Appendix

87
Lampiran 2
KUESIONER
PENGARUH DUKUNGAN GURU DAN TEMAN SEBAYA TERHADAP
AKSEPTABILITAS DAN PEMANFAATAN PUSAT INFORMASI
KONSELING REMAJA (PIK REMAJA) PADA SISWA
SMU NEGRI 2 KOTA TANJUNG BALAI
TAHUN 2015
I. KARAKTERISTIK RESPONDEN
1. Usia :
2. Jenis Kelamin :
3. Apakah anda memiliki teman sekelompok : YA TIDAK
II. DUKUNGAN GURU DAN TEMAN SEBAYA
1. Berilah tanda √ pada kolom yang tersedia pada pilihan jawaban yang benar
2. Bacalah setiap pertanyaan dengan seksama. Pilih jawaban yang sesuai dengan
sikap, pendapat, pengalaman dan kebiasaan anda
NO ITEM PERTANYAAN YA TIDAK
1. Seluruh teman dalam kelompok saya memiliki jenis
kelamin yang sama dengan saya
2. Saya dan teman kelompok memiliki hobi yang sama
3. Saya berbagi cerita, informasi dan pengalaman pribadi
dengan teman kelompok saya
4. Saya selalu meluangkan waktu untuk teman kelompok
saya
5. Teman kelompok tidak pernah memanfaatkan layanan
konseling remaja di sekolah
6. Semua anggota di kelompok teman saya sudah memiliki
pacar
7. Memiliki kelompok teman sebaya merupakan hal yang
membanggakan bagi saya
8. Saya lebih senang mendengarkan nasihat teman
kelompok bila dibandingkan dengan guru dan orang tua
9. Perilaku saya dipengaruhi oleh teman kelompok
10. Semakin banyak teman semakin besar pengaruhnya
terhadap perilaku saya
11. Guru di sekolah sangat baik terhadap saya
12. Setiap selesai memberikan pelajaran, guru selalu
Universitas Sumatera Utara

88
meyarankan kami agar mengikuti kegiatan yang

dilakukan oleh PIK remaja
13. Guru ikut mendukung kegiatan yang dibuat oleh
konselor di PIK remaja
14. Guru ikut membantu untuk mengkoordinir siswa setiap
mengikuti kegiatan sosialisasi PIK remaja
15. Guru selalu dilibatkan oleh pihak sekolah dalam
membantu siswa untuk mendapatkan informasi tentang
kesehatan reproduksi
16. Sebaiknya guru yang menjadi konselor di sekolah
17. semua guru selalu mendukung kegiatan PIK remaja
18. Saya dekat dengan semua guru
19. Ada seorang guru yang menjadi tempat curhat saya
20. saya lebih senang curhat dengan guru atau dengan
konselor dari PIK remaja
III. AKSEPTABILITAS TERHADAP PIK REMAJA DI SEKOLAH

sikap, pendapat, pengalaman dan kebiasaan anda.
1. Ruangan layanan PIK remaja disekolah seharusnya
tertutup agar tidak diketahui orang lain.
2. Ruangan layanan PIK REMAJA disekolah sebaiknya
ditata dengan bersih dan nyaman
3. Ruangan untuk konsultasi sebaiknya dibuat tersendiri
agar tidak didengar orang lain.
4. Pemberi pelayanan konsultasi sebaiknya teman sebaya
(peer group)
5. Saya merasa malu untuk datang ke PIK REMAJA
6. Saya merasa takut menjadi bahan ejekan teman atau
orang lain yang saya kenal, apabila saya meminta
pelayanan kesehatan reproduksi di sekolah
7. Saya lebih senang jika petugas pemberi layanan berjenis
kelamin sama dengan saya
8. Petugas pemberi layanan sebaiknya seorang guru
9. Petugas sebaiknya mendengarkan dengan penuh
perhatian saat saya menyampaikan masalah yang saya
hadapi.
10. Waktu dalam konsultasi sebaiknya tidak dibatasi

89
IV. PEMANFAATAN TERHADAP PIK REMAJA DI SEKOLAH
sikap, pendapat, pengalaman dan kebiasaan anda.
1. Apakah anda mengetahui bahwa di sekolah anda
memiliki PIK REMAJA?
2. Pernahkah anda berkunjung dan berkonsultasi pada
petugas di PIK REMAJA?
3. Apakah anda membutuhkan pelayanan konseling
kesehatan reproduksi?
4. Apakah keberadaan PIK REMAJA di sekolah dapat
membantu siswa dalam memberikan informasi
kesehatan reproduksi?
5. Apakah pelayanan yang anda terima dari petugas PIK
REMAJA sudah baik?
6. Apakah semua materi tentang kesehatan reproduksi
yang siswa butuhkan dapat diberikan oleh petugas PIK
REMAJA?
7. Apakah terdapat masalah pada saat anda melakukan
konsultasi pada petugas di PIK REMAJA?
8. Apakah tempat melakukan konseling nyaman?
9. Apakah PIK REMAJA juga memberikan informas
itentang kesehatan reproduksi melalui media cetak
(brosur, leaflet, booklet, buku – buku bacaan)?
10. Apakah PIK REMAJA memberikan informasi juga
melalui diskusi kelompok (peer group)?

90
Lampiran 3 : Hasil Uji Validitas dan Reliabilitas
Reliability Dukungan Guru

Scale: ALL VARIABLES
Case Processing Summary

N %
Cases Valid 30 100.0
Excludeda 0 .0
Total 30 100.0
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in
the procedure.
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
Alpha N of Items
.891 10
Item Statistics
Mean Std. Deviation N
g1 .77 .430 30
g2 .80 .407 30
g3 .77 .430 30
g4 .70 .466 30
g5 .70 .466 30
g6 .70 .466 30
g7 .77 .430 30
g8 .83 .379 30
g9 .67 .479 30
g10 .70 .466 30

91
Item-Total Statistics
Corrected Item- Cronbach's
Scale Mean if Scale Variance Total Alpha if Item
Item Deleted if Item Deleted Correlation Deleted
g1 6.63 8.171 .629 .880
g2 6.60 8.662 .449 .892
g3 6.63 8.171 .629 .880
g4 6.70 7.941 .664 .878
g5 6.70 7.941 .664 .878
g6 6.70 8.010 .635 .880
g7 6.63 8.171 .629 .880
g8 6.57 8.323 .657 .879
g9 6.73 7.582 .792 .868
g10 6.70 8.217 .550 .886
Scale Statistics
Mean Variance Std. Deviation N of Items
7.40 9.903 3.147 10
Reliability Dukungan Teman


N %
Excludeda 0 .0
Total 30 100.0
the procedure.

