Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Arz Mohammad
Submitted to ,
Sir M Asif
Topic ,
Philosophy of John Lock
Locke did not like teaching profession and he started medicine. He was greatly
influenced by Descartes and became physician. Later on he became the
confidential Secretary of Lord Shaftsbury, the founder of the Whig Dynasty. He
went over to the Parliamentary side and was later on made a field marshal in the
rebel forces. When Charles II became king, he was made Earl of Shaftsbury in
1672.
In 1682, Shaftsbury was charged with the crime of conspiracy. He was arrested
and tried for treason. He was, however, acquitted but was compelled to leave
England. Locke also facing his persecution fled with him to Holland and remained
there until the bloodless Revolution. After the glorious revolution of 1688, he
came under the liberalizing influences that were beginning to be felt in England
and he devoted his entire intellectual faculties towards literary work and to
numerous controversies arising out of his works.
Sabine attributes John Locke in these words, “his sincerity, his profound moral
convictions, his genuine belief in liberty in human rights, and in the dignity of
human nature united with his moderation and good sense, made him the ideal
spokesman of the middle-class revolution.”
(Refer: Sabine; A history of political
theory)
Locke’s father, a renowned attorney of his time exerted a considerable influence
in making him zealous advocate of liberty, equality and democracy. Locke
completely discarded the Hobbes’s conception of man who depicted as utterly
selfish, irrational, solitary and brutish. He portrayed his men in the state of nature
fully possessed a sense of sociability bringing all men in togetherness of mutual
benefit and for the progress of civil society. He advocated for the elimination of
the coerciveness and intimidation over the subject for peaceful progress of the
state.
Utilitarianism
He is one of the great pleader of utilitarianism. His conception is quite apparent
from his contention that “happiness and misery are the two great springs of
human action.” He was of the view that morality is pleasure and pleasure is only
conformity to universal law.
Optimistic conception of human nature
Locke believes in the inherent goodness of human beings. He says that man is a
rational, sensible and social creature. He feels love, sympathy and tenderness
towards his fellow-beings and is capable of being actuated by altruistic motives.
He wants to live in peace and harmony with others.
Rejection of Absolute Monarchy based on Divinity and Heredity
Locke refuted emphatically the hereditary principle in kingship advocated most
fervently by Filmer in his Patriarcha and upheld by the Anglican Church. Filmer
contended that political power is derived from the authority of father over his
children and that regal authority is subjection of children to parents, and since the
actual monarchs are the heirs of Adam, therefore they can demand from the
citizens unflinching loyalty. Locke points out the injustice of primogeniture (the
principle by which property descends to the eldest son) which is unavoidable if
inheritance is to be the basis of monarchy. Further, Adam can have only one
heir, but no one knows who he is. And if the true heir could be discovered, would
all existing monarchs put their crowns at his feet. Moreover, in case of this
discovery all kings except, at most one, would be usurpers and would have no
right to demand the obedience of their de facto subjects.
I. Right to life
II. Right to liberty
III. Right to property
Locke was of the view that the right of property is a most important because all
other natural rights are analogous to the right of private property. He further
maintained that the right to private property existed in the state of nature under
the operation of natural law. Locke thought of natural rights as things which man
brings with him from birth. Society exists to protect them; they can be regulated
only to the extent that is necessary to give them effective protection.
"The life, liberty and estate of one person can be limited only to make effective
the equality valid claims of another person to the same rights.”
(refer; Sabine political thought)
According to Locke, “God, who has given the world to men in common, has also
given reason to make use of it to the best advantage of life and convenience.
The earth and all that is therein, is given to men for support and comfort of their
being and all the fruits it naturally produces and beasts it feeds, belongs to
mankind in common, as they are produced by the spontaneous hand of nature,
and nobody has originally a private dominion, exclusive of the rest of mankind, in
any of them, as they are thus in their natural state. Whatsoever he removes out
of the state that nature has provided and left it in, he ahs mixed his labor with and
joined to it something that is his own and thereby makes it his own property.”
Locke did not advance the idea of legal, absolute and indivisible sovereignty. The
very idea of it was discarded by him because Machiavellian and Hobbesian
conception of sovereignty brings about a reign of terror for the people who would
loudly whisper for freedom and equality. He initiated the conception of popular
sovereignty, which has been firmly accepted, a best way of rule by the
succeeding thinkers and the whole world own him too much, because real and
practical democracy was strongly enunciated.
John Locke formulated a classic reasoning for religious tolerance which can
be seen in his Letters Concerning Toleration (1689–1692). Three arguments
were central to his reasoning: judges, state or human beings are not capable of
evaluating the truth-claims of competing religious standpoints; enforcing a single
religion would have an adverse effect as faith cannot be compelled by violence;
and coercing religious uniformity would lead to more social disorder than allowing
diversity. Furthermore, he believed that those holding political power were no
better at discovering the true religion than anyone else and so they should not
attempt to enforce their views on others. Locke did place a limit to tolerance
stating that any religious group which posed a threat to political stability or public
safety should not be tolerated. Locke’s writings on tolerance were very
progressive for the time. However, he believed that atheists should not be
tolerated as lack of faith made them untrustworthy and irresponsible.
REFERRENCES
Fumerton, Richard (21 February 2000). "Foundationalist Theories of
Epistemic Justification"
Locke, John (1690). Two Treatises of Government (10th edition): Chapter II,
Section 6. Project Gutenberg.
Hirschmann, Nancy J., Gender, Class, and Freedom in Modern Political
Theory, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2009.