2011, 2014) and with a current
the documentation of a flora of Malaysia is the estimate of about 4,000 species of trees, we now
availability of recent revisions that provide the estimate the Tree Flora of Sabah and Sarawak will
foundation for flora writing. The vascular flora of need another ten years to complete the remaining
Malaysia will include 250 families in Peninsular estimated 2,000 species at a revision rate of about
Malaysia and 253 families in Sabah and Sarawak. 200 species per year using present resources.
In working towards the flora of Malaysia, we have In realising the flora of Malaysia, a pragmatic
continued to separate the two regions, simply out approach is to review our existing commitment
of convenience from the historical perspective, but towards the Tree Flora of Sabah and Sarawak

Rodriguésia 66(4): 947-960. 2015


954 Saw, L.G. & Chung, R.C.K.

Table 3 – The flora of Borneo based on Masamune’s checklist (Masamune 1942).


Checklists Groups Families Genera Species
Masamune (1945) Ferns & fern allies   118 963
Masamune (1942) Gymnosperms 5 7 34
  Dicots 133 996 4,997
  Monocots 29 307 2,170
  Total 167 1,428 8,164

Table 4 – Revisions of families of the Tree Flora of Sabah and Sarawak compared to the Tree Flora of Malaya. The
figures for Tree Flora of Sabah and Sarawak were extracted from volumes 1-8 including 2 single-species families
not found in the Tree Flora of Malaya; the figures for the Tree Flora of Malaya were extracted from volumes 1-4
with updates from Turner (1997).
TFSS Tree Flora of Sabah & Sarawak Tree Flora of Malaya Species common
Volumes Families Genera Species Families Genera Species to both regions

1 31 99 312 31 91 227 152


2 23 75 247 21 63 186 116
3 4 29 358 4 27 246 139
4 6 21 292 6 21 202 106
5 4 25 361 4 27 225 132
6 4 18 189 4 18 117 82
7 3 32 311 3 28 275 111
8 3 32 165 3 31 135 51
Total 78 331 2,235 76 306 1613 889

Table 5 – Important herbarium holdings for Malaysia and Singapore.


Country Herbaria Specimens
Malaysia Forest Research Institute Malaysia 400,000
  Forest Research Centre, Sandakan, Sabah 300,000
  Forest Research Centre, Kuching, Sarawak 300,000
  University Malaya 65,000
  Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 72,000
Singapore Singapore Botanic Gardens 750,000

project and attempt to extend it into a full national is best completed in a phased approach. In this
flora project. The institutions currently engaged pragmatic approach, the flora of Malaysia can
in the Tree Flora of Sabah and Sarawak, i.e. the be tackled as two regional projects, revisions
Forest Research Institute Malaysia, and the Forest for Peninsular Malaysia and revisions for Sabah
Departments of Sabah and Sarawak are keen to and Sarawak. This is the way forward towards
complete the Tree Flora project and it is clear from plans to complete the Flora of Malaysia. In April
the information above that the Flora of Malaysia 2004, the Ministry of Natural Resources and

Rodriguésia 66(4): 947-960. 2015


The flora of Malaysia projects 955

Environment was formed. With the creation of the of Malaya, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia,
ministry, it became a national priority supported Universiti Malaysia Sarawak and Universiti
by government to document the biodiversity of Malaysia Sabah. At regional level we collaborate
the country. The work of documenting the flora with many herbaria including Singapore Botanic
of Malaysia quickly became a national need and Gardens, Herbarium Bogoriense and the Royal
no more an academic wish-list of botanists in Forest Herbarium, Bangkok. Internationally
Malaysia. Quickly identified was the need for a collaboration includes, the Royal Botanic Gardens
checklist of its entire flora as Peninsular Malaysia Kew, Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, the
already has a checklist; the immediate need was Natural History Museum, London, the National
for Sabah and Sarawak to have an updated list. Herbarium of the Netherlands, Leiden, and the
In 2005, an application to fund a Flora of Arnold Arboretum, Harvard University, USA.
Peninsular Malaysia project was made. It was These collaborating institutes are important as
thought that the time was right for such a project as they support our research by providing herbarium
the Tree Flora of Sabah and Sarawak had already specimen loans, sourcing of literature, and a wide
been running well for about 15 years and over that range of expert advice and support. At present we
period the flora of Peninsular Malaysia had been have over 25 collaborators actively contributing
relatively neglected. Furthermore, as explained to revisions of families.
earlier, a phased approach to realise the flora of To develop and build local expertise two
Malaysia seemed a viable option for Malaysia. essential elements must be in place; opportunities
Subsequently the Flora of Peninsular Malaysia to build careers in botanical sciences and
project received five years of funding at the end of availability of training regimes for those interested.
2005. The project has since published six volumes The Flora of Peninsular Malaysia project when
in two series - Ferns & Lycophytes (Parris et al. it was first envisage included these elements.
2010, 2013) and Seed Plants (Kiew et al. 2010, We are also very fortunate that, in the last few
2011, 2012, 2013). For Sabah and Sarawak, the years, the Forest Research Institute Malaysia has
next phase (after the completion of the Tree Flora committed to increase the number of botanists to
of Sabah and Sarawak project) will be to start the do floristic work. In the last ten years, FRIM has
Flora of Sabah and Sarawak project so that all recruited seven new botanists and taken on seven
vascular plants will have been covered. Funding contract researchers for the two projects. Together
opportunities will need to be sourced in the future. with existing staff, FRIM now has 16 botanists
  working on both projects. Training of these new
Collaborations, Contributors and and aspiring botanists became a very important
Rates of Revision element of both projects. We are confident that,
Flora projects are always collaborative if the current institutional and financial support
involving both local and foreign experts. The is maintained, both the Tree Flora of Sabah and
experiences from the Tree Flora of Malaya and Sarawak and the Flora of Peninsular Malaysia
Tree Flora of Sabah and Sarawak and the Flora projects will be successful and will produce
of Peninsular Malaysia projects have shown that not just the revisions that contribute towards a
contributions from experts are essential for their Flora of Malaysia but also ensure that Malaysia
success. Experts often produce revisions at a will maintain a pool of botanists trained in
much faster pace and can tackle groups that are understanding the its National flora.
systematically more difficult. At the same time, How many years will it take for the current
Malaysian botanists must be trained to become flora projects to complete? It is very important that
experts so that they will continue to work within in planning the delivery of a Flora of Malaysia,
