Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 3

1

Letter G Lesson Reflection:

Today the lesson about G, I was confused little bit, so I think it's don’t works very well. The

areas went well are, firstly, I believe that I provide excellent activities that assist children to

achieve the learning objective and build their own competition by responding with materials. For

example, in creating letter “g” by clay activity children were learned who to write litter g by

responding with clay to form letter\G\, therefore, they have accomplished basic outcome which

is write letter G capital and small by using different equipment. According to Piaget theory of

constructivism “argues that people produce knowledge and form meaning based on their

experiences”. ("Piaget's Theory," n.d.).

Secondly, I felt the area worked success is I had the ability to manage children behavior by

applied Albert Bandura approach by model the child with desired behavior in front of the

children to learn from it. For example, when I asked children questions I observed most of them

shout, and others say the answer without raising their hand that made the class noise but, I was

dripline them by model Ahmed how raised his hand, and I say, “Look at Ahmed, he is excellent

child because he raises his hand when he wants to answer”. Consequently, other kids were

observed Ahmed behavior and when I ask another question the children were retention

the raising hand behavior than they reproduction the positive behavior by raising their hand to

answer (Shirley & Peter, 2011, p. 53).

The aspects need awareness in next lesson is, show the children right direction of the letter

because my MST said that there are some children wrote letter g from down to up instead to start

it from up to down so, she recommends me to make sour that I show the children right direction

so, in next time if I saw child write letter in the wrong direction I will say for them we write the

letter from here and I will mode it so, he\ she can see. Furthermore, I was talking quickly and
2

don’t speak in different voice level which is bad because children can’t understand and follow

my instructions so, in next time I will talk little bit slow. In addition, children are not

responded to me when I asked them questions I think because I still don’t have strong

relationship with them and maybe they shy from my consequence, I was losing lesson time so,

my MST advised me to motivate children to answer so in next time, I will encourage children by

saying How’s know the answer? Or point out one child.


3

References:

Piaget's theory of constructivism. (n.d.). Retrieved fromhttp://www.teach-


nology.com/currenttrends/constructivism/piaget/Shirley, A., & Peter, G. (2011).

Albert Bandura: Vol. 53. How children learn: Thinkingon special educational needs and
inclusion Practical Pre-School Books.

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi