Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
)
BOOK III. AN ACCOUNT OF COUNTRIES, NATIONS, SEAS, TOWNS, HAVENS, MOUNTAINS,
RIVERS, DISTANCES, AND PEOPLES WHO NOW EXIST OR FORMERLY EXISTED.
Editions and translations: English (ed. John Bostock, M.D., F.R.S., H.T. Riley, Esq., B.A.) | Latin (ed.
Karl Friedrich Theodor Mayhoff)
Your current position in the text is marked in red. Click anywhere on the line to jump to another position.
Inizio modulo
3.48
Go to
Fine modulo
XLVIII.
transpadana appellatur ab eo regio undecima, tota in mediterraneo, cui marina cuncta fructuoso alveo
inportat. oppida vibi forum, segusio, coloniae ab alpium radicibus augusta taurinorum - inde navigabili
pado - antiqua ligurum stirpe, dein salassorum augusta praetoria iuxta geminas alpium fores, graias
atque poeninas - his poenos, grais herculem transisse memorant - , oppidum eporedia sibyllinis a
populo romano conditum iussis. eporedias galli bonos equorum domitores vocant. vercellae libiciorum
ex salluis ortae, novaria ex vertamocoris, vocontiorum hodieque pago, non, ut cato existimat, ligurum,
ex quibus laevi et marici condidere ticinum non procul a pado, sicut boi transalpibus profecti laudem
pompeiam, insubres mediolanum. oromobiorum stirpis esse comum atque bergomum et licini forum
aliquotque circa populos auctor est cato, sed originem gentis ignorare se fatetur, quam docet cornelius
alexander ortam a graecia interpretatione etiam nominis vitam in montibus degentium. in hoc situ
interiit oppidum oromobiorum parra, unde bergomates cato dixit ortos, etiamnum prodente se altius
quam fortunatius situm. interiere et caturiges, insubrum exsules, et spina supra dicta, item melpum
opulentia praecipuum, quod ab insubribus et bois et senonibus deletum eo die, quo camillus veios
ceperit, nepos cornelius tradidit.
Inizio modulo
Fine modulo
COMUM (Kômon: Eth. Kômitês, Comensis: [p. 653] Como), an important city of Cisalpine Gaul,
situated at the southern extremity of the Lacus Larius, immediately at the foot of the Alps; and distant
28 miles from Milan. (Itin. Ant. p. 278, where we should certainly read xxviii. for xviii. The Tab. Peut.
gives xxxv., which considerably exceeds the truth.) It was included in the territory of the Insubrian
Gauls (Ptol. iii. 1, § 33); though according to Pliny, Cato assigned the foundation of Comum as well as
Bergomum to a people called the Orobii, who are not mentioned by any other author, and would seem
to have been extinct in the time of Pliny himself. (Cato ap. Plin. iii. 17. s. 21.) Justin mentions Comum
among the cities founded by the Gauls after their occupation of this part of Italy, but without indicating
the particular tribe. (Justin. xx. 5.) Its name occurs only once during the wars of the Romans with the
Gauls, in B.C. 196, when the Comenses joined their arms with those of the Insubrians; but their united
forces were defeated by Marcellus, and the town of Comum itself taken. (Liv. xxxiii. 36.) After the
reduction of Cisalpine Gaul, it appears early to have been occupied by a body of Roman settlers; but
these having suffered severely from the incursions of the neighbouring Rhaetians, a more considerable
body of colonists was established there by Pompeius Strabo, to which 3000 more were soon after added
by C. (?) Scipio. A still more important accession to their numbers was made by Julius Caesar, who
settled there 5000 new colonists, of whom 500 were Greeks of distinction. (Strab. v. p. 213.) Whether
the site of the town was changed at this time does not appear, but the new colony assumed the title of
Novum Comum, by which it is designated by Catullus (xxxv. 3): Greek writers term it Neokômon, and
the inhabitants Neokômitai (Appian, B.C. ii. 26; Strab. l. c.; Ptolemy has Wea kômê, but this is
probably erroneous). The new colonists had obtained the Latin franchise; but just before the outbreak
of the civil war, the enemies of Caesar endeavoured to cancel this privilege; and the consul C.
Marcellus even went so far as to order a magistrate of the colony to be scourged, by way of an insult to
Caesar. (Appian, l. c.; Suet. Caes. 28; Plut. Caes. 29; Cic. ad Att. v. 1. 1) But after the victory of the
latter, the citizens of Comum obtained the full Roman civitas, in common with the rest of the
Transpadane Gauls (B.C. 49); and it from this time ceased to be a colony, ranking only as a
municipium, though it was one of the most populous and flourishing towns in this part of Italy. The
name of New Comum seems to have been early laid aside, and it was called simply Comum. It is
probable that it was the birthplace of both the elder and the younger Pliny, though we have no direct
testimony to this effect; the latter certainly made the adjoining lake his favourite place of residence, and
had several villas on its banks, one of which, about five miles from Como, is still known as the
Pliniana. There is little doubt that his native place (patria), to which he repeatedly alludes, and which
he enriched with public works, as well as with a library and other institutions for purposes of education,
is no other than Comum. (Plin. Ep. i. 3, 8, iii. 6, iv. 13; Orell. Inscr. 1172.) With this exception,
however, we hear little of it under the Roman Empire: inscriptions prove that it continued to be a
flourishing municipal town, and one of these, in honour of a grammarian named Septicianus, shows
that the efforts of Pliny to render it a school of learning were not altogether fruitless. (Orell. Inscr.
1197, 3898.) It was, however, more noted for its iron foundries, which were among the most celebrated
in Italy. (Plin. xxxiv. 14. s. 41.) Its position at the southern end of the Lacus Larius, the fertile and
beautiful shores of which were comprised, in great part at least, within its territory, must, in itself, have
secured its prosperity: it was also the point from whence travellers, proceeding across the Rhaetian
Alps, used to embark on the lake; a route which appears to have been one very much frequented during
the latter ages of the Empire. (Itin. Ant. p. 279; Claudian. B. Get. 319; Cassiod. Var. xi. 14.) It appears
to have retained its prosperity down to the close of the Roman Empire, and is still mentioned as a
flourishing city under the Goths and Lombards. In the 4th century we find that a fleet was stationed
there for the protection of the lake; and Cassiodorus speaks of it as one of the bulwarks of Italy in a
military point of view, while he extols the beauty of its situation, and the richness of the villas or
palaces with which the neighbouring shores were adorned. (Not. Dign. ii. p. 118; Cassiod. l. c.; P. Diac.
v. 38.) Comum continued to be a city of importance in the middle ages, and is still a populous and
flourishing place; but contains no remains of antiquity, except numerous inscriptions, several of which
relate to the family of the two Plinies.
The Lacus Larius, now called the Lake of Como, was already under the Roman Empire sometimes
termed Lacus Comacinus. (Itin. Ant. p. 278.) P. Diaconus (v. 38) calls it Comatianus Lacus. [E. H. B.]
LAEVI
LAEVI or LAÏ (Laoi), a tribe of Cisalpine Gauls, who dwelt near the sources of the river Padus. This is
the statement of Polybius (ii. 17), who associates them with the Libicii (Lebekioi), and says that the
two tribes occupied the part of the plains of Cisalpine Gaul nearest to the sources of the Padus, and next
to them came the Insubres. He distinctly reckons them among the Gaulish tribes who had crossed the
Alps and settled in the plains of Northern Italy: on the other hand., both Livy and Pliny call them
Ligurians. (Liv. v. 35; Plin. iii. 17. s. 21.) The reading in the passage of Livy is, indeed, very uncertain;
but he would appear to agree with Pliny in placing them in the neighbourhood of Ticinum. Pliny even
ascribes the foundation of that city to the Laevi, in conjunction with the Marici, a name otherwise
wholly unknown, but apparently also a Ligurian tribe. There can be no doubt that in this part of Italy
tribes of Gaulish and Ligurian origin were very much intermixed, and probably the latter were in many
cases confounded with the Gauls. [LIGURIA]
Laevi
or Levi. A Ligurian people in Gallia Transpadana, on the river Ticinus, who, in conjunction with the
Marici, built the town of Ticinum (Pavia).
BOII
BOII a Celtic people who emigrated from Transalpine Gaul to Italy in company with the Lingones (Liv.
v. 35) by the pass of the Pennine Alps or the Great St. Bernard. Their original abode seems, therefore,
to have been near the territory of the Lingones, who were between the upper Sane and the highest parts
of the Seine and Marne. Those Boii who joined the Helvetii in their march to the country of the
Santones, had crossed the Rhine (B. G. i. 5), and it seems that they came from Germany to join the
Helvetii. After the defeat of the Helvetii Caesar gave them a territory in the country of the Aedui (B. G.
i. 28, vii. 9), which territory D'Anville supposes to be in the angle between the Allier and the Loire. The
Boia of Caesar (vii. 14) may be the country of these Boii; if it is not, it is the name of a town unknown
to us. Walckenaer places these Boii in the modern diocese of Auxerre (Autesiodurum), which he
supposes to be part of their original territory that had been occupied by the Aedui. But this supposition
is directly contradicted by the narrative of Caesar (B. G. vii. 9, 10, 11). The town of the Boii was
Gergovia according to the common texts of Caesar, but the name is corrupt, and the site is unknown.
No conclusion can be derived as to the position of these Boii from the passage of Tacitus (Hist. ii. 61),
except that they were close to the Aedui, which is known already. Pliny's enumeration (iv. 18), under
Gallia Lugdunensis, of intus Hedui federati, Carnuti federati, Boii, Senones, Aulerci, places the Boii
between the Carnutes and the Senones, and agrees with Walckenaer's conjecture; but this is not the
position of the Boii of Caesar.
The name Boii also occurs in the Antonine Itin. on the road from Aquae Augustae or Tarbellicae (Dax)
to Bordeaux. The name is placed 16 Gallic leagues or 24 Roman miles from Bordeaux, These Boii are
represented by the Buies of the Pays de Buch, or Bouges, as Walckenaer calls them (Gog. &c. vol. i. p.
303). The name Boii in the Itin. ought to represent a place, and it is supposed by D'Anville that Tte de
Buch, on the Bassin d'Arcachon, may represent it; but he admits that the distance does not agree with
the Itin.: and besides this, the Tte de Buch seems to lie too much out of the road between Dax and
Bordeaux. [G. L.]
BOII a people of Cisalpine Gaul, who migrated from Transalpine Gaul, as mentioned above. They
found the plains N. of the Padus already occupied by the Insubres and Cenomani, in consequence of
which they crossed that river, and established them-selves between it and the Apennines, in the plains
previously occupied by the Umbrians. (Liv. v. 35; Pol. ii. 17; Strab. iv. p. 195.) They are next
mentioned as cooperating with the Insubres and Senones in the destruction of Melpum, an event which
was placed by Cornelius Nepos in the same year with the capture of Veil by Camillus, B.C. 396. (Corn.
Nep. ap. Plin. iii. 17. s. 21.) According to Appian (Celt. 1), the Boii took part in the expedition of the
Gauls into Latium in B.C. 358, when they were defeated by the dictator C. Sulpicius; but Polybius
represents them as taking up arms against the Romans for the first time after the defeat and destruction
of their neighbours the Senones. Alarmed at this event, they united their forces with those of the
Etruscans, in B.C. 283, and were defeated together with them at the Vadimonian Lake. Notwithstanding
this disaster, they took up arms again the next year, but being a second time defeated, concluded a
treaty with Rome, to which they appear to have adhered for 45 years, when the occupation by the
Romans of the territory that had been previously held by the Senones again alarmed them for their own
safety, and led to the great Gallic war of B.C. 225, in which the Boii and Insubres were supported by
the Gaesatae from beyond the Alps. (Pol. ii. 20--31.) Though defeated, together with their allies, in a
great battle near Telamon in Etruria, and compelled soon after to a nominal submission, they still
continued hostile to Rome, and at the commencement of the Second Punic War (B.C. 218) did not wait
for the arrival of Hannibal, but attacked and defeated the Romans who were founding the new colony
of Placentia. (Pol. iii. 40; Liv. xxi. 25 ; Appian, Annib. 5.) The same year they supported Hannibal with
an auxiliary force at the battle of the Trebia; and two years afterwards they suddenly attacked the
consul Postumius as he was marching through their territory with a force of 25,000 men, and entirely
destroyed his whole army. (Pol. iii. 67; Liv. xxiii. 24.) Again, after the close of the Second Punic War,
the Boii took a prominent part in the revolt of [p. 417] the Gauls under Hamilcar, and the destruction of
Placentia, in B.C. 200 (Liv. xxxi. 2, 10), and from this time, during a period of ten years,
notwithstanding repeated defeats, they continued to carry on the contest against Rome, sometimes
single-handed, but more frequently in alliance with the Insubrians and the neighbouring tribes of
Ligurians. At length, in B.C. 191, they were completely reduced to submission by Scipio Nasica, who
put half their population to the sword, and deprived them of nearly half their lands. (Liv. xxxii. 29--31,
xxxiii. 36, 37, xxxiv. 21, 46, 47, xxxv. 4, 5, 22, xxxvi. 38--40.) In order to secure the territory thus
acquired, the Romans soon after established there the colony of Bononia, and a few years later (B.C.
183) those of Mutina and Parma. The construction in B.C. 187 of the great military road from
Ariminum to Placentia, afterwards so celebrated as the Via Aemilia, must have contributed greatly to
the same result. (Liv. xxxvii. 57, xxxix. 2, 55.)
But the conquerors do not appear to have been contented even with these precautions, and ultimately
compelled all the remaining Boians to migrate from their country and recross the Alps, where they
found a refuge with the kindred tribe of the Tauriscans, and established themselves on the frontiers of
Pannonia, in a portion of the modern Bohemia, which derives its name from them. Here they dwelt for
above a century, but were ultimately exterminated by the Dacians. (Strab. v. p. 213, vii. pp. 304, 313.)
Hence both Strabo and Pliny speak of them as a people that had ceased to exist in Italy in their time.
(Strab. v. p. 21 6; Plin. iii. 15. s. 20.) It is therefore almost impossible to determine with any accuracy
the confines of the territory which they occupied. Polybius speaks of the Ananes as bordering on them
on the W., but no other author mentions that nation; and Livy repeatedly speaks of the Boii as if they
were conterminous with the Ligurians on their western frontier. Nor is the exact line of demarcation
between them and the Senones on the E. better marked. Livy expressly speaks of the three colonies of
Parma, Mutina, and Bononia as established in the territory of the Boii, while Ariminum was certainly in
that of the Senones. But the limit between the two is no--where indicated.
The long protracted resistance of the Boii to the Roman arms sufficiently proves that they were a
powerful as well as warlike people; and after so many campaigns, and the repeated devastation of their
lands, they were still able to bring not less than 50,000 men into the field against Scipio Nasica. (Liv.
xxxvi. 40.) Cato even reported that they comprised 112 different tribes (ap. Plin. l. c.). Nor were they
by any means destitute of civilization. Polybius, indeed, speaks of them (in common with the other
Gauls) as inhabiting only unwalled villages, a,.nd ignorant of all arts except pasturage and agriculture
(Pol. ii. 17); but Livy repeatedly alludes to their towns and fortresses (castella), and his account of the
triumph of Scipio Nasica over them proves that they possessed a considerable amount of the precious
metals, and were able to work both in silver and bronze with tolerable skill. (Liv. xxxvi. 40.) A large
portion of their territory seems, however, to have been still occupied by marshes and forests, among
which last one called the LITANA SILVA was the scene of more than one conflict with the Roman
armies. (Liv. xxiii. 24, xxxiv. 22; Frontin. Strat. i. 6. ァ 4.) [E. H. B.]
