Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
aDepartment of Pediatrics, Brown Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island; bDepartment of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana;
cCenter for Research for Mothers and Children, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Rockville, Maryland; dRTI International, Research Triangle
Park, North Carolina
The authors have indicated they have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE. Beneficial effects of breast milk on cognitive skills and behavior ratings
have been demonstrated previously in term and very low birth weight infants.
www.pediatrics.org/cgi/doi/10.1542/
Extremely low birth weight infants are known to be at increased risk for devel- peds.2005-2382
opmental and behavior morbidities. The benefits of breast milk that is ingested in doi:10.1542/peds.2005-2382
the NICU by extremely low birth weight infants on development and behavior
Key Words
have not been evaluated previously. human milk, extremely low birth weight,
Bayley, outcomes
METHODS. Nutrition data including enteral and parenteral feeds were collected pro-
Abbreviations
spectively, and follow-up assessments of 1035 extremely low birth weight infants LC-PUFA—long-chain polyunsaturated
at 18 months’ corrected age were completed at 15 sites that were participants in fatty acids
ELBW— extremely low birth weight
the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research AAP—American Academy of Pediatrics
Network Glutamine Trial between October 14, 1999, and June 25, 2001. Total CA— corrected age
NICHD—National Institute of Child Health
volume of breast milk feeds (mL/kg per day) during hospitalization was calculated. and Human Development
Neonatal characteristics and morbidities, interim history, and neurodevelopmental BSID II—Bayley Scales of Infant
Development II
and growth outcomes at 18 to 22 months’ corrected age were assessed.
BRS—Behavior Rating Scale
MDI—Mental Development Index
RESULTS. There were 775 (74.9%) infants in the breast milk and 260 (25.1%) infants
PSI—Psychomotor Development Index
in the no breast milk group. Infants in the breast milk group were similar to those VLBW—very low birth weight
in the no breast milk group in every neonatal characteristic and morbidity, Accepted for publication Jan 31, 2006
including number of days of hospitalization. Mean age of first day of breast milk for Address correspondence to Betty R. Vohr, MD,
Women and Infants Hospital, 101 Dudley St,
the breast milk infants was 9.3 ⫾ 9 days. Infants in the breast milk group began to Providence, RI 02905. E-mail: Betty_Vohr@
ingest non– breast milk formula later (22.8 vs 7.3 days) compared with the non– brown.edu
breast milk group. Age at achieving full enteral feeds was similar between the PEDIATRICS (ISSN Numbers: Print, 0031-4005;
Online, 1098-4275). Copyright © 2006 by the
breast milk and non– breast milk groups (29.0 ⫾ 18 vs 27.4 ⫾ 15). Energy intakes American Academy of Pediatrics
of 107.5 kg/day and 105.9 kg/day during the hospitalization did not differ between
the breast milk and non– breast milk groups, respectively. At discharge, 30.6% of
e116 VOHR et al
Downloaded from http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/ by guest on October 18, 2017
work between October 1999 and June 2001. A total of months’ CA.32 BSID II scores of 100 ⫾ 15 represent the
251 infants died before discharge, and 23 infants died mean ⫾ 1 SD. An abnormal score (⬍70) is ⬎2 SD below
before the 18-month visit. A total of 124 infants were the mean. BRS percentile scores range from 1 to 99;
lost to follow-up. The final sample consisted of 1035 scores of 11 to 25 are considered questionable, and
(89.4%) of 1159 ELBW infant survivors on whom fol- scores of 1 to 10 are nonoptimal.
low-up data were available. Mothers of infants who The primary caregiver or adult who brought the child
were seen in follow-up were more likely to have re- for the visit stayed with the child during the BSID II
ceived prenatal care than mothers of infants who were examination, which was administered early in the clinic
not seen (93% vs 86%; P ⬍ .01, respectively). There visit before the medical assessment and interviews. Ex-
were no differences in infant characteristics or morbidi- aminers were not able to administer parts or all of the
ties between those who were and were not seen in BSID II successfully to 95 children who were seen. The
follow-up. following reasons were given: acute illness (n ⫽ 10),
The Glutamine Trial encouraged early parenteral nu- language barrier (n ⫽ 2), behavior problem (n ⫽ 24),
trition but did not prescribe an enteral feeding protocol. developmental delay (n ⫽ 18), and other (n ⫽ 41). The
Nutrition data were collected daily until the infants were other category included children who had sensory loss
on full enteral feeds (ⱖ462 kJ/kg per day). Thereafter, (blindness or deafness) and could not be administered
data were collected on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday the BSID II items. These data therefore were not in-
of each week until discharge or 120 days; values were cluded in the analysis. Although every effort was made
interpolated for days of the week on which the data to test children within the window of 18 to 22 months’
were not collected: Tuesday data were the weighted CA, 22 infants were evaluated outside the window be-
average of Monday and Wednesday data. The total vol- cause of illness or tracking issues. These data were in-
ume of breast milk feeds per kilogram per day for the cluded because the BSID II is age adjusted.
duration of hospitalization was calculated. A total of 775 Social and economic status information, including
(74.9%) of the infants received some breast milk during maternal and paternal education and occupation, mari-
their NICU hospitalization. None of the centers used tal status, insurance status, and income level, and a
banked breast milk during the trial. The proportion of detailed interim medical history, including data on hear-
infants who received breast milk feeds at centers ranged ing and vision status, were obtained. Hearing status in-
from a low of 39.1% to a high of 97.3%. Information formation was obtained from the parent and follow-up
was not collected on breast milk ingestion after dis- audiologic test results when available. Hearing impair-
charge. Neonatal characteristics and morbidities were ment was defined as use of hearing aids. A history of
collected, including gestational age by best obstetric es- postdischarge eye examinations and procedures was ob-
timate, birth weight, and neonatal course. Institutional tained from the parent. In addition, a standard eye ex-
Review Board approval and informed consent were ob- amination was completed to evaluate tracking, esotro-
tained as previously described.36 pia, nystagmus, or roving eye movements. Blind was
Infants were evaluated at 18 to 22 months’ CA. The defined as functional corrected vision ⬍20/200.
assessment included standardized interim medical his- Statistical analyses were completed by RTI Interna-
tory, a developmental evaluation, neurologic assess- tional. Bivariate analyses for group differences (any
ment, and physical examination that included growth breast milk versus no breast milk) consisted of t tests, 2,
parameters.32 A neurologic examination that was based or Fisher’s exact tests. We evaluated the relationship
on the Amiel-Tison37 assessment was performed by cer- between breast milk feeding and developmental out-
tified examiners. The neurologic assessment included an comes in 3 ways: (1) whether any breast milk feeding
evaluation of tone, strength, reflexes, angles, and pos- was beneficial (breast milk yes versus breast milk no),
ture. Infants were scored as normal when no abnormal- (2) whether the amount of breast milk feeding was
ities were observed in the neurologic examination. Ce- associated with better developmental outcomes (breast
rebral palsy was defined as a nonprogressive central milk as a continuous variable), and (3) whether there
nervous system disorder characterized by abnormal was a threshold beyond which breast milk feeding pro-
muscle tone in at least 1 extremity and abnormal control vided benefits. Infants who received breast milk were
of movement and posture. divided into quintiles of mean intake of breast milk per
The Bayley Scales of Infant Development II (BSID kilogram per day during the entire hospitalization, in-
II),35 including the Mental Scale, Motor Scale, and the cluding 0 for days with no intake, for analysis. Mean
Behavior Rating Scale (BRS), were administered by volume of human milk (mL/kg per day) for the entire
testers who were trained to reliability by 1 of 4 study hospitalization was entered as a continuous variable.
Gold Standard examiners. Examiner certification at sites Multivariate analyses to evaluate the effects of breast
was obtained by the successful completion of 2 video- milk on outcomes consisted of multiple linear-regression
taped demonstrations of accurate performance and scor- and logistic-regression analyses. Adjustments were made
ing of the BSID II on preterm children at 18 to 22 for the following confounders: mother’s age, education,
e118 VOHR et al
Downloaded from http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/ by guest on October 18, 2017
TABLE 3 Outcomes by Breast Milk Feeding
Outcomes Breast Milk, n (%) No Breast Milk, n (%) Adjusted P
or Mean ⫾ SD or Mean ⫾ SD
MDI 79.9 ⫾ 18 75.8 ⫾ 16 .0709
MDI ⬍85 421 (58.1) 168 (70.9) .0355
PDI 84.6 ⫾ 19 81.3 ⫾ 17 .0227
PDI ⬍85 307 (42.9) 116 (49.2) .0939
BRS
Orientation/engagement 53.8 ⫾ 30 48.5 ⫾ 29 .0351
Emotional regulation 53.0 ⫾ 29 47.1 ⫾ 29 .0825
Motor quality 50.1 ⫾ 35 44.1 ⫾ 33 .0296
Total 52.0 ⫾ 31 45.6 ⫾ 30 .0280
Blind in both eyes 4 (0.5) 0 (0.0) .5773a
Hearing aids 9 (1.2) 4 (1.6) .7472a
Cerebral palsy (moderate/severe) 43 (5.6) 16 (6.2) .7327a
Rehospitalizations before first birthday 180 (23.3) 78 (30.1) .028
Adjustments were made for the following confounders: mother’s age, education, marital status, and race and infant’s gestation, gender, sepsis,
IVH 3 to 4, PVL, O2 at 36 weeks, necrotizing enterocolitis, weight ⬍10th percentile at 18 months, and volume of breast milk (mL/kg per day) for
every day of hospitalization (a continuous variable).
a Unadjusted P.
TABLE 4 Effect of Breast Milk Feeding (mL/kg per day) on no breast milk group. Breast milk intake by quintile
Developmental Outcomes and Rehospitalization: Multiple ranged from 1.0 mL/kg per day to 110.6 mL/kg per day.
Regression Results In addition, total breast milk on days when only breast
Outcomes Parameter P milk was ingested was calculated and ranged from 22.1
Estimate mL/kg per day to 124.0 mL/kg per d. The proportion of
MDI 0.53 .0002 infants who were discharged on breast milk ranged from
PDI 0.63 ⬍.0001 ⬃0.7% for the lowest quintile to 85.1% for the highest
BRS 0.82 .0025
quintile. Mean Bayley MDI, PDI, and BRS were calcu-
Logistic regression OR 95% CI lated for the quintiles, and the relationship between
Rehospitalization for infection or respiratory 0.94 0.90–0.98 BSID II scores and quintiles of breast milk are shown.
morbidity
For MDI, there was a 13.1-point difference between
Estimates are adjusted for standard covariates listed previously. OR indicates odds ratio; CI,
confidence interval.
ⱕ20th quintile and ⬎80th quintile, and for PDI, there
was an 8.8-point difference between ⱕ20th quintile
and ⬎80th quintile. Overall, the differences across the
milk on all of our study outcomes remained significant. feeding quintiles of MDI and PDI were significant (mod-
(data not shown). el-adjusted P ⬍ .0044 and P ⬍ .0027, respectively).
In an effort to identify a threshold effect of breast milk There was a 14.0% difference in BRS scores between the
on Bayley MDI and PDI scores and BRS percentile lowest and highest quintiles (P ⬍ .028). For the out-
scores, we calculated the mean volume of breast milk comes presented in Table 4 (MDI, PDI, BRS, and Rehos-
per kilogram per day during the hospitalization, and pitalization ⬍1 year), only the values for the ⬎80th
infants in the breast milk group were divided into quin- percentile of breast milk feeding are significantly differ-
tiles of breast milk ingestion adjusted for confounders as ent from the no breast milk values at P ⬍ .01 within the
shown in Table 5. Quintiles were analyzed relative to the multiple-regression analyses. The values for MDI, PDI,
TABLE 5 Breast Milk Feeding Measures, Developmental Outcomes, and Rehospitalization by Quintiles of Breast Milk Intake During
Hospitalization
No Breast Milk Percentile Adjusted P
ⱕ20th 20th–40th 40th–60th 60th–80th ⬎80th
Total breast milk (mL/kg per day) for every day of hospitalization 0.0 1.0 7.3 24.0 63.8 110.6 —
Total breast milk (mL/kg per day) on days breast milk received 0.0 22.1 45.0 66.8 95.3 124.0 —
% Discharged on breast milk 0.0 0.7 2.1 8.6 40.2 85.1 —
Mean MDI score 75.8 74.2 76.9 78.3 80.4 87.3a ⬍.0044
Mean PDI score 81.3 80.6 82.7 84.2 84.4 89.4a .0027
Mean total BRS percentile score 45.6 44.8 52.1 50.1 51.8 58.8a .0281
Rehospitalized ⬍1 y 30.2 25.2 32.2 26.0 23.2 12.7a .0460
a Value significantly different from no breast milk value at P ⬍ .01.
e120 VOHR et al
Downloaded from http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/ by guest on October 18, 2017
and none are breastfeeding exclusively. Differences in optimize outcomes and decrease costs by decreasing the
parenting style and maternal intelligence, which were number of VLBW children who required special educa-
not a part of this study protocol, also have been proposed tion services. Lucas et al5 reported that increased volume
to be important. These factors are difficult to measure of breast milk was significantly associated with higher
and cannot be ruled out. Our results, however, were test scores in VLBW infants and that effects remained
adjusted for maternal education. Another factor that was significant at 7.5 to 8 years of age. Although critics of
not evaluated is that there is greater bioavailability of breast milk studies have suggested that higher family
protein in breast milk compared with formula. The socioeconomic status is the major contributor to higher
fourth proposed mechanism is the role of specific com- developmental scores, both in our own cohort and in
ponents of breast milk, including LC-PUFA (arachidonic that of Lucas et al,5 breast milk effects remained signifi-
acid and docosahexanoic acid), choline, glycoproteins, cant after adjustment of measures of socioeconomic sta-
phospholipids, growth factors, and hormones, on cogni- tus confounders. A limitation of our study is that we did
tive function.20,36,49–51 These mechanisms may comple- not assess maternal IQ. The potential long-term benefit
ment each other. of receiving breast milk in the NICU for the ELBW infant
Our findings suggest that the effects of breast milk on and family may be to optimize cognitive potential and to
the ELBW population are similar to that previously reduce the needs for early intervention and special ed-
found in very low birth weight (VLBW) infants.1–6 The ucation services. Long-term follow-up of ELBW infants
mean gestation of infants in our study was lower at 26.6 is needed to determine whether these effects persist at
weeks. We speculate that the 12 to 14 weeks before term school age. A weakness of this study is that we do not
may be an important window of opportunity for this have data on use of breast milk after discharge, and we
vulnerable population of infants. Active brain develop- do not have specific information on the home environ-
ment, neurogenesis, migration, and synaptogenesis oc- ment.
cur during this time, and brain development may be
particularly responsive to “maternal nutrition.” Previous CONCLUSION
studies have shown beneficial effects of arachidonic acid The provision of breast milk to ELBW infants during the
and docosahexanoic acid in breast milk on neurodevel- neonatal period is an easy-to-implement, cost-effective
opment.20–24,26–29 During the study period, preterm for- intervention with a potential payoff that includes better
mulas with these nutrients were not available. Addi- developmental outcomes, more optimal behavior, and
tional prospective studies need to be initiated to examine fewer rehospitalizations.
the relationships between breast milk ingestion and
brain development before term and after discharge. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Strengths of the study include the large study popu- Members of the NICHD Neonatal Research Network:
lation, the detailed nutritional intake data collected, and Alan Jobe, MD, PhD, Chairman*; University of Cincin-
the finding of breast milk effects after controlling for nati, University of California at San Diego (U10
known environmental and biological confounders. The HD40461): Neil N. Finer, MD*, Yvonne Vaucher, MD‡,
13.1-point difference in Bayley MDI scores (74.2– 87.3) Chris Henderson, RCP, Martha Fuller, RN, MSN; Case
between the lowest and highest quintiles adjusted for Western Reserve University (U10 HD21364), Avroy A.
environmental confounders at 18 months is remarkable Fanaroff, MB, BCh*, Dee Wilson, MD‡, Nancy Newman,
and provides a measure of the gap between those with RN, Bonnie Siner, RN; University of Cincinnati (U10
the highest and lowest amount of breast milk feeding. In HD27853, M01 RR 08084): Edward F. Donovan, MD*,
our regression analyses adjusted for important maternal Jean Steichen, MD‡, Marcia Mersmann, RN, Teresa
social/environmental and infant biological confounders, Gratton, RN; Emory University (U10 HD27851): Barbara
every 10 mL/kg per day of breast milk contributed 0.53 J. Stoll, MD*, Ira Adams-Chapman, MD‡, Ellen Hale,
points to the Bayley MDI. Therefore the impact on the RN; Indiana University (U10 HD27856, M01 RR 00750):
Bayley MDI of breast milk for infants who were in the James A. Lemons, MD*, Anna Dusick, MD‡, Lucy
highest quintile and ingested 110 mL/kg per day would Miller, RN, Leslie Richard, MD; University of Miami
be 10 ⫻ 0.53, or 5.3 points. The societal implications of (U10 HD21397): Shahnaz Duara, MD*, Charles R.
a 5-point potential difference (one third of an SD) in IQ Bauer, MD‡, Ruth Everett, RN; National Institute of
are substantial.52 Annually, ⬃56 000 (1.4%) of infants in Child Health and Human Development: Linda L. Wright,
the United States are born VLBW.53 Reports54–57 indicate MD, Rosemary Higgins, MD, James Hanson, MD; Uni-
that 50% of VLBW infants (⬃28 000 children) require versity of New Mexico (U10 HD27881, M01 RR00997):
remedial or special education services at school age. Lu-Ann Papile, MD*, Conra Backstrom, RN; Research
Hack56 reported a history of lower academic achieve- Triangle Institute (U01 HD36790): W. Kenneth Poole,
ment in adult VLBW survivors for whom the IQ was 5 PhD, Abhik Das, PhD, Betty Hastings, Carolyn Petrie,
points lower than that in term control subjects (87 vs 92, MS; Stanford University (U10 HD27880, M01 RR
respectively). An increase of 5 points potentially would 00070): David K. Stevenson, MD*, Susan R. Hintz, MD‡,
e122 VOHR et al
Downloaded from http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/ by guest on October 18, 2017
34. American Academy of Pediatrics, Section on Breastfeeding. benefits and challenges, incidence and duration, and barriers to
Breastfeeding and the use of human milk. 2005;115:496 –506 breastfeeding in preterm infants. Adv Neonatal Care. 2005;5:
35. Bayley N. Bayley Scales of Infants Development-II. San Antonio, 72– 88; quiz 89 –92
TX: Psychological Corporation; 1993 47. Killersreiter B, Grimmer I, Buhrer C, Dudenhausen JW,
36. Poindexter BB, Ehrenkranz RA, Stoll BJ, et al. Parenteral glu- Obladen M. Early cessation of breast milk feeding in very low
tamine supplementation does not reduce the risk of mortality birthweight infants. Early Hum Dev. 2001;60:193–205
or late-onset sepsis in extremely low birth weight infants. 48. Doyle LW, Rickards AL, Kelly EA, Ford GW, Callanan C.
Pediatrics. 2004;113:1209 –1215 Breastfeeding and intelligence. Lancet. 1992;339:744 –745
37. Amiel-Tison C. Neuromotos status. In: Taeusch HW, Yogman 49. Fewtrell MS, Morley R, Abbott RA, et al. Double-blind, ran-
MW, eds. Follow-up Management of the High-Risk Infant. Boston, domized trial of long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid supple-
MA: Little, Brown & Company; 1987:115–126 mentation in formula fed to preterm infants. Pediatrics. 2002;
38. Papile LA, Burstein J, Burstein R, Koffler H. Incidence and 110(pt 1):73– 82
evolution of subependymal and intraventricular hemorrhage: 50. O’Connor DL, Hall R, Adamkin D, et al. Growth and develop-
a study of infants with birth weights less than 1,500 gm. ment in preterm infants fed long-chain polyunsaturated fatty
J Pediatr. 1978;92:529 –534 acids: a prospective, randomized controlled trial. Pediatrics.