92
Cronbach's
Alpha N of Items
.843 10
Item Statistics
t1 .73 .450 30
t2 .37 .490 30
t3 .33 .479 30
t4 .07 .254 30
t5 .20 .407 30
t6 .27 .450 30
t7 .53 .507 30
t8 .43 .504 30
t9 .40 .498 30
t10 .40 .498 30
Cronbach's
Scale Mean if Scale Variance if Corrected Item- Alpha if Item
Item Deleted Item Deleted Total Correlation Deleted
t1 3.00 7.172 .573 .825
t2 3.37 7.137 .526 .830
t3 3.40 6.731 .721 .810
t4 3.67 8.092 .414 .840
t5 3.53 7.499 .489 .833
t6 3.47 7.430 .458 .836
t7 3.20 6.648 .706 .811
t8 3.30 7.252 .460 .837
t9 3.33 7.126 .518 .831
t10 3.33 7.057 .547 .828

93
Scale Statistics
3.73 8.754 2.959 10
Reliability Akseptabilitas

N %
Excludeda 0 .0
Total 30 100.0
the procedure.
Cronbach's
Alpha N of Items
.817 10
Item Statistics
a1 .27 .450 30
a2 .33 .479 30
a3 .10 .305 30
a4 .30 .466 30
a5 .10 .305 30
a6 .23 .430 30
a7 .27 .450 30
a8 .23 .430 30
a9 .30 .466 30
a10 .40 .498 30

94
Corrected Item- Cronbach's
Scale Mean if Scale Variance Total Alpha if Item
Item Deleted if Item Deleted Correlation Deleted
a1 2.27 5.720 .541 .796
a2 2.20 5.407 .650 .783
a3 2.43 6.323 .436 .808
a4 2.23 5.702 .524 .798
a5 2.43 6.323 .436 .808
a6 2.30 5.734 .566 .794
a7 2.27 5.995 .403 .811
a8 2.30 5.872 .493 .802
a9 2.23 5.633 .558 .794
a10 2.13 5.844 .412 .812
Scale Statistics
2.53 7.085 2.662 10
Reliability Pemanfaatan

N %
Excludeda 0 .0
Total 30 100.0
the procedure.

95
Cronbach's
Alpha N of Items
.863 10
Item Statistics
p1 .50 .509 30
p2 .33 .479 30
p3 .77 .430 30
p4 .43 .504 30
p5 .43 .504 30
p6 .13 .346 30
p7 .10 .305 30
p8 .07 .254 30
p9 .10 .305 30
p10 .07 .254 30
Cronbach's
Scale Mean if Scale Variance if Corrected Item- Alpha if Item
Item Deleted Item Deleted Total Correlation Deleted
p1 2.43 5.840 .463 .864
p2 2.60 5.766 .539 .855
p3 2.17 6.075 .461 .860
p4 2.50 5.362 .694 .839
p5 2.50 5.431 .661 .843
p6 2.80 5.890 .732 .839
p7 2.83 6.213 .612 .849
p8 2.87 6.464 .549 .855
p9 2.83 6.075 .711 .843
p10 2.87 6.395 .606 .852

96
Scale Statistics
2.93 7.237 2.690 10
Lampiran 4 : Analisis Univariat
Karakteristik Responden
usia
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 16 65 33.5 33.5 33.5
17 121 62.4 62.4 95.9
18 8 4.1 4.1 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0
sex
Cumulative
Valid Laki-laki 72 37.1 37.1 37.1
Perempuan 122 62.9 62.9 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0
T_kelompok
Cumulative
Valid Tidak 76 39.2 39.2 39.2
Ya 118 60.8 60.8 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0

97
Dukungan Guru
Frequency Table
g1
Cumulative
Valid Tidak 119 61.3 61.3 61.3
Ya 75 38.7 38.7 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0
g2
Cumulative
Valid Tidak 78 40.2 40.2 40.2
Ya 116 59.8 59.8 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0
g3
Cumulative
Valid Tidak 127 65.5 65.5 65.5
Ya 67 34.5 34.5 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0
g4
Cumulative
Valid Tidak 87 44.8 44.8 44.8
Ya 107 55.2 55.2 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0

98
g5
Cumulative
Valid Tidak 111 57.2 57.2 57.2
Ya 83 42.8 42.8 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0
g6
Cumulative
Valid Tidak 74 38.1 38.1 38.1
Ya 120 61.9 61.9 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0
g7
Cumulative
Valid Tidak 67 34.5 34.5 34.5
Ya 127 65.5 65.5 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0
g8
Cumulative
Valid Tidak 86 44.3 44.3 44.3
Ya 108 55.7 55.7 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0

99
g9
Cumulative
Valid Tidak 80 41.2 41.2 41.2
Ya 114 58.8 58.8 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0
g10
Cumulative
Valid Tidak 95 49.0 49.0 49.0
Ya 99 51.0 51.0 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0
Kat_guru
Cumulative
Valid Kurang 106 54.6 54.6 54.6
Baik 88 45.4 45.4 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0
Dukungan Teman
Frequency Table
t1
Cumulative
Valid Tidak 61 31.4 31.4 31.4
Ya 133 68.6 68.6 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0

100
t2
Cumulative
Valid Tidak 110 56.7 56.7 56.7
Ya 84 43.3 43.3 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0
t3
Cumulative
Valid Tidak 97 50.0 50.0 50.0
Ya 97 50.0 50.0 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0
t4
Cumulative
Valid Tidak 118 60.8 60.8 60.8
Ya 76 39.2 39.2 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0
t5
Cumulative
Valid Tidak 101 52.1 52.1 52.1
Ya 93 47.9 47.9 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0