[LITANA SILVA
LITANA SILVA a forest in the territory of the Boians in Gallia Cispadana, memorable for the defeat to
the Roman consul L. Postumius, in B.C. 216. On this disastrous occasion the consul himself perished,
with his whole army, consisting of two Roman legions, augmented by auxiliaries to the amount of
25,000 men. (Liv. xxiii. 24; Frontin. Strat. i. 6. ァ 4.) At a later period it witnessed, on the other hand, a
defeat of the Boians by the Roman consul L. Valerius Flaccus, B.C. 195. (Liv. xxxiv. 22.) The forest in
question appears to have been situated somewhere between Bononia and Placentia, but its name is
never mentioned after the reduction of Cisalpine Gaul, and its exact site cannot be determined. It is
probable, indeed, that a great part of the tract between the Apennines and the marshy ground on the
banks of the Padus was at this time covered with forest. [E. H. B.]]
One of the most powerful of the Keltic people, said to have dwelt originally in Gallia Transalpina, but
in what part of the country is uncertain. At an early time they migrated in two great swarms, one of
which crossed the Alps and settled in the country between the Po and the Apennines; the other crossed
the Rhine and settled in the part of Germany called Boihemum (Bhmen, Bohemia) after them, and
between the Danube and the Tyrol. The Boii in Italy long carried on a fierce struggle with the Romans,
but they were at length subdued by the consul P. Scipio in B.C. 191, and subsequently incorporated in
the province of Gallia Cisalpina. The Boii in Germany maintained their power longer, but were at
length subdned by the Marcomanni, and expelled from the country.
Polybius
War with Insubres and Boii and Gaesatae
After these defeats the Gauls maintained an unbroken
B. C. 236.
peace with Rome for forty-five years. But when the generation which had witnessed the actual struggle
had passed away, and a younger generation of men had taken their places, filled with unreflecting
hardihood, and who had neither experienced nor seen any suffering or reverse, they began, as was
natural, to disturb the settlement; and on the one hand to let trifling causes exasperate them against
Rome, and on the other to invite the Alpine Gauls to join the fray. At first these intrigues were carried
on by their chiefs without the knowledge of the tribesmen; and accordingly, when an armed host of
Transalpine Gauls arrived at Ariminum, the Boii were suspicious; and forming a conspiracy against
their own leaders, as well as against the new-comers, they put their own two kings Atis and Galatus to
death, and cut each other to pieces in a pitched battle. Just then the Romans, alarmed at the threatened
invasion, had despatched an army; but learning that the Gauls had committed this act of self-
destruction, it returned home again. In the fifth year after this alarm, in the Consulship of Marcus
Aemilius Lepidus, the Romans [p. 119] divided among their citizens the territory of Picenum, from
which they had ejected the Senones when they conquered them: a democratic measure introduced by
Gaius Flaminius, and a policy which we must pronounce to have been the first step in the
demoralisation of the people, as well as the cause of the next Gallic war.
B. C. 232
For many of the Gauls, and especially the Boii whose lands were coterminous with the Roman territory,
entered upon that war from the conviction that the object of Rome in her wars with them was no longer
supremacy and empire over them, but their total expulsion and destruction.
ORO´BII
ORO´BII a tribe of Cisalpine Gauls, mentioned only by Pliny (iii. 17. s. 21), upon the authority of
Cato, who said that Bergomum and Comum had been founded by them, as well as Forum Licinii, by
which he must mean the Gaulish town that preceded the Roman settlement of that name. Their original
abode, according to Cato, was at a place called Barra, situated high up in the mountains; but he
professed himself unable to point out their origin and descent. The statement that they were a Greek
people, advanced by Cornelius Alexander (ap. Plin. l. c.), is evidently a mere inference from the name,
which was probably corrupted or distorted with that very view. [E. H. B.]