0 évaluation0% ont trouvé ce document utile (0 vote)
55 vues6 pages
Hal Davidson Aka Hal Abramson v. John Safford Aka J. Safford - Consent Judgment - Google Deindexing-Removal Request per Google's Lumen Database at lumendatabase.org
Hal Davidson Aka Hal Abramson v. John Safford Aka J. Safford - Consent Judgment - Google Deindexing-Removal Request per Google's Lumen Database at lumendatabase.org
Hal Davidson Aka Hal Abramson v. John Safford Aka J. Safford - Consent Judgment - Google Deindexing-Removal Request per Google's Lumen Database at lumendatabase.org
{A
104313748,
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO
HAL DAVIDSON AKA HAL ABRAMSON Case No: CV-18-897472
Plaintiff
Judge: HOLLIE L GALLAGHER
JASON SAFFORD AKA J. SAFFORD
Defendant
JOURNAL ENTRY
{96 DISP.OTHER - FINAL
‘THE COURT HEREBY ENTERS THE ATTACHED JUDGMENT PER CONSENT OF THE PARTIES, OSJ. FINAL.
COURT COST ASSESSED AS EACH THEIR OWN.
PURSUANT TO CIV.R. $8(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER.
PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL
PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE.
OSd
Judge Signature Date
Go 8
eS o.
Boe
a = =
Bex tf
pa
a8 4 Pa
ge oO
22 we
aA
S :
-96
06/20/2018
Page 1 of 1IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO
HAL DAVIDSON aka HALABRAMSON ) CASE NO.: CV-18-897472
)
Plaintiff, Judge Hollie L, Gallagher
JASON SAFFORD aka J. SAFFORD
)
)
)
d
) CONSENT JUDGMENT
d
)
Defendant.
WHEREAS, PLAINTIFF filed a lawsuit on or about May 9, 2018, in the Court of
Common Pleas, Cuyahoga County against DEFENDANT, styled Hal Davidson aka Hal
Abramson v. Jason Safford aka J. Safford, assigned Case No. CV-18-897472, alleging one cause
of action in his Complaint (the “Lawsuit”);
‘WHEREAS, service of the Complaint was effectuated on Defendant on May 15,2018 and
the Court finds that all necessary parties have been named and served.
‘WHEREAS, each party has consented to this Court's exercise of jurisdiction over them
personally and over the subject matter of this Lawsuit.
WHEREAS, the Parties desire to resolve fully and finally any claims or disputes arising
in the Lawsuit, and any claims or disputes which could be raised in any subsequent state, federal,
or administrative procceding, in an amicable manner without the difficulties and expense involved
in further proceedings.
‘WHEREAS, the Parties have jointly proposed, stipulated, and consented to the entry of
this Order and this Court finds the terms of this Order to be reasonable, necessary, and just underthe circumstances presented.
‘THEREFORE, I IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. The injunctive provisions of this Judgment shall apply to Plaintiff Hal Davidson
aka Hal Abramson (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Jason Safford aka J. Safford (“Defendant”)
(collectively the “Parties”, or each, individually, a “Party”), as well as their respective agents,
servants, employees, and those persons or entities in active concert or participation with either.
2. The Parties published statements about each other on the Intemet website
RipOffReport.com, accessible through the Internet search engines Google, Yahoo!, and Bing,
‘which each party admits are false and defamatory.
3, The Parties shall be and hereby are permanently enjoined and restrained from
directly or indirectly doing any of the following: i) defaming or disparaging the other Party on the
Intemet; ii) making any statements on the Internet about the other Party which are negative,
disparaging, and false; and iif) authoring or contributing to any posts or other content about the
other Party on any Internet blog or website, including, but not limited to, any of the the blogs or
‘websites identified herein.
4, Plaintiff and Defendant are each ordered to take all necessary action and to
authorize the other Party and his eounsel to take all necessary action on their behalf to permanently
remove from the Intemet any mentions of, information about, or references to one Party by the
‘other Party, whether authored or published directly by the Party, or atthe Party’s request or on his
beta
5. Plaintiff and Defendant are ordered to do everything within the ability to cause the
permanent removal of such content and URLs (defined and listed below) from Intemet search
engines including Google, Yahoo!, Bing, and any additional webpages on which such content and
2