Grading Rubric for Philosophy Paper — Portfolio II an Name Lauren Harvey ate: 2-4-1 F BAD You will write S-page paper using APA style, re-examining your philosophy. The philasophy paper for Portfolio {should be diferent from the one that was written for Portfolio, and should describe how your personal philosophy has evolved since submission of Portfolio I. Your evolving philosophy should be based on your experiences, textbooks, research, field observations, reflections, course readings, and discussion, as well as other resourees. You should examine various philosophies of education, including constructivism, and discuss how these philosophies impact your personal philosophy. ‘The Portfolio Il paper should exemplify groval in the understanding and articulation of your philosophy of education, One of tho essential questions is: “How doos my personal philosophy reflect he tenets ofthe Education Department's Conceptual Framework?” CATEGORY 1 2 3 = Length of Tess than Three Three double- | Four double-spaced |( Five or more double> Paper double-spaced pages | spaced pages pages spaced pages Introduction | There isno clear ‘The introduction “The introduction | The jpetiOn is invita introduction to the states the purpose, but | clearly states the | engérages the reader to purpose of the paper or | doesnot adequately | purpose of the paper, | \yarn more about the its structure, proviow the structure | proviows the structure | Aandidate’s philosophy, and ‘ofthe paper and does | of the paper, but does //cloarly states tho main not engage the reader. | not engage the reader. f points and the purpose of, the paper. Coverage of | Information includes | Information includes | formation includes \) Information includes Teaching —_| very few, ifany, of tc. | few of the knowledge, #/some of the thorough delineation of the Dimensions | Knowledge, skills, and | skills and knowledge, skills, knowledge, skills, a dispositions of effective | dispositions of and dispositions of} dispositions of effective teachers; articulates few | effective teachers; | | effective teachers; teachers; clearly articulates, best practices of anticulates some best \\ clearly articulates | many best practices of effective teachers practices of effective effective leachers feachers Tntegration of | Does not include Offers few examples fers quality details and Experiences, | examples of personal | of experiences, ues, and beliefs © |/examples about person Beliefs, and. | &xperiences, values, or | values, and beliefs to | illustrate the experiences, values, or Vatncs beliefs related to illustrate commitment } commitment to most | beliefs to ilustrate support dispositions to dispositions. dispositions dispositions Examples add litle to Meets the discussion Incorporation | Connections between — | There is litle There issome isa sirong connect of Theo the weiter’s expression | connection between | connection between | Hetween the writer’s and Readings | of philosophy and the witee's the writer's ‘expression of philosophy curriculum theory, expression of expression of| and curriculum theory, practice, constmctivist | philosophy and philosophy and practice, constructivist | theory and readings | curriculum theory, | curriculum theory, | | theory and readings | completed in courses art | practice, practice, ‘completed in courses. All, ‘unclear or unrelated. constructivist theory| | points are supported with and readings roferences. completed in courses. | completed in courses. Few points are ‘Most points are supported with supported with references. references, Page 1 of 2Name Grading Rubric for Philosophy Paper — Portfolio IL ane CATEGORY i T 2 3 # Many points are not in logical order. The paper lacks organization, The ‘ransitions between paragraphs and/or ideas tare uvelear or nonexistent, Somme points are not logical order; the way | hey ar prevented | makes the writing | diticalt to fellow and Jes interesting, Some transitions work well but connections among ideas are fizzy Points are made ina logical order; the way they are presented sometimes makes th writing dificult to follow or less interesting for the roader. Transitions show how ideas are connected, but there is little varity. Pafnts aro made in a logical “order, the smooth flow effectively maintains the terest ofthe render and eases the ease of reading. A variety of clear transitions are used. They clearly show how ideas are connected, ‘The conclusion is “The conelision | documented, but | many are not in APA format documented, but a few are not in APA format Conclusions | There ino clear “Te conclusions song conclusion; the paper | recognizable; but does | recogntable; ties up [| and leaves the reader wih ads with ao summary | notte up several | almostalt loose ends {| an understanding of the statement. It simply loose ends. ina summary writer’s points; offers a | ood satement, Summary itement, looks | | ard to the fate, use uot eee dl Sxpepoveere— ‘Mechanical | Many grammatical, | Several ramimatal, | One artwo avors in [xo gratamatal, a spelling or punctuation eaptlization, yams, Capitalization, peling or trrors; eos internpt | speling, or capitalization andfof | punctuation errs; the the flow. pretation rors; | panctston the (| peperis exceptionally easy the evorsinfemupé the | papers easy to reall | to read. flo Proper Use of | adequate mnberaf —] AtieastS sources” | AtTeat 3 sources — | 3 Soreas Ctene | sources, othe sources | Gnformation and | inforaaon and graphics) are acutely trenotaccaratsy | graphics) ae ppephies) ae Elouumented in APA fora documented accurately securely | Evidence of Cites one clear and | concrete examples of Cites at Teast v0 clear and concrete [-Giies atleast throo clear and concrete examples of ways Continued Evolution of | buteites no exemples "| way philosophy has | examples of ways (| philosophy has evolved Personal | evolved philosophy has Philosophy l __| evolved 30/40 score with no Page 2 of 2