Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Melissa Winn
Background
Objects are unintentionally being left inside of patients’ bodies after surgeries. It has
been estimated that for every 5,500 surgeries performed, one surgery results in the retention of a
surgical instrument being left within the patient (Williams, Tung, Steelman, Chang & Szekendi,
2014). This means that objects which were used to perform surgical procedures were
accidentally left within the patients’ bodies after the surgery had been completed. For example,
sponges that are used to soak up excess bleeding tend to blend in with surrounding organs and
Surgical instruments are mistakenly being forgotten within patients’ bodies after invasive
surgical procedures. Research conducted by the Journal of the American College of Surgeons
found that objects were being left inside of patients in one out of almost every 7,000 surgeries
(Stawicki et al., 2013). There are many tools that are used during surgery, such as sponges,
scalpels, and scissors. This study shows that these different objects are being missed by
physicians and nurses and are left to remain in the patient’s body once the surgical procedure has
finished.
Foreign items are neglectfully and persistently omitted during operations and remain on
the inside of patients’ bodies. A study performed at the University of North Carolina Hospitals
found that surgical instruments are being left inside of patients in approximately one out of every
1,000 surgeries (Rupp et al., 2012). An example of this occurring is during the time out
procedure that occurs before the surgical procedure begins. Counting procedures are put in place
to ensure that the same number of instruments exist before and after the surgery, in order to
confirm that no instruments were left within the patient. Although these procedures have been
RETENTION OF FOREIGN BODIES AFTER SURGERY 3
put in place, a thorough count is not always completed and surgical instruments are still being
Significance
Objects that are unintentionally abandoned within patients’ bodies lead to increased
patient hospital stays. Research voluntarily reported by healthcare facilities to the Joint
Commission Sentinel Event Database between the years 2012 and 2017 found that 69.6% of
retained surgical sponges led to extended hospital stays (Steelman, Shaw, Shine, & Hardy-
Faribanks, 2018). This means that the time patients spent in the hospital was longer than what
was initially expected, due to the retention of the surgical sponge. Patients’ hospital stays are
extended for a number of reasons, one of which is the time and tests that it takes in order to
determine that a surgical sponge was left inside of the patient. Another reason stays are
prolonged is the additional surgery that is required to remove these instruments, as well as the
additional time it takes for the patient to heal from the second surgical procedure.
When surgical items are unknowingly left within the patient, costs to the hospital and the
patient increase. A single incident of foreign body retention can cost between $37,041 and
$2,350,000 (Hariharan & Lobo, 2013). This sizeable price tag goes towards the many different
legal fees. For example, healthcare workers left a tool where it should never be left. The
hospital now requires legal defense after making such a horrendous error. Indemnity payments
towards the patient as compensation for the awful mistake are also included in this astronomical
price.
The retention of surgical tools left inside of the patient after surgery subjects the patient
to unnecessary physical and emotional pain and trauma. Reports of patients that have endured
the unintentional retention of surgical instruments include pain, palpable masses, and frequent
RETENTION OF FOREIGN BODIES AFTER SURGERY 4
infections (Zejnullahu, Bicaj, Zejnullzhu, V., & Hamza, 2017). This report means that these
patients not only endured the pain from the initial surgery, but also suffered additional pain of
having surgical equipment left inside of their bodies. Surgery on its own is already painful, but
the pain is greatly increased when another procedure is performed and the healing time is
extended. Foreign body retention within surgical patients’ bodies causes increased hospital
One of the many roles of a nurse is to provide the best possible care to each patient.
According to Katie Eriksson’s caritative caring theory, the most important goal of nursing is to
relieve the patient’s agony, which can respectfully be done through the aspect of care (Frilund &
Eriksson, 2013). This means that when a nurse displays integrity while caring for a patient, the
nurse is in turn showing their care for that particular patient. Nurses constantly come face to face
with moral and ethical dilemmas. Based on Eriksson’s theory, when nurses display honesty,
they are not only able to administer the best care, but they are also able to show their patients that
they are important and protected. For example, when a nurse educates the patient on things such
as upcoming procedures and tests, the nurse is providing the patient with informed consent. The
nurse is able to show their care for the patient when they fully teach the patient and provide
informed consent.