39. Horwood LJ, Fergusson DM. Breastfeeding and later cognitive
2001;108:359 –371
and academic outcomes. Pediatrics. 1998;101(1). Available at:
51. Amin SB, Merle KS, Orlando MS, Dalzell LE, Guillet R. Brain-
www/pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/101/1/e9
stem maturation in premature infants as a function of enteral
40. Furman L, Wilson-Costello D, Friedman H, Taylor HG, Minich
feeding type. Pediatrics. 2000;106(pt 1):318 –322
N, Hack M. The effect of neonatal maternal milk feeding on the
52. Weiss B. Pesticides as a source of developmental disabilities.
neurodevelopmental outcome of very low birth weight infants.
Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 1997;3:246 –256
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2004;25:247–253
53. Martin JA, Kochanek KD, Strobino DM, Guyer B, MacDorman
41. Nolan L, Goel V. Sociodemographic factors related to breast-
feeding in Ontario: results from the Ontario Health Survey. Can MF. Annual summary of vital statistics: 2003. Pediatrics. 2005;
J Public Health. 1995;86:309 –312 115:619 – 634
42. Lucas A, Cole TJ, Morley R, et al. Factors associated with 54. Taylor HG, Minich N, Bangert B, Filipek PA, Hack M. Long-
maternal choice to provide breast milk for low birthweight term neuropsychological outcomes of very low birth weight:
infants. Arch Dis Child. 1988;63:48 –52 associations with early risks for periventricular brain insults.
43. Meinzen-Derr J, Poindexter BB, Donovan EF, et al. The role of J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2004;10:987–1004
human milk feedings in risk of late-onset sepsis [abstract]. 55. Litt J, Taylor HG, Klein N, Hack M. Learning disabilities in
Pediatr Res. 2004;55:393A children with very low birthweight: prevalence, neuropsycho-
44. Furman L, Taylor G, Minich N, Hack M. The effect of maternal logical correlates, and educational interventions. J Learn Dis-
milk on neonatal morbidity of very low-birth-weight infants. abil. 2005;38:130 –141
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003;157:66 –71 56. Hack M, Flannery DJ, Schluchter M, Cartar L, Borawski E,
45. Callen J, Pinelli J, Atkinson S, Saigal S. Qualitative analysis of Klein N. Outcomes in young adulthood for very-low-birth-
barriers to breastfeeding in very-low-birthweight infants in the weight infants. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:149 –157
hospital and postdischarge. Adv Neonatal Care. 2005;5:93–103 57. Saigal S. Follow-up of very low birthweight babies to adoles-
46. Callen J, Pinelli J. A review of the literature examining the cence. Semin Neonatol. 2000;5:107–118
Updated Information & including high resolution figures, can be found at:
Services http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/118/1/e115
References This article cites 52 articles, 23 of which you can access for free at:
http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/118/1/e115.full#ref-list-
1
Subspecialty Collections This article, along with others on similar topics, appears in the
following collection(s):
Fetus/Newborn Infant
http://classic.pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/collection/fetus:newb
orn_infant_sub
Permissions & Licensing Information about reproducing this article in parts (figures, tables) or
in its entirety can be found online at:
https://shop.aap.org/licensing-permissions/
Reprints Information about ordering reprints can be found online:
http://classic.pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/reprints
Pediatrics is the official journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics. A monthly publication, it
has been published continuously since . Pediatrics is owned, published, and trademarked by the
American Academy of Pediatrics, 141 Northwest Point Boulevard, Elk Grove Village, Illinois,
60007. Copyright © 2006 by the American Academy of Pediatrics. All rights reserved. Print ISSN:
.
The online version of this article, along with updated information and services, is
located on the World Wide Web at:
http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/118/1/e115
Pediatrics is the official journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics. A monthly publication, it
has been published continuously since . Pediatrics is owned, published, and trademarked by the
American Academy of Pediatrics, 141 Northwest Point Boulevard, Elk Grove Village, Illinois,
60007. Copyright © 2006 by the American Academy of Pediatrics. All rights reserved. Print ISSN:
.