Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Hongguo Xu
School of Transportation
Jilin University
Changchun, China
xhg@email.jlu.edu.cn
Abstract—Based on the coupling of PC-Crash and embedded the pedestrian’s head contact location [4], as shown in Fig. 1.
MADYMO, influence laws of pedestrian’s head WAD involved Therefore, pedestrian’s head contact location on vehicle
in a vehicle/pedestrian collision are analyzed by modeling body surface may be described by the WAD.
vehicle/pedestrian multi-body system and selecting main
factors influencing on pedestrian’s head contact location on
vehicle body surface as independent variables for simulation
tests. Various influencing factors and laws of pedestrian WAD
as well as vehicle impact speed thresholds under different
collision circumstances are in depth researched. Furthermore,
mathematical relation curves and empirical formulae between
Figure 1. Pedestrian WAD
the pedestrian WAD and vehicle impact speed are derived
from regression analyses. The comparisons of simulation
An extensive review of various factors influencing on
results with staged and real world vehicle/pedestrian impacts
pedestrian’s head contact location on vehicle front was
have verified a good harmony and consistency between them;
moreover, these regression models may be used to assess
conducted in this paper. Influence laws of pedestrian WAD
vehicle/pedestrian impact speed. The results in this paper will under different vehicle/pedestrian collision circumstances are
be of practicality in technical appraisal of vehicle/pedestrian analyzed by modeling vehicle/pedestrian multi-body system
collisions. through the coupling of PC-Crash and embedded
MADYMO. Furthermore, applicable relationships
Keywords-vehicle/pedestrian collision; pedestrian WAD; comparing pedestrian WAD to vehicle impact speed are
influence law; vehicle impact speed; regression analyses; developed from regression analyses of the simulation data.
modeling
II. MODELING
I. INTRODUCTION
Collisions involving a pedestrian and a motor vehicle are
a common occurrence on road traffic in today’s society. An
important objective in the investigation of vehicle/pedestrian
collisions is the evaluation of the vehicle impact speed. Some
existing studies [1-3] reported an approach for evaluating the
vehicle impact speed from the post-impact information such
as vehicle damage, pedestrian injuries and pedestrian throw
distance. However, the post-impact vehicle damage and Figure 2. Pedestrian multi-body model
pedestrian injuries may be only used to estimate the
approximate vehicle impact speed. This paper presents a The pedestrian model is developed by using MADYMO;
practical analytical method for evaluating vehicle impact the vehicle model is given by applying PC-Crash [5].
speed from the post-impact pedestrian wrap around distance. Pedestrian model is a multi-body system consisting of 16
Pedestrian wrap around distance (WAD) stems from the rigid bodies interconnected by 15 joints (Fig. 2). The
case that a pedestrian hit by a vehicle is wrapped around the different ellipsoidal bodies respectively represent different
front of the vehicle; the WAD represents the length segments of human body, the joints for different links of
measured along the vehicle’s front profile from the ground to
71
1) Vehicle/Pedestrian geometry R: The simulation two cases are respectively involved in the influence of
results indicate that the effect of vehicle’s front profiles and vehicle impact speed on the WAD.
structure parameters, geometry between vehicle front-end When pedestrian’s initial speed is lower (such as 0,
and pedestrian on the WAD is significant (see Fig. 6). 5km/h), the WAD will become larger with the increase in VV.
Furthermore, under the same other conditions, if the lower Furthermore, there will be nearly the same threshold of VV
the front-end of vehicle, the higher the pedestrian stature, under different collision circumstances (approximately
i.e. the smaller the R, then the larger the WAD. 50km/h). When VV is below the threshold, the effect of VV on
the WAD is significant; furthermore, if the higher the VV,
then the larger the WAD. When VV is beyond the threshold,
its effect on the WAD is no significant.
When pedestrian speed is higher (such as 13, 20km/h),
the WAD will become smaller with the increase in VV. There
will be different thresholds of VV for various collision
circumstances, the thresholds of approximately 70km/h and
90km/h respectively correspond to collision circumstances of
pedestrian speed at 13km/h and 20km/h. When VV is below
the threshold, the effect of VV on the WAD is significant;
moreover, if the higher the VV, then the smaller the WAD.
When VV is beyond the threshold, its effect on the WAD is
no significant.
3) Vehicle braking intensity Z: The effect of Z on the
Figure 7. Relationship between WAD and influencing factors WAD is significant; furthermore, the threshold of VV is
found to be approximately 45km/h (see Fig. 10). When VV is
below the threshold, the WAD will become smaller with the
increase in Z. When VV is beyond the threshold, if the higher
the Z, then the larger the WAD.
72
B. Regression Analyses of WAD versus Impact Speed assess lower limit of vehicle impact speed from the post-
The mathematical relation curves and equations between impact pedestrian WAD.
the WAD and vehicle impact speed may be obtained from V. CONCLUSIONS
regression analyses of the available simulation data. These
derived mathematical relationships are listed in Table 2. The modeling vehicle/pedestrian multi-body system is
conducted by using PC-Crash/MADYMO, influence laws of
TABLE II. REGRESSION ANALYSES OF WAD VS. IMPACT SPEED pedestrian WAD under different collision circumstances are
in depth analyzed from the available simulation data. The
results of these studies indicate that the influence laws and
Collision their effect of various factors such as vehicle’s front profiles
Regression Curve Regression Equationa
Circumstances
and structure parameters, geometry between vehicle front-
end and pedestrian body, vehicle impact speed and braking
intensity, pedestrian’s initial motion state/speed, as well as
(1/2W, 90˚)
z=φ dw = 2.0301−9.3486/VV
vehicle/pedestrian impact configuration on pedestrian WAD
VP = 0km/h under different vehicle/pedestrian collision circumstances are
respectively different. The simulation results are found to be
consistent and harmonious with staged and real world
vehicle/pedestrian impacts. Furthermore, the relation curves
and empirical formulae between the pedestrian WAD and
(1/2W, 90˚) vehicle impact speed are developed from regression analyses
z=φ dw = 1.9947−6.1107/VV of the available simulation data, these regression models can
VP = 5km/h be used to assess vehicle impact speed from the post-impact
pedestrian WAD. The analytical method documented in this
paper will be of certain practicality in technical appraisal of
vehicle/pedestrian collisions.
(1/2W, 90˚)
z=φ dw = 2.5699VV−0.0629 ACKNOWLEDGMENT
VP = 13km/h
This project would not have been possibly accomplished
without the computer software provided by School of
Transportation, Jilin University.
(1/2W, 90˚)
REFERENCES
z=φ dw = 3.7838VV−0.1433 [1] Andrew Happer, Michael Araszewski, Amrit Toor, Robert Overgaard
VP = 20km/h and Ravinder Johal, “Comprehensive Analysis Method for
Vehicle/Pedestrian Collisions”, 2000-01-0846. Warrendale, PA:
Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc., March 2000.
[2] Thomas F. Fugger, Jr., Bryan C. Randles, Jesse L. Wobrock, and
Jerry J. Eubanks, “Pedestrian Throw Kinematics in Forward
(1/2W, 0˚) Projection Collisions”, 2002-01-0019. Warrendale, PA: Society of
z=φ dw = 2.0481−8.304/VV Automotive Engineers, Inc., March 2002.
VP = 0km/h [3] Amrit Toor, Michael Araszewski, Ravinder Johal, Robert Overgaard,
and Andrew Happer, “Revision and Validation of Vehicle/Pedestrian
Collision Analysis Method”, 2002-01-0550. Warrendale, PA: Society
of Automotive Engineers, Inc., March 2002.
[4] Koji Mizuno, and Janusz Kajzer, “Head Injuries in Vehicle-
(1/2W, 180˚) Pedestrian Impact”, 2000-01-0157. Warrendale, PA: Society of
z=φ dw = 2.054−9.0477/VV Automotive Engineers, Inc., March 2000.
VP = 0km/h [5] Hermann Steffan, PC-Crash Technical Manual Version 7.3. Linz,
Austria: Dr. Steffan Datentechnik GmbH, 2006.
[6] Hongguo Xu, Automotive Accident Engineering. Beijing, China:
China Communications Press, 2004.
a. dw represents pedestrian WAD. [7] Hongguo Xu, and Yanhui Fan, “Simulation Research on Form and
Kinematics Law of Contact Process for Automobile-Pedestrian
Collision Based on the Coupling of PC-Crash and MADYMO”,
Owing to the influence of virtual collision circumstances Proceedings of the First International Conference of Transportation
and test error, different sensitivities of the WAD to changes Engineering (ICTE 2007), ASCE Press, Chengdu, July 2007, pp.
in various influencing factors would occur. Thus, there may 2235-2240.
be certain changes in effect of various factors on the WAD [8] Yanhui Fan, and Hongguo Xu, “Simulation on Influence Law of
as well as the thresholds of vehicle impact speed. However, Contact Location for Vehicle/Pedestrian’s Head Collision”,
Proceedings of 2008 International Conference on Modeling,
significant changes in influence laws of the WAD would not Identification and Control (ICMIC 2008), Shanghai, June 2008.
occur. Therefore, these regression models can be used to
73