Nurses work with patients each and every day and it is their duty to help and care for
these individuals. In connection with the caritative caring theory, caring must not be forgotten
and should be at the core of healthcare (Eriksson, 2007). For instance, patients come to
healthcare facilities each day with various illnesses and injuries and come seeking the assistance
of doctors and nurses. As these patients obtain the help of these trained medical professionals, it
RETENTION OF FOREIGN BODIES AFTER SURGERY 5
is not only the nurses’ responsibility to give the necessary medical attention, but also to provide
these patients with appropriate care. Medical treatment is simply receiving the necessary
treatment that is required, such as antibiotics or surgery. However, medical care goes beyond the
quick fix. Medical care is given by nurses that have the patients’ best interests in mind. Medical
care is given by ethical nurses that properly teach and inform their patients, and do more than
As nurses work with and treat patients, they must also be able to morally care for and
help these people. As part of Eriksson’s theory, it is not appropriate to give care that is “just
good enough.” Rather, nurses must be ethically aware in order to give quality care to each patient
(Frilund & Eriksson, 2013). For example, ethically caring nurses work to find the root of the
problem and fix the actual cause, rather than finding a simple solution and covering the problem.
Nurses that care for their patients go above and beyond what is asked of them, instead of just
meeting the basic requirements. This links to the problem of objects being left within patients
after surgery because the best care is not able to be given when objects are forgotten within
patients’ bodies. Research performed by the Journal of the American College of Surgeons
discovered that in one out of almost every 7,000 surgeries, an object was left within the patient’s
body (Stawicki et al., 2013). After an object is neglectfully left inside of the patient, they are
subjected to many more complications, and therefore are not receiving quality care. A patient
has received the best possible care when instruments are not left to remain within their body after
Each day nurses come in contact with a variety of people, many of whom are sick and
injured and are in search of the appropriate care. The caritative caring theory suggests that the
RETENTION OF FOREIGN BODIES AFTER SURGERY 6
root of the healthcare given is quality care (Eriksson, 2007). When ethical healthcare is
provided, it is more than just treating the injured patient and moving onto the sick patient.
Ethical care is taking the time to make sure the best care is provided. For instance, the “time-
out” period just before a surgery begins is an example of ethical care. This pause is used to
prevent mistakes, such as operating on the wrong patient or performing the wrong surgery. This
theory ties back to the problem of foreign body retention after surgery, because despite efforts to
give quality care, objects are still being left inside patients’ bodies after surgery. The University
of North Carolina Hospitals conducted research and found that for every 1,000 procedures,
approximately one surgical instrument is being left within the patient’s body (Rupp et al., 2012).
Quality care is not able to be given when instruments are being overlooked and left inside of the
patient. Nurses have the responsibility of preventing such complications and by doing so, they
are able provide the best ethical care these patients deserve.
Research Methods
A higher level of ethical nursing care would lead to fewer surgical instruments being left
within patients’ bodies after surgical procedures. The theorist, Katie Eriksson, proposed the
theory that ethical care must be at the core of nursing (Frilund & Eriksson, 2013). When ethical
care is given, nurses are able to perform at a higher level. As these nurses work at this higher
level, these patients will in turn receive better care. As better care is given, fewer surgical
Research Design
For this research, a quantitative study will be used, more specifically, a correlational
research design. Quantitative research is an objective way of finding and collecting numerical
data (Grove, Gray & Burns, 2015). Through the use of quantitative research, numbers are
RETENTION OF FOREIGN BODIES AFTER SURGERY 7
gathered and data is analyzed, which in turn creates a cause and effect relationship. This type of
research is concerned with measuring collectable data and producing facts. Correlational
research explores the relationships between different variables. Quantitative correlational is the
best research to use for this study, as this will help determine the correlation between the quality
of surgical care given and the retention of surgical instruments after procedures.
