Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Kelly Nadeau
Professor Ditch
English 115
12 September 2018
spend years pining after. The collection of articles, in the book Pursuing Happiness, address,
question, and argue for happiness, in order to assert each author’s perspective toward the
conceptual steps that must be taken in order to feel this desired emotion. Graham Hill, David
Brooks, Sonja Lyubomirsky as well as the duo of Howard Cutler and The Dalai Lama contend
that happiness is derived from an internal space, and that to some infinitesimal degree is
influenced by outside stimulus. Ultimately, all the authors prove to the reader that the reigns to
transform their personal happiness reside within themselves rather than from an external space.
In the article “Living With Less. A Lot Less”, Graham Hill tells his personal narrative
about shifting his frame of mind from a blind consumer to keen entrepreneur, advocating for less
material possessions and more travel, real world experience. Graham Hill himself writes: “It took
15 years, a great love and a lot of trouble to get rid of all the in essential things I had collected
and live a bigger better richer life with less”(Hill 309). In other words, using his personal
testimony, Hill makes the point that having less physical possessions leads to longer fulfillment,
and what may seem essential is completely dispensable. Hill sheds light on the counterintuitive
notion that, more objects, and material stuff does not equate to more happiness. According to
Hill: “Often, material objects take a mental as well as physical space”(312). Hill points out that
material possessions may consume space in our homes, but additionally these objects have
Nadeau 2
copious ramifications for simply existing. These objects exhaust the human mind with worry
over where a person may have accidentally misplaced the object, or the staggering price that
haunts them from enjoying the good. Hill’s narrative portrays material objects to be the root issue
as to why individuals cannot attain the satisfaction in feeling the rich emotion of happiness.
Hence, by connecting the idea of objects taking up mental space Hill leads the reader to the idea
that happiness comes from an internal space. Furthermore, the first step the reader must take in
transforming this space is to come to the realization that “The best things in life aren't things”
(Hill 311). Hill is corroborating the age-old adage that objects only provide pleasure not lasting
happiness. The latest gadgets only serve to distract from happiness, making us feel the need to
fill this void in our life with the latest and greatest disposable good; yet freedom comes from
simplicity. Hill assertion in his article provides an individual with the key to unlock
transformational happiness. Hill points out that the key to happiness coming from an internal
While Hill stresses the idea of owning less physical material, David Brooks contends that
happiness can be upheaved from the experience of suffering. David Brooks asserts that in the
midst of the internal struggle for happiness, the concept of suffering should be praised for the
lessons it teaches us, as well as providing the gateway to lasting bliss. According to Brooks
“Often, physical or social suffering can give people an outsider’s perspective an attuned
awareness of what other outsiders are enduring”(Brooks 287). The essence of Brooks argument
is that, although we are all outsiders, experiencing a healthy amount of suffering can turn
strangers into a collective group. The trials an individual faces when they're suffering pull them
out of their comfortable, happy, mindset into a survival mentality. Brooks compliments his
assertion further when he writes: “The suffering involved in their tasks becomes a fearful gift and
Nadeau 3
very different than that equal and other gift, happiness, conventionally defined” (Brooks 287).
Brooks point is that, suffering acts as a present that allows individuals to not be necessarily
healed after going through it, but internally conscious to see a different perspective. By
comparing suffering to a gift, Brooks alludes to suffering being a transformational award; that in
turn shifts the individual suffering into a conscious state of mind. Suffering is the vessel in which
transformation can occur, in order to reach an internal state of happiness. Brooks perspective is
not that suffering leads to happiness, rather it paves a path of experience, which enables an
individual to propel themselves into a state of gratitude and maturity from their faults. Brooks
offers the notion that transformation of the internal space can be achieved through experiencing
Brooks professes that suffering is a modality that leads to grateful happiness, while Sonja
Lyubomirsky factors in the genetic component to her position on unlocking happiness. In her
article Sonja Lyubomirsky dissolves the myths surrounding happiness by using a combination of
statistical evidence and personal testimony. The genetic component of happiness ties into
Lyubomirskys’ claim, that happiness can be attained within the confines of the internal space.
Lyubomirsky illustrates: “There is a powerful study that shows just what a dramatic effect one
particular environmental factor can have on whether or not people succumb to the depression
gene. The environmental factor is severe stress” (Lyubomirsky 191). Here Lyubomirsky alludes
to the notion that external events play a small role in attaining happiness. However, external
events may take place, yet it is up to the mental strength of the individual to determine whether
or not they buckle to the events; ultimately proving happiness is exerted from an internal space.
Lyubomirsky alludes to the idea that a simple change in perspective, or a small shift in behavior
The foundation of Lyubomirskys’ argument lies within the concept that: “Happiness,
more than anything is the state of mind, a way of perceiving in approaching ourselves and the
world in which we reside” (Lyubomirsky 194). In the statement, Lyubomirsky is advocating for
the concept of happiness being within every individual; and not something that must be hunted
for externally, through the outside world. Lyubomirsky additionally writes, “In a nutshell the
fountain of happiness can be found in how you behave, what you think, and what goals you set
every day in your life” (Lyubomirsky 190). In making this comment Lyubomirsky pushes for
happiness being a combination of factors that result in a state of internal balance that enables the
individual to be at their peak happiness in life. Lyubomirsky speaks to the science behind
happiness addressing the idea that individuals are born with a happiness “set point”(Lyubomirsky
190); thus there is a portion of an individual's happiness level that can be attributed to genetics.
However, Lyubomirsky advocates for the importance of a positive mindset, when it comes to
attaining happiness.
Lyubomirsky hones in on the science behind happiness while The Dalai Lama, and
Howard Cutler pursue the notion of happiness occurring once the internal spirit is at balance. In
their essay, The Dalai Lama, and Howard Cutler advocate for the concept that happiness comes
from an internal space, and the degree to which happiness is determined by the choices, actions,
and perceptions an individual undergoes in their day-to-day life. The Dalai Lama, and Howard
Cutler support the idea that: “Happiness is determined more by one's state of mind than by
external events” (The Dalai Lama and Howard Cutler 32). Basically, The Dalai Lama and Cutler
support the sentiment that external events have little bearing on an individual’s approach to the
emotion of happiness, in comparison to how they must rewire their brain to feel the emotion. The
Dalai Lama and Cutler support their theory by writing: “Researchers have conducted a number
Nadeau 5
of experiments demonstrating that simply shifting one’s perspective and contemplating how
things could be worse can enhance one’s level of life satisfaction” (The Dalai Lama and Howard
Cutler 27). In pointing out the research, Cutler argues that in order to truly appreciate the gifts we
have, we must look within to appreciate the circumstances, or mundane issues we may face, and
realize the enormity to which the situation could be far greater exaggerated or made worse. The
authors assert that transformation of the internal space occurs once an individual reaches “inner
contentment”(The Dalai Lama and Howard Cutler 25). Inner Contentment can only be reached
when an individual finds peace without the dependent urge for material possessions, along side
of the discovery that freedom occurs in relinquishing pessimistic thoughts and emotions.
In each Author’s article they individually campaign for the collective belief, that
happiness can be transformed internally as opposed to being forced fixed externally. Graham Hill
writes about the value an individual can be transformed by letting go of the myriad of
possessions they own. David Brooks urges the reader to embrace suffering rather than recoil in
fear from it, by virtue that it can only serve to forever alter their approach to happiness. Sonja
Lyubomirsky contends that once the reader understands the harmonious, idyllic medley, which is
behavior, emotion, and genetics, true lasting transformation can occur. Howard Cutler and The
Dalai Lama propose the idea of inner contentment as a means toward taking a step in the
personal testimony, together with logic, to explain the internal shift that occurs once an
Works Cited
Brooks David What Suffering Does. Pursuing Happiness, by: Matthew Parfitt and Dawn
Hill Graham Living With Less. A Lot Less. Pursuing Happiness, by: Matthew Parfitt and Dawn
His Holiness the Dalai Lama and Howard Cutler, The Source of Happiness. Pursuing Happiness,
Lyubomirsky Sonja, How Happy Are You and Why? Pursuing Happiness, by: Matthew Parfitt