the country. Such strategy must be used for a we have a realistic estimate of manpower
Flora of Malaysia. Currently, the Tree Flora of and financial cost. The Tree Flora of Malaya
Sabah and Sarawak and the Flora of Peninsular took 24 years to complete. Kiew (1984) made
Malaysia are using such a strategy. Collaborations some projections regarding the rate of revision
are at many different levels. At institutional level production by botanists in different types of floras
our traditional partners include local institutes (identification and information floras) in past
such as Forest Research Centre, Sandakan, flora projects. They ranged from 250 species per
Forest Research Centre, Kuching, University taxonomist per year to 20–30 per year. Taking the

Rodriguésia 66(4): 947-960. 2015


956 Saw, L.G. & Chung, R.C.K.
example of the late K.M. Kochummen, in his seven In our experience, training young botanists is
years tenure as a full-time experienced botanist, he a challenging task. Over the last twenty three years
managed to revise 54 species per year for the Tree for both the flora projects we have directly trained
Flora of Sabah and Sarawak (Tab. 6). twenty three individuals in the science of botanical
For the Flora of Peninsular Malaysia, Table revisions. We consider out of this number only seven
7 provides the different rates of revision against have enough experience to independently revise
the number of full-time staff working on the flora families. Another four still require guidance in their
revisions. The matrix estimates the number of years work. The remaining have since left the project to
needed to complete the flora of Peninsular Malaysia take up other careers not related to botany.
with the estimated flora of 8,300 species. Using  
the example of Kochummen, we estimated that Finances and Institutional Commitment
for a budding botanist, it would be very difficult to One of the constant challenges in any flora
maintain a revision of over 50 species per year. A more project is to ensure long-term commitment and
realistic figure of about 40 species may be feasible sustainability in funding for the continuity of
for a relatively grounded botanist. If our current project. Projects are financed in fixed time-frame
manpower strength is maintained with about 10 full- (e.g., 5 years for the Flora of Peninsular Malaysia),
time botanists working for the project, we envisage following which it is often difficult to obtain
that it will take just over twenty years to complete the extensions. The Tree Flora of Sabah and Sarawak
Flora of Peninsular Malaysia. This estimate ignores project has gone through a number of funding
the contributions from other collaborators. changes over the last 15 years; 1991-2006 - ODA,
For the Tree Flora of Sabah and Sarawak ITTO, Government of Malaysia (Intensification of
we have also worked out the rates using similar Research and Development Priority Areas (IRPA)
formulas (Tab. 8). The project with 5 full-time staff funding); 2006-present - research development funds
will take over twelve years to complete. from the Ninth and Tenth Malaysian Plans. Similarly,
we expect the Flora of Peninsular Malaysia to go
through various funding challenges as the project
develops.
Table 6 – Families revised by K.M. Kochummen (1992 In the future, we are not certain of how we
- March 1999) during his tenure with the Tree Flora of can continue but it is up to the project to develop
Sabah and Sarawak project, his average revision rate different ways to maintain funding continuity. We
was 54 species per year. are now working towards funding for the two flora
Families Genera Species projects as a consolidated project under the Eleventh
Anacardiaceae 17 92 Malaysian Plan. Whoever the funding comes from it
Burseraceae 8 59 is important such projects have strong institutional
commitment, failing which it would be almost
Celestraceae 10 44
impossible to secure continuity in finances and
Moraceae 5 173 manpower commitment.
Ochnaceae 5 7 It is essential that funding bodies see quality
Total 45 375 products arising from the project. There is a need to

Table 7 – Rate of revision based on about 8,300 species Table 8 –  Revision rates based on about 2,500 species
of vascular for the Flora of Peninsular Malaysia. of tree species for the Tree Flora of Sabah and Sarawak.
    Number of Full-time Staff     Number of Full-time Staff
    5 10 15 20     5 10 15 20
20 83 42 28 21 20 25 12.5 8.3 6.3
Revision 30 55 28 18 14 Revision 30 16.7 8.3 5.6 4.2
Rates/ Staff/ 40 42 21 14 10 Rates/ Staff/ 40 12.5 6.3 4.2 3.1
Year 50 33 17 11 8.3 Year 50 10 5 3.3 2.5
60 28 14 9.2 6.9 60 8.3 4.2 2.8 2.1
 
Rodriguésia 66(4): 947-960. 2015
The flora of Malaysia projects 957

be creative in selling the products from the project, Argent, G.; Lamb, A. & Phillipps, A. 2007. The
outside the standard flora volumes and more Rhododendron of Sabah Malaysian Borneo. Natural
innovative methods must be used to disseminate History Publications (Borneo), Malaysia. Kota
the results of the projects to a wider audience so Kinabalu, Sabah. 290p.
that they can be seen as pertinent and relevant to Ashton, P.S. 1964. Manual of dipterocarp trees of Brunei
State. Oxford University Press, London. 242p.
both national and scientific needs.
Ashton, P.S. 1968. A manual of the dipterocarp trees of
 
Brunei State and of Sarawak. Borneo Literature Bureau
Conclusion for Sarawak Forest Department, Kuching. 129p.
The Tree Flora of Sabah and Sarawak Ashton, P.S. 1988. Manual of the non-dipterocarp trees of
has produced eight volumes to date, FRIM is Sarawak. Vol. 2. Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka for Forest
currently making information from the project Department Sarawak, Kuching. 490p.
available on the internet thus disseminating the Beaman, J.H. & Beaman, R.S. 1998. The plants of
results of the project to the wider public. The Mount Kinabalu 3. Gymnosperm and Non-Orchid
Flora of Peninsular Malaysia is being implemented Monocotyledons. Natural History Publications
(Borneo) in association with Royal Botanic Gardens,
together with a conservation project of threatened
Kew. 220p.
plants of Peninsular Malaysia, thus extending the
Beaman, J.H.; Anderson, C. & Beaman, R.S. 2001. The
taxon information with distribution to be used plants of Mount Kinabalu 4. Dicotyledon Families
in conservation. Here too, the project has been Acanthaceae to Lythraceae. Natural History
productive and has now generated six volumes Publications (Borneo) in association with Royal
in two series. We are now in the process of Botanic Gardens, Kew. 570p.
including all revisions available on the web. This Beaman, J.H. & Anderson, C. 2004. The plants of Mount
will be launched in the near future using software Kinabalu 5. Dicotyledon Families Magnoliaceae to
BRAHMS (Botanical Research And Herbarium Winteraceae. Natural History Publications (Borneo) in
Management System) online software. Such association with Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. 609p.
achievements will certainly complement the global Beaman, J.H. & Beaman, R.S. 1998. The plants of
effort towards the World Flora Online project. Mount Kinabalu 3. Gymnosperm and Non-Orchid
Monocotyledons. Natural History Publications
 
(Borneo) in association with Royal Botanic Gardens,
Based upon the discussion above, the phased Kew. 220p.
approach towards a Flora of Malaysia the following Beaman, T.E.; Wood, J.J.; Beaman, R.S. & Beaman, J.H.
points are reiterated. 2001. Orchids of Borneo. Natural History Publications
l The inventory for a Flora of Malaysia (Borneo) in association with Royal Botanic Gardens,
can be done with resources in Malaysia and Kew. 584p.
collaboration with our traditional partners; Browne, F.G. 1955. Forest trees of Sarawak and Brunei.
l Based on current Tree Flora of Sabah Government Press, Sarawak. 369p.
and Sarawak and the Flora of Peninsular Malaysia Burgess, P.F. 1966. Timbers of Sabah.  Sabah Forest
projects, the Flora of Malaysia to continue with the Records No 6. Forest Department, Sabah. 511p.
geographical division of Peninsular Malaysia and Burkill, I.H. 1927. Botanical collectors, collections and
Sabah & Sarawak; collecting places in the Malay Peninsula. The Gardens’
l The project to be phased into the immediate
Bulletin, Straits Settlements 4: 113-202.
short-term needs (checklists) and revisions of the Burkill, I.H. 1935. A dictionary of the economic products
of the Malay Peninsula. Vols. 1 & 2. Governments of
two geographical floras; and
the Straits Settlements and Federated Malay States,
l Project must be seen as long-term as
London. Volume I (A-H) 1-1240p and Volume II (I-
it requires long-term institutional and financial Z) 1241-2444p.
commitments in order to be brought into completion. Burn-Murdoch, A.M. 1911. Trees and timbers of the Malay
  Peninsula, Part 1. F.M.S. Government Press, Kuala
References Lumpur. 14p + 13pl.
Anderson, J.A.R. 1980. A Checklist of the trees of Sarawak. Burn-Murdoch, A.M. 1912. Trees and timbers of the Malay
Forest Department, Sarawak. 364p. Peninsula, Part 2. F.M.S. Government Press, Kuala
Argent, G.; Campbell, E.J.F. & Wilkie, P. (eds.). Lumpur. 17p + 6pl.
1997. Manual of the larger and more important non- Clarke, C.C. 1997. Nepenthes of Borneo. Natural History
dipterocarp trees of Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. Publications, Kota Kinabalu and Science and
Vol. 1 & 2. Forest Research Institute, Samarinda. 685p. Technology Unit, Sabah. 209p.

