Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Grade 3:3: Students recognize the area as an attribute of two-dimensional regions. They measure the area of a shape by finding the
total number of same-size units of the area required to cover the shape without gaps or overlaps, a square with sides of unit length
being the standard unit for measuring area. Students understand that rectangular arrays can be decomposed into identical rows or into
identical columns. By decomposing rectangles into rectangular arrays of squares, students connect the area to multiplication and
justify using multiplication to determine the area of a rectangle.
Grade 3: (4) Students describe, analyze, and compare properties of two-dimensional shapes. They compare and classify shapes by
their sides and angles, and connect these with definitions of shapes. Students also relate their fraction work to geometry by expressing
the area of the part of a shape as a unit fraction of the whole.
Students will create shapes with set areas and perimeters and classify them as Square, Rectangle or an Irregular shape.
Objects can have the same area but vastly different What does it mean that two objects have the same
perimeters. area? Will they always be the same shape?
Students should be able to answer the independent Students will do the “independent work” section on
problems independently and their won in center three.
correctly. The teachers will make
rounds to check for clarity
and answer questions.
Closure:
This went so much better. After doing my host teachers corrections, I found the students learning improved
drastically. By allowing the second group of students to move on to the “on their Own” section I was able to
more effectively focus on the group unlocking the problem. I know I will only be able to do this if the students
have a fairly effective foundation in what they are doing. Luckily, these chapters were near the end of the unit
(11.9 and 11.10) so they had been practicing the strategies for over a week by the time I got to them. And after
3 days of PEAKS testing, they were ready to get back to real work.
Even the simple, easy changes to the rotation schedule made things a much better experience for everyone.
Little things like having the rotation starter on the unlock and end on the Gameshow instead of having the
students have to collect their textbooks helped immensely. Having the Game show center more fully stocked
and having a pocket full of backup rubber bands to keep things moving smoothly. I had modified some of the
cards because I was used to a 6x6 grid for the Geoboards where these were only 4x4.
I decided to do the “Unlock the Problem” as a group this time and took a little extra time to go over the visual
aids. Students were misinterpreting the graphs as a model, not as a work area. They were giving me the area
and perimeter of the workspace, not of the model we needed to draw inside of it. I had students slow down and
read the problem as a group, then we drew our model together. That seemed to help as well. On my previous
lesson, Mrs. Zoerb pointed out that I should never be afraid to stop the lesson and bring the group together if I
see these kinds of communication errors. I feel the reason I hadn’t before was a fear that I would run out of
time. Again, I need to learn to trust my students to ask when they need clarification instead of just having them
constantly repeat information to me. It’s a delicate balance because I want to make sure auditory learners are
getting what they need from me. Spatial and kinesthetic learners I can work with more easily one on one, but
with auditory, having the whole class repeat can really cement ideas.
Again, the center's process will be a good one to learn, but I suspect I’m more of a lecture teacher. I
enjoy performing for a class, but I also find it’s the best way for me to get eye contact with students and read
from their faces what they need from me. I look forward to having more control and a better footing in my
group of students.