101
t6
Cumulative
Valid Tidak 126 64.9 64.9 64.9
Ya 68 35.1 35.1 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0
t7
Cumulative
Valid Tidak 114 58.8 58.8 58.8
Ya 80 41.2 41.2 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0
t8
Cumulative
Valid Tidak 123 63.4 63.4 63.4
Ya 71 36.6 36.6 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0
t9
Cumulative
Valid Tidak 128 66.0 66.0 66.0
Ya 66 34.0 34.0 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0

102
t10
Cumulative
Valid Tidak 132 68.0 68.0 68.0
Ya 62 32.0 32.0 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0
Kat_teman
Cumulative
Valid Kurang 133 68.6 68.6 68.6
Baik 61 31.4 31.4 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0
Akseptabilitas
Frequency Table
a1
Cumulative
Valid Tidak 49 25.3 25.3 25.3
Ya 145 74.7 74.7 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0
a2
Cumulative
Valid Tidak 109 56.2 56.2 56.2
Ya 85 43.8 43.8 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0

103
a3
Cumulative
Valid Tidak 48 24.7 24.7 24.7
Ya 146 75.3 75.3 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0
a4
Cumulative
Valid Tidak 92 47.4 47.4 47.4
Ya 102 52.6 52.6 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0
a5
Cumulative
Valid Tidak 88 45.4 45.4 45.4
Ya 106 54.6 54.6 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0
a6
Cumulative
Valid Tidak 129 66.5 66.5 66.5
Ya 65 33.5 33.5 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0

104
a7
Cumulative
Valid Tidak 141 72.7 72.7 72.7
Ya 53 27.3 27.3 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0
a8
Cumulative
Valid Tidak 142 73.2 73.2 73.2
Ya 52 26.8 26.8 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0
a9
Cumulative
Valid Tidak 145 74.7 74.7 74.7
Ya 49 25.3 25.3 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0
a10
Cumulative
Valid Tidak 146 75.3 75.3 75.3
Ya 48 24.7 24.7 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0

105
akseptabilitas
Cumulative
Valid Tidak menerima 132 68.0 68.0 68.0
Menerima 62 32.0 32.0 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0
Pemanfaatan
Frequency Table
p1
Cumulative
Valid Tidak 81 41.8 41.8 41.8
Ya 113 58.2 58.2 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0
p2
Cumulative
Valid Tidak 98 50.5 50.5 50.5
Ya 96 49.5 49.5 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0
p3
Cumulative
Valid Tidak 95 49.0 49.0 49.0
Ya 99 51.0 51.0 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0

106
p4
Cumulative
Valid Tidak 93 47.9 47.9 47.9
Ya 101 52.1 52.1 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0
p5
Cumulative
Valid Tidak 80 41.2 41.2 41.2
Ya 114 58.8 58.8 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0
p6
Cumulative
Valid Tidak 109 56.2 56.2 56.2
Ya 85 43.8 43.8 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0
p7
Cumulative
Valid Tidak 100 51.5 51.5 51.5
Ya 94 48.5 48.5 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0

107
p8
Cumulative
Valid Tidak 84 43.3 43.3 43.3
Ya 110 56.7 56.7 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0
p9
Cumulative
Valid Tidak 104 53.6 53.6 53.6
Ya 90 46.4 46.4 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0
p10
Cumulative
Valid Tidak 87 44.8 44.8 44.8
Ya 107 55.2 55.2 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0
pemanfaatan
Cumulative
Valid Tidak memanfaatkan 104 53.6 53.6 53.6
Memanfaatkan 90 46.4 46.4 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0

108
Lampiran 5 : Analisis Bivariat
Crosstabs
Kat_teman * akseptabilitas
Crosstab
akseptabilitas
Tidak menerima Menerima Total
Kat_teman Kurang Count 91 42 133
% within Kat_teman 68.4% 31.6% 100.0%
% within akseptabilitas 68.9% 67.7% 68.6%
% of Total 46.9% 21.6% 68.6%
Baik Count 41 20 61
% within Kat_teman 67.2% 32.8% 100.0%
% of Total 21.1% 10.3% 31.4%
Total Count 132 62 194
% within Kat_teman 68.0% 32.0% 100.0%
% of Total 68.0% 32.0% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig.
Value df sided) sided) (1-sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square .028 1 .867
b
Continuity Correction .000 1 .999
Likelihood Ratio .028 1 .867
Fisher's Exact Test .870 .496
Linear-by-Linear
.028 1 .867
Association
N of Valid Casesb 194
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 19,49.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

109
Kat_guru * akseptabilitas
Crosstab
akseptabilitas
Kat_guru Kurang Count 82 24 106
% within Kat_guru 77.4% 22.6% 100.0%
% of Total 42.3% 12.4% 54.6%
Baik Count 50 38 88
% within Kat_guru 56.8% 43.2% 100.0%
% of Total 25.8% 19.6% 45.4%
% within Kat_guru 68.0% 32.0% 100.0%
% of Total 68.0% 32.0% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig.
Value df sided) sided) (1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 9.329a 1 .002
b
Continuity Correction 8.408 1 .004
Likelihood Ratio 9.352 1 .002
Linear-by-Linear
9.281 1 .002
Association

110
Kat_teman * pemanfaatan
Crosstab
pemanfaatan
Tidak
memanfaatkan Memanfaatkan Total
% within Kat_teman 58.6% 41.4% 100.0%
% within pemanfaatan 75.0% 61.1% 68.6%
% of Total 40.2% 28.4% 68.6%
Baik Count 26 35 61
% within Kat_teman 42.6% 57.4% 100.0%
% of Total 13.4% 18.0% 31.4%
% within Kat_teman 53.6% 46.4% 100.0%
% of Total 53.6% 46.4% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df (2-sided) sided) sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 4.317 1 .038
b
Linear-by-Linear
4.295 1 .038
Association

111
Kat_guru * pemanfaatan
Crosstab
pemanfaatan
Tidak
memanfaatkan Memanfaatkan Total
% within Kat_guru 50.9% 49.1% 100.0%
% of Total 27.8% 26.8% 54.6%
Baik Count 50 38 88
% within Kat_guru 56.8% 43.2% 100.0%
% of Total 25.8% 19.6% 45.4%
% within Kat_guru 53.6% 46.4% 100.0%
% of Total 53.6% 46.4% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. Exact Sig. (1-
Value df (2-sided) (2-sided) sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square .667 1 .414
b
Linear-by-Linear
.664 1 .415
Association

112
Correlations
Correlations
gtot ttot atot ptot
gtot Pearson Correlation 1 .060 .299** -.007
Sig. (2-tailed) .407 .000 .922
N 194 194 194 194
ttot Pearson Correlation .060 1 -.037 .335**
Sig. (2-tailed) .407 .609 .000
N 194 194 194 194
**
atot Pearson Correlation .299 -.037 1 -.029
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .609 .688
N 194 194 194 194
**
ptot Pearson Correlation -.007 .335 -.029 1
Sig. (2-tailed) .922 .000 .688
N 194 194 194 194
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

113
Lampiran 6 : Analisis Multivariat
Uji Normalitas Data

NPar Tests
One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test

ttot gtot atot ptot
N 194 194 194 194
Normal Parametersa Mean 4.23 5.23 4.39 5.22
Std. Deviation 2.508 2.238 2.348 2.934
Most Extreme Absolute .086 .088 .089 .092
Differences Positive .086 .088 .086 .081
Negative -.075 -.088 -.089 -.092
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z 1.196 1.224 1.243 1.279
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .114 .100 .091 .076
a. Test distribution is Normal.
Multivariat
Regression
Variables Entered/Removedb
Variables Variables
Model Entered Removed Method
1 ttot, gtota . Enter
a. All requested variables entered.
b. Dependent Variable: atot
Model Summary
Adjusted R Std. Error of
Model R R Square Square the Estimate
1 .304a .093 .083 2.248
a. Predictors: (Constant), ttot, gtot

114
ANOVAb
Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
1 Regression 98.579 2 49.289 9.751 .000a
Residual 965.427 191 5.055
Total 1064.005 193
Coefficientsa
Standardized
Unstandardized Coefficients Coefficients
Model B Std. Error Beta t Sig.
1 (Constant) 2.943 .482 6.110 .000
gtot .318 .072 .303 4.384 .000
ttot -.052 .065 -.055 -.798 .426
a. Dependent Variable: atot
Regression
Variables Variables
Model Entered Removed Method
b. Dependent Variable: ptot
Model Summary
Adjusted R Std. Error of
Model R R Square Square the Estimate
1 .336a .113 .104 2.777

115
ANOVAb
1 Regression 188.055 2 94.027 12.189 .000a
Residual 1473.414 191 7.714
Total 1661.469 193
Coefficientsa
Standardized
1 (Constant) 3.742 .595 6.289 .000
gtot -.036 .089 -.027 -.399 .690
ttot .394 .080 .337 4.936 .000
a. Dependent Variable: ptot

116
Lampiran 7 : Kanonik
Manova
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
The default error term in MANOVA has been changed from WITHIN CELLS to
WITHIN+RESIDUAL. Note that these are the same for all full factorial design
s.
A n a l y s i s o f V a r i a n c e * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
178 cases accepted.

0 cases rejected because of out-of-range factor values.
16 cases rejected because of missing data.
1 non-empty cell.
1 design will be processed.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Adjusted WITHIN CELLS Correlations with Std. Devs. on Diagonal
atot ptot
atot 2,26647
ptot -,00373 2,86264
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Statistics for ADJUSTED WITHIN CELLS correlations
Log(Determinant) = -,00001
Bartlett test of sphericity = ,00242 with 1 D. F.
Significance = ,961
F(max) criterion = 1,59527 with (2;175) D. F.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Adjusted WITHIN CELLS Variances and Covariances
atot ptot
atot 5,13687
ptot -,02421 8,19468
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Adjusted WITHIN CELLS Sum-of-Squares and Cross-Products
atot ptot
atot 898,95265
ptot -4,23707 1434,06901

117
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
A n a l y s i s o f V a r i a n c e Design 1 * * * * * * * * * * * * *
EFFECT .. WITHIN CELLS Regression

Adjusted Hypothesis Sum-of-Squares and Cross-Products
atot ptot
atot 28,03611
ptot -19,11125 66,13324
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Multivariate Tests of Significance (S = 2, M = -1/2, N = 86 )
Test Name Value Approx. F Hypoth. DF Error DF Sig. of F

Pillais ,07371 3,34842 4,00 350,00 ,010
Hotellings ,07718 3,33798 4,00 346,00 ,011
Wilks ,92736 3,34328 4,00 348,00 ,011
Roys ,05381
Note.. F statistic for WILKS' Lambda is exact.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Eigenvalues and Canonical Correlations
Root No. Eigenvalue Pct. Cum. Pct. Canon Cor. Sq. Cor
1 ,05687 73,68685 73,68685 ,23197 ,05381

2 ,02031 26,31315 100,00000 ,14108 ,01990
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Dimension Reduction Analysis
Roots Wilks L. F Hypoth. DF Error DF Sig. of F
1 TO 2 ,92736 3,34328 4,00 348,00 ,011

2 TO 2 ,98010 3,55393 1,00 175,00 ,061
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
EFFECT .. WITHIN CELLS Regression (Cont.)
Univariate F-tests with (2;175) D. F.
Variable Sq. Mul. R Adj. Rsq. Hypoth. MS Error MS F Sig. of F
atot ,03024 ,01916 14,01806 5,13687 2,72891 ,068

ptot ,04408 ,03316 33,06662 8,19468 4,03513 ,019
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

118
Raw canonical coefficients for DEPENDENT variables

Function No.
Variable 1 2
atot -,23410 ,36907

ptot ,28642 ,18972
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Standardized canonical coefficients for DEPENDENT variables
Function No.
Variable 1 2
atot -,53573 ,84462

ptot ,83385 ,55235
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Correlations between DEPENDENT and canonical variables
Function No.
Variable 1 2
atot -,55224 ,83369

ptot ,84446 ,53562
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Variance in dependent variables explained by canonical variables
CAN. VAR. Pct Var DEP Cum Pct DEP Pct Var COV Cum Pct COV
1 50,90371 50,90371 2,73915 2,73915

2 49,09629 100,00000 ,97721 3,71636
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Raw canonical coefficients for COVARIATES
Function No.
COVARIATE 1 2
gtot -,14889 ,43896

ttot ,40973 ,16271
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Standardized canonical coefficients for COVARIATES
CAN. VAR.
COVARIATE 1 2
gtot -,32162 ,94824

119
ttot ,93061 ,36957
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Correlations between COVARIATES and canonical variables
CAN. VAR.
Covariate 1 2
gtot -,36909 ,92939

ttot ,94701 ,32121
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Variance in covariates explained by canonical variables
CAN. VAR. Pct Var DEP Cum Pct DEP Pct Var COV Cum Pct COV
1 2,77945 2,77945 51,65262 51,65262

2 ,96230 3,74175 48,34738 100,00000
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Regression analysis for WITHIN CELLS error term

--- Individual Univariate ,9500 confidence intervals
Dependent variable .. atot
COVARIATE B Beta Std. Err. t-Value Sig. of t Lower -95% CL-Upper
gtot 1618031416 ,1527312558 ,07897 2,04904 ,042 ,00596 ,31765

ttot -,0763193958 -,0757455506 ,07510 -1,01620 ,311 -,22454 ,07190
Dependent variable .. ptot
COVARIATE B Beta Std. Err. t-Value Sig. of t ower -95% CL- Upper
gtot ,0116611736 ,0086525788 ,09974 ,11692 ,907 -,18518 ,20850

ttot ,2694603936 ,2102226336 ,09486 2,84068 ,005 ,08225 ,45667
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
A n a l y s i s o f V a r i a n c e Design 1 * * * * * * * * * * * *
EFFECT .. CONSTANT
atot ptot
atot 234,56343
ptot 239,67718 244,90242
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Multivariate Tests of Significance (S = 1, M = 0, N = 86 )

120
Test Name Value Exact F Hypoth. DF Error DF Sig. of F
Pillais ,30230 37,69586 2,00 174,00 ,000

Hotellings ,43329 37,69586 2,00 174,00 ,000
Wilks ,69770 37,69586 2,00 174,00 ,000
Roys ,30230
Note.. F statistics are exact.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Root No. Eigenvalue Pct. Cum. Pct. Canon Cor.
1 ,43329 100,00000 100,00000 ,54982
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
EFFECT .. CONSTANT (Cont.)
Variable Hypoth. SS Error SS Hypoth. MS Error MS F Sig. of F
atot 234,56343 898,95265 234,56343 5,13687 45,66269 ,000

ptot 244,90242 1434,06901 244,90242 8,19468 29,88554 ,000
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Raw discriminant function coefficients
Function No.
Variable 1
atot ,34343
ptot ,22032
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Standardized discriminant function coefficients
Function No.
Variable 1
atot ,77838
ptot ,63071
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Estimates of effects for canonical variables
Canonical Variable
Parameter 1

121
1 2,18056
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Canonical Variable
Variable 1
atot ,77602
ptot ,62780
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

122
Lampiran 3 : Hasil Uji Validitas dan Reliabilitas
Reliability Dukungan Guru


N %
a
Excluded 0 .0
Total 30 100.0
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.
Cronbach's Alpha N of Items
.891 10
Item Statistics
g1 .77 .430 30
g2 .80 .407 30
g3 .77 .430 30
g4 .70 .466 30
g5 .70 .466 30
g6 .70 .466 30
g7 .77 .430 30
g8 .83 .379 30
g9 .67 .479 30
g10 .70 .466 30
Scale Mean if Item Scale Variance if Corrected Item-Total Cronbach's Alpha if
Deleted Item Deleted Correlation Item Deleted
g1 6.63 8.171 .629 .880
g2 6.60 8.662 .449 .892
g3 6.63 8.171 .629 .880
g4 6.70 7.941 .664 .878
g5 6.70 7.941 .664 .878
g6 6.70 8.010 .635 .880

123
g7 6.63 8.171 .629 .880

g8 6.57 8.323 .657 .879
g9 6.73 7.582 .792 .868
g10 6.70 8.217 .550 .886
Scale Statistics
7.40 9.903 3.147 10
Reliability Dukungan Teman


N %
a
Excluded 0 .0
Total 30 100.0
.843 10
Item Statistics
t1 .73 .450 30
t2 .37 .490 30
t3 .33 .479 30
t4 .07 .254 30
t5 .20 .407 30
t6 .27 .450 30
t7 .53 .507 30
t8 .43 .504 30
t9 .40 .498 30
t10 .40 .498 30

124
t1 3.00 7.172 .573 .825
t2 3.37 7.137 .526 .830
t3 3.40 6.731 .721 .810
t4 3.67 8.092 .414 .840
t5 3.53 7.499 .489 .833
t6 3.47 7.430 .458 .836
t7 3.20 6.648 .706 .811
t8 3.30 7.252 .460 .837
t9 3.33 7.126 .518 .831
t10 3.33 7.057 .547 .828
Scale Statistics
3.73 8.754 2.959 10
Reliability Akseptabilitas

N %
Excludeda 0 .0
Total 30 100.0
.817 10

125
Item Statistics
a1 .27 .450 30
a2 .33 .479 30
a3 .10 .305 30
a4 .30 .466 30
a5 .10 .305 30
a6 .23 .430 30
a7 .27 .450 30
a8 .23 .430 30
a9 .30 .466 30
a10 .40 .498 30
a1 2.27 5.720 .541 .796
a2 2.20 5.407 .650 .783
a3 2.43 6.323 .436 .808
a4 2.23 5.702 .524 .798
a5 2.43 6.323 .436 .808
a6 2.30 5.734 .566 .794
a7 2.27 5.995 .403 .811
a8 2.30 5.872 .493 .802
a9 2.23 5.633 .558 .794
a10 2.13 5.844 .412 .812
Scale Statistics
2.53 7.085 2.662 10
Reliability Pemanfaatan
N %
Excludeda 0 .0
Total 30 100.0

126
.863 10
Item Statistics
p1 .50 .509 30
p2 .33 .479 30
p3 .77 .430 30
p4 .43 .504 30
p5 .43 .504 30
p6 .13 .346 30
p7 .10 .305 30
p8 .07 .254 30
p9 .10 .305 30
p10 .07 .254 30
p1 2.43 5.840 .463 .864
p2 2.60 5.766 .539 .855
p3 2.17 6.075 .461 .860
p4 2.50 5.362 .694 .839
p5 2.50 5.431 .661 .843
p6 2.80 5.890 .732 .839
p7 2.83 6.213 .612 .849
p8 2.87 6.464 .549 .855
p9 2.83 6.075 .711 .843
p10 2.87 6.395 .606 .852
Scale Statistics
2.93 7.237 2.690 10

127
Lampiran 4 : Analisis Univariat

Karakteristik Responden
usia
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid 16 65 33.5 33.5 33.5
17 121 62.4 62.4 95.9
18 8 4.1 4.1 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0
sex
Valid Laki-laki 72 37.1 37.1 37.1
Perempuan 122 62.9 62.9 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0
T_kelompok
Valid Tidak 76 39.2 39.2 39.2
Ya 118 60.8 60.8 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0
Dukungan Guru
Frequency Table
g1
Valid Tidak 119 61.3 61.3 61.3
Ya 75 38.7 38.7 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0
g2
Valid Tidak 78 40.2 40.2 40.2
Ya 116 59.8 59.8 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0
g3
Valid Tidak 127 65.5 65.5 65.5
Ya 67 34.5 34.5 100.0

128
g2
Valid Tidak 78 40.2 40.2 40.2
Ya 116 59.8 59.8 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0
g4
Valid Tidak 87 44.8 44.8 44.8
Ya 107 55.2 55.2 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0
g5
Valid Tidak 111 57.2 57.2 57.2
Ya 83 42.8 42.8 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0
g6
Valid Tidak 74 38.1 38.1 38.1
Ya 120 61.9 61.9 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0
g7
Valid Tidak 67 34.5 34.5 34.5
Ya 127 65.5 65.5 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0
g8
Valid Tidak 86 44.3 44.3 44.3
Ya 108 55.7 55.7 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0

129
g9
Valid Tidak 80 41.2 41.2 41.2
Ya 114 58.8 58.8 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0
g10
Valid Tidak 95 49.0 49.0 49.0
Ya 99 51.0 51.0 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0
Kat_guru
Valid Kurang 106 54.6 54.6 54.6
Baik 88 45.4 45.4 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0
Dukungan Teman
Frequency Table
t1
Valid Tidak 61 31.4 31.4 31.4
Ya 133 68.6 68.6 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0
t2
Valid Tidak 110 56.7 56.7 56.7
Ya 84 43.3 43.3 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0
t3
Valid Tidak 97 50.0 50.0 50.0
Ya 97 50.0 50.0 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0

130
t4
Valid Tidak 118 60.8 60.8 60.8
Ya 76 39.2 39.2 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0
t5
Valid Tidak 101 52.1 52.1 52.1
Ya 93 47.9 47.9 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0
t6
Valid Tidak 126 64.9 64.9 64.9
Ya 68 35.1 35.1 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0
t7
Valid Tidak 114 58.8 58.8 58.8
Ya 80 41.2 41.2 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0
t8
Valid Tidak 123 63.4 63.4 63.4
Ya 71 36.6 36.6 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0
t9
Valid Tidak 128 66.0 66.0 66.0
Ya 66 34.0 34.0 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0

131
t10
Valid Tidak 132 68.0 68.0 68.0
Ya 62 32.0 32.0 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0
Kat_teman
Valid Kurang 133 68.6 68.6 68.6
Baik 61 31.4 31.4 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0
Akseptabilitas
Frequency Table
a1
Valid Tidak 49 25.3 25.3 25.3
Ya 145 74.7 74.7 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0
a2
Valid Tidak 109 56.2 56.2 56.2
Ya 85 43.8 43.8 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0
a3
Valid Tidak 48 24.7 24.7 24.7
Ya 146 75.3 75.3 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0
a4
Valid Tidak 92 47.4 47.4 47.4
Ya 102 52.6 52.6 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0
a5

132

Valid Tidak 88 45.4 45.4 45.4
Ya 106 54.6 54.6 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0
a6
Valid Tidak 129 66.5 66.5 66.5
Ya 65 33.5 33.5 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0
a7
Valid Tidak 141 72.7 72.7 72.7
Ya 53 27.3 27.3 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0
a8
Valid Tidak 142 73.2 73.2 73.2
Ya 52 26.8 26.8 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0
a9
Valid Tidak 145 74.7 74.7 74.7
Ya 49 25.3 25.3 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0
a10
Valid Tidak 146 75.3 75.3 75.3
Ya 48 24.7 24.7 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0

133
akseptabilitas
Valid Tidak menerima 132 68.0 68.0 68.0
Menerima 62 32.0 32.0 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0
Pemanfaatan
Frequency Table
p1
Valid Tidak 81 41.8 41.8 41.8
Ya 113 58.2 58.2 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0
p2
Valid Tidak 98 50.5 50.5 50.5
Ya 96 49.5 49.5 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0
p3
Valid Tidak 95 49.0 49.0 49.0
Ya 99 51.0 51.0 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0
p4
Valid Tidak 93 47.9 47.9 47.9
Ya 101 52.1 52.1 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0
p5
Valid Tidak 80 41.2 41.2 41.2
Ya 114 58.8 58.8 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0
p6

134

Valid Tidak 109 56.2 56.2 56.2
Ya 85 43.8 43.8 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0
p7
Valid Tidak 100 51.5 51.5 51.5
Ya 94 48.5 48.5 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0
p8
Valid Tidak 84 43.3 43.3 43.3
Ya 110 56.7 56.7 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0
p9
Valid Tidak 104 53.6 53.6 53.6
Ya 90 46.4 46.4 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0
p10
Valid Tidak 87 44.8 44.8 44.8
Ya 107 55.2 55.2 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0
pemanfaatan
Valid Tidak memanfaatkan 104 53.6 53.6 53.6
Memanfaatkan 90 46.4 46.4 100.0
Total 194 100.0 100.0

135
Lampiran 5 : Analisis Bivariat
Correlations
Correlations
gtot ttot atot ptot
Sig. (2-tailed) .407 .000 .922
N 194 194 194 194
Sig. (2-tailed) .407 .609 .000
N 194 194 194 194
**
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .609 .688
N 194 194 194 194
**
Sig. (2-tailed) .922 .000 .688
N 194 194 194 194

136
Crosstabs
Kat_teman * akseptabilitas
Crosstab
akseptabilitas
% within Kat_teman 68.4% 31.6% 100.0%
% of Total 46.9% 21.6% 68.6%
Baik Count 41 20 61
% within Kat_teman 67.2% 32.8% 100.0%
% of Total 21.1% 10.3% 31.4%
% within Kat_teman 68.0% 32.0% 100.0%
% of Total 68.0% 32.0% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .028a 1 .867
b
Linear-by-Linear Association .028 1 .867
b
N of Valid Cases 194

137
Kat_guru * akseptabilitas
Crosstab
akseptabilitas
% within Kat_guru 77.4% 22.6% 100.0%
% of Total 42.3% 12.4% 54.6%
Baik Count 50 38 88
% within Kat_guru 56.8% 43.2% 100.0%
% of Total 25.8% 19.6% 45.4%
% within Kat_guru 68.0% 32.0% 100.0%
% of Total 68.0% 32.0% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
b
Linear-by-Linear Association 9.281 1 .002
b

138
Kat_teman * pemanfaatan
Crosstab
pemanfaatan
Tidak memanfaatkan Memanfaatkan Total
% within Kat_teman 58.6% 41.4% 100.0%
% of Total 40.2% 28.4% 68.6%
Baik Count 26 35 61
% within Kat_teman 42.6% 57.4% 100.0%
% of Total 13.4% 18.0% 31.4%
% within Kat_teman 53.6% 46.4% 100.0%
% of Total 53.6% 46.4% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
b
Linear-by-Linear Association 4.295 1 .038
b

139
Kat_guru * pemanfaatan
Crosstab
pemanfaatan
Tidak memanfaatkan Memanfaatkan Total
% within Kat_guru 50.9% 49.1% 100.0%
% of Total 27.8% 26.8% 54.6%
Baik Count 50 38 88
% within Kat_guru 56.8% 43.2% 100.0%
% of Total 25.8% 19.6% 45.4%
% within Kat_guru 53.6% 46.4% 100.0%
% of Total 53.6% 46.4% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Pearson Chi-Square .667a 1 .414
b
Linear-by-Linear Association .664 1 .415
b

140
Correlations
Correlations
gtot ttot atot ptot
Sig. (2-tailed) .407 .000 .922
N 194 194 194 194
Sig. (2-tailed) .407 .609 .000
N 194 194 194 194
**
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .609 .688
N 194 194 194 194
**
Sig. (2-tailed) .922 .000 .688
N 194 194 194 194

141
Lampiran 6 : Analisis Multivariat
Uji Normalitas Data

NPar Tests
One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test

ttot gtot atot ptot
N 194 194 194 194
Normal Parametersa Mean 4.23 5.23 4.39 5.22
Std. Deviation 2.508 2.238 2.348 2.934
Most Extreme Differences Absolute .086 .088 .089 .092
Positive .086 .088 .086 .081
Negative -.075 -.088 -.089 -.092
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z 1.196 1.224 1.243 1.279
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .114 .100 .091 .076
a. Test distribution is Normal.
Multivariat
Regression
Model Variables Entered Variables Removed Method
a
1 ttot, gtot . Enter
Model Summary
Std. Error of the
Model R R Square Adjusted R Square Estimate
1 .304a .093 .083 2.248
ANOVAb
1 Regression 98.579 2 49.289 9.751 .000a
Residual 965.427 191 5.055
Total 1064.005 193

142
ANOVAb
1 Regression 98.579 2 49.289 9.751 .000a
Residual 965.427 191 5.055
Total 1064.005 193
Coefficientsa
Standardized
1 (Constant) 2.943 .482 6.110 .000
gtot .318 .072 .303 4.384 .000
ttot -.052 .065 -.055 -.798 .426
a. Dependent Variable: atot
Regression
Model Variables Entered Variables Removed Method
Model Summary
Std. Error of the
Model R R Square Adjusted R Square Estimate
1 .336a .113 .104 2.777
ANOVAb

143
1 Regression 188.055 2 94.027 12.189 .000a

Residual 1473.414 191 7.714
Total 1661.469 193
Coefficientsa
Standardized
1 (Constant) 3.742 .595 6.289 .000
gtot -.036 .089 -.027 -.399 .690
ttot .394 .080 .337 4.936 .000
a. Dependent Variable: ptot

144
Lampiran 7 : Kanonik
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * A n a l y s i s o f V a r i a n c e *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The default error term in MANOVA has been changed from WITHIN CELLS to
WITHIN+RESIDUAL. Note that these are the same for all full factorial design
s.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * A n a l y s i s o f V a r i a n c e *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
194 cases accepted.

0 cases rejected because of out-of-range factor values.
0 cases rejected because of missing data.
1 non-empty cell.
1 design will be processed.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Adjusted WITHIN CELLS Correlations with Std. Devs. on Diagonal
atot ptot
atot 2,24824
ptot -,00941 2,77745
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Statistics for ADJUSTED WITHIN CELLS correlations
Log(Determinant) = -,00009
Bartlett test of sphericity = ,01678 with 1 D. F.
Significance = ,897
F(max) criterion = 1,52618 with (2;191) D. F.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Adjusted WITHIN CELLS Variances and Covariances
atot ptot
atot 5,05459
ptot -,05875 7,71421

145
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Adjusted WITHIN CELLS Sum-of-Squares and Cross-Products
atot ptot
atot 965,42656
ptot -11,22187 1473,41412
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * A n a l y s i s o f V a r i a n c e --
Design 1 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
EFFECT .. WITHIN CELLS Regression

atot ptot
atot 98,57859
ptot -27,40184 188,05495
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Multivariate Tests of Significance (S = 2, M = -1/2, N = 94 )
Test Name Value Approx. F Hypoth. DF Error

DF Sig. of F
Pillais ,20481 10,89542 4,00 3

82,00 ,000
Hotellings ,22933 10,83579 4,00 3
78,00 ,000
Wilks ,80526 10,86575 4,00 3
80,00 ,000
Roys ,12281
Note.. F statistic for WILKS' Lambda is exact.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Sq. Cor
1 ,14001 61,05138 61,05138 ,35045

,12281
2 ,08932 38,94862 100,00000 ,28635
,08200

146
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Dimension Reduction Analysis
Roots Wilks L. F Hypoth. DF Error

DF Sig. of F
1 TO 2 ,80526 10,86575 4,00 380

,00 ,000
2 TO 2 ,91800 17,06020 1,00 191
,00 ,000
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
EFFECT .. WITHIN CELLS Regression (Cont.)
Variable Sq. Mul. R Adj. R-

sq. Hypoth. MS Error MS F Sig. of F
atot ,09265 ,08315 49,28929 5,05459

9,75139 ,000
ptot ,11319 ,10390 94,02748 7,71421
12,18887 ,000
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Raw canonical coefficients for DEPENDENT variables
Function No.
Variable 1 2
atot -,20693 ,37245

ptot ,29312 ,17419
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Standardized canonical coefficients for DEPENDENT variables
Function No.
Variable 1 2
atot -,48587 ,87451

ptot ,86003 ,51107
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Function No.

147
Variable 1 2
atot -,51085 ,85967

ptot ,87414 ,48567
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Variance in dependent variables explained by canonical variables
CAN. VAR. Pct Var DEP Cum Pct DEP Pct Var COV Cum Pct
COV
1 51,25504 51,25504 6,29481 6,29

481
2 48,74496 100,00000 3,99692 10,29
173
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Raw canonical coefficients for COVARIATES
Function No.
COVARIATE 1 2
gtot -,21738 ,39133

ttot ,36015 ,17273
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Standardized canonical coefficients for COVARIATES
CAN. VAR.
COVARIATE 1 2
gtot -,48647 ,87575

ttot ,90328 ,43322
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Correlations between COVARIATES and canonical variables
CAN. VAR.
Covariate 1 2
gtot -,43245 ,90166

ttot ,87418 ,48560
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

148
Variance in covariates explained by canonical variables
CAN. VAR. Pct Var DEP Cum Pct DEP Pct Var COV Cum Pct
COV
1 5,84100 5,84100 47,55992 47,55

992
2 4,29990 10,14090 52,44008 100,00
000
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Regression analysis for WITHIN CELLS error term
--- Individual Univariate ,9500 confidence intervals
Dependent variable .. atot
COVARIATE B Beta Std. Err. t-

Value Sig. of t Lower -95% CL- Upper
gtot ,3175620935 ,3026715609 ,07244 4,38351

,000 ,17467 ,46046
ttot -,0515529701 -,0550674361 ,06464 -
,79753 ,426 -,17905 ,07595
Dependent variable .. ptot
COVARIATE B Beta Std. Err. t-

Value Sig. of t Lower -95% CL- Upper
gtot -,0357097087 -,0272367323 ,08950 -

,39900 ,690 -,21224 ,14082
ttot ,3941952744 ,3369599727 ,07986 4,93629
,000 ,23668 ,55171
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * A n a l y s i s o f V a r i a n c e --
Design 1 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
EFFECT .. CONSTANT
atot ptot
atot 188,72336
ptot 239,97662 305,14917
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Multivariate Tests of Significance (S = 1, M = 0, N = 94 )

149
Test Name Value Exact F Hypoth. DF Error

DF Sig. of F
Pillais ,28897 38,60872 2,00 1

90,00 ,000
Hotellings ,40641 38,60872 2,00 1
90,00 ,000
Wilks ,71103 38,60872 2,00 1
90,00 ,000
Roys ,28897
Note.. F statistics are exact.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
1 ,40641 100,00000 100,00000 ,53756
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Variable Hypoth. SS Error SS Hypoth. MS Error

MS F Sig. of F
atot 188,72336 965,42656 188,72336 5,05

459 37,33703 ,000
ptot 305,14917 1473,41412 305,14917 7,71
421 39,55676 ,000
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Raw discriminant function coefficients
Function No.
Variable 1
atot ,31150
ptot ,25939
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Standardized discriminant function coefficients
Function No.

150
Variable 1
atot ,70032
ptot ,72045
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Estimates of effects for canonical variables
Canonical Variable
Parameter 1
1 1,88747
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Canonical Variable
Variable 1
atot ,69354
ptot ,71386
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

153
154

155

156

Appendix

Transféré par

Informations du document

Copyright

Formats disponibles

Partager ce document

Partager ou intégrer le document

Options de partage

Avez-vous trouvé ce document utile ?

Ce contenu est-il inapproprié ?

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

Appendix

Transféré par

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

87

Universitas Sumatera Utara

meyarankan kami agar mengikuti kegiatan yang

III. AKSEPTABILITAS TERHADAP PIK REMAJA DI SEKOLAH

Universitas Sumatera Utara

IV. PEMANFAATAN TERHADAP PIK REMAJA DI SEKOLAH

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Lampiran 3 : Hasil Uji Validitas dan Reliabilitas

Reliability Dukungan Guru

Case Processing Summary

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Reliability Dukungan Teman

Case Processing Summary

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Case Processing Summary

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Case Processing Summary

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Lampiran 4 : Analisis Univariat

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Lampiran 5 : Analisis Bivariat

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Lampiran 6 : Analisis Multivariat

Uji Normalitas Data

One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Universitas Sumatera Utara

178 cases accepted.

Statistics for ADJUSTED WITHIN CELLS correlations

F(max) criterion = 1,59527 with (2;175) D. F.

Universitas Sumatera Utara

EFFECT .. WITHIN CELLS Regression

Test Name Value Approx. F Hypoth. DF Error DF Sig. of F

1 ,05687 73,68685 73,68685 ,23197 ,05381

Roots Wilks L. F Hypoth. DF Error DF Sig. of F

1 TO 2 ,92736 3,34328 4,00 348,00 ,011

Variable Sq. Mul. R Adj. Rsq. Hypoth. MS Error MS F Sig. of F

atot ,03024 ,01916 14,01806 5,13687 2,72891 ,068

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Raw canonical coefficients for DEPENDENT variables

atot -,23410 ,36907

atot -,53573 ,84462

atot -,55224 ,83369

1 50,90371 50,90371 2,73915 2,73915

gtot -,14889 ,43896

gtot -,32162 ,94824