Rodriguésia 66(4): 947-960. 2015


958 Saw, L.G. & Chung, R.C.K.
Clarke, C.C. 2001. Nepenthes of Sumatra and Peninsular Holttum, R.E. 1951. The Marantaceae of
Malaysia. Natural History Publications (Borneo), Malaya. The Gardens› Bulletin, Singapore 13: 254-
Malaysia, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah. 329p. 296.
Cockburn, P.F. 1976. Trees of Sabah. Sabah Forest Holttum, R.E. 1958. The bamboos of the Malay
Records No 10. Vol. 1. Forest Department Sabah, Peninsula. The Gardens’ Bulletin Singapore 16: 1-135.
Sandakan. 261p. Holttum, R.E. 1964. A revised flora of Malaya. Orchids of
Cockburn, P.F. 1980. Trees of Sabah. Sabah Forest Malaya. Vol. 1. Botanic Gardens, Singapore. 759p.
Records No 10. Vol. 2. Forest Department Sabah, Holttum, R.E. 1968. A revised flora of Malaya. Ferns of
Sandakan. 124p. Malaya. Vol. 2. Botanic Gardens, Singapore. 653p.
Corner, E.J.H. 1940. Wayside Trees of Malaya. 2 vols. Hooker, J.D. 1872-1897. The Flora of British India. Vol.
United Selangor Press, Kuala Lumpur. VII+772p 1-7. L. Reeve & Co., London. 1: 740, 2: 791, 3: 712,
269fig+228phot. 4: 780, 5: 910, 6: 792, 7: 842.
Cribb, P.J. 1997. Slipper orchids of Borneo. Natural History Kamarudin, M.S. & Turner, I.M. 2004. Quarterly notes: new
Publications, Kota Kinabalu. 118p. taxa and records of Malaysian vascular plants. Folia
Cubitt, G.E.S. 1919. Report on forest administration malaysiana 5: 65-68.
for the year 1918. Federated Malay States. F.M.S. Keith, H.G. 1947. The timbers of North Borneo.  North
Government Press. Kuala Lumpur. 15p. Borneo Forest Records No 3. Published by permission
De Wit, H.C.D. 1949. History of Malaysian of the Government of the colony of North Borneo. Ye
phytography. Flora Malesiana I: LXXI-CLXI. Olde Printerie, Hong Kong. 154p.
Dransfield, J. 1979. A manual of the rattans of the Malay Kessler, P.J.A. & Sidiyasa, K. 1994. Trees of the
Peninsula.  Malayan Forest Records 29. Forest Balikpapan-Samarinda area, East Kalimantan,
Department, West Malaysia. 270p. Indonesia.  Tropenbos Series 7. The Tropenbos
Dransfield, J. 1984. The rattans of Sabah.  Sabah Forest Foundation, Wageningen, The Netherlands. 446p.
Records 13. Forest Department Sabah, Sandakan. 87p. Kiew, R. 1984. Towards a flora of Borneo. In: Sahid, I. et
Dransfield, J. 1992. The rattans of Sarawak. Royal Botanic al.  (eds.). Research priorities in malaysian biology.
Gardens, Kew & Sarawak Forest Department, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Bangi, Selangor.
Kuching. 233p. Pp. 73-80
Dransfield, S. 1992. The bamboos of Sabah. Sabah Forest Kiew, R. 2005. Begonias of Peninsular Malaysia. Natural
Records No 14. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew & history publications (Borneo), Kota Kinabalu. 308p.
Forestry Department Sabah, Sandakan. 94p. Kiew, R.; Chung, R.C.K.; Saw, L.G.; Soepadmo, E. &
Foxworthy, F.W. 1921. The commercial woods of the Boyce, P.C. (eds.). 2010. Flora of Peninsular Malaysia.
Malay Peninsula. Malayan Forest Records 1. Forest Series II: seed plants. Vol. 1. Malayan Forest Records
Department, Federated Malay States Government, No 49. Forest Research Institute Malaysia, Kepong,
Kuala Lumpur. 195p. Selangor. 329p.
Foxworthy, F.W. 1922. Minor forest products of the Kiew, R.; Chung, R.C.K.; Saw, L.G.; Soepadmo, E. &
Malay Peninsula. Malayan Forest Records 2. Forest Boyce P.C. (eds.) (2011). Flora of Peninsular Malaysia.
Department, Federated Malay States Government, Series II: Seed Plants. Vol. 2. Malayan Forest Records
Kuala Lumpur. 217p. No. 49. 235 p.
Foxworthy, F.W. 1932. Dipterocarpaceae of the Malay Kiew, R.; Chung, R.C.K.; Saw, L.G. & Soepadmo, E. (eds.).
Peninsula.  Malayan Forest Records 10. Federated 2012. Flora of Peninsular Malaysia. Series II: seed
Malay States Government, Singapore. 109p. plants. Vol. 3. Malayan Forest Records No 49. Forest
Gilliland, H.B. 1971. A revised flora of Malaya. Grasses Research Institute Malaysia, Kepong, Selangor. 85p.
of Malaya. Vol. 3. Botanic Gardens, Singapore. 319p. Kiew, R.; Chung, R.C.K.; Saw, L.G. & Soepadmo, E. (eds.).
Hasan, P. & Ashton. P.S. 1964. A checklist of Brunei trees. 2013. Flora of Peninsular Malaysia. Series II: seed
State Forest Office, Brunei. 132p. plants. Vol. 4. Malayan Forest Records No 49. Forest
H e n d e r s o n , M . R . & Wy a t t - S m i t h , J . Research Institute Malaysia, Kepong, Selangor. 405p.
1956. Calophyllum Linn. The Gardens’ Bulletin King, G. 1889. Materials for a Flora of the Malayan
Singapore 15: 375. Peninsula. Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal 58:
Henderson, M.R. 1959. Malayan Wild Flowers, 359-408.
Dicotyledons. Caxton Press Ltd., Kuala Lumpur. 478p. Latiff, A. & Turner, I.M. 2001a. Quarterly notes: new
Henderson, M.R. 1974. Malayan wild flowers, taxa and records of Malaysian vascular plants. Folia
Monocotyledons. Art Printing Works, Kuala Lumpur. malaysiana 2: 54-56.
357p. Latiff, A. & Turner, I.M. 2001b. Quarterly notes: new
Holttum, R.E. 1950. The Zingiberaceae of the Malay taxa and records of Malaysian vascular plants. Folia
Peninsula. The Gardens’ Bulletin Singapore 13: 1-250. malaysiana 2: 127-128.

Rodriguésia 66(4): 947-960. 2015


The flora of Malaysia projects 959

Latiff, A. & Turner, I.M. 2001c. Quarterly notes: new Poulsen, A.D. 2006. Etlingera of Borneo. Natural History
taxa and records of Malaysian vascular plants. Folia Publications (Borneo) in association with Royal
malaysiana 2: 203-206. Botanic Garden Edinburgh, Kota Kinabalu. 263p.
Latiff, A. & Turner, I.M. 2001d. Quarterly notes: new Primack, R.B. 1983. Forester’s guide to the Moraceae of
taxa and records of Malaysian vascular plants. Folia Sarawak. Forest Department Sarawak, Kuching. 140p.
malaysiana 2: 283-284 Ridley, H.N. 1907. Materials for a Flora of the Malayan
Latiff, A. & Turner, I.M. 2002a. Quarterly notes: new Peninsula. 3 Parts. Methodist Publishing House,
taxa and records of Malaysian vascular plants. Folia Singapore. Part 1, 233p.; Part 2, 235p.; Part 3, 197p.
malaysiana 3: 67-68. Ridley, H.N. 1922-1925. The flora of the Malay Peninsula.
Latiff, A. & Turner, I.M. 2002b. Quarterly notes: new Vol. 1-5. L. Reeve & Co. Ltd, London. 1: 918, 2: 672,
taxa and records of Malaysian vascular plants. Folia 3: 405, 4: 383, 5: 470.
malaysiana 4: 129-132 Ridley, H.N. 1926. The ferns of the Malay Peninsula. Journal
Latiff, A. & Turner, I.M. 2003. Quarterly notes: new of the Malayan Branch, Royal Asiatic Society 4: 1-121.
taxa and records of Malaysian vascular plants. Folia Saw, L.G. & Chung, R.C.K. 2007. Towards the flora of
malaysiana 4: 227-230. Malaysia.  In:  Chua, L.S.L.; Kirton, L.G. & Saw,
Masamune, G. 1942. Enumeratio Phanerogamarum L.G. (eds.). Proceedings of seminar and workshop
Bornearum. Taihoku Imperial University, Japan. 739p. on the status of biological diversity in Malaysia &
Masamune, G. 1945. Enumeratio Pteridophytarum threat assessment of plant species in Malaysia. Forest
Bornearum. Imperial University, Japan 124p. Research Institute Malaysia, Kepong. Pp. 203-219.
Merrill, E.D. 1921. A bibliographic enumeration of Bornean Seidenfaden, G. & Wood, J.J. 1992. The orchids of
plants. Journal of Straits Branch Royal Asiatic Society, Peninsular Malaysia and Singapore. Olsen & Olsen,
Special Number. 637p. Fredensborg. 779p.
Newman, M.F.; Burgess, P.F. & Whitmore, T.C. Smythies, B.E. 1965. Common Sarawak trees. Borneo
1996. Manuals of dipterocarps for foresters: Borneo
Literature Bureau, Sarawak. 153p.
Island Light Hardwoods. Royal Botanic Gardens
Soepadmo, E. 1995. Background to the Tree Flora of Sabah
Edinburgh & CIFOR. Bogor. 275p.
and Sarawak Project. In: Soepadmo, E. & Wong, K.M.
Ng, F.S.P. (ed.). 1978. Tree flora of Malaya. Malayan
(eds.). Tree Flora of Sabah and Sarawak. Vol. 1. Forest
Forest Records 26. Vol. 3. Forest Department, West
Research Institute Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Sabah
Malaysia. 339p.
Forestry Department, Sandakan & Sarawak Forestry
Ng, F.S.P. & Jacobs, M. 1983. A guide to King’s “Materials
Department, Kuching. Pp. XIII-XIX.
for a flora of the Malayan Peninsula”. The Gardens’
Bulletin Singapore 36: 177-185. Soepadmo, E. & Wong, K.M. (eds.). 1995. Tree flora of
Sabah and Sarawak. Vol. 1. Forest Research Institute
Ng, F.S.P. (ed.). 1989. Tree flora of Malaya. Malayan
Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Sabah Forestry Department,
Forest Records 26. Vol. 4. Forest Department, West
Malaysia. 549p. Sandakan & Sarawak Forestry Department, Kuching.
513p.
Ng, F.S.P.; Low, C.M. & Mat Asri, N.S. 1990. Endemic trees
of the Malay Peninsula. Research Pamphlet 106. Forest Soepadmo, E. 1999. Botanical study of Malaysian
Research Institute Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur. 118p. medicinal plants–an appraisal. In: Manaf Ali, A. et
Parris, B.S.; Beaman, R.S. & Beaman, J.H. 1992. The Plants al. (eds.). Phytochemical and biopharmaceutins from
of Mount Kinabalu 2. Ferns. Royal Botanic Gardens, the Malaysian rain forest. FRIM & PSSM, Kuala
Kew. 165p. Lumpur. Pp. 1-14.
Parris, B.S. & Latiff, A. 1997. Towards a Pteridophyte flora Soepadmo, E.; Wong, K.M. & Saw, L.G. (eds.). 1996. Tree
of Malaysia: A provisional checklist of taxa. Malayan flora of Sabah and Sarawak. Vol. 2. Forest Research
Nature Journal 50: 235-280. Institute Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Sabah Forestry
Parris, B.S.; Kiew, R.; Chung, R.C.K.; Saw, L.G. & Department, Sandakan & Sarawak Forestry
Soepadmo, E. (eds.). 2010. Flora of Peninsular Department, Kuching. 443p.
Malaysia. Series I: Ferns and Lycophytes, Vol. 1. Soepadmo, E. & Saw, L.G. (eds.). 2000. Tree flora of
Malayan Forest Records No 48. Forest Research Sabah and Sarawak. Vol. 3. Forest Research Institute
Institute Malaysia, Kepong, Selangor. 249p. Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Sabah Forestry Department,
Parris, B.S.; Kiew, R.; Chung, R.C.K. & Saw, L.G. (eds.). Sandakan & Sarawak Forestry Department, Kuching.
2013. Flora of Peninsular Malaysia Series I: Ferns 511p.
and Lycophytes, Vol. 2. Malayan Forest Records Soepadmo, E.; Saw, L.G. & Chung, R.C.K. (eds.).
No 48. Forest Research Institute Malaysia, Kepong, 2002. Tree Flora of Sabah and Sarawak, Vol. 4. Forest
Selangor. 241p. Research Institute Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Sabah
Piggott, A.G. 1988. Ferns of Malaya in colour. Tropical Forestry Department, Sandakan & Sarawak Forestry
Press Sdn. Bhd. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. 458p. Department, Kuching. 388p.

