Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 36

# Reliability Test.

1- MU
Case Processing Summary

N %

Excludeda 0 .0

Total 49 100.0

## a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the

procedure.

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's
Alpha N of Items

.797 19

Observations:-
The result of Cronbach’s Alpha is 0.797 which is greater than 0.50 its mean higher than Cronbach’s alpha the
data is more reliable.
Or we can say that the table shows the reliability of alpha is 79% reliability which is greater than the benchmark
the data is reliable as for as Cronbach Alpha.
2-Age
Case Processing Summary

N %

Excludeda 0 .0

Total 49 100.0

## a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the

procedure.

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's
Alpha N of Items

.819 19

Observations:-
The result of Cronbach’s Alpha is 0.819 which is greater than 0.50 its mean higher than Cronbach’s alpha the
data is more reliable.
Or we can say that the table shows the reliability of alpha is 82% reliability which is greater than the benchmark
the data is reliable as for as Cronbach Alpha.

3-Gender

N %

Excludeda 0 .0

Total 49 100.0

## a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the

procedure.

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's
Alpha N of Items

.820 19
Observations:-
The result of Cronbach’s Alpha is 0.820 which is greater than 0.50 its mean higher than Cronbach’s alpha the
data is more reliable.
Or we can say that the table shows the reliability of alpha is 82% reliability which is greater than the benchmark
the data is reliable as for as Cronbach Alpha.

4- JS

N %

Excludeda 0 .0

Total 49 100.0

## a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the

procedure.

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's
Alpha N of Items

.818 19

Observations:-
The result of Cronbach’s Alpha is 0.818 which is greater than 0.50 its mean higher than Cronbach’s alpha the
data is more reliable.
Or we can say that the table shows the reliability of alpha is 82% reliability which is greater than the benchmark
the data is reliable as for as Cronbach Alpha.

Frequency
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
less than 25 34 68.0 68.0 68.0
between 25 and 35 14 28.0 28.0 96.0
more than 35 2 4.0 4.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

Observations:-
 68 % respondent of age group less than 25
 28% respondent of age group between 25and 35
 4 % respondent of age group more than 35

Results:
Majority our respondents are less than 25 years of age

Q2: Gender
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
male 20 40.0 40.0 40.0
female 30 60.0 60.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

Observations:-
 60 % respondents are female
 40 % respondents are male

Results:
Majority of respondents are Females
Q3: Job Status
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
employed 32 64.0 64.0 64.0
unemployed 18 36.0 36.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

Observations:-
 64 %respondents are employed.
 36 % respondents are unemployed.

Results:
64% (Majority) of our respondents are employed

## Q4: How many hours do you have cell phone in a day?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
less than 1 hour 7 14.0 14.0 14.0
1 to 3 hours 18 36.0 36.0 50.0
4 to 6 hours 7 14.0 14.0 64.0
7 to 9 hours 6 12.0 12.0 76.0
more than 10 hours 12 24.0 24.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

Observations:-
 36 % respondents have 1 to 3 hours usage of mobile phone.
 24 % respondents have a usage of mobile phone more than 10 hours.
 14 % respondents have a usage of mobile phone less than 1 hours or 4 to 6 hours.
 12% respondents have a usage of mobile phone 7 to 9 hours.

Results:
36 % respondents use 1 to 3 hours mobile phone which are the majority of the respondents

## Q5: Mobile phones have great importance in improving student’s quality of

education.
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
strongly agree 7 14.0 14.0 14.0
agree 24 48.0 48.0 62.0
undecided 8 16.0 16.0 78.0
disagree 8 16.0 16.0 94.0
strongly disagree 3 6.0 6.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

Observations:-
 48% respondents are agreed that mobile phones have a great importance in improving the quality of
education.
 16 % respondents are either undecided or disagree that mobile phones have a great importance in
improving the quality of education.
 14 % respondents are strongly agreed that mobile phones have a great importance in improving the
quality of education.
 6% respondents are strongly disagreed that mobile phones have a great importance in improving the
quality of education.

Results:
Majority of our respondents are agreed that mobile phones have a great importance in improving the quality of
education.

## Q6: Mobile phones help in enhancing student’s knowledge.

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
strongly agree 7 14.0 14.0 14.0
Agree 22 44.0 44.0 58.0
Undecided 8 16.0 16.0 74.0
Disagree 11 22.0 22.0 96.0
strongly disagree 2 4.0 4.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

 44% of respondents are agreed that mobile phones help in enhancing the student’s knowledge.
 22% of respondents are disagreed that mobile phones help in enhancing the student’s knowledge.
 16% of respondents are undecided that mobile phones help in enhancing the student’s knowledge.
 14% of respondents are strongly agreed that mobile phones help in enhancing the student’s
knowledge.
 4% of respondents are strongly disagreed that mobile phones help in enhancing the student’s
knowledge.

Results:
Majority 44% of respondents are agreed that mobile phones help in enhancing the student’s knowledge.

Q7: Approaching teachers has become more convenient with cell phones.

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

## Total 50 100.0 100.0

Observations:-
 50% respondents are agreed that approaching teachers has become more convenient with cell phones.
 34% respondents are strongly agreed that approaching teachers has become more convenient with cell
phones.
 10% respondents are disagreed that approaching teachers has become more convenient with cell phones.
 4% respondents are strongly agreed that approaching teachers has become more convenient with cell
phones.
 2% respondents are neutral that approaching teachers has become more convenient with cell phones.

Results:
Majority 50% respondents are agreed that approaching teachers has become more convenient with cell phones.

Q8: The student’s academic performance has been decreased due to excess usage
of cell phones.
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
strongly agree 26 52.0 52.0 52.0
Agree 15 30.0 30.0 82.0
Undecided 3 6.0 6.0 88.0
Disagree 6 12.0 12.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

Observations:-
 52% respondents are strongly agreed that the student’s academic performance has been decreased due to
the excess usage of cell phone.
 30% respondents are agreed that the student’s academic performance has been decreased due to the
excess usage of cell phone.
 12% respondents are disagreed that the student’s academic performance has been decreased due to the
excess usage of cell phone.
 6% respondents are undecided that the student’s academic performance has been decreased due to the
excess usage of cell phone.

Results:
Majority 52% respondents are strongly agreed that the student’s academic performance has been decreased due
to the excess usage of cell phone.

Q9: The student’s waste their precious time in sending useless SMS to friend during
lectures.
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
strongly agree 25 50.0 50.0 50.0
agree 18 36.0 36.0 86.0
undecided 4 8.0 8.0 94.0
disagree 2 4.0 4.0 98.0
strongly disagree 1 2.0 2.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

Observations:-
 50% respondents are strongly agreed that the student wastes their precious time in sending useless
SMS to friends during lectures.
 36% respondents are agreed that the student wastes their precious time in sending useless SMS to
friends during lectures.
 8% respondents are undecided that the student wastes their precious time in sending useless SMS to
friends during lectures.
 4% respondents are disagreed that the student wastes their precious time in sending useless SMS to
friends during lectures.
 2% respondents are strongly disagreed that the student wastes their precious time in sending useless
SMS to friends during lectures.

Results:
Majority 50% respondents are strongly agreed that the student wastes their precious time in sending useless
SMS to friends during lectures.

Q10: Student’s punctuality level in classes is adversely affected due to use of cell
phones during late night hours.
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
strongly agree 22 44.0 44.0 44.0
Agree 13 26.0 26.0 70.0
Undecided 4 8.0 8.0 78.0
Disagree 9 18.0 18.0 96.0
strongly disagree 2 4.0 4.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

Observations:-
 44 % respondents are strongly agreed that student’s punctuality level in classes is adversely affected due
to use of cell phone during late night hours.
 26% respondents are agreed that student’s punctuality level in classes is adversely affected due to use of
cell phone during late night hours.
 18% respondents are disagreed that student’s punctuality level in classes is adversely affected due to use
of cell phone during late night hours.
 8% respondents are undecided that student’s punctuality level in classes is adversely affected due to use
of cell phone during late night hours.
 4% respondents are strongly disagreed that student’s punctuality level in classes is adversely affected
due to use of cell phone during late night hours.

Results:
Majority 44 % respondents are strongly agreed that student’s punctuality level in classes is adversely affected
due to use of cell phone during late night hours.
Q11: Student’s enjoys music and play games during class lectures.
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
strongly agree 10 20.0 20.0 20.0
agree 23 46.0 46.0 66.0
undecided 4 8.0 8.0 74.0
disagree 9 18.0 18.0 92.0
strongly disagree 4 8.0 8.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

Observations:-
 46% respondents are agreed that student enjoys music and play games on mobile phone during class
lecture.
 20% respondents are strongly agreed that student enjoys music and play games on mobile phone during
class lecture.
 18% respondents are disagreed that student enjoys music and play games on mobile phone during class
lecture.
 8% respondents are undecided or strongly disagreed that student enjoys music and play games on
mobile phone during class lecture.

Results:
Majority 46% respondents are agreed that student enjoys music and play games on mobile phone during class
lecture.

Q12: Viewing adult contents via cell phones have negative on moral values of
students.
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
strongly agree 26 52.0 52.0 52.0
Agree 16 32.0 32.0 84.0
Undecided 4 8.0 8.0 92.0
Disagree 2 4.0 4.0 96.0
strongly disagree 2 4.0 4.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

Observations:-
 52% respondents are strongly agreed that viewing adult contents via cell phones have negative on moral
values of student.
 32% respondents are agreed that viewing adult contents via cell phones have negative on moral values
of student.
 8% respondents are undecided that viewing adult contents via cell phones have negative on moral values
of student.
 4% respondents are disagreed that viewing adult contents via cell phones have negative on moral values
of student.
 4% respondents are strongly disagreed that viewing adult contents via cell phones have negative on
moral values of student.
Results:
Majority 52% respondents are strongly agreed that viewing adult contents via cell phones have negative on
moral values of student.

Q13: The students uses mobile phones for cheating purpose during exams.
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
strongly agree 9 18.0 18.0 18.0
Agree 17 34.0 34.0 52.0
Undecided 12 24.0 24.0 76.0
Disagree 7 14.0 14.0 90.0
strongly disagree 5 10.0 10.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

Observations:-
 34% respondents are agreed that the student uses mobile phones for cheating purpose during exams.
 24% respondents are undecided that the student uses mobile phones for cheating purpose during exams.
 18% respondents are strongly agreed that the student uses mobile phones for cheating purpose during
exams.
 14% respondents are disagreed that the student uses mobile phones for cheating purpose during exams.
 10% respondents are strongly disagreed that the student uses mobile phones for cheating purpose during
exams.

Results:
Majority 34% respondents are agreed that the student uses mobile phones for cheating purpose during exams.

Q14: During the class lectures, student teases other fellows by sending missed calls
from unknown numbers.
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
strongly agree 14 28.0 28.0 28.0
Agree 18 36.0 36.0 64.0
Undecided 5 10.0 10.0 74.0
Disagree 10 20.0 20.0 94.0
strongly disagree 3 6.0 6.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

Observations:-
 36% respondents are agreed that during the class lectures, students tease other class fellows by sending
missed calls through unknown numbers.
 28% respondents are strongly agreed that during the class lectures, students tease other class fellows by
sending missed calls through unknown numbers.
 20% respondents are disagreed that during the class lectures, students tease other class fellows by
sending missed calls through unknown numbers.
 10% respondents are undecided that during the class lectures, students tease other class fellows by
sending missed calls through unknown numbers.
 6% respondents are strongly agreed that during the class lectures, students tease other class fellows by
sending missed calls through unknown numbers.
Results:
Majority 36% respondents are agreed that during the class lectures, students tease other class fellows by sending
missed calls through unknown numbers.

Q15: Parents can be directly connected to the teachers via cell phones and student’s
performance.
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
strongly agree 16 32.0 32.0 32.0
Agree 14 28.0 28.0 60.0
Undecided 10 20.0 20.0 80.0
Disagree 7 14.0 14.0 94.0
strongly disagree 3 6.0 6.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

Observations:-
 32% respondents are strongly agreed that parents can be directly connected to the teachers via cell
phone& access student’s performance.
 28% respondents are agreed that parents can be directly connected to the teachers via cell phone&
access student’s performance.
 20% respondents are undecided that parents can be directly connected to the teachers via cell phone&
access student’s performance.
 14% respondents are disagreed that parents can be directly connected to the teachers via cell phone&
access student’s performance.
 6% respondents are strongly disagreed that parents can be directly connected to the teachers via cell
phone& access student’s performance.

Results:
Majority 32% respondents are strongly agreed that parents can be directly connected to the teachers via cell
phone& access student’s performance.

Q16: Class announcements and deadlines can be announced via cell phones.
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
strongly agree 26 52.0 52.0 52.0
Agree 18 36.0 36.0 88.0
Undecided 3 6.0 6.0 94.0
Disagree 2 4.0 4.0 98.0

## strongly disagree 1 2.0 2.0 100.0

Total 50 100.0 100.0
Observations:-
 52% respondents arestrongly agreed that the class announcements and deadlines can be announced via
cell phones.
 36% respondents are agreed that the class announcements and deadlines can be announced via cell
phones.
 6% respondents are undecided that the class announcements and deadlines can be announced via cell
phones.
 4% respondents are disagreed that the class announcements and deadlines can be announced via cell
phones.
 2% respondents are strongly disagreed that the class announcements and deadlines can be announced via
cell phones.

Results:
Majority 52% respondents are strongly agreed that the class announcements and deadlines can be announced
via cell phones.

## Q17: Mobile phones abbreviations adversely affect the writing composition of

students.
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
strongly agree 24 48.0 48.0 48.0
Agree 18 36.0 36.0 84.0
Undecided 4 8.0 8.0 92.0
Disagree 4 8.0 8.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

Observations:-

 48% respondents are strongly agreed that mobile phone abbreviations adversely affect the writing
composition of students.
 36% respondents are agreed that mobile phone abbreviations adversely affect the writing
composition of students.
 8% respondents are undecided that mobile phone abbreviations adversely affect the writing
composition of students.
 8% respondents are disagreed that mobile phone abbreviations adversely affect the writing
composition of students.

Results:
Majority 48% respondents are strongly agreed that mobile phone abbreviations adversely affect the writing
composition of students.
Q18: Excess usage of cell phones will have less interaction among family members.
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
strongly agree 23 46.0 46.0 46.0
Agree 15 30.0 30.0 76.0
Undecided 2 4.0 4.0 80.0
Disagree 8 16.0 16.0 96.0
strongly disagree 2 4.0 4.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

Observations:-
 46% respondents are strongly agreed that excess usage of cell phone decrease the interaction between
the family members.
 30% respondents are agreed that excess usage of cell phone decrease the interaction between the family
members.
 16% respondents are disagreed that excess usage of cell phone decrease the interaction between the
family members.
 4% respondents are undecided or strongly disagreed that excess usage of cell phone decrease the
interaction between the family members.

Results:
Majority 46% of respondent are strongly agreed that excess usage of cell phone decrease the interaction
between the family members.

Q19: In cell phones, internet option helps the student to submit online assignment
with ease.
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid strongly agree 16 32.0 32.0 32.0
Agree 17 34.0 34.0 66.0
Undecided 10 20.0 20.0 86.0
Disagree 6 12.0 12.0 98.0
strongly disagree 1 2.0 2.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

Observations:-
 34% respondents are agreed that in cell phone, internet option helps the students to online submit the
assignment with ease.
 32% respondents are strongly agreed that in cell phone, internet option helps the students to online
submit the assignment with ease.
 20% respondents are undecided that in cell phone, internet option helps the students to online submit the
assignment with ease.
 12% respondents are disagreed that in cell phone, internet option helps the students to online submit the
assignment with ease.
 2% respondents are strongly disagreed that in cell phone, internet option helps the students to online
submit the assignment with ease.
Results:
Majority 34% respondents are agreed that in cell phone, internet option
helps the students to online submit the assignment with ease.

Q20: In cell phone, reminder option helps the student to actively perform their tasks
on time.
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
strongly agree 14 28.0 28.0 28.0
agree 21 42.0 42.0 70.0
undecided 6 12.0 12.0 82.0
disagree 9 18.0 18.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

Observations:-
 42% respondents are agreed that in cell phone, reminder option helps the students to actively perform
 28% respondents are strongly agreed that in cell phone, reminder option helps the students to actively
 18% respondents are disagreed that in cell phone, reminder option helps the students to actively perform
 12% respondents are undecided that in cell phone, reminder option helps the students to actively

Results:
Majority 42% respondents are agreed that in cell phone, reminder option helps the students to actively perform

Q21: The mobile phones features help the students to share material with other
classmates.
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
strongly agree 16 32.0 32.0 32.0
Agree 23 46.0 46.0 78.0
Undecided 3 6.0 6.0 84.0
Disagree 6 12.0 12.0 96.0
strongly disagree 2 4.0 4.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

Observations:-
 46% respondents are agreed that the mobile phone features helps the students to share materials among
other class mates.
 32% respondents are strongly agreed that the mobile phone features helps the students to share materials
among other class mates.
 12% respondents are disagreed that the mobile phone features helps the students to share materials
among other class mates.
 6% respondents are undecided that the mobile phone features helps the students to share materials
among other class mates.
 4% respondents are strongly disagreed that the mobile phone features helps the students to share
materials among other class mates.

Results:
46% respondents are agreed that the mobile phone features helps the students to share materials among other
class mates.

Q22: The disturbance substantially decreases when the cell phone is switched to
silent mode.
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
strongly agree 25 50.0 50.0 50.0
Agree 19 38.0 38.0 88.0
Undecided 1 2.0 2.0 90.0
Disagree 3 6.0 6.0 96.0
strongly disagree 2 4.0 4.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

Observations:-
 50% respondents are strongly agreed that the disturbance substantially decreases when the phone is
switched to silent mode.
 38% respondents are agreed that the disturbance substantially decreases when the phone is switched
to silent mode.
 6% respondents are disagreed that the disturbance substantially decreases when the phone is
switched to silent mode.
 4% respondents are strongly disagreed that the disturbance substantially decreases when the phone is
switched to silent mode.
 2% respondents are undecided that the disturbance substantially decreases when the phone is
switched to silent mode.

Results:
Majority 50% of respondents are strongly agreed that the disturbance substantially decreases when the phone is
switched to silent mode.
5- Cross Tabs (Contingency Tabs)

Cases

## MU * Gender 49 100.0% 0 .0% 49 100.0%

MU * Gender Crosstabulation

Gender

## % within MU 57.1% 42.9% 100.0%

1 to 3 hours Count 6 12 18

## % within MU 33.3% 66.7% 100.0%

4 to 6 hours Count 3 4 7

## % within MU 42.9% 57.1% 100.0%

7 to 9 hours Count 1 4 5

## % within MU 41.7% 58.3% 100.0%

Total Count 19 30 49

## % within MU 38.8% 61.2% 100.0%

Observations:-
 61.2 % respondents are total numbers of female
 38.8 % respondents are total numbers of male
 57.1 % respondents are male (Less than 1 hour)
 80.0 % respondents are female (7 to 9 hours)

Results:
Majority of respondents are Females (61.2% out off 100%)
Case Processing Summary

Cases

## MU * Gender 49 100.0% 0 .0% 49 100.0%

MU * JS Crosstabulation

JS

## % within MU 71.4% 28.6% 100.0%

1 to 3 hours Count 9 9 18

## % within MU 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

4 to 6 hours Count 3 4 7

## % within MU 42.9% 57.1% 100.0%

7 to 9 hours Count 3 2 5

## % within MU 91.7% 8.3% 100.0%

Total Count 31 18 49

## % within MU 63.3% 36.7% 100.0%

Observations:-
 63.3 % respondents are employed.
 36.7 % respondents are unemployed.

Results:
63.3 % (Majority) of our respondents are Employed

Cases

## MU * Age 49 100.0% 0 .0% 49 100.0%

MU * Age Crosstabulation

Age

Between 25 and
Less than 25 35 More than 35 Total

## % within MU 42.9% 42.9% 14.3% 100.0%

1 to 3 hours Count 15 3 0 18

## % within MU 83.3% 16.7% .0% 100.0%

4 to 6 hours Count 5 2 0 7

## % within MU 71.4% 28.6% .0% 100.0%

7 to 9 hours Count 4 1 0 5

## % within MU 50.0% 41.7% 8.3% 100.0%

Total Count 33 14 2 49

## % within MU 67.3% 28.6% 4.1% 100.0%

Observations:-
 67.3 % respondent of age group less than 25
 28.6 % respondent of age group between 25and 35
 4.1 % respondent of age group more than 35

Results:
(67.3% of respondent in majority are less than 25 years of age

Cases

## MU * Q5 49 100.0% 0 .0% 49 100.0%

MU * Q5 Crosstabulation

Q5

Strongly
Strongly Agree Agree Undecided Disagree Disagree Total

## % within MU 14.3% 28.6% .0% 28.6% 28.6% 100.0%

1 to 3 hours Count 1 8 7 1 1 18

## % within MU 5.6% 44.4% 38.9% 5.6% 5.6% 100.0%

4 to 6 hours Count 0 5 1 1 0 7

## % within MU .0% 71.4% 14.3% 14.3% .0% 100.0%

7 to 9 hours Count 2 1 0 2 0 5

## % within MU 25.0% 66.7% .0% 8.3% .0% 100.0%

Total Count 7 24 8 7 3 49

## % within MU 14.3% 49.0% 16.3% 14.3% 6.1% 100.0%

Observations:-
 49.0% respondents are agreed that mobile phones have a great importance in improving the quality of
education.
 16.3 % respondents are either undecided that mobile phones have a great importance in improving the
quality of education.
 14.3 % respondents are strongly agreed that mobile phones have a great importance in improving the
quality of education.
 14.3% respondents are strongly disagreed that mobile phones have a great importance in improving the
quality of education.
 6.1% respondents are strongly disagreed that mobile phones have a great importance in improving the
quality of education.

Results:
Majority of our respondents are agreed that mobile phones have a great importance in improving the quality of
education.

Cases

## MU * Q6 49 100.0% 0 .0% 49 100.0%

MU * Q6 Crosstabulation

Q6

Strongly
Strongly Agree Agree Undecided Disagree Disagree Total

## % within MU 14.3% 28.6% 14.3% 28.6% 14.3% 100.0%

1 to 3 hours Count 2 7 3 5 1 18

## % within MU 11.1% 38.9% 16.7% 27.8% 5.6% 100.0%

4 to 6 hours Count 0 6 1 0 0 7

## % within MU .0% 85.7% 14.3% .0% .0% 100.0%

7 to 9 hours Count 2 1 0 2 0 5

## % within MU 16.7% 50.0% 25.0% 8.3% .0% 100.0%

Total Count 7 22 8 10 2 49

## % within MU 14.3% 44.9% 16.3% 20.4% 4.1% 100.0%

 44.9% of respondents are agreed that mobile phones help in enhancing the student’s knowledge.
 20.4% of respondents are disagreed that mobile phones help in enhancing the student’s knowledge.
 16.3% of respondents are undecided that mobile phones help in enhancing the student’s knowledge.
 14.3% of respondents are strongly agreed that mobile phones help in enhancing the student’s
knowledge.
 4.1% of respondents are strongly disagreed that mobile phones help in enhancing the student’s
knowledge.

Results:
Majority 44.9% of respondents are agreed that mobile phones help in enhancing the student’s knowledge.

Cases

## MU * Q22 49 100.0% 0 .0% 49 100.0%

MU * Q22 Crosstabulation

Q22

Strongly
Strongly Agree Agree Undecided Disagree Disagree Total

## % within MU 71.4% 14.3% .0% .0% 14.3% 100.0%

1 to 3 hours Count 10 6 0 2 0 18

## % within MU 55.6% 33.3% .0% 11.1% .0% 100.0%

4 to 6 hours Count 2 4 0 1 0 7

## % within MU 28.6% 57.1% .0% 14.3% .0% 100.0%

7 to 9 hours Count 2 2 0 0 1 5

## % within MU 41.7% 50.0% 8.3% .0% .0% 100.0%

Total Count 24 19 1 3 2 49

## % within MU 49.0% 38.8% 2.0% 6.1% 4.1% 100.0%

Observations:-
 49.0% respondents are strongly agreed that the disturbance substantially decreases when the phone is
switched to silent mode.
 38.8% respondents are agreed that the disturbance substantially decreases when the phone is
switched to silent mode.
 6.1% respondents are disagreed that the disturbance substantially decreases when the phone is
switched to silent mode.
 4.1% respondents are strongly disagreed that the disturbance substantially decreases when the phone
is switched to silent mode.
 2.0% respondents are undecided that the disturbance substantially decreases when the phone is
switched to silent mode.

Results:
Majority 49.0% of respondents are strongly agreed that the disturbance substantially decreases when the phone
is switched to silent mode.
Testing Of Hypotheses. (One single T-Test)

One-Sample Statistics

One-Sample Test

Test Value = 0

Difference

## Result: Probability value is equal to 0.000s less than 0.05 we rejected Ho

One-Sample Statistics

One-Sample Test

Difference

## Result: Probability value is equal to 0.037 less than 0.05 we rejected Ho

One-Sample Statistics

One-Sample Test

Test Value = 3

Difference

## Result: Probability value is equal to 0.766 Greater than 0.05 we Accepted Ho

One-Sample Statistics

One-Sample Test

Difference

## Paired Samples Correlations

N Correlation Sig.

## Pair 1 MU & Age 49 .080 .587

Paired Samples Test

Paired Differences

## 95% Confidence Interval of the

Difference

Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean Lower Upper t df Sig. (2-tailed)

## Paired Samples Correlations

N Correlation Sig.

## Paired Samples Test

Paired Differences

## 95% Confidence Interval of the

Difference
Std. Error
Mean Std. Deviation Mean Lower Upper t df Sig. (2-tailed)

## JS 1.37 49 .487 .070

Paired Samples Correlations

N Correlation Sig.

## Paired Samples Test

Paired Differences

## 95% Confidence Interval of the

Difference
Std. Error
Mean Std. Deviation Mean Lower Upper t df Sig. (2-tailed)

## Paired Samples Correlations

N Correlation Sig.

## Paired Samples Test

Paired Differences

## 95% Confidence Interval of the

Difference

Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean Lower Upper t df Sig. (2-tailed)

## Result: Probability value is equal to 0.141 Greater than 0.05 we Accepted Ho

Paired Samples Statistics

## Paired Samples Correlations

N Correlation Sig.

## Paired Samples Test

Paired Differences

## 95% Confidence Interval of the

Difference

Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean Lower Upper t df Sig. (2-tailed)

## Paired Samples Correlations

N Correlation Sig.

## Pair 1 MU & Q7 49 -.175 .230

Paired Samples Test

Paired Differences

## 95% Confidence Interval of the

Difference

Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean Lower Upper t df Sig. (2-tailed)

## Paired Samples Correlations

N Correlation Sig.

## Paired Samples Test

Paired Differences

## 95% Confidence Interval of the

Difference

Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean Lower Upper t df Sig. (2-tailed)

## Q9 1.73 49 .930 .133

Paired Samples Correlations

N Correlation Sig.

## Paired Samples Test

Paired Differences

## 95% Confidence Interval of the

Difference
Std. Error
Mean Std. Deviation Mean Lower Upper t df Sig. (2-tailed)

## Paired Samples Correlations

N Correlation Sig.

## Paired Samples Test

Paired Differences

## 95% Confidence Interval of the

Difference

Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean Lower Upper t df Sig. (2-tailed)

## Result: Probability value is equal to 0.002 less than 0.05 we rejected Ho

Paired Samples Statistics

## Paired Samples Correlations

N Correlation Sig.

## Paired Samples Test

Paired Differences

## 95% Confidence Interval of the

Difference

Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean Lower Upper t df Sig. (2-tailed)

## Result: Probability value is equal to 0.121 Greater than 0.05 we Accepted Ho

Paired Samples Statistics

## Paired Samples Correlations

N Correlation Sig.

## Paired Samples Test

Paired Differences

## 95% Confidence Interval of the

Difference

Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean Lower Upper t df Sig. (2-tailed)
Paired Samples Test

Paired Differences

## 95% Confidence Interval of the

Difference

Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean Lower Upper t df Sig. (2-tailed)

## Paired Samples Correlations

N Correlation Sig.

## Paired Samples Test

Paired Differences

## 95% Confidence Interval of the

Difference

Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean Lower Upper t df Sig. (2-tailed)

## Q14 2.43 49 1.258 .180

Paired Samples Correlations

N Correlation Sig.

## Paired Samples Test

Paired Differences

## 95% Confidence Interval of the

Difference

Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean Lower Upper t df Sig. (2-tailed)

## Paired Samples Correlations

N Correlation Sig.

## Paired Samples Test

Paired Differences

## 95% Confidence Interval of the

Difference

Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean Lower Upper t df Sig. (2-tailed)

## Result: Probability value is equal to 0.067 Greater than 0.05 we Accepted Ho

Paired Samples Statistics

## Paired Samples Correlations

N Correlation Sig.

## Paired Samples Test

Paired Differences

## 95% Confidence Interval of the

Difference

Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean Lower Upper t df Sig. (2-tailed)

## Paired Samples Correlations

N Correlation Sig.

## Pair 1 MU & Q17 49 -.058 .692

Paired Samples Test

Paired Differences

## 95% Confidence Interval of the

Difference

Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean Lower Upper t df Sig. (2-tailed)

## Paired Samples Correlations

N Correlation Sig.

## Paired Samples Test

Paired Differences

## 95% Confidence Interval of the

Difference

Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean Lower Upper t df Sig. (2-tailed)

## Q19 2.20 49 1.080 .154

Paired Samples Correlations

N Correlation Sig.

## Paired Samples Test

Paired Differences

## 95% Confidence Interval of the

Difference

Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean Lower Upper t df Sig. (2-tailed)

## Paired Samples Correlations

N Correlation Sig.

## Paired Samples Test

Paired Differences

## 95% Confidence Interval of the

Difference

Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean Lower Upper t df Sig. (2-tailed)

## Result: Probability value is equal to 0.006 less than 0.05 we rejected Ho

Paired Samples Statistics

## Paired Samples Correlations

N Correlation Sig.

## Paired Samples Test

Paired Differences

## 95% Confidence Interval of the

Difference

Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean Lower Upper t df Sig. (2-tailed)

## Paired Samples Correlations

N Correlation Sig.

## Pair 1 MU & Q22 49 .032 .826

Paired Samples Test

Paired Differences

## 95% Confidence Interval of the

Difference
Std. Error
Mean Std. Deviation Mean Lower Upper t df Sig. (2-tailed)