Research Population
This research will study approximately 300 nurses across five hospitals. The inclusion
criteria for this study will include registered nurses that work in operating rooms in Southeastern
Idaho. This group will be used for this study, because registered nurses that work in operating
rooms assist doctors in surgical procedures, and therefore play a role in the retention of foreign
bodies. Exclusion criteria for this study will include nurses that work in outpatient clinics,
nurses that are still completing orientation, and nurse managers. These nurses are excluded from
this study, because these nurses are usually not involved in a lot of direct patient care. Nurses
that work in outpatient clinics are also excluded, since they typically do not assist with invasive
Research for this study will be conducted through the use of questionnaires. After
obtaining the approval of the Institutional Review Board (IRB) for hospitals within Southeastern
Idaho, nurse managers will be contacted with the questionnaire, which will then be distributed to
the registered nurses on their unit. This questionnaire will include various questions regarding
whether these nurses have been involved in a procedure that resulted in the retention of surgical
instruments. The questionnaire will also include questions related to the nature of the surgery,
such as the type of surgery, as well as the necessity of the surgery. For example, an elective
RETENTION OF FOREIGN BODIES AFTER SURGERY 8
procedure versus an emergency surgery. Within the survey, nurses will also be asked to share
the level of care that was provided during the surgery. For instance, if a complete and thorough
“time-out” period was completed. Since nurses are very busy and often do not have time to
complete extra tasks, such as a survey, an incentive will be included. Each nurse that
participates in the survey will receive a $5 Amazon gift card for their time. After this research
has been collected, a statistical analysis will be used, as this will provide the researchers with a
way of identifying patterns that are contained within the data. An inferential statistic will help in
identifying similarities found in the research and common themes related to foreign body
retention may be identified (Grove et al., 2015). After these similarities have been discovered,
researchers will better know how to create solutions to the problem of surgical instruments being
Ethical Considerations
In this research study, participants may not want to be personally identified. This ethical
consideration is called privacy (Grove et al., 2015). In order to keep participants’ identities
confidential, those involved in the study will receive a number, instead of having to use their
actual name. By giving each person involved a number, researchers will still be able to correctly
identify the specific participant without having to know the individual’s personal identifiers,
such as their first and last name. The retention of surgical instruments is a very serious issue.
These participants may not want their names associated with specific incidents, which is why
During the collection of data for this research study, participants will be asked to answer
a series of questions, some of which may cause uncomfortable feelings. This ethical
consideration is called beneficence (Grove et al., 2015). These participants have the right to be
RETENTION OF FOREIGN BODIES AFTER SURGERY 9
protected from discomfort and harm. In order to protect these participants, these surveys will be
optional. Along with the option of completing the survey, each participant is allowed to choose
the questions they wish to answer. They may answer as many questions as they desire, or if
there are questions that bring up unpleasant memories or feelings, these participants may simply
As part of this research study, participants may fear that they will be mistreated or be
subjected to unfair selection. This ethical consideration is called justice (Grove et al., 2015).
The selection of participants will first go through the hospital’s IRB and then through the nurse
managers. A survey will then be handed out to each registered nurse that meets the specific
qualifications. Each participant will receive the same survey, in order to protect the participants
from being unfairly treated. Each participant will be treated the same, in order to create equality
and fairness.
Annotated Bibliography
Halverson, A. L., Casey, J. T., Andersson, J., Anderson, K., Park, C., Rademaker, A. W. &
Moorman, D. (2011). Communication failure in the operating room. Surgery 149(3), 305-
310.
The researchers that conducted this study consist of doctors and nurses. Together, these
trained professionals have years of healthcare experience related to the surgical field.
better understand communication errors that occur within the operating room. A strength
of this research was the classifications that were made. After the data was collected, it
was then grouped into categories according to the type of error that was made. One
identifiable weakness is the small amount of operations that were observed. It is difficult
RETENTION OF FOREIGN BODIES AFTER SURGERY 10
to obtain accurate results when only 150 hours of surgical procedures were watched.
This research was of poor quality. A longer study with more surgical procedures
observed would have led to more conclusive results. This research is very useful for an
individual’s career as a nurse. As nurses work in the operating room, there is a great deal
of communication that occurs. Nurses must be aware of the risks that could potentially
happen if they are not aware and careful. The intended audience for this research is all
healthcare workers that work within the operating room. Communication occurs between
nurses, doctors, and surgical technicians, all of which may lead to errors. This research
study uses the same population of operating room nurses as the proposed research study
Judson, T. J., Howell, M. D., Guglielmi, C., Canacari, E. & Sands, K. (2013). Miscount
surgical instruments. The Joint Commission on Quality and Patient Safety, 39(10), 468-
474.
These five authors all work as educators and advocates for patient and environmental
safety. Although they specialize in different areas, Guglielmi, Howell, and Sands have
all worked at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston, Massachusetts. These
individuals worked to create a qualitative cohort study that observed incidences that
resulted in the retention of surgical instruments. This study was conducted in order to
help identify possible reasons surgical instruments are forgotten during surgery. One of
the strengths of the study was the large sample size. Over a 12-month period, 23,955
operations were observed. One possible weakness of this study are the multiple variables
that were tested. When more than one variable is tested at a time, it is harder to
RETENTION OF FOREIGN BODIES AFTER SURGERY 11
determine what caused the results of the study. Overall, this was a strong study. This
study had a strong sample size and could be replicated and tested in many other hospitals
in order to obtain similar results. This research is very useful to nurses, as they must be
aware of potential risk factors, and be vigilant in order to prevent such errors. The
intended audience is members of the healthcare team that have any involvement in
surgeries. Mistakes could be made at any point in the surgical process, whether it be in
the perioperative stage, during the actual operation, or even in the postoperative stage.
This research links to the research problem in that it uses the same population of
Moffat-Bruce, S. D., Cook, C. H., Steinberg, S. M. & Stawicki, S. P. (2014). Risk factors for
retained surgical items: A meta-analysis and proposed risk stratification system. Journal
The four of these authors are all medical doctors that have an extensive amount of
experience working in trauma and the operating room. These researchers conducted a
quantitative meta-analysis in order to determine risk factors that increased the likelihood
of a surgical instrument being left inside of the patient after surgery. The study was
strong, in that it was able to identify multiple factors that place a patient at risk for
foreign body retention. However, the study was weak in the number of cases that were
analyzed. Of all the cases of foreign body retention, only 19 cases were studied.
Although only a few cases were analyzed, the quality of the study was moderate. The
researchers were able to go through these cases and assign ratios to each risk factor and
were able to identify common risks. These research findings are useful for nursing
practices, in that it was able to identify risks that increase a patients chance of having a
RETENTION OF FOREIGN BODIES AFTER SURGERY 12
surgical instrument left within their bodies. When these risks are identified, nurses are
able to work to prevent these occurrences. The specific audience for this research is
doctors working in operating rooms, but is also applicable to other healthcare workers
that have patient interaction within the operating room. This research directly links to the
research problem of surgical instrument retention, as both studies use the same
Steelman, V. M. & Cullen, J. J. (2011). Designing a safer process to prevent retained surgical
sponges: A healthcare failure mode and effect analysis. AORN Journal, 94(2), 132-141.
This pair of authors are both professors at the University of Iowa, each specializing in
surgery. Together they worked to create a qualitative observational study that focused on
surgical procedures and cases that involved the retention of surgical instruments. The
goal of the study was to identify ways to prevent the mistake of foreign body retention.
In order to correlate the data that was found, these researchers used process mapping,
which is one of the strengths of this study. The study was conducted at a smaller Veteran
Affairs hospital that only has a 93-bed capacity. The smaller size of this study is a
potential weakness. The quality of this study was fair in regards to the research that was
used and the method of conduction. Observational studies are useful, since researchers
are able to see results without implementing variables. This research is useful to the
nursing practice. As research is conducted and ways are found to prevent the retention of
surgical instruments, nurses are able to implement these practices. This research has
been designed for individuals that work in the operating room, whether it be doctors,
nurses, or even surgical technicians. The research that was conducted connects to the
RETENTION OF FOREIGN BODIES AFTER SURGERY 13
research problem of foreign body retention as both studies use the same population of
Research Implications
Nursing Knowledge
After this study concludes, nurses will know the most common events that place a patient
at risk for having an object left within their body after surgery. There are many different factors
that increase a patient’s chances of having a foreign object left after surgery. At the completion
of this study, nurses will comprehend and be able to identify the most common risk factors. For
example, nurses will know the type of surgeries that have the highest probability of foreign body
retention. Nurses will also know whether the severity of the surgery is a factor related to surgical
instruments being forgotten. For instance, if there is a higher chance of an object being left
inside of someone during an emergency surgery versus an elective procedure. From this study,
nurses will better understand events that place a patient at risk of having an instrument left within
their body after surgery, and how to help prevent these mishaps.
Nursing Theory
Nurses have the duty to care for and protect each of their patients. According to
Eriksson’s caritative caring theory, care should be at the basis of healthcare in order to
effectively treat each patient (Eriksson, 2007). The study of foreign body retention after surgery
will continue to support Eriksson’s theory. In accordance with this theory, when proper care is
given and close attention is paid, even to the smallest details, patients are able to be properly
cared for and kept safe. The best care is not able to be given when objects are being left inside of
patients’ bodies after surgical procedures. However, as Eriksson’s theory is implemented and
RETENTION OF FOREIGN BODIES AFTER SURGERY 14
more effort is given to the treatment of each patient, these individuals will in turn be able to
Nursing Practice
Once this study has been completed, nurses will give better patient care in order to
prevent the retention of surgical instruments during surgery. Nurses will be aware of the
common surgical procedures and events that place a patient at risk for foreign body retention.
Nurses will ensure that more accurate and thorough counting procedures are put in place. For
example, nurses will not only implement counting procedures at the start and at the end of each
surgery, but nurses will also take the time to do a count within the surgery. Nurses will also
work to assist the doctor in checking the body cavities for surgical instruments before each
patient is closed. As a part of the healthcare team, nurses will work more carefully in order to
This study works to improve patient safety. Through the use of this study, researchers
will be able to identify common events that lead to the occurrence of foreign body retention.
When an object is left within a patient’s body after surgery, they are at risk for many serious
consequences. For example, a scalpel left within the abdomen could cut an organ, which could
lead to internal bleeding. A sponge could create a blockage, which could cause decreased blood
flow to limbs and organs. These seemingly small instruments have the potential of creating very
large and serious consequences. Although foreign body retention may only lead to problems
such as increased pain, the same tool could also end up killing the patient. By stopping the
problem of objects being left after surgery, the safety of each patient is greatly improved. The
safety of the patient should always be at the top of the list for doctors and nurses. However,
RETENTION OF FOREIGN BODIES AFTER SURGERY 15
when objects are continually being left within patients’ bodies, their lives are being put at great
risk, and patient safety is not being fully demonstrated. This study will work to increase the
safety of each patient, by working to decrease each incidence of foreign body retention after
surgical procedures.
The study of retention of foreign bodies after surgeries works to promote cost-effective
care. There are many astronomical costs that come with surgery and a hospital stay. These
healthcare costs only increase when an instrument is left within a patient after surgery. Further
tests will have to be completed in order to determine the cause of the problem. Once the surgical
instrument has been identified, a secondary surgery will need to be performed in order to remove
the object. The additional surgery only prolongs the time the patient will have to stay in the
hospital. All of these factors greatly increase the cost to not only the patient, but also to the
hospital. The hospital will have to pay for these added healthcare fees, as well as the legal fees.
Indemnity payments will need be to the patient in order to help compensate for the horrendous
error that was made. All of these costs may be avoided through the use of this study. This study
will work to help prevent the retention of surgical instruments after invasive procedures. By
preventing these mistakes, the cost to the patient will decrease, as they will not be required to
pay for additional tests and procedures, as well as an extended hospital stay. The hospital will in
turn be able to save money, as they will not need to compensate patients for the mistakes they
have made.
The use of this study works to improve the outcome of patients and healthcare providers.
When an object is left within a patient’s body after surgery, the health of the patient becomes
compromised. After a healthcare provider makes this mistake, whether it be a doctor or a nurse,
their careers become jeopardized. These healthcare providers are at risk of being sued. For
RETENTION OF FOREIGN BODIES AFTER SURGERY 16
example, a patient could sue these providers for malpractice, since healthcare providers work to
provide safe care, and should not be leaving surgical instruments inside of patients’ bodies.
Even if the healthcare providers career is not ended, their credibility greatly decreases. Patients
will not be willing to trust a healthcare provider that has made such a disastrous mistake in the
past. This study will help nurses and doctors from preventing these terrible mistakes. Once the
issue has been corrected, not only the outcomes for these patients, but also the careers of these
Recommendations
surgical instrument retention. A qualitative grounded theory study could be used to analyze the
events related to surgical instruments being retained after surgery. The same population of
operating room nurses would be used for this study. The study will be conducted through the use
of semi-structured individual interviews. The purpose of these interviews will focus on the
phenomenon and the events surrounding the incidence of foreign body retention. This study will
work to evaluate the events and experiences, rather than the numbers and data surrounding the
most common risks, as in the initial study. This study will be beneficial, as it will help determine
Although this study focused on the role of nurses in the retention of surgical instruments,
this study could be transferred to doctors. Doctors have direct patient contact, as they are the
ones performing the surgery. This research has the ability to focus on the occurrence of doctors
overlooking surgical instruments during surgical procedures. Although nurses assist in surgery
and help to facilitate the time out and counting procedures, doctors are ultimately the people that
RETENTION OF FOREIGN BODIES AFTER SURGERY 17
open and close the patient. By transferring this research to the focus of doctors, incidences that
The results of this study will be used to improve patient care. The current level of patient
care is clearly not sufficient; as surgical tools are still being left within patients. The results of
this study will teach individuals involved in the surgical process, such as doctors and nurses, the
common events that result in the retention of instruments. These results will increase the
knowledge amongst doctors and nurses. With this increased knowledge, these individuals will
be able to give more quality care and work to prevent these tragic events from ever happening
again.
RETENTION OF FOREIGN BODIES AFTER SURGERY 18
References
Eriksson, K. (2007). The theory of caritative caring: A vision. Nursing Science Quarterly, 20(3),
201-202.
Frilund, M., Eriksson, K. (2013). The caregivers’ possibilities of providing ethically good care
Grove, S. K., Gray, J. R. & Burns, N. (2015). Understanding nursing research: Building an
Hariharan, D. & Lobo, D. (2013). Retained surgical sponges, needles and instruments. The Royal
Rupp, C. C., Kagarise, M. J., Nelson, S. M., Deal, A. M., Phillips, S., Chadwick, J., … Jin Kim,
counting protocols for tracking surgical sponges: A prospective trial of 2,285 patients.
Stawicki, S. P., Moffatt-Bruce, S. D., Ahmed, H. M., Anderson, H. L., Balija, T. M., Bernescu,
I., … Cook, C. H. (2013). Retained surgical items: A problem yet to be solved. Journal of
Steelman, V. M., Shaw, C., Shine, L., & Hardy-Fairbanks, A. J. (2018). Retained surgical
sponges: a descriptive study of 319 occurrences and contributing factors from 2012 to
Williams, T. L., Tung, D. K., Steelman, V. M., Chang, P. K. & Szekendi, M. K. (2014). Retained
364.
Zejnullahu, V., Bicaj, B. X., Zejnullahu, V. A., & Hamza, A. R. (2017). Retained Surgical
Foreign Bodies after Surgery. Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences, 5(1), 97-100.