Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 5

A Short Guide To Answering A Business Organizations Essay

Question

A couple of my former students mentioned that they were covering business


organizations in BarBri this week. I was reminded that many Bus Orgs students have a
hard time getting their heads around the course as a whole. Bus Orgs is a big survey
class, and it can be hard to pull out comprehensive themes. I tell my students that a
good way of tackling a Bus Orgs essay question is to identify (a) the specific type of
organization; (b) the roles of the people involved in the problem; and (c) the nature of
their dispute. With these three data points, it is relatively easy to focus in on the handful
of issues that come up in a given scenario. Below the fold, I've pasted my veryshort
guide to taking a Bus Orgs essay exam, which also hits the major substantive points of
the class. But first, the usual caveat: if you are a student, remember to focus on what
your professor taught you, not what I have to say.

Ben Barros

This is a class in business organizations, so one way of organizing the course is by type
of organization.

1. With an exam question, the first thing to do is figure out what type of
organization you are dealing with.
2. The second thing to do is to categorize the parties to the dispute. Is it between:
3. Partners and partners?
4. Partners and creditors?
5. Shareholders of a corporation and creditors?
6. Principal and party seeking to bind principal to actions of an agent?
7. Shareholders and directors?
8. Majority shareholder v. minority shareholder?

Agency is not an organization per se, though you can think of an agent and principal as a
two-person organization of sorts.

 Agency is fundamental to everything else in the course.


 The basic concepts of fiduciary duty created in agency law run through all of
business organizations law.
 Two broad fiduciary duties – duty of care and duty of loyalty.
 These were introduced in the agency section, but run throughout the course.
 Note that modern corporations law uses a more lenient concept of fiduciary duty
(esp. duty of care) than traditional agency and partnership cases.
 In a sense, business organizations can be seen as networks of people linked by
fiduciary relationships.
 Authority is the single biggest issue in agency. Authority usually comes up when
someone is trying to enforce a contract.
o Remember that the same set of facts might present multiple ways of
establishing authority
o Also remember that organizations can’t act on their own – they have to act
through agents.
 In a general partnership, the partners are all agents of the
partnership. In a corporation, officers are the agents of the
corporation.
 Of course, an organization can also appoint other agents to do other
things. As an attorney, you will be an agent for all of your clients.
 Even where someone acting for a business organization does not
have actual authority, the organization might be bound by the
person’s actions on the basis of another type of authority – e.g.,
apparent authority, estoppel and/or ratification.
 Say a corporate officer only has actual authority to sign
contracts worth up to $100,000. There might be other
circumstances where a court would hold, e.g., that the officer
had apparent authority to sign larger contracts.
o Another big issue is the principal’s liability for torts of an agent.
 The law of respondeat superior is not particularly clear - be
especially ready to argue both sides. The two biggest issues are (a)
control (servant v. independent contractor) and (b) scope of
employment.

General partnerships are the most basic business organization.

 Each partner is an agent of the partnership.


 Each partner is individually liable for the debts and liabilities of the partnership.
 Some of the issues that typically come up in the partnership context:
o Creditor v. partner
 Was a partnership formed? If so, all partners generally liable for
partnership debts.
o Partner v. partner:
 Was the partnership dissolved?
 General rule is that partnerships are terminable at will.
 What are the rights, duties and liabilities of departing
partners?
 What are the rights of partners in management?
 General rule is that all partners have an equal right to
manage the partnership by majority vote.
 When can a partner be expelled?

Limited partnerships offer limited liability to some partners.


 A limited partnership always has at least one general partner. General partners
have unlimited liability.
 Limited partners have limited liability, but must be passive. They can become
generally liable if they get involved in the management of the partnership.

LLCs offer the limited liability of a corporation and the tax treatment and flexibility of a
partnership.

 Should know the basics, which is pretty much all we covered.


 The most important point – LLCs are the business organization of the future. As
we’ve mentioned throughout the course, they avoid many of the problems of
other corporate forms.

Corporations.

 Creditors v. the corporation


o Likely to present authority issues.
 Creditors v. the shareholders.
o The whole point of a corporation is to limit shareholder liability.
o But do the facts warrant piercing the corporate veil?
 Shareholders v. directors and officers.
o Basic structure is that the shareholders are the passive owners; they elect a
board of directors to oversee management of the corporation; the directors
in turn appoint officers to run the corporation on a day-to-day basis.
o Say a shareholder objects to something that the directors have done. What
can the shareholder do?
 Bring a direct or derivative action.
 Derivative = injury to corporation.
o Must shareholder post bond for costs?
o Must shareholder make demand first?
o Can corporation kill the suit by appointing an
independent committee?
 Direct = injury to shareholder.
o Doesn’t have the procedural hurdles present in a
derivative action.
 Try to have a proposal included in the corporation’s proxy.
 When does a corporation have to include a shareholder
proposal in the proxy?
 Substantive areas of shareholder claims can vary widely.
 The first thing to ask is whether there has been a breach of
fiduciary duty.
o If no, then business judgment rule
applies. Corporation generally wins.
o If yes, the business judgment rule does not apply.
o This clearly is the case with a breach of the duty of
loyalty.
o Need to be careful with the duty of care, because the
duty of care has been so watered down in the
corporate context.
 Duty of care:
o Standard is not traditional negligence; rather, focus is
on neglect of duties. E.g., did directors fully inform
themselves of the relevant facts before making a
decision? Can the directors rely on what the officers
tell them? On what experts tell them?
o Can be limited by statute.
 Duty of loyalty:
o Common problems:
 Corporation – director contracts.
 Conflicts of interest.
 Does ratification fix the problem?
 Disclosure claims:
o Securities laws come up most often with corporations.
 But they can come up in connection with other
business organizations when the definition of a
security is met.
 Know the Howey test.
 Securities fraud in an initial prospectus: ’33
Act Section 11.
 Due diligence defense?
 Securities fraud in the secondary market: ’34
Act Section 10(b); SEC Rule 10b-5.
 Elements:
o Scienter.
o Causation.
o Materiality.
o Reliance.
 Distinguish between failure to
disclose/fraudulent disclosure and insider
trading.
 Short-swing profits: ’34 Act Section 16(b).

Officer or director v. corporation.

o Indemnification and insurance.


o When are corporations obligated by statute to indemnify their officers and
directors?
o What are the statutory limits on ability of corporation to indemnify?
o Shareholder v. shareholder.
o Closely held corporations are unique in this context.
o Under what circumstances can a minority shareholder force a buyout by
the majority?