Rodriguésia 66(4): 947-960. 2015


960 Saw, L.G. & Chung, R.C.K.
Soepadmo, E.; Saw, L.G. & Chung, R.C.K. (eds.). Forest Research and Development Centre, Bogor.
2004. Tree Flora of Sabah and Sarawak. Vol. 5. Forest Pp. 431-620.
Research Institute Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Sabah Wong, K.M. 1987. The herbarium and arboretum of the
Forestry Department, Sandakan & Sarawak Forestry Forest Research Institute of Malaysia at Kepong
Department, Kuching. 528p. - a historical perspective.  The  Gardens’ Bulletin
Soepadmo, E.; Saw, L.G. & Chung, R.C.K. (eds.). 2007. Singapore 40: 15-30.
Tree Flora of Sabah and Sarawak. Vol. 6. Forest Wong, K.M. 1995a. A brief history of botanical collecting
Research Institute Malaysia, Kepong. 335p.Soepadmo, and documentation in Borneo. P. XXI-XLI In:
E.; Saw, L.G.; Chung, R.C.K. & Kiew, R. (eds.). Soepadmo, E. & Wong, K.M. (eds.). Tree flora of
2011. Tree Flora of Sabah and Sarawak. Vol. 7. Forest Sabah and Sarawak. Vol. 1. Forest Research Institute
Research Institute Malaysia, Kepong. 450p. Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Sabah Forestry Department,
Soepadmo, E.; Saw, L.G.; Chung, R.C.K. & Kiew, R. (eds.). Sandakan & Sarawak Forestry Department, Kuching.
2014. Tree Flora of Sabah and Sarawak. Vol. 8. Forest 513p.
Research Institute Malaysia, Kepong. 248p. Wong, K.M. 1995b. The Bamboos of Peninsular
Symington, C.F. 1943. Foresters’ manual of Dipterocarps. Malaysia.  Malayan Forest Records No 41. Forest
Malayan Forest Records No 16. Syonan-Hakubutukan, Research Institute Malaysia, Kepong. 199p.
Kuala Lumpur. 244p. Wong, K.M. 1998. Patterns of plant endemism and rarity
Symington, C.F. 1974 (reprint). Foresters’ manual of in Borneo and the Malay Peninsula. In: Peng, C.-I. &
Dipterocarps. Malayan Forest Records No 16. Penerbit Lowry II, P.P. (eds.). Rare, threatened, and endangered
Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur. 244p. + plate 1-144. floras of Asia and the Pacific Rim. Academia Sinica
Thiers, B. 2015. Index Herbariorum: a global directory Monograph Series No 16: 139-169.
of public herbaria and associated staff. New York Wood, G.H.S. & Agama, J. 1956. Check list of forest flora
Botanical Garden’s Virtual Herbarium. Available at of North Borneo. North Borneo Forest Records No 6.
<http://sweetgum.nybg.org/ih/>. Access on 31 July Sunshine Print, Sandakan. 42p
2015. Wood, G.H.S. & Meijer, W. 1964. Dipterocarps of Sabah
Turner, I.M. 1997 (‘1995’). A catalogue of the vascular (North Borneo). Sabah Forest Records No 5. Forest
plants of Malaya. The Gardens’ Bulletin Singapore 47: Department, Sandakan. 344p.
1-757. Wood, J.J.; Beaman, R.S. & Beaman, J.H. 1993. The plants
Turner, I.M. 2000. The taxonomy of Malaysian vascular of Mount Kinabalu 2. Orchids. Royal Botanic Gardens,
plants: new taxa (1996-2000) and endemic Kew. 411p.
genera. Folia malaysiana 2: 41-82. Wood, J.J. & Cribb, P.J. 1994. A checklist of orchids
Van Steenis, G.G.G.J. 1955. Annotated selected of Borneo. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. 421p.
bibliography. Flora Malesiana Series I. Vol. 5. Wyatt-Smith, J. 1952. Pocket check list of timber
Noordhoff-Kolff N.V., Djakarta. 595p. trees. Malayan Forest Records N o 17. Forest
Van Steenis-Kruseman, M.J. 1950. Cyclopaedia of Department, Kuala Lumpur. 367p.
collectors. Flora Malesiana Series I. Vol. 1. Noordhoff- Wyatt-Smith, J. 1953a. Manual of Malayan timber trees.
Kolff N.V., Djakarta. 639p. Burseraceae. F.R.I. Research Pamphlet No 1. Forest
Whitmore, T.C. (ed.). 1972. Tree flora of Malaya. Malayan Research Institute, Kepong. 33p.
Forest Records 26. Vol. 1. Forest Department, West Wyatt-Smith, J. 1953b. Manual of Malayan timber trees.
Malaysia. 471p. Leguminosae. F.R.I. Research Pamphlet No 2. Forest
Whitmore, T.C. (ed.). 1973. Tree flora of Malaya. Malayan Research Institute, Kepong. 74p.
Forest Records 26. Vol. 2. Forest Department, West Wyatt-Smith, J. 1953c. Manual of Malayan timber trees.
Malaysia. 444p. Myristicaceae. F.R.I. Research Pamphlet No 3. Forest
Whitmore, T.C.; Tantra, I.G.M. & Sutisna, U. 1990a. Tree Research Institute, Kepong. 25p.
flora of Indonesia. Check list of Kalimantan. Part I. Wyatt-Smith, J. 1954a. Manual of Malayan timber trees.
Forest Research and Development Centre, Bogor. Sapotaceae. F.R.I. Research Pamphlet No 4. Forest
Pp. 1-181. Research Institute, Kepong. 56p.
Whitmore, T.C.; I.G.M. & Sutisna, U. 1990b. Tree flora Wyatt-Smith, J. 1954b. Manual of Malayan timber trees.
of Indonesia. Check list of Kalimantan. Part II. 1. Lauraceae. F.R.I. Research Pamphlet No. 5. Forest
Forest Research and Development Centre, Bogor. Research Institute, Kepong. 64p.
Pp. 181-429. Wyatt-Smith, J. 1954c. Manual of Malayan timber trees.
Whitmore, T.C.; I.G.M. & Sutisna, U. 1990c. Tree flora Sapindaceae. F.R.I. Research Pamphlet No. 6. Forest
of Indonesia. Check list of Kalimantan. Part II. 2. Research Institute, Kepong. 23p.

Artigo recebido em 11/06/2015. Aceito para publicação em 03/09/2015.

Rodriguésia 66(4): 947-960. 2015

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi