Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 7

1.7.

Organizational Planning Tools (HL only)

 Decision-making

 Types of decisions

 Operational (daily) – policies, practice, rules, set


procedures, etc.

 Tactical (regular/short term issues) – handled by


management regarding their respective departments

 Strategies (long term) – high level decisions made by top


management on new directions, growth, and issues affecting the
entire organization or with long term consequences

 Types of decision-making

 Intuitive decision-making

 Making decisions based on instinct or gut-feeling

 Less costly and time consuming

 May sometimes be considered as irresponsible


decision-making

 Scientific decision-making

 Basing decisions on a formal framework and data


analysis

 Greater chance of success

 Takes longer and can be expensive

 Decision-Making Framework

 A guide or model that involves following certain steps


to make the best and most appropriate business decision in a
given situation

 In a simple decision-making model, the following


steps may be done:

 Identify the business problem, concern or issue


 Gather sufficient data and information

 Analyze data and information to produce a list


of possible options

 Assess the costs and benefits of each option

 Select the most favorable and realistically


achievable option

 Communicate this decision to the staff

 Review and evaluate the outcome, i.e. did it


help the organization’s objectives and what lessons were
learned?

 Fishbone/Ishikawa Diagram

 Cause and effect diagram developed by Prof. Kaoru Ishikawa

 Can usually be broken down into 6Ms (but not limited to)

 Machine

 Mother Nature

 Manpower

 Money

 Market

 Materials

 And usually into the 4Ps (but not limited to)

 People

 Policies

 Paraphernalia

 Procedure

 Stages of Fishboning
 Agree on the problem and write this on the right as the
EFFECT.

 Brainstorm the main categories or generic ones (6Ms or


4Ps) = main bones

 Brainstorm all of the detailed reasons why problems might


occur = small bones

 Analyze findings and investigate the main causes of the


problem

 Recommendations for the improvement of the business


based on the constructed diagram.

 Decision tree

 Quantitative decision making tool representing available options


to a business and showing probable outcomes

 By comparing likely financial results from each option, the


manager can minimize risk and maximize returns

 Constructing a Decision Tree

 Decisions nodes (squares) and chance nodes (circles),


representing the outcomes of a decision

 Probabilities are shown with each possible outcome

 Economic returns are expected financial gains or losses of


a particular outcome
 Expected Value

 Likely financial result of an outcome.

 (Economic return – costs) * probability

 Net EV is calculated from right to left

 Limitations

 Limited by the accuracy of the data used – estimate


or guesstimate date and outdated probabilities

 Merely aid the decision making process, but they


cannot replace the consideration of risk or the impact of
qualitative factors

 Force field analysis

 Decision-making tool that looks at helping or hindering forces


towards a plan
 Analyzes factors that support and oppose the plan to decide
whether or not to push through with it

 Constructing a force field analysis

 Draw a large rectangle in the middle, write the proposed


plan in it

 List down the supporting factors on the left side

 List down the opposing factors on the right side

 Rate each factor based on influence (usually on 1-to-5


scale, with 1 being leastsignificant/influential, 5
being most significant/influential)

 Using force field analysis

 Decide whether or not to push through with proposed


plan given both supporting and opposing factors and their
respective importance

 Plan changes that may be implemented to


strengthen supporting factors, weaken opposing factors, and
make the proposed plan more successful/effective

 Limitations

 Factors and their ratings are subjective and may be


biased

 May cause a division among decision-making parties


on whether or not to push through with plan
 Gantt chart

 A type of bar chart that illustrates a project schedule

 Outlines the start and finish dates of important elements of a


project

 Also shows relationship of these elements (i.e. Task B starts only


when Task A finishes)

 Constructing a Gantt chart

 Rows are the elements/tasks

 Columns are the dates (left to right)

 Fill in boxes corresponding to duration of each task

 Draw vertical line to represent current date

 Limitations

 Relies on completed and accurate project breakdown


structure (breakdown of elements and tasks of project)

 Depicts time of tasks, but not scope or cost

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi