Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Listening Sessions
Report Back
December 10th, 2018 | Cincinnati Public Schools Board Meeting
2|Page
Introduction and Process
Cincinnati Public Schools (CPS) purchased the former Mercy High School building and plans to open a
new school in the building in the fall of 2019, creating a momentous opportunity for CPS. The purchase
of the historic school and campus will provide CPS with the opportunity to bring a new “innovative
educational campus” to the West Side of town and meet the needs of their growing enrollment.
Throughout October and the beginning of November 2018, the Community Building Institute and the
Westwood Coalition hosted a series of listening sessions to let Cincinnati Public Schools hear from the
community about what they would like to see happen at the Westwood Campus, the former home of
Mercy High School. The Community Building Institute (CBI) and the Westwood Coalition hosted four
listening sessions which included community members from Westwood, Mercy Alumna, parents and a
community wide meeting. Each of the four sessions were open to the public. In addition, CBI hosted four
listening sessions with current Cincinnati Public School students. The sessions included a conversation
with 5th and 6th grade students at Westwood Elementary, a conversation with 7th and 8th grade, as well
as 11th and 12th grade students at West High, and a conversation with 11th and 12th grade students at
Gamble Montessori. An opportunity to provide input online was facilitated through ThoughtExchange
for those who could not attend the in person sessions.
Session 2: Mercy Alumnae Community Session 2: 7th and 8th Grade Students
Date: October 25th | 7:15pm - 9pm Date: October 24th | 12:30pm- 1:15pm
Location: Westwood United Methodist Location: West High
11 attendees Approximately 12 students
Session 4: Community Wide Session Session 4: 11th and 12th Grade Students
Date: October 30th | 6:30pm – 8pm Date: November 9th | 9am – 10am
Location: Xavier- Cintas Center Location: Gamble Montessori
13 attendees Approximately 15 students
3|Page
Summary of Insights
The following is a summary of the key insights that came out of the Listening Sessions with community
members and current CPS students. The summary is organized by insights about the physical place, the
school, the school culture and the community surrounding the school.
Leveraging and preserving the green space of the Westwood Campus is important. The green space
surrounding the Westwood campus is seen as a physical asset to the future school. Parents and students
recognize the potential opportunities to focus on the outdoor space and environmental education.
Students need to have access to the grounds and be part of caring for them.
Community members and parents talk about the Westwood Campus as an opportunity to expand
High School options on the Westside. Throughout the listening sessions, there was a focus on the
Westwood Campus serving the community as a high school. Community members talked about the
infrastructure of the former Mercy building being designed to serve high school- aged students because
of the amenities it has, including a science lab and computer room. There is a significant contingent of
people who feel that Gamble Montessori should move to the new space.
The school should focus on professional pathways, wide career awareness, and local and regional co-
op opportunities. Students and parents recognize the importance of exposure to co-op opportunities,
experiential learning and other training opportunities, like exposure to training in the trades. Students
recognize the need for more exposure to options for paths after high school. We heard from older
4|Page
students that they wished they had been more aware that their grades in freshman and sophomore
years can impact their options for after high school. Students want lots of hands on learning through
labs, libraries, and art and music rooms. The incorporation of the arts and a technology rich school are
important parts of making the school successful. Students and parents also recognize the importance of
embedding more life skills training, like financial literacy, into the school.
The design of the physical space in the school and the atmosphere that is created matters, and effects
students’ abilities to be successful. Creating an environment that feels safe and “theirs” is critical to
the school’s success. Both parents and students who are currently enrolled in CPS schools on the West
Side recognize the challenges of space constraints and overcrowding in current buildings. For students,
this includes recognizing that darkly lit and overcrowded hallways do not create a welcoming
atmosphere for students. Students recognize that student art being displayed in the buildings and other
cosmetic improvements can be powerful in creating a more positive and welcoming atmosphere in a
building. Students are concerned about the stress of accessing their lockers and being able to have a
place to store personal belongings and books while at school. Some students appreciate amenities such
as desks that have storage capacity for books/personal items, and recognize the benefits of grouping
grade level classrooms within different parts of the buildings. Young people want spaces to work in
teams, study together and socialize outside of the classroom. Students value flexible spaces in the
schools, which might include a quiet room or accessible outdoor space, where they can access necessary
resources but also step out of the formal classroom structure. Other students recognize that places like
libraries and computer rooms as having the potential to serve that role in a school building, but they do
not feel they are currently flexible, welcoming spaces in their buildings.
Students recognize the benefits of a positive school culture and peer-to-peer relationships that create
a supportive environment for students. Peer to peer relationships among students are crucial to
students success. Younger students talked about the significant distractions and challenges that result
from “drama” and negative peer relationships in school buildings. Older students talk about the
balancing act of an increased work load, extracurricular activities, employment and planning for their
next steps after high school and their reliance on their peers for support. Worries about school safety,
bullying, suicides and discipline in the school buildings are pervasive issues.
The Westwood Campus should engender the image of quality, and be something to be strived for. The
school should be and feel “west side centric” – connected to the people, families, and traditions that
5|Page
have grown up there. Academics should be challenging but students should feel supported, not
challenged to succeed “against all odds.” Students and parents recognize that students have different
learning styles; a school having proper resources and teachers who have the bandwidth to recognize
and respond to the different needs of students creates an environment where all students can be
successful. As technology permeates classrooms and computers are used for testing, students are aware
of the need for hands on learning and instruction to supplement technology.
Westwood residents, business, and civic leadership should be actively involved in the start-up and
operation of the school. Residents should be welcomed and challenged to be engaged in the school.
Several close neighbors to the Westwood Campus commented on their history of feeling welcomed on
the campus and feeling a part of the school. Community members recognize that they can play an
important role in supporting the school by sharing their talents with students at the school. Students
should also be encouraged to get out of the building and learn from the community. Many parents
expressed their desire for the school to be a Community Learning Center.
6|Page
Community Engagement Model
Cincinnati Public Schools (CPS) is an important community partner and an anchor in places where
schools exist. When they make decisions, they impact children and families and people in community
care about outcomes, and what happens in their communities. The process we used to have a
community discussion with the Westwood community about the Mercy campus could serve as a model
for future discussions.
CBI was able to engage with the community in a way that allowed the CPS Board to be present and hear
the conversation but not drive the discussion. We started by working with established civic groups in
the Westwood community to define and vet the process, identify stakeholders and garner support for
co-hosting the conversations with community leaders from Westwood. That community participation
early dictated how and with whom we would engage, and allowed us to make sure that we were indeed
connecting to all the people we needed to and created credibility in the process.
We established clear expectations with the community and CPS about what issues were on the table
and how input would be helpful. We hosted open, targeted community conversations, with the
community helping make the invitation to attend. We used the Appreciative Inquiry model to frame
conversations in a way that helps participants focus on values and assets and future-oriented solutions.
Often community meetings can devolve into complaint sessions. These can leave everyone involved
feeling frustrated and unheard. The Appreciative Inquiry Model, developed by David Cooperrider and
other organizational change professionals at Case Western Reserve University was first used in
corporate organizational change work. It has been translated to community settings with great success
over the years. CBI has been using the approach as a complement to our Asset Based Community
Development perspective for over five years.
Maybe the most important part of the conversation was we talked to students. In four separate
conversations with students; incoming high school students, and veteran high school students who have
some experience, we had open conversations. The students were thoughtful, interested and very
helpful. Their insights have strongly influenced these findings.
The process also provided an outlet for online input and conversation through ThoughtExchange for
those who did not have a chance to attend scheduled meetings. The format is a great way to
supplement the in person conversations and give even more people an opportunity to participate in
decision-making.
7|Page
Finally, communicating findings and decisions clearly and early is important to the integrity of the
process. When community is engaged, they want to understand that their comments and thoughts
make a difference in decision-making.
8|Page
Appendix
Facilitation Questions
One on One Introductions 7 minutes
What is your best memory of your own education?
How should we make best use of the Westwood Campus (former Mercy High School) to serve the
children in this community?
What do we need to do to make sure that the Westwood Campus (former Mercy High School) remains a
wonderful community asset?
Facilitation Questions
One on one Introductions 7 minutes
What is your best memory of Mercy?
What should CPS keep in mind as they plan for the future use of this building?
How can the former Mercy campus best serve the children in Westwood? Throughout the City?
Facilitation Questions
One on one Introductions 7 minutes
What is your best memory of your school days?
What educational innovations do you think are most important to successful students?
What do schools need to be doing to prepare their students for the future?
Facilitation Questions
One on one Introductions 7 minutes
What is your best memory of your school days?
What resources did the school provide that contributed to that success?
What barriers exist that keep children from being successful in school? In life?
How can CPS maximize their investment at the former Mercy campus to best serve the community?
What is helping you get ready for life after high school?
What do you feel like you need to accomplish to be ready for life after high school?
%% What are some important things to consider for our new school community and building
in Westwood?
PARTICIPATION BY ROLE
TO P I C 1
Group A Group B
29 (50%) 14 (24%)
▪▪ In Group A, 43% of participants are Community Members and Mercy Alumnus compared to 0% of
participants in Group B.
▪▪ In Group B, 80% of participants are CPS Parents, Guardians or Students compared to 59% of
participants in Group A.
Would like a Westwood Campus as if it was a high school like Walnut Hills. 4.8 1.3
Want a entrance exam for the best qualified students to attend. I am a Mercy
A high-performance school like Walnut Hills – entrance exam, quality programs 5.0 1.1
and teachers. Westwood neighborhood needs invigoration for growth to
Not just another public high school. Make this campus a copy of the Walnut Hills 5.0 1.1
campus; there are families exiting the CPS area for better schools.
Could Gamble Montessori High School be moved to this location? The current 1.4 5.0
Gamble site is at capacity and limits the number of AP classes students have
access to. The facility itself is not suited for older kids.
There is already a school on the West Side which has a great curriculum 1.5 5.0
alternative, Gamble Montessori High School. Gamble was not included in the
District's original facilities master plan, therefore did not receive an adequate
Students at Gamble don't feel appreciated. Gamble students work for CPS to 1.1 4.9
give us a building that wasn't done and not to mention the building is 60-plus
years old.
What need is unfulfilled in CPS? What new ideas are other urban districts 1.7 1.8
implementing? What can set the Westwood Campus school up for success?
schools hours and day, traffic. And widening Werk Road, course offerings,
work studies/co-op.
The new school has to attract kids from the entire city. It has to be a magnet 2.2 2.4
school. Consider making this a STEM school or a language-based school,
like Spanish.
TO P I C 2
Group A Group B
30 (51%) 20 (34%)
▪▪ In Group A, 61% of participants are Community Members and Mercy Alumnus compared to 0% of
participants in Group B.
▪▪ In Group B, 90% of participants are CPS Parents, Guardians or Students compared to 27% of
participants in Group A.
Would like Westwood Campus building to get new windows to fit the 4.2 1.4
historical appearance of the school building just as we did for Westwood
Building in past has been beautiful and well-loved. Can we expect pride of 4.2 1.8
ownership on part of CPS community, including instilling that in the students?
I don't think we need a new school on the West Side. There are enough schools 2.3 2.1
on the West Side. I think the High School James N. Gamble should be moved to
There is a need for an additional elementary school on the West Side. This could 2.2 2.3
be the current Gamble building slightly renovated if Gamble moves. The West
If not either of these, I’d like to see a technical high school. Woodward is the only 2.3 2.2
one, but it’s far and doesn’t seem like a true tech school. CPS doesn’t contract with
TO P I C 3
Group A Group B
22 (38%) 24 (41%)
▪▪ In Group A, 65% of participants are Community Members and Mercy Alumnus compared to 5% of
participants in Group B.
▪▪ In Group B, 85% of participants are CPS Parents, Guardians or Students compared to 32% of
participants in Group A.
Would not like another Western Hills University or Gamble Montessori. They 4.6 1.3
already exist and are not needed.
Would like Westwood Campus to consider Westwood or City of Cincinnati 4.3 2.2
West Side students first. Make it a high-qualifying school with options to all
A school that Eastsiders would send their kids to. No CPS West Side high school 4.8 1.6
that good families want to send their kids to.
Worry about what kind of school this will be – so far we hear words like 2.6 1.8
innovative, but innovations can be good and can be bad.
Consider partnering with the Cincinnati Rec Commission to bring a rec center and 1.5 2.5
community learning center to Westwood. Maximize the opportunities to create
Maybe this school could deviate from the national Department of Education 2.3 1.8
curriculum. This would give the opportunity to experiment with best practice
GAMBLE MONTESSORI
Gamble Montessori High School is the first non-chartered public Montessori 3.8 8
High School to receive American Montessori Society accreditation. A new
building would make great improvements to student and teacher life, enabling
Gamble is lacking in space for a computer lab, library, and Community Learning 3.5 10
Center. Having spent time at Walnut Hills and seeing the benefits of a well
W E S T WO O D WA L N U T H I L L S
types of students. Again, make it like a successful Walnut Hills type of environment.
Not just another public high school. Make this campus a copy of the Walnut Hills 4.0 33
campus; there are families exiting the CPS area for better schools.
Small class sizes. All students perform better when class sizes are smaller. More 3.5 28
school options, hopefully, will lead to smaller class sizes.
The new school should fill any voids that currently exist as far as curriculum and 3.7 24
experience that currently exist in CPS West. As a Westsider, my experience with
CPS and its offerings, I chose to travel across town to attend Walnut Hills because
of its offerings.
This is an opportunity for CPS to bring something new and innovative to the 3.4 36
West Side along with using current best practices from other schools. The
program focus for this school has the potential to encourage families to move to
CO M M U N I T Y
The three West Side zip codes are the fastest growing in CPS schools, and 3.7 10
community is an important part of Montessori education. Community is an
That all students' – even the current students – needs be considered. They need 3.5 6
space and support from the community.