Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Ltd
METHOD STATEMENT
This Method Statement describes and illustrates the process used in the production of Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment - Third Edition -
‘Visually Verified Montages’ (VVMs) prepared by Gladman Care Homes Ltd in support Landscape Institute and The Institute of Environmental Management &
of a planning application for the development of Use Class C2 Residential Apartments Assessments
with Care at Compton Mill, Leek.
Photography and photomontage in landscape and visual impact assessment -
VVMs combine 3D Computer Generated Model views of the proposals placed Landscape Institute Advice Note 01/11
accurately within real-life photographic views.
Visual Representation of Windfarms - Good Practice Guidance - Scottish National
This provides the most easily understood, accurate and impartial true-to-life Heritage 2006
representation of the proposals for assessment by design and development
professionals and members of the public. Para 15 notes ‘This guidance is specifically for onshore windfarms within
Scotland; however some of the principles established through this guidance
High quality photography and 3D laser topographic surveying is used to record each may be relevant to other types of development or within other locations’
viewpoint and existing reference features to calibrate the 3D Model of the proposals to
the photographic image. This guidance is the most comprehensive in describing theory and practice in
creating and presenting VVMs and other ’real life’ imagery.
The completed VVMs serve 2 primary purposes:-
London View Management Framework SPG March 2012 (particularly Appendix C
1. Provide a series of photorealistic images which illustrate the proposals in sufficient - Accurate Visual Representations including guidance on method statements)
context for a viewer without visiting the site.
Limitations and Use
2. Enable a viewer to visit the site, locate each viewpoint and be able to align and
view the relevant VVM within its actual setting. Neither photographs nor visualisations can fully convey a view as seen in reality by the
human eye. This applies equally to single photographic images or video sequences.
This Method Statement is organised in 3 sections:-
They are however the most ‘life-like’ representations generally produced for building
1. Introduction proposals, most readily understood by the general public and an important tool for site
assessment by professional users.
2. Method
It is important to ensure data used in preparing photomontages is accurate and can
3. Illustrated Process and Verification for each VVM:- be verified as such. This method statement describes the process of gathering, verifying
and using data for this project.
Survey Brief & Data
Each VVM represents the view from a single location. It is essential to ensure this view is
Survey Data & 3D Model view
representative of the wider dynamic views in the locality and agreed as such by
relevant parties including the Applicant and Local Planning Authority.
Standards Views have been selected as the most representative following careful assessment of
the site and its visual context.
The working method described in Section 2 has been developed based on published
’best practice’ guidance noted below and from analysis of production of VVMs Should the need for additional views emerge, these can be prepared by the same
specifically for building proposals. methodology and integrated with existing material.
Although the much of this guidance is related to Landscape Impact Assessments, the Where key views have been identified, photographed and surveyed early in the
basic principles they describe in producing VVMs and other ‘real life’ imagery apply design process, VVMs become an important design tool in design development and
equally to building proposals. evaluation, using ’wireline’ and ’block’ models as well as a presentation of the final
design.
2
2
Visually Verified Montages
Method Statement
Compton Mill, Leek
December 2016 Method
Method
The following sequence has been used for producing and verifying accurate VVMs 3. Image selection
Ideally used as a working tool in design development and evaluation before Base photographs selected for best exposure & field-of-view.
completion of finished views for planning submission and public consultations.
A VVM needs a field-of-view which is comfortable to use and interpret on site
1. Establish Views Required with sufficient context to allow the proposals to be evaluated as a desktop
exercise.
Identify key viewpoints and site context - near, middle and distant views using
Visual Impact Assessment techniques. This imposes a camera focal length range of between 30-50mm (35mm film
equivalent).
A comprehensive initial selection of views allows selection and editing of most
representative views during the design process without repeat site visits. The lower figure provides a wider field-of-view without lens distortion and a
comfortable viewing distance on an A3 sheet, assisting site assessment.
Establish view/photography constraints within available timescales: -
Ideally a set of VVMs should be to the same field-of-view, image size and
Optimum times of day for each view. viewing distance. This is generally established by the constraints of the closest
Weather conditions. views of the site. This also ensures that for a ‘desktop’ assessment views are of
consistent relative ‘scale’ to each other to compare the true size and impact of
Need for summer/winter views. the proposals in each view.
2. Site Work Where there is a mix of near and distant views, a longer focal length for the latter
can provide a better level of detail, subject to the overall constraints for
Site photography in advance of topographic survey work ensures a better brief comfortable viewing., and may be used in addition to a ‘standard’ wider view.
for the survey and gives greater flexibility in making best use of weather
conditions and time of day for photography. Single images are preferred - multiple panoramic ‘stitched’ images are more
complex to set up and use, and more prone to distortion.
Photography
4. Modelling & verifying viewpoints
Use of good quality digital SLR and lens, mounted on level tripod at consistent
height, usually 1.6m. Using CAD and 3D modelling software, survey data is mapped to accurate co-
ordinates for each viewpoint and associated reference points. Each viewpoint is
Comprehensive image set for each viewpoint, at best image quality, for range then saved as a ‘virtual camera’ scene and exported as an image.
of exposures and focal lengths/fields-of-view.
Using Image Editing software, these ‘virtual camera’ modelled views are
Camera locations marked & noted for topographic survey and future reference. accurately placed within the corresponding viewpoint photograph.
Date, time, weather conditions noted. This establishes an accurate baseline reference between photograph and 3D
Topographic Survey design modelling for the inclusion of design proposals.
3
2
Visually Verified Montages
Method Statement
Compton Mill, Leek
December 2016 Method
Method
5. Developing and Evaluating Proposals
Once design model and base photographs have been matched and verified,
design proposals can be developed to a level of detail appropriate for design
evaluation & final presentation.
* - AVR (Accurate Visual Representation): a wider term including VVMs, & videos - Levels defined in Appendix C of London View
Management Framework (see p 2 ‘Standards’)
4
3
Visually Verified Montages
Method Statement
Compton Mill, Leek
December 2016 Process and Verification
Selection of Viewpoints
Site photographs were taken on 23/02/16. Weather
was sunny.
5
30mm
36mm
40mm
50mm
Selection of Focal Length / Field of View - View 3 - 36mm gives good field of view & workable for other views
Viewpoint
1
Viewpoint
5
Viewpoint
2
Viewpoint
4
Viewpoint
3
3D Topographic Survey & location plan - viewpoint locations and reference points added
Adjacent 58-60 St Edward St -
mark on setts
VIEWPOINT
OS Grid Reference 398330,356401
Ground level (m AOD) 184.38m
Viewing height 1.60m
View direction SE
Bearing 138°
Distance from Site Boundary 147m
VIEWPOINT
OS Grid Reference 398362,356341
Ground level (m AOD) 181.20m
Viewing height 1.60m
View direction SE
Bearing 131°
Distance from Site Boundary 79m
VIEWPOINT
OS Grid Reference 398440,356191
Ground level (m AOD) 189.74m
Viewing height 1.60m
View direction N
Bearing 0º
Distance from Site Boundary 40m
VIEWPOINT
OS Grid Reference 398514,356239
Ground level (m AOD) 196.21m
Viewing height 1.60m
View direction W
Bearing 272°
Distance from Site Boundary 17m
VIEWPOINT
OS Grid Reference 398408,356334
Ground level (m AOD) 186.22m
Viewing height 1.60m
View direction SSE
Bearing 155°
Distance from Site Boundary 48m
VIEWPOINT 2 X Y Z VIEWPOINT 4 X Y Z
VIEW B View from St Edward Street - adjacent to no 74 398362.050 356341.112 179.597 VIEW D View from Duke Street - adjacent to No 38 398513.747 356238.695 194.611
A03 NE end northlight roof - Compton Mill 398452.798 356290.763 203.451 A20 Top of spire stonework - St Marys Church 398413.026 356255.621 227.103
A06 NW parapet apex - Compton Mill 398431.474 356272.641 203.849 B09 Top of lighting column - Derby Street 398453.156 356219.393 195.214
A08 Base of lampost-Compton near road junction (behind van) 398384.440 356327.008 180.273 D01 42 Compton - junction roof ridge and north chimney 398428.054 356209.712 196.718
A10 Parapet-top north corne r- Compton Mill turret 398434.806 356252.667 198.133 D02 Compton Mill - SW parapet adjacent Duke Street 398455.228 356220.473 197.256
A11 Top west corner of turret window - Compton Mill 398432.864 356252.174 190.141 D03 Top of telegrpah pole - Duke Street 398459.290 356221.989 198.919
A13 Base of bus stop adjacent to Compton Mill 398438.246 356234.782 187.008 D04 Compton Mill - SW parapet corner of middle section - substation 398479.761 356231.639 199.949
A14 Top of bus stop adjacent to Compton Mill 398438.248 356234.785 189.589 D05 Top of lighting column - Duke Street adjacent to Mill substation 398483.853 356233.454 198.392
A17 Top of lighting column adjacent St Marys Church 398410.932 356268.796 194.773 D06 Compton Mill - SE ground corner of middle section - substation 398488.726 356235.909 192.835
A18 Base of traffic light west side of Compton 398379.464 356314.604 180.691 D07 Compton Mill - SE parapet corner of middle section - substation 398488.802 356235.913 199.944
A19 Kerbside top of traffic light west side of Compton 398379.425 356314.794 184.469 D08 Compton Mill - junction of jamb & threshold of double doors 398487.552 356238.458 193.116
A20 Top of spire stonework - St Marys Church 398413.026 356255.621 227.103 D09 Compton Mill - junction of jamb & head of double doors 398487.589 356238.466 195.259
B01 end of front eaves - 2 Brook Street 398383.673 356332.586 187.211 D10 Compton Mill - ground level outside corner adjacent to roller shutter 398493.040 356242.843 193.092
B02 gable apex - 2 Brook Street 398385.000 356330.324 188.937 D11 Compton Mill - parapet outside corner above roller shutter 398493.066 356242.817 201.028
B03 end of rear eaves - 2 Brook Street 398386.386 356328.095 187.236 D12 Compton Mill - jamb/lintel juction facing 25 Duke Sreet 398491.437 356246.217 196.526
B04 Top of telegraph pole - Prospect Place 398414.737 356296.701 195.495 D13 25 Duke Street - outside SW end of gutter 398503.170 356242.579 199.320
B05 NW edge of parapet - Compton Mill 398426.154 356284.129 200.837 D14 25 Duke Street - SW door jamb/stone lintel junction 398503.609 356242.911 196.255
B06 NW corner of capping - Compton retaining wall 398406.558 356294.008 187.368
B07 SW corner of lantern roof - Compton Mill turret 398433.603 356249.696 197.647
B08 SW parapet corner - Compton Mill adjoining Derby Street 398454.267 356220.769 197.206
B09 Top of lighting column - Derby Street 398453.156 356219.393 195.214
B10 West ridge/chimney junction - 8-10 Duke Street 398459.971 356208.524 197.008