Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 15

Recommendation: Conditional approval

GOODING AVENUE: BRAUNSTONE HALL, BRAUNSTONE


20141434
PARK
CHANGE OF USE FROM SCHOOL (CLASS D1) TO HOTEL;
FUNCTION HALLS; CONFERENCE FACILITIES AND CARE
TAKERS FLAT (NO USE CLASS); DEMOLITION OF EXISTING
SINGLE STOREY BUILDING AND REAR SINGLE STOREY
Proposal: EXTENSION; SINGLE STOREY EXTENSION AT SIDE AND
REAR; TWO STOREY LINK EXTENSION; ALTERATIONS TO
ROOF;TEMPORARY MARQUEE; ASSOCIATED CAR PARKING;
SINGLE STOREY CAFE (CLASS A3) TO SIDE OF
SITE(AMENDED)
Applicant: MR & MRS N & S PARMAR
App type: Change of use
Status: Smallscale Major Development
Expiry Date: 29 May 2015
KER WARD: Braunstone Park & Rowley Fields

Summary
 Joint report with 20121435 which is a listed building application that
can be found elsewhere on the agenda.
 The application is brought to committee at the request of the former
Councillors Cooke and Glover for members to consider access, traffic
and fencing.
 Hall is Grade II listed, located in the centre of Braunstone Park and has
been vacant for many years.
 Two objections received on grounds of impact on protected species,
disturbance to the park, unacceptable access from Hinckley Road,
access should be from Gooding Avenue only, increase noise and
disturbance and impact on road safety.
 Main issues to consider are impact on the listed building, design,
ecology, trees and parking.
 Change of use and extensions are considered acceptable, they would
not have an adverse impact on the fabric and character of the listed
building and will bring back the use of a vacant listed building in poor
condition.
 Application is recommended for approval

Introduction

The application relates to Braunstone Hall and its adjoining kitchen block which is
located within the centre of Braunstone Park. The park occupies a large island site
and is predominantly surrounded by housing. The main vehicular access routes into
the site are from Hinckley Road and Gooding Avenue. The main Hall and its kitchen
block are Grade II listed as is the adjoining stable block and walled garden. The
©Crown Copyright Reserved. Leicester City Council Licence 100019264(2015). Ordnance
Survey mapping does not imply any ownership boundaries and does not always denote the
exact ground features.
stable block is mainly used as offices by Leicester City Council with some visitor
facilities. The walled garden is open to the public at certain times during the week.
The park has dense tree coverage and there is a protected tree to the front of the
hall close to where the main hall joins the kitchen block. There is a large cedar tree
to the rear which is also protected. There is also a large group TPO of trees to the
rear of the Hall. Part of the site is allocated as a local wildlife site. The Hall and its
buildings were previously allocated as community, education and leisure, however,
this policy is no longer saved. The remaining area of the site is allocated as green
space.

The site has a level difference at the rear.

Planning application 20141435 is the accompanying listed building application for


internal and external alterations to the building. This is a joint report for both
applications.

Background

The Hall was originally built by the Winstanley family as their family home. When the
Winstanley family left the building it appears it came into the ownership of the
corporation of Leicester and subsequently Leicester City Council. The hall has an
extensive history which dates back to the 1960’s. There have been numerous
applications for alterations and extensions to it and its use from the 1960’s appears
to be as a school.

The Proposal

The applicant proposes a change of use from school (Class D1) to hotel; function
halls and conference facilities (no use class); demolition of existing single storey
building and rear single storey extension; two storey extension at front; single storey
extension at front’s; side and rear; alterations to roof; temporary marquee;
associated car parking; single storey cafe (Class A3) to side of site.

The hall and the adjoining kitchen block would be used as a hotel, function halls and
conference facilities. There is currently a gap between the two buildings and the
proposed two storey extension would seek to link these two buildings together and
provide the main reception to the venue. This extension would wrap around to the
rear of the building and it would be single storey. The extension to the rear and side
would form ballrooms with associated facilities. There would also be a small single
storey extension to the front of the kitchen block to provide a chair store.

The main hall will contain function rooms, meeting rooms and ancillary offices. The
first and second floors of the main hall will contain 13 bedrooms with ensuite
facilities.

The application has been amended to include a care takers flat and to alter the
appearance of the proposed extensions.

A freestanding structure is now proposed to the central courtyard instead of the


previous covered roof which was attached to the building.
The applicant also wishes to place a marquee to the rear of the hall and has
indicated potential locations.

A tree report has been submitted.

The single storey café building comprises a seating area, toilets and kitchen is
proposed. It was previously located close to the car parking area, however, given
the potential impact on surrounding trees its location has not been finalised.

Policy Considerations

Development plan policies relevant to this application are listed at the end of this
report.

Supplementary Planning Guidance – Vehicle Parking Standards

Consultations

Severn Trent
Have no objection subject to a drainage condition.

Pollution – Land
No objection.

Conservation Advisory Panel

In terms of the original plans the Panel were supportive of the reuse of the building,
however, they considered the plans were inadequate to allow a thorough
assessment of the proposal.
Following the submission of amended plans, the panel fully supports the conversion
of Braunstone Hall to a wedding / conference venue, as it gives the listed buildings
an active use and secures their long term future. They accepted the need for the
new ballrooms and reception atrium, as they allow for large-scale events without
compromising the integrity of the hall.

The panel considered the revised proposals a great improvement, particularly the
revised design of the new extensions, as they were of a better design and an
improved relationship with the existing buildings; showing a clear distinction between
new and old.

There was however some concern over the height of the lower section of the
reception atrium and its relationship with the eave detailing of the existing kitchen
wing. It was suggested that the flat roof should be reduced in height to address this.

The panel felt that the success of the development would be in the quality of the
details and asked that special attention (through conditions) be considered to the
fascia details, soffit details and materials of the new extensions.

Pollution – noise
Have concerns that there could be a detrimental impact on neighbouring amenity
from amplified voice from the application site. They recommend conditions requiring
an insulation scheme and that there be no detriment to residential amenity from
amplified voice.

They also have concerns about vehicles leaving the site onto Gooding Avenue as
there may be the potential for noise and disturbance, especially from car headlights
etc. They consider the Hinckley Road entrance should be used between the hours
of 2200 hours and 0730.

Highway Authority

Raise some concerns about the use of the access road into the park from Hinckley
Road in terms of conflict with pedestrians and discouraging unauthorised vehicular
use of the park, in which the volume of traffic using Hinckley Road, especially those
turning right into the site, which may result in queuing on Hinckley Road.

Historic England

Commented on the original plans and had concerns about the impact the extensions
would have on the fabric of the existing buildings and the level of detail provided.
They welcome the reuse of the building and appreciate the challenge to achieve
proper balance between the special interest of the buildings and securing a new use.

They acknowledge additional information has been submitted with examples of


materials and contemporary extensions. They consider it is an improvement on the
original plans in terms of details. However, they still have concerns about the
proposed glazing of the courtyard, the substantial demolition of the west elevation
and the sizeable extensions will have a dominating impact on the Hall and stables
block. They do note that the extensions attempt to act as stand-alone elements,
allowing a clear distinction between old and new, the proposals will clearly change
the historic footprint compromising the architectural and historic / functional
relationship with one another which forms an important part of their special interest.
They consider the amount of information submitted regarding materials is insufficient
and are not sure conditions would secure sufficient information. They are also
concerned about the proposed marquee. They have not commented on the impact
of the proposals on the park nor the setting of the grade II listed stables. They do not
object to the application and recommend advice is sought from the Council’s
conservation specialist.

Leicester Civic Society

I have received a letter of support from the Leicester Civic Society who detail the
history of the hall and their involvement with the owner before the application had
been submitted. They urge the granting of consent in order for the restoration of the
building and it will be of great benefit to the city.

They have commented further that the amended scheme in that the hall will be a
medium sized facility and is unlikely to generate large volumes of traffic. Traffic on
Hinckley Road is less than it used to be following the construction of the ring road.
The auto bollards could be set further into the site to reduce queues on the main
road.

Other than access for private cars all other access and egress will be from Gooding
Avenue.

Nearby Western Park has similar arrangements and has remained traffic free despite
large volumes of traffic.

The Council may wish to consider placing a footpath alongside the drive as there is
at Western Park.

Representations

I have received two objections on the following grounds:


 Impact on protected species
 Impact on peace and quiet of the park
 Concern about the past – supernatural
 Access from Hinckley Road unacceptable
 Increase noise and disturbance to the park
 Road safety issues
 All access should be from Gooding Avenue
I have received a letter of objection from the former Councillors Cooke and Glover,
they make the following points:

 Would like the application considered at planning committee.


 Their comments are following a public meeting at which residents raised
issues / questions.
 Access to the Hall from Hinckley Road presents a number of problems;
turning right off Hinckley Road close to a traffic light controlled junction at
Oswin Road appears to present a hazard to other vehicles moving in the
same direction, not only because of reduced traffic speed and tailing back, but
also because of the delay the barriers in the park will present to vehicles.

 More hazardous with vehicles crossing the park in close proximity to users of
the park, including children playing. The roadway is part of the park, not part
of the Hall.

 Vehicles exit from the Hall is via Gooding Avenue which in our view should be
the only entrance and exit. Although we concede bridal cars could use the
Hinckley Road entrance.

 There are concerns that the area allotted to parking is insufficient


 Commercial deliveries will enter and leave via Gooding Ave using a narrow
one vehicle road in the Park which will be in conflict with any vehicles entering
the Park from Hinckley Road.

 A further problem created by delivery vehicles is that it is proposed that


deliveries be through the current car park serving The Stables and accessing
the flower gardens. There is a people hazard as a consequence as the
Stables are not only a Council Parks facility but also host the Braunstone
History Club. The Stables provide a well used and useful community amenity,
which should not be jeopardised in anyway.

 No provision appears to have been made for commercial vehicle parking

 Residents are concerned that high security fencing will be erected around the
Hall, and whilst appreciating the need for security, would like some
assurances that the fencing will not detract from the amenity of the park.
I have received two letters of support welcoming the redevelopment of the hall as it
will bring a neglected building back into use.

I have received a letter of support from Restore Braunstone Hall Group who
welcome the proposals and want to see the hall restored.

Consideration

Principle of development

The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) paragraph 19 states: “The


Government is committed to ensuring that the planning system does everything it
can to support sustainable economic growth. Planning should operate to encourage
and not act as an impediment to sustainable growth.”

Part of the application site lies on an area which was previously designated as a
Community and Leisure area in the 2006 City of Leicester Local Plan. This policy
has since been deleted and so this area currently has no policy attached to it. Part of
the application site (the car park) lies within an area designated as green space on
the 2006 City of Leicester Local Plan.

Core Strategy Policy CS16 “Cultural Strategy” states that the council will encourage
investment to improve the quality of the infrastructure for…leisure.” Core Strategy
Policy CS18 “Historic Environment” states: “The Council will protect and seek
opportunities to enhance the historic environment including the character and setting
of designated and other heritage assets.” The listed building has not been used for
several years and has fallen into disrepair as a result. Therefore bringing the
building back into a viable use would be supported if it should help to secure the
future of the heritage asset.

A hotel and conference facility is classed as a city centre use (Annex 2, NPPF). Core
Strategy policy CS12 states that the council will develop “an economically
prosperous Centre through the location of small offices and creative industries and
supporting related uses including new hotels and conference venues.” Therefore a
sequential test should normally be completed demonstrating that there are no
sequentially preferable sites within the city centre and why this site would be the
most appropriate location for the hotel and conference facilities (paragraph 24
NPPF). However, whilst there may be sequentially preferable sites closer to the city
centre, it is acknowledged that the proposed development would bring a vulnerable
listed building back into use and safeguard its future. In this instance due to the
proposal ensuring the future of the listed building, the need for the location of the use
to be within the city centre can be discounted.

Whilst the construction of a car park on green space would be contrary to Core
Strategy CS 13 “Green Network,” the car park is an essential requirement to serve
the proposal. The City Council’s 2007 Open Space, Sport and Recreation Study
shows this area of land as a Park and Garden. The same study shows Braunstone
Park and Rowley Fields ward has having a sufficient supply of Parks and Gardens,
with a surplus of 62.23ha. Therefore the loss of a small area of Braunstone Park
would not result in the ward having a deficiency in open space.

