1 vues

Transféré par xxx

Tensile Strain Capacity of Concrete

- Composite Bar
- Technical Tidbits July-August 2005_ Tensile Strength Considerations
- Cable Tray Structural Design.pdf
- Rc Wall Design Web
- E 447.pdf
- The Tensile Strength of Rocks_Hobbs1964
- Leather
- Experiment 1
- Simulation on Bushed Coupling in C++
- Raphael - Tensile Strength of Concrete
- Standard Specification for Ferritic Malleable I
- S5 Full Report
- WW-T-700_4F
- 2
- Unconfined Compressive Test
- Presentation GEOBURGG
- Development and testing of Al5083 alloy reinforced by SiC particles
- 180 Top Most Concrete Technology and Design of Concrete Structures Interview Questions Civil Engineering Objective Type Questions and Answers
- Tensile Strength
- Blast Resisting Measures and Design of Vulnerable Components by UFC-3-340-02 (2008)

Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 9

3, June, 185±193

Relacja eps_crack przy zginaniu i rozciaganiu:

eps_cr_direct = 0.7 eps_cr_flexural

Punkt 4.3 Cracking strain w Nguyen et al.

zrodlo: Wee et al. -> Table 4. dla OPC, ostatnia kolumna – ok. 70%

states of stress

T. H. Wee, H. R. Lu and S. Swaddiwudhipong

The direct-tension-test method and the mechanical properties of concrete in compression, flexure and tension have

been investigated. The mould used for preparing the specimens in the direct tension test has been modified to

overcome the difficulties in centralizing and aligning the two embedded bars in the specimens. The method adopted

improves the weak bond strength between the embedded bar and concrete and reduces the stress concentration at

the end of the embedded bar. Concrete is most brittle under tension. The state of stress affects the failure

characteristics of concrete. The tensile strain capacity, which is used to evaluate cracking in concrete, should be

chosen judiciously depending on the state of stress in the concrete. The tensile strain capacity obtained from the

flexure test has a higher standard deviation, indicating wider variability of the results. Relationships between

tensile strength and flexural strength and between compressive strength and tensile or flexural strength are also

presented in this paper. The modulus of elasticity from the tension test is similar to that obtained from the

compression test for low-grade concrete, but the values obtained from the tension test are lower than those from

the compression test for concrete of high grade. The values of Poisson's ratio in tension and flexure decrease when

the tensile or flexural stress in the concrete is raised. The values of Poisson's ratio in compression vary

insignificantly before reaching the discontinuity point, and increase sharply afterwards.

mum tensile strain that the concrete can withstand a

The limiting tensile strain serves as a good indicator continuous crack forming. Most researchers have at-

1±3

of concrete strength under static loading and can be tempted to use either the direct tension test or the

used as a measure for failure of concrete materials. The flexural-strength test to study the properties of concrete

7 8

failure criterion of the limiting tensile strain is supported in tension. Hughes and Chapman, Dunstan, and Xie

4 5 9

by an analysis advanced by Lower. Newman and Car- and Liu determined the tensile strain capacity by the

6 10 11

ino and Slate have proposed that the discontinuity point direct tension test. Houghton, Houk et al. and Tho-

12

should be used as a definition of failure of concrete. The mas et al. used the flexural-strength test to study the

13

discontinuity point represents the point at which con- tensile strain capacity of concrete. Hunt measured the

crete can no longer be treated as a continuum. The stress tensile strain capacity from fully restrained concrete

transfer ceases to be continuous at this point. For con- prisms in which temperature differentials were induced

crete under static uniaxial compression, the discontinu- to make the prisms crack.

ity point is the point at which the volumetric strain stops For the direct tension test, depending on the method

decreasing and Poisson's ratio starts to increase sharply. adopted for clamping the specimen ends to the test

Under static uniaxial tension, the discontinuity point is machine, there are four main categories of test meth-

14

defined as the point at which the stress±strain curve ods. They are as follows:

begins to deviate from a straight line. 9

(a) tensile testing by means of embedded steel bars

15,16

(b) tensile testing by lateral gripping

17

(c) tensile testing by gluing

Department of Civil Engineering, National University of Singapore, (d) tensile testing by means of wings or truncated

10 Kent Ridge Crescent, Singapore 119260. 18

cones.

(MCR 786) Paper received 20 May 1999 The above methods of testing suffer several major

185

Downloaded by [ Technische Informationsbibliothek Universitaetsbibliothek Hannover / TIBUB (NEW)] on [09/11/18]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.

Wee et al.

drawbacks, such as load eccentricity and non-uniformity BS 12,19 ground granulated blastfurnace slag (GGBFS)

20

of stress or strain in the tensile specimen for methods complying with BS 6699 and pulverized fuel ash

21

(a)±(d), poor adherence between steel plates and moist (PFA) complying with BS 3892. The chemical com-

concrete for method (c), lack of adequate guidelines to positions and physical properties are given in Table 1.

ensure good bond and central location of the bars for The fine aggregate used in this study was silica with

method (a) and stress concentration at the ends, causing a specific gravity of 2´60 and fineness modulus of

end fracture of the specimens for methods (a), (b) and 2´59. The coarse aggregate (maximum size 20 mm)

(d). In view of the above drawbacks associated with the consisted of solid crushed granite, which had a specific

direct tension tests, the tensile strain capacity is often gravity of 2´65 and fineness modulus of 6´67. The

more conveniently assessed from the tensile fibres in the coarse aggregate was properly washed and separated

constant-moment section of the prism in the flexural- into two categories, i.e. 5±10 mm and 10±20 mm.

strength test. The Corps of Engineers employed a flexur- These categories of aggregate were then proportionally

al-strength test as a measure of the capability of mass mixed (5±10 mm : 10±20 mm 1 : 3) and maintained

10,11

concrete to resist tensile strains. The non-reinforced, in a saturated surface-dry (SSD) condition prior to mix-

12 3 12 3 64 in (300 3 300 3 1600 mm) beams used ing of the concrete. The fine and coarse aggregates

22

in this case were tested to failure under third-point load- complied with ASTM C33-97.

ing. Strains in tension were measured directly at the Ten mixes were designed for the present study. The

extreme fibre of each test specimen. mix proportions are presented in Table 2. Three speci-

The tensile strain capacity can also be estimated mens were cast of each of the following types: 100 mm

from the flexural strength and modulus of elasticity. cubes for compressive-strength tests, standard cylinders

10

Houghton indicated that the estimated tensile strain of size 100 3 200 mm for modulus-of-elasticity tests,

capacity (åtics ) could be evaluated from the flexural 100 3 100 3 400 mm prisms for flexural-strength tests

strength ( f r ) divided by the modulus of elasticity of and 100 3 100 3 500 mm prisms for direct tension

concrete in compression (Ec ): tests. The ambient temperature during mixing and cast-

fr ing was 27 38C. After demoulding (24 h after casting),

åtsc (1) all specimens were cured in a moisture-curing room at a

Ec

temperature of 27 28 and a relative humidity of not

23

Concrete shows different fracture mechanism under less than 90%, and tested at the age of 28 days.

various states of stress. Different flaws and crack pat-

terns induce different values of the limiting tensile strain

under different loading conditions. This paper describes

an improvement and simplification that can be intro- Experimental investigation

duced in the direct-tension-test method. The improved

Compression and modulus-of-elasticity tests

procedure of preparing specimens and testing makes the

direct tension test of concrete more appealing and pro- Cube compressive-strength tests complying with BS

25

vides results that are more accurate, rational and reli- 1881: Part 116 were carried out using a compressive

able. The paper also presents mechanical properties of testing machine of 2000 kN capacity. Modulus-of-elas-

26

concrete, mortar and cement paste under the conditions ticity tests complying with BS 1881: Part 121 were

of the compression, tension and flexural-strength tests. carried out using an Instron Dynamic Materials Testing

The tensile strain capacities obtained in direct tension System. The compressive strain in the latter test was

and flexural-strength tests are presented and compared. measured by four transducers. The transducers were

mounted in the middle 100 mm section of the cylinder.

The lateral strains were measured by electrical-

resistance strain gauges of 60 mm length and gauge

factor 2:09 1%. All strains and load data in this test

Materials and mix proportions

and the other tests described below were acquired

The cementitious materials used in the present study through a portable data logger, which was connected to

were ordinary Portland cement (OPC) complying with a computer.

Table 1. Chemical compositions and physical properties of OPC, GGBFS and PFA

Material CaO: % SiO2 : % Al2 O3 : % Fe2 O3 : % MgO: % SO3 : % Na2 O: % K2O: % Fineness: Specific gravity

cm2 =g

OPC 63´80 21´20 5´50 3´00 2´00 2´00 ± ± 3150 3´15

GGBFS 42´90 32´50 13´80 0´20 5´80 ± ± ± 4500 2´90

PFA 3´37 49´30 28´30 13´01 ± ± 0´21 0´76 91´6%y 2´41

Using Blaine method.

y

Percentage passing a 45 ìm sieve.

Downloaded by [ Technische Informationsbibliothek Universitaetsbibliothek Hannover / TIBUB (NEW)] on [09/11/18]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.

Tensile strain capacity of concrete

Mix w/c Water OPC PFA or GGBFS Sand Coarse aggregate Slump: mm

OPC1 0´30 165 550 0 755 920 40y

OPC2 0´40 180 450 0 775 950 35

OPC3 0´50 180 360 0 810 990 35

OPC4 0´60 180 300 0 835 1020 30

PFA 0´50 180 250 110 795 975 30

GGBFS 0´50 180 110 250 800 985 25

M1 0´50 275 550 0 1370 0 ±

M2 0´70 245 350 0 1615 0 ±

P1 0´26 440 1700 0 0 0 ±

P2 0´35 515 1470 0 0 0 ±

The slump test complied with BS 1881: Part 102. 24

y

The ASTM type F superplasticizer (powder) was used in OPC1 with a dosage of 0´5% of cement content.

Flexural tests complying with BS 1881: Part 118

27 bedded bars, a two-piece-mould (Fig. 1) was pro-

were carried out using the Instron testing system. Two posed in lieu of a five-piece or three-piece mould.

strain gauges with a length of 60 mm each were used in One lateral piece of a three-piece mould was

the flexural test. These were glued on the tensile sur- welded to the bottom plate to make it a two-piece

faces in the constant-moment section of the flexural mould. The lower number of pieces introduces a

specimen. The strain rate of the tensile fibre was con- lower number of degrees of freedom and hence

trolled to be 5 ìå=min during the linear portion of the makes the specimen easier to fabricate. With this

stress±strain curve. modification, it is convenient to adjust the two-

piece mould to align and centralize two embedded

bars by means of the standard rod and plate. The

Direct tension test

two holes on the end plates of the two-piece mould

Improved test method. As mentioned above, it is were carefully drilled to ensure that their centres

very difficult to align and centralize the two bars lay exactly on the geometric centre of the plate.

used for pulling at the two ends from outside the Both holes in the mould can be easily aligned

specimen, such as those adopted in the gripping and before fixing the embedded bars using the standard

gluing methods. Besides, a stress concentration near rod and plate. Fig. 1(a) shows the two-piece mould,

the ends of the specimen is unavoidable if the speci- Fig. 1(b) the mould adjustment and Fig. 1(c) the

men is gripped laterally or enlarged at its ends. The mould fixed with embedded bars after adjustment.

success rate is low when the gluing method is used, (b) The bond strength between the embedded bars

especially for high-strength concrete. In the present and the concrete must be large enough to prevent

study the embedded-bar method was chosen and im- the steel bars from being pulled out of the speci-

proved. A special testing technique was proposed to men during the test. In the present study, the bars

overcome the existing problems. were embedded with sufficient depth (125 mm)

The problems associated with the embedded-bar into the concrete specimen and four additional

method for the direction tension test are (a) the diffi- bars were welded evenly on the main bars to

culties in aligning and centralizing the two steel bars enhance the bond strength. These small subsidi-

embedded in the specimen, (b) the weaker mechanical ary bars also help in stress distribution along the

bond between the steel bar surface and the concrete, embedded bar and hence eliminate fracture in the

and (c) the high stress concentration at the ends of the concrete at the ends of the specimen due to

embedded bar. The following modifications were intro- stress concentration. The main embedded screw

duced to improve the existing method. bar, 12 mm in diameter, was 150 mm long, out

(a) With the embedded-bar method, it is vital that the of which 125 mm was embedded in the specimen

two embedded bars are aligned along the geometric and the remaining 25 mm was intended for con-

centre of the specimen. Elaborate work was carried nection between the specimen and the mould or

out to achieve the above requirement. The em- between the specimen and the testing machine.

bedded bars should also be aligned such that they Each of the four 6 mm dia. stress-distributing

are parallel to the edges of the specimen. This will bars, about 50 mm long, was welded evenly

ensure that the tension test provides an accurate around the main bar. The embedded bars were

estimate of the tensile strain and strength, and fixed on to the two-piece mould before casting

diminish the bending action in the specimen under the specimen, as shown in Fig. 1.

Downloaded by [ Technische Informationsbibliothek Universitaetsbibliothek Hannover / TIBUB (NEW)] on [09/11/18]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.

Wee et al.

Fig. 1. Tensile mould: (a) two-piece mould; (b) mould adjustment with a standard rod and plate; (c) mould with embedded bars

fixed after adjustment

were glued on opposite faces of the tensile specimens

in the middle section. The tensile specimen was

mounted on the Instron testing system through a joint

set at each end. The joint set was composed of three

components, i.e. a ball joint, a joint box and a bolt

joint. The ball joint connection between the testing

machine and specimen helped diminish any bending

moment that might occur owing to the eccentricity of

the applied load. A constant strain rate of 5 ìå=min

was achieved through the stroke speed adjustment

and maintained in the linear portion of the stress±

strain curve. The test set-up is shown in Fig. 2.

Test method

Typical stress±strain curves recorded from a tension

test are shown in Fig. 3. It is evident that the two

tensile-strain values measured on opposite faces are

very close up to about 70±80% of the failure load. This

demonstrates that the test method adopted in the pre-

sent study is effective in minimizing the load eccentri-

city. Since concrete is a non-homogeneous material, the

two curves will part at a certain stress level, depending

Fig. 2. Direct tension test

on the stress concentration at the tips of flaws of the

crack pattern existing in the concrete specimen.

The stress concentration at the ends of the embedded

bars is substantially reduced. Using this test method, Strength, modulus of elasticity and Poisson's ratio

more that 90% of over 200 tensile specimens tested The compressive strength, tensile strength and flex-

fractured in the middle 200 mm section. Fig. 4 shows ural strength of concretes of various mixes are tabu-

some tensile specimens after testing. lated in Table 3. Their relationships are evaluated and

188 Magazine of Concrete Research, 2000, 52, No. 3

Downloaded by [ Technische Informationsbibliothek Universitaetsbibliothek Hannover / TIBUB (NEW)] on [09/11/18]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.

Tensile strain capacity of concrete

Tensile stress: MPa

3

Mix Compressive Tensile Modulus of

2 strength: MPa strength: rupture:

MPa MPa

Cube Cylinder

1

OPC1 67´8 56´5 3´33 4´73

0 OPC2 58´4 48´8 2´90 4´17

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 OPC3 49´3 40´3 2´73 4´29

Tensile strain: µε OPC4 40´4 32´5 2´68 3´65

PFA 49´2 39´8 2´48 3´93

Fig. 3. Typical stress±strain curves of concrete in tension GGBFS 49´3 38´9 2´70 4´07

M1 41´2 35´2 2´04 2´88

M2 24´5 20´1 1´68 2´65

P1 81´3 61´3 1´22 2´79

listed in Table 4. The results show that concrete with a P2 62´9 42´4 1´01 2´42

higher compressive strength has a lower tensile/com-

pressive strength ratio. The tensile strength of concrete

and mortar is about two-thirds of the flexural strength.

The flexural strength and tensile strength are about compressive, flexure and tension tests are depicted in

8´5±11´5% and 5´5±8´5%, respectively, of the cylinder Figs 5±7. Stress±strain curves of concrete are affected

compressive strength, or 6´5±9´5% and 4´5±7% of the by the applied state of stress. Under uniaxial compres-

cube strength. sion, the higher the compressive strength, the longer

Aggregate arrests cracks much less frequently under the linear portion of the stress±strain curve (Fig. 5).

tension than under compression in concrete. Under ten- However, as expected, high-strength concrete has a low

sion, only a few cracks, can be fully developed and maximum compressive strain at failure, indicating more

cause failure of the specimen, rather than the numerous brittle behaviour. Concrete is more ductile under the

cracks that are developed under compression. Owing to flexural-strength test than under the tension test, as

the lack of aggregate, cement paste shows a very low demonstrated by the longer flat portion of most stress±

tensile strength although its compressive strength is strain curves shown in Fig. 6 compared with those

very high. It seems that fine aggregate shows lower depicted in Fig. 7.

resistance against cracking than coarse aggregate. Mor- The modulus of elasticity of concrete was taken as

tar M1 has lower tensile and flexural strengths than the slope of the linear portion of its stress±strain

concrete OPC4, while both have almost same cube curves. Table 5 lists the values of the modulus of

compressive strength. elasticity under various states of stress. For concrete

The stress±strain relationships of concrete under with low compressive strength (mix OPC4), the values

Magazine of Concrete Research, 2000, 52, No. 3 189

Downloaded by [ Technische Informationsbibliothek Universitaetsbibliothek Hannover / TIBUB (NEW)] on [09/11/18]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.

Wee et al.

Mix Ratio: %

Tensile strength to cube Tensile strength to Flexural strength to Flexural strength to Tensile strength to

compressive strength cylinder compressive cube compressive cylinder compressive flexural strength

strength strength strength

OPC1 4´91 5´89 6´98 8´37 70´4

OPC2 4´97 5´94 7´14 8´55 69´5

OPC3 5´54 6´77 8´70 10´64 63´6

OPC4 6´63 8´25 9´03 11´23 73´4

PFA 5´04 6´25 7´99 9´87 63´1

GGBFS 5´47 6´94 8´26 10´45 66´3

M1 4´95 5´79 6´99 8´18 70´8

M2 6´86 8´36 10´82 13´18 63´4

P1 1´50 1´99 3´43 4´55 43´7

P2 1´61 2´38 3´85 5´71 41´7

Compressive strength: MPa

OPC1 OPC2

50 Mix Modulus of Modulus of Modulus of

OPC3

40

elasticity in elasticity in elasticity in

GGBFS compression: tension: flexure:

30 GPa GPa GPa

20 OPC1 35´1 30´6 28´9

PFA OPC4 OPC2 30´4 27´4 25´8

10 OPC3 28´5 26´3 26´1

0 OPC4 26´0 26´1 25´1

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 PFA 27´0 26´7 27´0

Compressive strain: µε GGBFS 27´5 25´9 23´7

M1 24´0 22´4 21´7

Fig. 5. Stress±strain curves of concrete in compression M2 18´9 20´7 21´5

P1 24´2 21´5 18´1

P2 17´7 17´8 16´5

The moduli of elasticity in tension and flexure are the slopes of the

6

OPC1 GGBFS

linear portion of the stress±strain curve.

5 OPC2

Flexural stress: MPa

4 OPC3

3 PFA

of the modulus of elasticity under different loading

conditions are close to each other. However, for con-

2 OPC4

cretes with greater compressive strength, the values of

1 the modulus of elasticity in the compressive test are

0

greater than those in the tension or flexural-strength

0 100 200 300 400 500 tests. The higher the compressive strength, the greater

Tensile strain: µε the difference. The modulus of elasticity of mortar and

cement paste is lower than that of concrete in general.

Fig. 6. Stress±strain curves of concrete in flexure

The results show that aggregates, especially coarse

aggregate, contribute significantly to the modulus of

elasticity. Coarse aggregate increases the value of the

GGBFS modulus of elasticity under compression, flexure and

OPC1

3 tension.

Tensile stress: MPa

2 OPC3 ulus of elasticity and stress under flexure and tension.

OPC4 The values decrease gradually up to about 60% of the

PFA ultimate tensile strength and then drop sharply beyond

1

that point. It is difficult to locate the dicontinuity point,

which indicates fracture in concrete and is defined as

0

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180

the point of deviation of the stress±strain curve from a

Tensile strain: µε straight line, in flexure and tension. However, the dis-

continuity point can be easily captured during the com-

Fig. 7. Stress±strain curves of concrete in tension pression test, as shown in Fig. 10. The turning point of

190 Magazine of Concrete Research, 2000, 52, No. 3

Downloaded by [ Technische Informationsbibliothek Universitaetsbibliothek Hannover / TIBUB (NEW)] on [09/11/18]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.

Tensile strain capacity of concrete

30 0·4

Tangent modulus: GPa

Poisson's ratio

25 0·3

20

0·2

15

0·1

10

0

5

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45

0 Compressive stress: MPa

0 0·5 1·0 1·5 2·0 2·5 3·0 3·5 4·0

Flexural stress: MPa Fig. 11. Typical variation of Poisson's ratio of concrete in

Fig. 8. Typical relationship between tangent modulus and compression

flexural stress

35 also increases at an accelerated rate.

The relationship between the Poisson's ratio and the

Tangent modulus: GPa

30

25 stress in the flexural-strength test is depicted in Fig. 12.

20 In this case, the Poisson's ratio is the ratio of the lateral

15 compressive strain to the longitudinal tensile strain on

10 the surface in the constant-moment section. Poisson's

5 ratio varies inversely with the level of the stress. Fig.

0 13 shows the relationship between Poisson's ratio and

0 0·5 1·0 1·5 2·0 2·5 3·0 stress in the tension test. The Poisson's ratio, the ratio

Tensile stress: MPa

of lateral compressive strain to longitudinal tensile

Fig. 9. Typical relationship between tangent modulus and strain, decreases with stress only marginally when the

tensile stress load is below 75% of the ultimate strength. The values

then decrease sharply when the specimen is loaded

beyond 75% of its ultimate strength.

50

Compressive stress: MPa

40

In practice, the tensile strain capacity of concrete is

30 estimated as the tensile strain at 90% failure load in the

28

20 flexural-strength test. The tensile strain is measured

10

on the tensile face of constant moment portion of the

0

–1000 0 1000 2000 0·3

Tensile strain: µε Compressive strain: µε

Poisson's ratio

0·2

Fig. 10. Typical relationship between strains and stresses in

compression test 0·1

0

0 1 2 3 4 5

the volumetric-strain curve signifies the discontinuity

Flexural stress: MPa

point. The limiting tensile strain is the lateral tensile

strain at the discontinuity point, which lies between Fig. 12. Typical variation of Poisson's ratio of concrete in

300 ìå and 500 ìå. flexure

Figure 11 shows the relationship between Poisson's

ratio and the compressive stress in the concrete. The

relationship reflects the cracks developing in the con-

crete. The lateral tensile strain is affected by cracking

Poisson's ratio

75% of the ultimate load, most cracks exist in the

transition zone between the matrix and the coarse 0

0 0·5 1·0 1·5 2·0 2·5 3·0

aggregate, while matrix cracking is negligible. The

Tensile stress: MPa

Poisson's ratio shows a marginal increment in this re-

gime. When the load is above 75% of the ultimate load, Fig. 13. Typical variation of Poisson's ratio of concrete in

cracks in both the transition zone and the matrix mortar tension

Magazine of Concrete Research, 2000, 52, No. 3 191

Wee et al.

29 Concluding remarks

city is estimated as the tensile strain at failure. The

values of tensile strain capacity obtained from the flex- The mould proposed here for preparing a specimen

ural-strength test and the tension test, and those calcu- for a direct tension test overcomes the difficulties in

lated from equation (1) are tabulated and compared in centralizing and aligning the two embedded bars in the

Table 6. The standard deviation for each category of specimen. The method adopted enhances the bond

the text results is also included in the table. strength between the embedded bar and the concrete

The tensile strain capacity of the concrete varies and minimizes the stress concentration at the end of the

marginally with the concrete mixes. The values of embedded bar. The method can be used to study the

tensile strain capacity obtained from different test mechanical behaviour of concrete under tension, such

methods differ. The average value derived from the as the relationship between tensile stress and strain and

flexural-strength test is 188 ìå, that is, about 60 ìå creep under tension.

larger than that obtained from the direct tension test. The state of stress affects the failure characteristics

The tensile strain capacity of the concrete lies between of concrete. Concrete is most brittle under tension. The

150 ìå and 210 ìå in the flexural-strength test and be- tensile strain capacity, which is used to evaluate crack-

tween 100 ìå and 140 ìå in the direct tension test. The ing in concrete, should be chosen judiciously depending

standard deviation of the tensile strain capacity under on the state of stress in the concrete. The limiting

flexure also shows a larger value than that under the tensile strain in the uniaxial compressive test lies

tension test. between 300 ìå and 500 ìå. The tensile strain capacity

Theoretically, if the stress±strain curve in tension is of concrete lies between 150 ìå and 210 ìå in the

assumed to vary linearly to failure, the tensile strain flexural-strength test and between 100 ìå and 140 ìå in

capacity should be equal to the tensile strength divided the direct tension test. The tensile strain capacity ob-

by the modulus of elasticity under tension. In equation tained from the flexure test has a higher standard devia-

(1), the tensile strain capacity is esimated as the flex- tion. The tensile strain capacity calculated from

ural strength divided by the modulus of elasticity under equation (1) on the basis of the flexural strength from

compression. Coincidentally, both the flexural strength the flexure test and the modulus of elasticity from the

and the modulus of elasticity under compression are compression test is, coincidentally, close to that ob-

higher than the tensile strength from the direct tension tained from the direct tension test. However, the former

test and the modulus of elasticity in tension respec- overestimates the tensile strain capacity of cement

tively, and hence this procedure is self-correcting. paste.

Although the differences are not proportional and de- The tensile strength obtained from the direct tension

pend on the grade of concrete, the values of tensile test is about two-thirds of the flexural strength of the

strain capacity calculated from equation (1) do not concrete. The flexural strength is about 8±11´5% of the

differ significantly from those obtained from the direct cylinder compressive strength or 6´5±9´5% of the cube

tension test. The average value of the former is 145 ìå, strength. The tensile strength is 5´5±8´5% of the cylin-

which is reasonably close to that of the latter. Equation der compressive strength or 4´5±7% of the cube

(1), however, will not be able to predict the tensile strength. Cement paste shows a very low tensile

strain capacity of cement paste accurately, as the value strength. The modulus of elasticity obtained from the

obtained from equation (1) is much greater than that tension test is similar to that obtained from the com-

under the direct tension test. pression test for low-grade concrete, but the values of

the former are lower than those of the latter for con-

crete of high grade. The value of Poisson's ratio de-

creases when the tensile or flexural stress in the

concrete is raised. The value of Poisson's ratio in com-

Table 6. Tensile strain capacity and standard deviation pression varies insignificantly before reaching the dis-

continuity point and increases sharply afterwards.

Mix Tensile strain capacity: ìå Standard deviation:

ìå

Flexure Tension Equation (1)

Flexure Tension

OPC1 179 125 135 38´9 31´5

Acknowledgement

OPC2 207 130 137 63´2 26´6 The research scholarship awarded to the second

OPC3 201 126 151 45´8 35´8

OPC4 151 125 147 31´3 22´2

author by the National University of Singapore is grate-

PFA 178 103 146 58´6 21´6 fully acknowledged.

GGBFS 210 141 152 51´6 29´7

M1 175 99 110 26´4 30´2

M2 130 112 152 12´4 21´7 References

P1 133 56 100 15´2 10´8

P2 173 69 158 22´7 6´2 1. Neville A. M. Some aspects of the strength of concrete. Part 1.

Civil Engineering, 1959, 54, 1153±1156.

Tensile strain capacity of concrete

2. Neville A. M. Some aspects of the strength of concrete. Part 2. anism of plain concrete under uniaxial tension. Concrete Library

Civil Engineering, 1959, 54, 1308±1310. of the JSCE, 1994, No. 24, 31±45.

3. Neville A. M. Some aspects of the strength of concrete. Part 3. 18. Elvery R. H. and Haroun W. A direct tensile test for concrete

Civil Engineering, 1959, 54, 1435±1438. under long- or short-term loading. Magazine of Concrete Re-

4. Lowe P. G. Deformation and fracture of plain concrete. Maga- search, 1968, 20, No. 63, 111±116.

zine of Concrete Research, 1978, 30, No. 105, 200±204. 19. British Standards Institution. Specification for Ordinary

5. Newman K. Criteria for the behaviour of plain concrete under and Rapid Hardening Portland Cement. BSI, Milton Keynes,

complex states of stress. Proceedings of the International Con- 1978, BS 12.

ference on the Structure of Concrete. London, 1965, pp. 255± 20. British Standards Institution. Specification for Ground

274. Granulated Blastfurnace Slag for Use with Portland Cement.

6. Carino N. J. and Slate F. O. Limiting tensile strain criterion for BSI, Milton Keynes, 1992, BS 6699.

failure of concrete. Journal of the American Concrete Institute, 21. British Standards Institution. Pulverized-fuel Ash. Part 1,

1976, 73, No. 3, 160±165. Specification for Pulverized-fuel Ash for Use with Portland Ce-

7. Hughes B. P. and Chapman C. P. Direct Tensile Tests for Con- ment. BSI, Milton Keynes, 1997, BS 3892.

crete Using Modern Adhesives. RILEM, Paris, 1980, Bulletin 26, 22. American Society for Testing and Materials. Standard

pp. 70±80. Specification for Concrete Aggregates. ASTM, Philadelphia,

8. Dunstan M. R. H. Rolled Concrete for DamsÐA Laboratory 1997, C33±97.

Study of Properties of High Fly Ash Content Concrete. CIRIA, 23. Singapore Standards Institution. Testing Concrete. Meth-

London, 1981, Technical Note 105. od of Normal Curing of Testing Specimens. SSI, Singapore, 1987,

9. Xie N. X. and Liu W. Y. Determining tensile properties of mass Part A11.

concrete by direct tensile test. Materials Journal of the American 24. British Standards Institution. Testing Concrete. Method

Concrete Institute, 1989, 214±219. for Determination of Slump. BSI, Milton Keynes, 1983, BS 1881:

10. Houghton D. L. Determining tensile strain capacity of mass Part 102.

concrete. Journal of the American Concrete Institute, 1976, 25. British Standards Institution. Testing concrete. Method for

691±700. Determination of Compressive Strength of Concrete Cubes. BSI,

11. Houk I. E., Jr., Paxton J. A. and Houghton D. L. Prediction Milton Keynes, 1983, BS 1881: Part 116.

of thermal stress and strain capacity of concrete by tests on small 26. British Standards Istitution. Testing Concrete. Method for

beams. Journal of the American Concrete Institute, Proceedings, Determination of Static Modulus of Elasticity in Compression.

1970, 67, No. 3, 253±261. BSI, Milton Keynes, 1983, BS 1881: Part 121.

12. Thomas M. D. A., Mukherjee P. K., Sato J. A. and Everitt 27. British Standards Institution. Testing Concrete. Method

M. F. Effect of fly ash composition on thermal cracking in con- for Determination of Flexural Strength. BSI, Milton Keynes,

crete. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Fly 1983, BS 1881: Part 118.

Ash, Silica Fume, and Natural Pozzolans in Concrete, Milwaukee, 28. American Concrete Institute. ACI Manual of Concrete

1995, 1, 81±98. Practice. Mass Concrete. ACI, Detroit, 1989, ACI 207, Part 1-

13. Hunt J. G. A Laboratory Study of Early-age Thermal Cracking 207-4R.

of Concrete. Cement and Concrete Association, London, 1971. 29. Hydroelectricity Department of the People's Republic

14. RILEM. Direct Tensile Test of Concrete. RILEM, Paris, 1963, of China. Experimental method of limiting tensile strain of

Bulletin 20, pp. 84±89. concrete. In Standard Methods of Test for Concrete in Hydraulic

15. Johnson C. D. and Sidwell E. H. Testing concrete in tension Structure. HDPRC, Beijing, 1982, SD 105±82, Part 506±80 [in

and in compression. Magazine of Concrete Research, 1968, 20, Chinese].

No. 65, 221±228.

16. Baishya M. C., Cook R. L. and Kelly M. T. Testing of

polymer injection material. Concrete International, 1997, Apr.,

48±51. Discussion contributions on this paper should reach the editor by

17. Ueda M., Hasebe N., Sato M. and Okuda H. Fracture mech- 25 September 2000

Downloaded by [ Technische Informationsbibliothek Universitaetsbibliothek Hannover / TIBUB (NEW)] on [09/11/18]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.

- Composite BarTransféré parSiddharth Narayanan Chidambareswaran
- Technical Tidbits July-August 2005_ Tensile Strength ConsiderationsTransféré parLee Koon Peng
- Cable Tray Structural Design.pdfTransféré parChristian D. Orbe
- Rc Wall Design WebTransféré parDavid Shutte
- E 447.pdfTransféré parIsm el
- The Tensile Strength of Rocks_Hobbs1964Transféré parSohrab Gheibi
- LeatherTransféré parwww3q
- Experiment 1Transféré parVinoth Kumar
- Simulation on Bushed Coupling in C++Transféré parabhianand123
- Raphael - Tensile Strength of ConcreteTransféré pararavindtank
- Standard Specification for Ferritic Malleable ITransféré parNicolas Roldan
- S5 Full ReportTransféré parNasrul
- WW-T-700_4FTransféré parBryan Martinez
- 2Transféré parالمهندس أبو أسامة
- Unconfined Compressive TestTransféré parsuhaimi
- Presentation GEOBURGGTransféré parM Ivan Adi
- Development and testing of Al5083 alloy reinforced by SiC particlesTransféré parijsret
- 180 Top Most Concrete Technology and Design of Concrete Structures Interview Questions Civil Engineering Objective Type Questions and AnswersTransféré parSheezan Khan
- Tensile StrengthTransféré parAnkit Kumar
- Blast Resisting Measures and Design of Vulnerable Components by UFC-3-340-02 (2008)Transféré parAfzal Waseem
- ANALYSIS of CURRENT METHODS of High Strength Concrete BeamsTransféré parSathya
- Engineering Properties of Silurian & Devonian Materials by JohnstonTransféré par4493464
- Design of Pressure Vessels for Low-Cycle Fatigue.pdfTransféré parLeonardo Terra
- IRJET-An Experimental Study to Develop Fibre Reinforced Concrete by Adding Inorganic Wastes as FibresTransféré parIRJET Journal
- 12-15Transféré parEdgardo Davidi
- Material ReportTransféré parSrivathsan R. Sharma
- C 1352 – 96 R02 ;QZEZNTI_Transféré parRufo Francisco
- MEC 2403-Lecture 2_SummaryTransféré parnicholas
- Masterflow 928T.pdfTransféré parChristian D. Orbe
- hybrid fibreTransféré parprabindp

- Wandartiger Träger - BerechnungsmethodenTransféré parxxx
- Semiar BIM - Frankfurt 21-22.03.2019Transféré parxxx
- CCIP Strut and Tie Feb15Transféré parAndreBenAli
- Ks StatikhandbuchTransféré parxxx
- Wandscheibe Mit TüröffnungTransféré parxxx
- Budimex i YouNick Mint Szukają Innowato...Ych - Infrastruktura - Newseria BiznesTransféré parxxx
- PERFORMANCE OF TECHNIQUES TO MINIMISE REFLECTION CRACKING AND ASSOCIATED DEVELOPMENTS IN PAVEMENT INVESTIGATION FOR MAINTENANCE OF UK MILITARY AIRFIELDSTransféré parxxx
- Wsparcie Finansowe Przed Doktoratem Lub HabilitacjąTransféré parmultikultiblablano
- Zasady Fin DoktoratTransféré parxxx
- Publication for AnalysisTransféré parxxx

- Lughi Et Al 2010, Zirconia and Low Temperature DegradationTransféré parEdward Elric2
- Seismic Response of Building Structures With Dampers in Shear WallsTransféré paralsafi118424
- Fouling FactorsTransféré parprasw
- CE-Conventional Paper-II-2010.pdfTransféré parShashank Tiwari
- CALFEM - A Finite Element ToolboxTransféré parqeddy
- Dense Medium CycloneTransféré parMohsen Aghaei
- ProMax pipeTransféré parchenguofu
- Exp 1 Memb221Transféré parKarthik Muniandy
- ds32_431Transféré parluthfiboment
- Design for ShearTransféré parMuhammad Saqib Abrar
- Heat Transfer Lab(1)Transféré parLakshmi Swamy
- Dropwise-and-filmwise-condensation.pdfTransféré parmustafa
- RccTransféré parGourav Kapoor
- Heat & ThermodynamicsTransféré pardso
- 1009.3299Transféré parJuan Navarrete
- AlphaTransféré parJojen
- LM-19Transféré parUdrea Vlad
- ERA2002 Major Hazards- Blast Resistant Design of LQsTransféré parRatulKumarMajumdar
- Course Plan SomTransféré parAmitGupta
- slides Chapter 4 Material Behavior-Linear Elastic SolidsTransféré parkkhemmo
- The Main Functions of a Drilling Mud.Transféré parMuhammad Mohtashim
- Heat Exchanger Exergy EvaluationTransféré parGurjeet Singh
- Batch Heating by SteamTransféré partpchowo
- Introduction to ThermodynamicsTransféré parmanosmagicas7340
- L33 - Psychrometric Properties of Moist AirTransféré parHasif D. Müller
- Chapter 5 Differential ApproachTransféré parAadarshPotluru
- FULLTEXT01.pdfTransféré parVijay Sane
- Circular plates Literature ReviewTransféré parLovesh Chennai
- SPE-152975-MSTransféré parmatheus_moreira0990
- Separator SizingTransféré parTolstoy Leo