0 évaluation0% ont trouvé ce document utile (0 vote)
152 vues2 pages
The document provides a rubric for evaluating project reports and seminar presentations for a management accounting course. It outlines several criteria for formatting, content, and structure and assigns point values for project reports. Criteria include proper report formatting, a clear introduction and conclusion, comprehensive and well-structured content, appropriate referencing, and examples applying the course concepts to industry. A similar rubric is provided to evaluate seminar presentations based on presentation skills, explaining issues, visual aids used, and answering audience questions.
The document provides a rubric for evaluating project reports and seminar presentations for a management accounting course. It outlines several criteria for formatting, content, and structure and assigns point values for project reports. Criteria include proper report formatting, a clear introduction and conclusion, comprehensive and well-structured content, appropriate referencing, and examples applying the course concepts to industry. A similar rubric is provided to evaluate seminar presentations based on presentation skills, explaining issues, visual aids used, and answering audience questions.
The document provides a rubric for evaluating project reports and seminar presentations for a management accounting course. It outlines several criteria for formatting, content, and structure and assigns point values for project reports. Criteria include proper report formatting, a clear introduction and conclusion, comprehensive and well-structured content, appropriate referencing, and examples applying the course concepts to industry. A similar rubric is provided to evaluate seminar presentations based on presentation skills, explaining issues, visual aids used, and answering audience questions.
MARKS FORMAT Report is properly Report is properly Report is properly Report is not binding, binding, with title page, binding. Missing one binding. Missing two no title page, no table table of contents, of the format criteria. or more of the format of contents, no paginating, introduction, criteria. paginating, no contents, conclusion and appendix appendix 10 10-8 7-6 6-5 >5 INTRODUCTION Provide clear overview Provide moderate Provide overview but Provide vague of the topic using own overview of the topic, no definition of key introduction (which is sentence (original),clear define some key concept, relevant not clear), irrelevant definition of key concepts and terminology and not using own concept, relevant terminology sentences, no terminology definition of key concept, no relevant terminology 15 15-14 13-10 9-7 >7 CONTENT Provide proper Provide logic structure, Unclear structure, no Provide an structure, readable, readable; less continuity among unstructured, not comprehensive yet comprehensive (omit paragraphs comprehensive, relevant discussion of few relevant issues of irrelevant discussion. the content. the topic). Topics are not arranged A smooth flow of accordingly. Not thought (good original arrangement of the topics). Original 40 40-35 34-27 26-20 >20 CONCLUSION Provide critical Provide general Provide conclusion by No conclusion given conclusion of the topic conclusion of the topic repeating the same by giving own comment by giving general sentences from the comment content with no comment given 15 15-14 13-10 9-7 >7 APPLICATION TO Provide discussion by Provide insufficient Provide example of No examples of INDUSTRY giving example of discussion of companies’ experience companies’ experience companies’ experiences companies’ that apply SMA on SMA that apply the SMA experiences that apply techniques but no techniques the SMA techniques discussion given 10 10-8 7-6 6-5 >5 REFERENCES Use sufficient references Use reference Use insufficient Reference given from which are relevant to the insufficient references reference which the textbook only topics, reliable (from which comes from comes from unreliable journals) with proper mixed sources (reliable sources and without referencing style and unreliable) with proper referencing proper referencing style style 10 10-8 7-6 6-5 >5 TOTAL 100 FORMAT REPORT: - Maximum 10 pages (2,000 words) - Use font: Arial, size 11 or Times New Roman, size 12 and text is justified. Line spacing 1.5 - Attach the references used under Appendix (Submit the articles used for references in softcopy i.e. disc) - Last day of submission: Week 14 MAF651 – SEMINAR IN MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING RUBRIC FOR SEMINAR PRESENTATION (10%)
MEMBERS’ NAME STUDENT’S NO. GROUP
1 2 3 4
CRITERIA MARKS EXCELLENT GOOD SATISFACTORY POOR
PRESENTATION Presenters have an Presenters miss one of Presenters miss two No eye contact- reading eye contact and the criteria in the or more criteria in the from the slide/notes, SKILLS interact with the presentation skills. presentation skills soft voice or mumbling, audience, speak with no intonation, locking clear and loud voice, hands, no interaction suitable intonation, with audience, Mixed body language, languages gestures, proficient English 20 20-18 17-14 13-10 >10 EXPLANATION OF All presenters able to The presenters able to The presenters try to Unable to explain the explain the issues, explain the issues, explain the issues issues clearly, do not THE ISSUES show a deep show a good although do not show understand the topic understanding of the understanding of the understanding the and do not give topic and able to give topic and give topic and do not give example relevant example satisfactory example relevant example 40 40-35 34-27 26-20 >20 VISUAL AIDS AND The group uses Use more than 1 Use more than 1 Use only 1 visual aid, various visual aids (eg. visual aids , attractive, visual aids, but do not small, not attractive and CREATIVITY Slides, colored paper, but no creativity in display creativity in do not display creativity use white board, flash presentation presentation in presentation cards), visible, attractive, and exhibit excellent creativity 20 20-18 17-14 13-10 >10 QUESTION AND The group able to Answer the question Answer the question Unable to answer answer all question confidently and unconfidently, no question asked and ANSWER asked correctly, provide example but example provided and unable to give example confidently and the answer is give incorrect answer provide example incorrect 10 10-8 7-6 6-5 >5 TEAM WORK Show high degree of Show good degree of Show moderate No co-operation among co-operation and co-operation and degree of co- members unity in group (help unity in group operation and unity in each other during the group presentation and Q&A session) 5 5 4-3 2 >2 APPEARANCE Dress professionally Dress according to the Dress according to the Dress unprofessionally (wear formal attire, university’s dress university’s dress code (causally: wear jeans, t- long sleeve shirt, tie, code, neat and shirt, fancy dress and pants and shoes) neat presentable slipper) and presentable 5 5 4-3 2 >2 TOTAL 100
- Time (including 10 minutes Q&A session): 60 minutes
- All group members must involve in the presentation - If any member is absent, the presentation can not be postponed to other time - All members must be accountable for the topic assigned & provide notes for all students