Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Priscilla Sneff
From: August Rothenberger
Subject: Rhetorical analysis of the JACS article “Room-Temperature Activation of Hydrogen by
Semi-immobilized Frustrated Lewis Pairs in Microporous Polymer Networks” by Trunk et al.
using Markel’s six characteristics for effective technical communication.
Date: 09/09/2018
The purpose of this memo is to provide a rhetorical analysis of the scientific article “Room-
Temperature Activation of Hydrogen by Semi-immobilized Frustrated Lewis Pairs in
Microporous Polymer Networks,” authored by Trunk et al. at the Technical University of Berlin
and published in the Journal of the American Chemical Society (JACS). The analysis centers on
Mike Markel’s six characteristics for effective technical communication: the document addresses
particular readers, helps readers solve problems, reflects the organization’s goals and culture, is
produced collaboratively, uses design to increase readability, and consists of both words and
images.
Summary
The JACS article successfully uses Markel’s six characteristics to address an experienced
chemistry audience regarding the synthesis and characterization of specialized polymer networks
and their usage in experiments to cleave hydrogen gas at room temperature. Trunk et al. and their
collaborators work with JACS to share scientific knowledge with other professional chemists
while promoting themselves as reputable and capable scientists. The authors’ and editors’
effective use of technical dialogue, proper references, straightforward design, and supplemental
graphics together create a comprehensive, informative journal article.
Discussion
Addresses Particular Readers
Trunk et al. effectively address experienced chemists through the use of scientific language and
conciseness. The authors include a short introduction regarding the background of their research,
but thereafter expect technical phrases like “sterically encumbered phosphine moieties” to be
understood without explanation. Similarly, the characterization and experimental sections
highlight only important procedural steps and relevant data. The authors include supporting
information that provides greater detail on the project for readers especially interested in a
specific portion of the article. The straightforward nature of writing leads to a concise,
descriptive article that both respects a professional chemist’s expertise and time.
Is Produced Collaboratively
Trunk et al. recognize the contributions of others by including acknowledgements and numerous
references throughout the document to benefit the reader and their professional image. The
authors ensure that relevant information is credited with in-text citations leading to the references
section, both to respect the work of others and to assist future researchers in locating specific
articles. Additionally, an acknowledgements section is included to thank individuals who
contributed to the project but did not author the paper, as well as recognize funding sources. The
acknowledgements and references together increase the authors’ credibility as reputable chemists
who perform credible and important research.