The proposal is therefore considered acceptable in policy terms.

Conservation

The conversion of the building is welcomed as it will bring a derelict heritage asset
back into use.
The amended plans submitted aim to provide additional detail regarding the impact
the proposal will have on the building for examples junctions with new and old. The
amendments are slightly different but aim to use the existing floorplans with minimal
intervention. This is welcomed.

There are several distinct parts to the building which will be examined individually:
Kitchen wing – the revised proposal looks to utilise the central courtyard, as per the
original proposal, with rooms around the courtyard following the existing floorplans.
The proposal does however now propose to incorporate a stairwell with a central
platform lift, formerly located within the new reception area.

The proposal to have a freestanding roof within the courtyard is welcomed, however,
there is some concern over the number of column supports required in order to
achieve this freestanding structure. Subject to a condition requiring details this is
acceptable.

New Builds

Reception Atrium - It is intended to create a 2-storey glazed atrium between the hall
and kitchen wing, with a set-back building line. The revised plans do however now
propose for the atrium to step-down, allowing for the eaves to sit beneath the roof of
the kitchen wing. This is welcomed, and is considered a better detail than previously
proposed.

The proposal for the rear elevation to be set-back from the rear building line of the
hall is also welcomed.
Ballroom 1 – the revised design for the ballroom, taking inspiration from the
Barcelona Pavilion, with an overhanging flat roof and heavily glazed elevations is
welcomed. It is felt that this contemporary approach, with a restrictive overall height
is the correct approach, allowing for a clear distinction between new and old.

A solid wall fronting the stables is acceptable (for security reasons). It is important
that this extension appears high-quality, befitting the architectural merits of the listed
building.

External Areas

Rear terrace –The proposal includes a raised terrace to the rear of the hall, with
access from ballroom 2 / reception atrium and the existing hall. This is acceptable in
principle, but will need to be designed carefully to respect the existing rear elevation
of the hall. A ‘generic’ raised timber area with timber balustrading would not be
acceptable therefore conditions are attached to achieve higher quality materials.
It is appreciated that a marquee may be required for some weddings and functions,
however, to have the marquee standing on a permanent basis would be detrimental
to the character of the listed building. I consider it appropriate to attach a condition
requiring the marquee to be a temporary structure and put into storage when not
required.

Careful consideration needs to be given to the boundaries of the site including the ha
– ha to the rear of the site. I will attach a condition requiring details to be submitted
of all boundaries.

The café building will be a single storey building located to the rear of the hall,
however, the exact location is not known at present. A condition will be attached to
require details of the location of the building to be provided.

Impact on neighbouring amenity

The park including Braunstone Hall occupy an island site with the Hall being set
within the middle of the park and almost entirely surrounded by trees. It is set at a
higher level to the surrounding roads. The main neighbouring properties around the
site are residential; however, there are some industrial uses on Hinckley Road and a
leisure centre, two churches with one including residential accommodation to the
east of the site on Gooding Avenue.

I do not consider any of the residential properties are likely to be adversely affected
as a result of the proposal, given their distance away from the Hall itself.

I note the concerns from Pollution Control in terms of car headlights etc disturbing
the properties on Gooding Avenue, especially the care home. I do not consider it
appropriate to attach conditions restricting the hours of use given it will be a hotel,
wedding/ conference venue that will need to operate 24 hours. However, a condition
will be attached to ensure there is no detriment to residential amenity from amplified
music or voice. I also consider it appropriate to attach a condition requiring a car
park management plan which should detail how vehicles will be managed leaving the
site. A sound insulation scheme has also been requested, however, this is not
appropriate given the listed nature of the building. However, the new extensions
could incorporate sound insulation as this is likely to be the parts of the building that
will generate the most noise. I will attach a condition to secure this.

Landscaping

Given the sites location in Braunstone Park consideration needs to be given to


ensure there is no adverse impact on the park. Large areas of grassed area would
be given over to the parking of vehicles. Whilst this would change the nature of this
area given the amount of open green space that would remain I consider it
acceptable in this case. It is not proposed to tarmac these areas. I consider it
appropriate to ask for details of the materials for this area which would form part of a
landscaping scheme.

Ecology and trees

Braunstone Hall grounds and areas to the north, east and west within Braunstone
Park are designated as a Local Wildlife Site due to the presence of mature veteran
trees, broadleaf and conifer woodland. Part of this area is shown within the red line
boundary.

The hall itself is known to contain bats, however, the surrounding trees have not
been assessed for their bat roost potential. There are also no proposals to indicate
what mitigation measures will be secured following the redevelopment of the hall and
the removal of some of the trees. I therefore consider it appropriate to attach a
condition requiring mitigation to compensate for these loses and impacts. In
addition there are no details proposed regarding external lighting. I will attach a
condition to secure this.

There are a significant number of trees within the park and in close proximity to the
hall. Some of these trees are subject to individual tree preservation orders and there
is also a group preservation order. The proposal will affect a large number of the
trees and the applicant has provided a tree report. This is still being looked at and I
will report further comments to your committee. A number of trees are going to have
to be felled to allow for the extensions. However, I consider this is an exceptional
case in terms of bring an historic building back into use. Conditions will be attached
to ensure appropriate mitigation is in place to compensate for the loss of the trees.

Parking and Highways


The main entrance to the Hall would be from Hinckley Road with vehicles then driving
along the long access drive which intersects the main park area. This would have been
the original approach to the hall. Vehicles would then park in a new parking area on
grassed areas to the east of the building. This is considered to be acceptable. Cycle
parking would also be provided in this area. Vehicles would then leave the site via the
access on Gooding Avenue. Goods / service vehicles would use Gooding Avenue to
enter and exit the site.

Concerns have been raised by the Highway Authority and objectors about vehicles
travelling through the park and the potential conflict between vehicles and pedestrians.
Whilst the route is not currently used by vehicles to come all the way into the site it was
its original intention. Vehicles currently use the Gooding Avenue entrance predominantly
but this does involve entering the park where pedestrians are also using the site. I
consider the access arrangements through the park to be acceptable. There may be
the opportunity for unauthorised vehicles to use the site which is something that has
been eradicated from the park at the moment after a long period of anti – social activities.
I consider it appropriate to attach a condition requiring details of measures to prevent
unauthorised access such as a knee rail to the access road and control mechanism to
the main entrance.

The use of the access on Hinckley Road could lead to vehicles queuing to turn right into
the site potentially leading to queuing traffic on Hinckley Road which is a busy main route
into the city. The applicant is currently working on a solution to provide a right hand
turning lane to allow for vehicles to still use Hinckley Road and those using the site to not
cause queuing on Hinckley Road.

Whilst there are highway concerns regarding the site I consider these can be overcome,
subject to conditions. Further comments may be received from the Highway Authority
which I will report to your committee.

Conclusion

I consider the proposed change of use of the Grade II listed Braunstone Hall to a
wedding / hotel, function centre will result in bring a building that has been vacant for a
long time back into an active use. It will also help to provide surveillance and activity to
the park during the evening which may assist with anti – social behaviour.

The extensions will be a significant addition to the existing buildings, however, I consider
they have been sensitively designed to minimise their impact upon the historic fabric.
Careful consideration will need to be given to materials and how the junction between
new and old is handled. Therefore a number of conditions have been attached to secure
this.

The proposed café will provide a community facility for all park users and is welcomed.
The proposal will result in a significant increase in the number of vehicular trips which
could be 24 hours given the hotel use. Whilst this will result in the increased use of
internal roads within the park, I consider subject to conditions securing appropriate
management and boundary treatments to the road it is considered to be acceptable.
The main vehicular access to the site will be from Hinckley Road and whilst there will be
a large number of vehicles turning right into the site a new right turn lane is proposed
which will assist in ensuring there is no large queuing of vehicles blocking Hinckley Road.
This will be secured by a condition. A number of other highway conditions will also be
attached.

The site is known to contain bats and whilst this information is known for the Hall itself no
details of the surrounding trees have been provided. I consider it appropriate to attach
conditions requiring ecological mitigation.

The proposal will result in the loss of protected trees, whilst this is not an ideal solution
the long term use of the hall is welcomed. I consider appropriate mitigation can be put in
place to compensate for the loss of these trees.

The proposed use will increase vehicular trips and activity within the park with vehicles
leaving potentially during the early hours of the morning. Whilst I do not consider there
would be an adverse impact on residential amenity I consider it appropriate to attach
conditions requiring an insulation scheme and management plan to ensure there is no
adverse impact on neighbouring amenity.

Overall, despite the proposal introducing significant alterations to an important listed


building I consider it will result in the long term restoration and use of the building which
outweighs some of the impacts the proposal may have.

Recommendation

I therefore recommend APPROVAL of planning application 20141434 subject to the


following conditions:

CONDITIONS

1. START WITHIN THREE YEARS

2. NO DETRIMENT FROM LIVE OR AMPLIFIED MUSIC OR VOICE

3. Before the development authorised by this permission is begun, a detailed


landscaping scheme showing the treatment of all parts of the site which will
remain unbuilt upon shall be submitted to and approved by the City Council as
local planning authority. This scheme shall include details of: (i) the position
and spread of all existing trees, shrubs and hedges to be retained or
removed; (ii) new tree and shrub planting, including plant type, size, quantities
and locations; (iii) means of planting, staking, and tying of trees, including tree
guards; (iv) other surface treatments; (v) fencing and boundary treatments;
(vi) any changes in levels; (vii) the position and depth of service and/or
drainage runs (which may affect tree roots), (Viii) Ecological mitigation. The
approved landscaping scheme shall be carried out within one year of
completion of the development. For a period of not less than five years from
the date of planting, the applicant or owners of the land shall maintain all
planted material. This material shall be replaced if it dies, is removed or
becomes seriously diseased. The replacement planting shall be completed in
the next planting season in accordance with the approved landscaping
scheme. (In the interests of amenity, and in accordance with policy UD06 of
the City of Leicester Local Plan and Core Strategy policy CS3.)

4. The development shall not commence until a sound insulation scheme to the
new extensions only to prevent the transmission of noise to adjacent
properties has been carried out in accordance with details which shall first
have been submitted to and approved by the City Council as local planning
authority. (In the interests of the amenities of nearby occupiers, and in
accordance with policies PS10 and PS11 of the City of Leicester Local Plan.)

5. TRAVEL PLAN - DETAILS REQUIRED

6. CYCLE PARKING - DETAILS REQUIRED

7. PARKING/SERVICE AREA RETAINED (%)

8. CONSTRUCTION METHOD STATEMENT (MAJOR SCHEMES) - DETAILS


TO BE AGREED

9. Before the occupation of the development details shall be provided of how the
vehicular entrances will be managed, including arrangements for managing
arrivals and departures of both visitors to the site and service vehicles.
Details of how the internal access roads will be treated to prevent
unauthorised vehicular access to the park shall also be provided. The details
shall be implemented as agreed and retained as such. ( In the interests of the
appropriate management of the site and in accordance with Policies AM01
and AM11 of the City of Leicester Local Plan and Policy CS14 of the Core
Strategy.)

10. Before development commences details of the alterations to Hinckley Road to


provide a right turn lane into the site (including timescale for delivery) shall be
submitted and agreed by the City Council as local planning authority and
implemented within the agreed timescale and retained as such. ( In the
interests of highway safety and in accordance with Policy AM11 of the Local
Plan and Policy CS14 of the Core Strategy.)

11. All trees on the site subject to a Tree Preservation Order ( that are not to be
removed) shall be protected from damage during building operations, in
accordance with details to be submitted to and approved by the City Council
as local planning authority. (In the interests of amenity, and in accordance
with policy UD06 of the City of Leicester Local Plan and Core Strategy policy
CS3.)

12. BRITISH STANDARD FOR TREE WORK

13. TEMPORARY ARRANGEMENTS DURING BUILDING OPERATIONS


14. SURFACING AND BOUNDARY TREATMENT ETC TO BE APPROVED

15. REPLACEMENT PLANTING (DETAILS)

16. Before development commences details of any ventilation to the kitchen and
cafe building shall be submitted to and agreed by the City Council as local
planning authority and retained thereafter. ( In the interests of amenity and in
accordance with Policies PS10 and PS11 of the City of Leicester Local Plan.)

17. Details required of marquee, location and management.

18. DETAILS OF LOCAITON REQUIRED

19. DETAILS OF MAIN ACCESS GATE TREATMENTS

20. This consent shall relate solely to the amended plans received by the City
Council as local planning authority on 21 May 2015, unless otherwise
submitted to and approved by the City Council as local planning authority.
(For the avoidance of doubt.)

NOTES FOR APPLICANT

1. With regard to condition 4 the applicant should note that the insulation
scheme shall take account of low frequency noise, and will probably need to
include ventilation arrangements.

Policies relating to this recommendation

2006_AM01 Planning permission will only be granted where the needs of pedestrians and
people with disabilities are incorporated into the design and routes are as
direct as possible to key destinations.
2006_AM02 Planning permission will only be granted where the needs of cyclists have
been incorporated into the design and new or improved cycling routes should
link directly and safely to key destinations.
2006_AM11 Proposals for parking provision for non-residential development should not
exceed the maximum standards specified in Appendix 01.
2006_BE16 Planning permission will be granted for the development of renewable energy
installations where local impacts are not outweighed by wider benefits. Major
developments must realise their potential for incorporating renewable energy
technologies.
2006_PS10 Criteria will be used to assess planning applications which concern the
amenity of existing or proposed residents.
2006_PS11 Control over proposals which have the potential to pollute, and over proposals
which are sensitive to pollution near existing polluting uses; support for
alternative fuels etc.
2006_UD06 New development should not impinge upon landscape features that have
amenity value whether they are within or outside the site unless it can meet
criteria.
2014_CS01 The overall objective of the Core Strategy is to ensure that Leicester develops
as a sustainable city, with an improved quality of life for all its citizens. The
policy includes guidelines for the location of housing and other development.
2014_CS02 Development must mitigate and adapt to climate change and reduce
greenhouse gas emissions. The policy sets out principles which provide the
climate change policy context for the City.
2014_CS03 The Council will require high quality, well designed developments that
contribute positively to the character and appearance of the local natural and
built environment. The policy sets out design objectives for urban form,
connections and access, public spaces, the historic environment, and
'Building for Life'.
2014_CS08 Neighbourhoods should be sustainable places that people choose to live and
work in and where everyday facilities are available to local people. The policy
sets out requirements for various neighbourhood areas in the City.
2014_CS12 In recognition of the City Centre's role in the City's economy and wider
regeneration, the policy sets out strategies and measures to promote its
growth as a sub-regional shopping, leisure, historic and cultural destination,
and the most accessible and sustainable location for main town centre uses.

2014_CS13 The Council will seek to maintain and enhance the quality of the green
network so that residents and visitors have easy access to good quality green
space, sport and recreation provision that meets the needs of local people.

2014_CS14 The Council will seek to ensure that new development is easily accessible to
all future users including by alternative means of travel to the car; and will aim
to develop and maintain a Transport Network that will maximise accessibility,
manage congestion and air quality, and accommodate the impacts of new
development.
2014_CS15 To meet the key aim of reducing Leicester's contribution to climate change,
the policy sets out measures to help manage congestion on the City roads.

2014_CS16 The Council aims to develop culture and leisure facilities and opportunities
which provide quality and choice and which increase participation among all
our diverse communities. New developments should create an environment
for culture and creativity to flourish.
2014_CS17 The policy sets out measures to require new development to maintain,
enhance and strengthen connections for wildlife, both within and beyond the
identified biodiversity network.
2014_CS18 The Council will protect and seek opportunities to enhance the historic
environment including the character and setting of designated and other
heritage assets.
2014_CS19 New development must be supported by the required infrastructure at the
appropriate stage. Developer contributions will be sought where needs arise
as a result of the development either individually or collectively.

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi