Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Coaching Journal
Christopher W. Cooper
Strategies
My first coaching session took place with Ms. Bortles, a new social studies teacher as
Dacula High School who is a first year teacher. I was able to enroll Ms. Bortles through the one-
to-one interview process described my Knight (2007). I felt that the one-to-one interview was
important because it, “provides teachers a chance to see you not as a professional developer, some
expert coming in, but as someone like them (Knight, 2007).” At the start of the interview I
explained the approach that I would be using throughout our coaching sessions, which was the
partnership approach to coaching. I felt that this was important because as Knight explains, ICs
can explain their partnership approach to coaching, listening to teachers’ concerns, and explain
that as coaches they are there to help, not evaluate (Knight, 2007). I wanted to make it clear to
Ms. Bortles that she had choices in everything that we did and that I wanted the coaching sessions
to be designed to help her in the areas that she felt would best serve her needs as a new teacher.
For our first meeting we discussed what Ms. Bortles was looking to accomplish from our
coaching sessions. It became very obvious that she was concerned with the expectations of our
school, which is providing students with student centered instruction, while constantly assessing
students to check for understanding, and differentiating instruction for each student’s needs. She
made it clear that she wanted to conduct assessments that would provide adequate data that she
could use to differentiate instruction. She also stated that she wished to become better at using
technology to provide differentiation for her school. After listening to Ms. Bortles concerns, I
provided her with a survey to determine how comfortable she was with using technology. I
explained to her that I would be able to use that information to drive the next coaching session.
COACHING JOURNAL- COOPER 3
We also established the best time to conduct our coaching sessions, which we determined would
The biggest observation that I made during our first coaching session was how reluctant
Ms. Bortles was about answering questions and asking questions. At first this was very frustrating
for me because she had volunteered for the coaching sessions and I felt like she did not want to
participate. As we continued to look at things that I felt would help her become successful in the
classroom and be able to carry out the expectations established by our administrators, I realized
that she was uncomfortable discussing things that she was not familiar with. I concluded that she
did not want to be embarrassed by what she was unfamiliar with. It was really difficult for her to
share what she felt her strengths and weaknesses were. I finally started sharing with her what my
strengths and weaknesses were and I put a lot more focus on my weaknesses. This seemed to make
her less reluctant to talk to me about her strengths and weaknesses and she became more open as
One of the biggest challenges that I face is being able to find classroom resources that meet
the needs of Ms. Bortles and her students. Ms. Bortles teachers resource World History and she
has expressed that many of her students are reluctant to change. Making changes to her daily
classroom procedures could pose a challenge for Ms. Bortles and her students. Another challenge
that I face is time management with us meeting during our planning period. As a course team
leader for US History, I have to make sure that I meet the needs of my US History course team and
plan effective coaching sessions for Ms. Bortles. Although I have been a course team leader for
several years now, this will be the first time I will have to manage a course team and coach a
COACHING JOURNAL- COOPER 4
colleague at the same time. Another challenge will be implementing the strategies that we have
studies in Knight’s book. I want to be sure that I am effectively taking a partnership approach and
Strategies
In the first coaching session Ms. Bortles mentioned that she wanted help meeting the
expectations of the school administration, which is incorporating technology into the classroom
that promotes student centered instruction, differentiation to meet individual needs and constant
assessment to check for mastery. With this in mind, I decided to introduce Ms. Bortles to an
assessment strategy called Schoolnet that I use to administer quizzes and exams. The reason I
chose Schoolnet was because you can tie each question into the class standards and it provides
very detailed reports to create differentiation to meet the needs of individual students. For this
session, I decided to use the model, you watch me (2007). During our meeting I showed Ms.
Bortles how to create a quiz for my US History students. I linked each question to the standards
for US History that we had covered for that quiz. Next I had Ms. Bortles enter an old quiz from
her World History class into Schoolnet and she linked the standards that went with each question
so that she would know how to create an assessment on Schoolnet. The next thing that we did was
look at the data that we received from once students has completed a quiz. For this I used the data
from a previous quiz that my US History had taken. We were able to look back and see what
questions each student had missed and the standards that those questions were tied to. I showed
her how to view the standards that were covered by each question and determine which area
students would need additional help. To model her resource classes, we only looked at eight of
my student’s results. This gave her a realistic look at what it would be like to shift through the
COACHING JOURNAL- COOPER 5
data from her students since she has no more than eight students in her resource classes. As we
looked at the results of my eight students I completed a data sheet that would show me which
standard each student needed to remediate over. After modeling this activity for Ms. Bortles I
selected eight more of my US History students and had her complete the data sheet over the
standards. She was excited about being able to quickly determine which standards each student
It was evident from our meeting that Ms. Bortles was excited about the data that Schoolnet
would provide her as an assessment tool. She had a good understanding of how to upload questions
and attach the standards to the individual questions. She also had a good grasp on how to assess
the data provided to try to differentiate instruction. She did express that she was nervous about
her ability to be able at create lessons using technology to engage students to meet their individual
needs. Ms. Bortles was much more comfortable asking questions during our second coaching
session and seemed eager to continue to learn, which was exciting for me as a first time coach.
Ms. Bortles expressed that she was very thankful that I walked her through the process of creating
an assessment on Schoolnet and felt that me modeling it for her was the best way to teach her to
The main challenge for this session was for me to pace myself and not go to fast. I had to
make sure that when I was modeling how to upload an assessment into Schoolnet, I went slow and
emphasized the importance of each step. I typically upload the assessments very quickly since I
am used to using the tool. I had to remind myself to slow down since this was my first time
coaching someone through the process. I stressed to Ms. Bortles that she needed to stop me if I
COACHING JOURNAL- COOPER 6
started to move too quickly. I also did not anticipate some of the questions that she asked me
during the coaching session, such as could she collaborate with other teachers on the assessment
tool. Although I knew how to collaborate with other teachers, I did not think about mentioning it
and I had to go back to the beginning to show her how to add other teachers and share the
The next thing that I did not account for was how excited Ms. Bortles would be to discuss
how to use the data from the assessment to remediate. Given the short amount of time that we had
to meet, I was not able to share many ideas about remediation with her during our session. Having
planned to create remediation and extension activities in the next coaching session, I was
unprepared to go into it during that session. To prepare for our next session, I asked Ms. Bortles
to prepare several resources is she was not already familiar with them. The resources I asked her
to explore were Quizlet, Popplet, and Storyboard. I explained to her those were often tools that I
used to provide remediation and extension activities in my class. She seemed very excited to
Strategies
In our previous meeting I had given Ms. Bortles several resources to explore that we would
use to create remediation and enrichment activities. It was obvious from our information that Ms.
Bortles provided me that she had researched each tool and was excite to use them in her classroom.
Knowing that we were going to be making remediation activities to meet the various needs of
students, I had Ms. Bortles give her students a 15 question quiz over their current content. Ms.
Bortles had 3 target standards that she quizzed over, with each having several sub-standards. I
allowed Ms. Bortles to choose which of the resources that she had explored that she felt most
COACHING JOURNAL- COOPER 7
comfortable using for the remediation, and she choose Quizlet. I then told her that we needed to
make three study sets on Quizlet for each of the three standards that she had quizzed over. Students
would study the study set that they needed remediation on a Chromebook by using flashcards,
matching, or gravity. Once they felt that they were familiar with the study set, they would then
take the test over the study set on Quizlet and report their score to Ms. Bortles. Ms. Bortles and I
then looked at the data and charted the questions that each of her students missed to determine
which standards they needed remediation on. This would allow us to easily assign the remediation
to her students. Ms. Bortles was excited about the remediation activity but had one student who
had make a 93 on their quiz and clearly did not need remediation. I suggested we make and
enrichment assignment for that student using one of the other tools that she had explored. Ms.
Bortles elected to use Popplet to have the student create a concept map over the three standards
that she had quizzed over. I explained to her that she could post the concept map on their classes
eClass page and other students could use it as a study guide. It was important for me to allow Ms.
Bortles to choose the tools that we used for enrichment and remediation to show that we both had
a voice in this experience, which is an important piece to the partnership approach (Knight, 2007).
Once we created the remediation activities, I again used the “you watch me” observation
model from Knight (2007). I explained to her that I would come to her class the next day and
teach her fifth period resource class during my lunch. I told her that I wanted her to complete an
observation sheet on me which I provided for her. The observation sheet provided her an
opportunity to record the things she liked about the lesson, things she didn’t like and things that
were not clear. Before starting the lesson with Ms. Bortles students I explained to them that I was
working as a partner with Ms. Bortles on a lesson and that I needed her to observe me teach, to
help me learn from the experience. At the conclusion of the lesson, Ms. Bortles and I agreed to
COACHING JOURNAL- COOPER 8
meet that afternoon during our common planning period. I wanted to meet as soon as possible
which is Knight says is very important (Knight, 2007). We started the meeting by talking about
the observation sheet that she had completed during the lesson. Ms. Bortles was very excited about
the lesson and was eager to carry out the lesson as well.
The biggest surprise that for me during our coaching sessions was the change of attitude
that Ms. Bortles had during three short sessions. I was excited to see her move from being very
reluctant to try new things to become eager to implement new resources in her classroom and use
data to drive her instruction. She admitted that she thought that differentiating instruction to meet
the needs of each of her students would be much more elaborate than making different study sets
on Quizlet to assign to the ones that certain students needed. She also was excited that she could
provide enrichment activities to her students who quickly grasped the concepts in her class without
feeling like she was providing them extra work. Ms. Bortles also expressed that she was confident
One of the biggest challenges for me during this coaching session was to allow Ms. Bortles
to decide which resource tools to use to enrich and remediate. I had to remind myself numerous
times that it was a partnership and that I wanted her to have a voice. I was also determined to
show her how she could quickly use the tool that she choose to provide enrichment or remediation
regardless of which tools she chose. I did not want to create a scenario where I said no, we should
really pick another one, that does not work well for remediation. I felt like that would turn her off
from the idea of differentiating her lesson using the data she received from Schoolnet.
COACHING JOURNAL- COOPER 9
After completing the three coaching sessions, I feel much more confident in my ability to coach
collogues in my building. I admit that I was intimidated at first, but become more comfortable
with each session. I do believe that Ms. Bortles being a new teacher made it a little easier for me,
and I think that it would be more difficult working with a seasoned teacher who was set in their
ways.
COACHING JOURNAL- COOPER 10
References