Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Nicolas Mason
Professor Hugetz
ENGL 1301.14
2 October 2018
In 1996, Congress passed the Telecommunications Deregulation Act that lifted many
federal regulations on the ownership of radio stations. Prior to 1996, the largest number of radio
stations owned by a single corporation was 38; since the passing of the act, several corporations
have acquired hundreds of radio stations nationwide. The act had changed the face of radio for
the time it’s active, but it’s also raised some controversy. Some people argue it helps radio
stations expand commerce and benefit the public while others argue it degrades diversity in radio
Lowry Mays, who wrote “Media Ownership Deregulation Has Helped Radio”, argues
that the Telecommunications Deregulation Act is very beneficial for radio. Mays states that
before deregulation, competition from cable and broadcast television dropped the profits of radio
stations (Mays 2). After the act was passed, Mays, who is a chairman and CEo of Clear Channel
Communications, a media based company in Texas, states that with larger businesses owning
more stations, it’s easier and less expensive to operate multiple stations together because they are
Bill Park, who wrote “Media Ownership Deregulation Has Harmed Radio”, argues that
the Telecommunications Deregulation Act is very harmful for radio. Park states that after
regulation, large corporations seek to control just revenue from radio, and prevent independent
station owners from making any money (Park 5). In the article, Park says that large media
Mason 2
corporations are only trying to “impress” the stock market and Wall Street. This requires them to
make more money and hire or intern workers at these stations, degrading the benefits of working
Works Cited
Mays, Lowry. “Media Ownership Deregulation Has Help Radio.” Mass Media, Greenhaven
Park, Bill. “Media Ownership Deregulation Has Harmed Radio.” Mass Media, Greenhaven