Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Kadete, H.
Published: 01/01/1987
Document Version
Publisher’s PDF, also known as Version of Record (includes final page, issue and volume numbers)
• A submitted manuscript is the author's version of the article upon submission and before peer-review. There can be important differences
between the submitted version and the official published version of record. People interested in the research are advised to contact the
author for the final version of the publication, or visit the DOI to the publisher's website.
• The final author version and the galley proof are versions of the publication after peer review.
• The final published version features the final layout of the paper including the volume, issue and page numbers.
Link to publication
General rights
Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners
and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights.
• Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research.
• You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain
• You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal ?
Take down policy
If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately
and investigate your claim.
by
H. Kadete
Eindhoven
December 1987
This report describes a study caY'l'ied out in a cooperation
of the Department of 8lectrical Engineering, University of
Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, and the High-Voltage GT'OUp of
8indhoven University of Technology, the Netherlands. The
experimental wOl'k done in Dar es Salaam i[J described in
section 3. 6.
This text Was submitted to the University of Dar es Salaam
as a Ph. D. Thesis garlicr'. As result the Doctor's degree,
the first fr'om the UniveT'lJity of Dar' es Salaam '8 Faculty of
8ngineering, was conferred to the author by the Chancellor' of
the University, Pl'esident MuJinyi of Tanzania, on 2.9 August 1987.
ABSTRACT
Kadete, H.
ENHANCEMENT OF HEAT TRANSFER BY CORONA WIND.
Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology,
the Netherlands, 1987.
EUT Report 87-E-184
CONTENTS
Page
ABSTRACT i ! i
DEDICATION iv
TABLE OF CONTENTS v
LIST OF SYMBOLS
viii
CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION
APPENDIX 111
REFERENCES 117
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 124
AUTOBIOGRAPHY 125
v iii
SYMBOLS
N.B. Symbols in boldface are vectors.
A Area [m']
B Constant
o Diameter [m]
Do Optical transparency [percent]
De Electrical current transparency of a grid
[percent]
dE
Gradient of the electriC field intensity in the
dx
x direction [Vim']
F Force [N]
F Force acting in the x direction [N]
H Magnetic field intensity [Aim)
Current [A]
Corona current from discharge electrode [A]
Current through the heating element [A]
Corona current collected at the plate [A]
ix
Scalar function
Voltage [V]
Voltage output of anemometer measuring unit [V]
Potential between grid and anode of corona
triode due to voltage of cathode [V]
Corona inception voltage [ V]
Voltage appl ied to corona discharge gap [V)
Corrected potential between grid and anode of
corona tr i ode [V]
Vgr Voltage appl ied to grid [V]
Vo Voltage output of anemometer measuring
unit at zero velocity measurement [V]
Potential between biasing grid and anode for
which anode current is zero in a corona triode
[V]
dV direction [Vim]
Voltage gradient in the x
dx
Ou
Ot Substantive derivative of the velocity u [m/s']
direction [m/s]
Ov
Substantive derivative of the velocity v [m/s']
Ot
dx
Velocity ;n the x direction [m/s]
dt
GREEK SYMBOLS
a Viscosity [Pa·s)
(l Temperature coefficient of
Resistivity [(OC)-I)
x Conductor roughness factor [dimensionless)
Relative air density [dimensionless)
E Electrostatic permittivity [F/m)
~ Efficiency [percent]
V i%x + j%y + Kd/dz
n Trichel pulse repetition frequency [S-I]
Enhancement of convective heat transfer
over natural convection [percent]
CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION
1.2 BacKground
1.3 Scope
2.1.1 Conduction
dT
= -K·A·- (1)
dn
2.1.2 Radiation
(2)
2.1.3 convection
qc = h-A-4T . (3)
qK = qc (4)
9
It follows that,
h
(5)
K
(6)
~ulses
I I I I
'" <'0
"
I
No ioni sa.t-lon
10 .2.0 30 40
Crap len:JtI1 ( Yllm) ..
Fig. 1: Negative dc voltage pOint-to-plate breaKdown
and corona characteristics.
« ,.
~
'0 :IP 30 40 50 60 .0 80
Time (ns)
(8)
Q = f(r).
II = (9)
2.941O- 3 p
I> =
273 + T
0.67] 1
Ec = 23.8 [ 1 + r O. 4 KVcm- , ( 1 Ob)
and [52)
0.613
Ec = 24.5 [ 1 +
O. 4 ] Kvcm- l ( 1 Oc)
r
( 11)
p I
V· ,E = ( 1 2)
Eo
Where
E = ·-V V
V·j=o, (13)
Where
j = pu i .
ui = KE.
V· j = V. pu i = P V· Ui + Ui • V P = °.
18
Therefore,
Ui'VP = -P"V'Ui'
Since,
Dp
= ui' V P
Dt
Dp
= -pV'ui
Dt
-Kp' ( 1 4)
=
Eo
j¢ = jo·cos 5 ¢ ( 1 5a)
K'EO'V'
g ( 1 6)
( 1 7 a)
From Eq.(15a),
d
dj1J
cos' j1J
60 0
KE V '
Is = -2nd' od~ 9 cos' ¢d(cos¢)
/
IS = ( 1 7d)
dE
Pm- ] ( 18)
dP m
( 1 9)
f = pE .
22
2.3.2 Hydrostatics
f = V p. (20)
fx = dp/dx (21 )
fx = pE .
= pUi
K
= j/K. ( 22)
2.3.3 Hydrodynamics
1;
rlI-
cathode (pOint)
streaml ines
anOde
/ . (plate)
Du
PmD"t = f x·
Dv
Pm- = f y. (24)
Dt
du dv
+ - = 0 . (25)
dx dy
du
Pm u . - = fx . (26)
dx
25
Pm· u~
= fxd . ( 27)
2
~
K
(28)
with
du
u · - = v.
dx
[d'd7u + ~u]
dY'
(29a)
uav = a· a c F
2KE oV g'
u avs = a·
d
(29b)
p +
Pm·
2
u'
- J~EdX = Constant. ( 30b)
Wi = eJEdX z eEd.
29
= eJE~dX
dx
.
= eI~dx.
KE
ed
=
K
ed
A (~mul ) u .
K
~ed·u/K
e·E·d
u
(31 )
ui
3. I. I Principles of Measurements
-ve dc voltage 40 mm
com
x
y
T'"e::::=======w i::::J
re
¢ = 5
-ve dc voltage
~r----------'
To dual beam
OScilloscope
-<'il-
~
~o-----------,
...... • d...:Z3mm
ad.. ~2.8mm
i 120
+ ,l.. :3~mYl'l
o ,l..,·38m",
80
40
o 16
----V,C-kV)
~r---E~W~5--------~~~
•• as... 10 _ n:::=f:==-~I",
-< H> Sou' 30_
••• Su·.ItO,.",
~12 pol.t- l,-p14U
___ Jp' Itf ...'"
t - . _a4-"'M'"
8
o 9
Wi re - - - - 1 - \
(01.)
late
F'(0%) (0·1.')
point-to-plate geometry EWS
Fig. 10: Equipotential plots at 5 percent steps.
37
'<'
<' ...s
~ .~o...
. .) ~ ~III
J-lO
-41
oj
-5
-'0
-80 -10
p + !PEdX = Constant,
Ap = ( 32)
2
Ap = Pmf·g·hp (33 )
(34 a)
(34 b)
4p = ~]
[ 1 + 100 '4Pm'
, I
5 l2oint-to-l2lg te geometry
d p = 35.7 mm
./0 "'- -15 KV.
--<J-<)-O- Vg =
i ~ ---,\(;-~-x- Vg =
-'O-'>7-V- Vg =
-16 KV.
-20 KV.
'/f( \1 EWS: dw =
dp =
20.5 mm,
35.7 mm,
40.0 mm.
j V \ Sw =
_ C]-CI-D-- Vg = -20 KV.
t II II r\ \
; VV
~ ,~>\
'v\
/
f) v:; '/
1. 0V ~~
l~
(/ "\ ~
Jl 20 o lO
~\ 1\
pOint-to-plate geometry
1.0
rr .xX IIg = -20 K \I , d p = 35.7 mm
08 /"
)Vi
l
" ,
,\
1\ \
00
Ic = -30 jJA
LV l\
. ..,
'-.
::>
'-.
0.6
o4
1/ " I~
..., ::>
VI
A \\
J \' 1\
o2
V \
V
o-60 ~
-40 -20 o 20 40 60
ang I e 91 (degreeS)
M = 21Tpmf~u(r)dr (36)
M
Na = ma (37)
42
ma = (0.8'28+0.232)1.6725210-27 Kg
Ni =~
e
(38)
100" (39)
where
43
{Xl
EWS
dw = 20.5 mm
dp = 35.7 mm
Sw = 40.0 mm M = 0.0108 Kg/s
Iw = -38.0 IJA Vg = -20 KV Na = 2.25><10 23 /5
Ip = -13.5 IJA Ni = 3.2><10 14 /5 Wa= 0.0351 J/5
Ic = -51 .5 IJA We = 1 .03 W umax = 4.7 m/s 3.41
44
w lre ~YZZII
~
IZI/ IN (~,"
prongs~ metal sheet ,
electric contacts
ceramic body
Rh = (1 + >')R o .
= (1 + ~.<1 T) R0 . (40)
Va = Vo + Beu K . (41 )
( Va - V 0) , = B' eu ( 42)
x-t
recorder
electric
anemometer
wind system
de- --+- unit
with (EWS)
supply
probe
de
l....r- ~ ~ voltmeter
L.P.F.
~t- pOint y
30
v-._._._·- -1---' _.-
L-~~l- _L_. _._ ._.~j._ '-l._
dW
= 30 mm
z
-, I
o
II !j xp x
Q8
" ./
/
V
~ /' ,.",... if"
/' V
c
~~
o > /
>
/ v
/ /
'"
> /
/
0.2
I.eV
V '\l overheating ratio = 0.7
0 overheating ratio = 0.6
0.6 o.G
::J ::J
g ~
0J r"> OJ OJ 0.'+
>
0 0
>, >,
xp = 30 mm
> '" 0.1.
> '"
0:1. xp = 60 mm
r 0 10
, z
').0 0
i 0 to w 30
(mm) •z (mm)
::J ::J
0.4
~ ~ OJ
01+
OJ OJ OJ >
>
0 0
>, >, xp = 120 mm
OJ
:.> 0.. xp = 90 mm > '" 0.1.
r 0 0
r 10 '2.0 3
~z (mm) • z (mm)
::J
II o· ::J
0.6
C\.J C\.J xp : 60 mm
~
0
>
~
xp : 30 mm ~
> C\.J C\.J
I >
0
> '" >
I
0.4
> '"
rO~
-
r
0 '0
Y (mm)
10 ~o 0
---- '0
y (mm)
20
test
g~
~HI'
m .Irry " v nanolite
/
..........
lens len5
+ve HV source
knife edge - HVdc for nanolite
camera lens r~
video TV ~ video
camera monitor I-- recorder
needle
Au Ah I (43 )
Au = ! fdn dy , (44 )
u hi dz
plate
---pi ate
plate
plate
I(----Pl ate
-('--Pi ate
I 0 0 0 o
o
view i ng direction
d b c
1--''-:'''_ fOi n~
, ... "nclecl
1II,'ft
point ~II
grounded
wires
jet
formation
zone
t_ _._0
flow Ines
) )\ \
II of the
growing
disturbance
I Sc I )
'fd w
- •
• •
___
wire
·-0
•
heat transfer
surface (pi ate)
styrofoam
thermocouple
X-T
thermometer
heating element recorder
~'IIO Ih = 0.7 A
-- -,..,,;;:
o
o
~80
~
I- .,.. -..-- --=
lh = 0.6 A
/
,/
..-
I---- -' - 1-' lh = 0.5 A
l-
V
.
I
1 V
r/ ."
-
--I'- r-
IV
Il W
I ,)(1
/'110
~ t (s) ,
lh = 0.5 A, r = 540 s.
lh = 0.6 A, r = 550 s.
0.7 A, T = 760 s.
th =
60 r- - r ~
I
-- - o.
~r-=- -'.:=
Ih = 0.6 A
" ;.-
1 IV
f
V
/'
f- -- I- Ih = 0.5 A
W i
o I)(/CI 3~IO~
t(s)
Ih = 0.5 A, ,. = 340 s.
Ih = 0.6 A, ,. = 340 s.
Ih = 0.7 A, ,. = 280 s.
() 50
o +-
t- 40
<I ,.......
!/
/
j
/
0
500 1000 1500
0 ..,. t (s)
Fig.46
u
o
so
v
1/
I: J
+-
-
7
10
/ - . t---
o
o 500
--~~
1000
t (5)
1500
Fig. 47
50
--- I - i-
V 1-
30
1 1.0
10
1/ -- - -- .
7
o
II
-- ;- t- --
Ii
o soO 1000 1500
--_ t ($)
Fig.48
v,
()
50
o
f- 40
~
,/
3D
20
1 10 /
o if
0 500 1000 1500
--------':>"
t (5)
Fig. 49
() 50
o
f- 'to
+-
1
-
<I
-
V
V -
17
1/
/0 )
o II
o soo 1000
t(S)
1500
----~
Fig. 50
""
050
o
-+-
1/
7
/
,
10 /
J
o0 I
s 0 lobo \50 o
~ t (5)
Fig. 51
~
o
,0
o
liD ,..,..
/
7 _i
J
-+- 1--' I
1 10
I
il -- -
o 1/
o S; io /1100 150o
---~ t(s)
Fig. 52
83
r'"
/
.l.0 I
1 10 /
/
o / 1500
o XX! lOW
_ _ _~,. t(s)
Fig. 53
dAT AT (45)
J = a"
dt
- +--
b
AT = J·b· (I - e- t / ab )
After substitution of
T = a'b
It follows that
(46)
<1T
(48)
Rth
Therefore,
(49)
with
<1T
Pin =
Rth
(50 )
86
Pin
h =
A·..1T
and
(51 )
hc - h
~ = hn
n· 100 percent.
87
or alternatively,
ATn - AT
_...!.!-_ _ _ c. 100 percen t . (52 )
ATc
• From Fig. 44 .
•• For values of with no corona wind see
Fig. 44.
88
(53 )
cathode
(pOint.)
------~~I
biased
g rid
anode
_-----~~r---'l~.,-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=r1-
~
-=r : : :;'
-
voltage
(grounded plate)
(54)
De
u l (55 )
K
(56)
1 dg
grid
------
Vgr
~-----
..:
c
-1'1
u.
-11
~
'- 0 0 0 t 0 3 mm, Ie ~ 10 ~A
Q.
c
.-
-/0 )( X )( t .. 5 mm, Ie ~ 10 ~A
t
;:J
c'
v
-8 • • • 10 mm, Ie ~ 10 ~A
<:
0
~
-,
r -1
:lOO 0
>
~ 180
<..
> I~
CI)
01
140 • •
...
1\1
{10
0
> • 0 0 0 Ie z 20 ~A
z 10
...... 100 • • • 1<; IJA
0
...
I
:>
80
()
,"0
,."
lit
t = :3 mm
n. - - - - - - - - - - - - --I
x 10 mm
t -
'"
E
o·
0·4
1 O-l.
o -.2.0
• Anode current, I P (nA)
•
j :
9KE o [
'8['r Vgr + u ~] (57)
(58)
where.
u. t
V9C : Vgr + K
u t
Vgc = Vgr +
K
(59)
transfer coefficient.
If the temperature of the plate,
the ambient
temperature, and the surface area of the plate are Kept
constant, then the average electrical power input
Pin varies directly with the convective heat
transfer coefficient h. Power losses by radiation
and convection from the edges of the plate also remain
constant when we change the parameters of the corona
discharge, and therefore cancel out.
~athode
I
: : - - - - - - (combs)
_~~~---s-c-~--~r------1t wires
,fd-;'
I .i.. -.-.-.--+-~~- .......---,
dp
plate
he at i n gel emen t ~'.fJ;2~~,=:~~:",:~:",~r-~-"-"-'=-
plexiglass
glasswool
controlled clocK
temperature
power supply
cathode
(combs)
--. J
!~
wires ~. 0 till .. 0
heat transfer
surface
given by
(60)
-'10
-30
----- ----
(1/)
I +- ~-
W) w ithout grid
1QO S ee Fig. 59
L - - - -,Ir,
1 120
V t:'
f-
"--------
- - - w ith grid
-
V,
;
b;
100 --- ----- - - - ---
s ee Fig. 60
---- r-----
RO
W
/ ---- .
- 40
0
C -100 -200 -300 -400
Ie (I-' A) ,..
corona wInd past the grid by the Ions which reach the
plate is too sma I I to have any effect on the
coefficient of heat transfer as has been discussed
above. Another effect of the Ions reaching the plate
could have been due to their potential energy of
ionization which the ions release when they get
neutral ized at the plate. The ionization energy carried
by these negative tons IS at most a few eV. Note that
positive Ions have a higher Ionization energy. of tl,e
order' of 10 eV. On reaching the plate the negative Ions
are neutralized, but since the plate current is very
smal the net energy which IS released by the
neutr~a Ii zat ion of the ions at the plate IS too smal to
be of any consequence (approximately 0. 15 ~W at 50 nA
pI ate current).
From Eq. (29a) the average corona wind velocity
is proportional to O 5
Ic . . From Fig. 62 it can be
deduced that h is proportional to
I O.3 So It may be concluded that h
c
due to corona wind IS proportional to U av 0.6 .
This compares favourably with a mechanically generated
jet where h is proportional to u
av O. 5
as was stated inEq. (5).
108
CHAPTER IV CONCLUSIONS
Proc. 7th Int. Symp. on Plasma Chemistry, Eindhoven, 1-5 July 1985. Ed. by C.J.
Timmermans. Dept. of Technical Physics, Eindhoven Un;v. of Technology, 1985. P. 522-527.
•
H. Kadete • P.T.M. Vaessen and P.C.T. van der Laan
High-Voltage Laboratory. Department of Electrical Engineering.
Eindhoven University of Technology. Eindhoven. The Netherlands •
• Department of Electrical Engineering.
University of Dar es Salaam, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
ABSTRACT
The convective heat transfer to or from a solid, can be significantly
enhanced by a nearby corona discharge. through the interaction of the
corona wind with the thermal boundary layer. Experimental measurements
with a number of measuring techniques have shown that this interaction
can be 'effective because the corona wind flows in quite laminar jets
-with a long reach and a small spread.
1. INTRODUCTION
The enhancement of heat transfer across solid-gaseous interfaces by a
nearby corona discharge has been known since 1899 (Chattock). In the
1960's increases of the heat transfer coefficient by about a factor four
above that for natural convection were measured. This resulted in an
. h
~ntense research on this process throug out the world
1.2 Nowadays
2. THEORY
In a corona discharge the ionization takes place in a very small region
near the electrode with the smallest radius of curvature. If this
electrode is negative and if an a~taching qas is present in the gap,
rapidly drifting negative ions are formed. These ions make frequent
collisions with the neutral molecules. so that they acquire a constant
1 12
drift velocity. The force caused by the electric field is then completely
transferred to the neutral gas. This is the essential element in the ion
3
drag theory The flow created in this manner, the so called corona wind,
resembles a jet flow. The body force,
F = Pc E ' (1)
in which p is the charge density and E the electric field strength, is
c
a function of the location within the jet flow and acts throughout the
entire region between the electrodes. This force couples the electrical
and fluid dynamical behaviour of the corona discharge and shows up as
a source term in the Navier-Stokes equation 4. The equations governing
the electric, velocity and temperature field form a large set of coupled
partial differential equations. The boundary conditions have a large
influence on the nature of the flow field but are often difficult to
formulate.
3. EXPERIMENTAL SETUP
The electric wind system as shown in Fig. I consists of a flat 90 degree,
1 mm thick brass edge and two parallel stainless steel rods of 5 mm
diameter. In this system d is the distance between the two rods and S1
the distance between the point and the plane of the rods. In commercially
used electric wind systems of this type (The METC-system, INTER-PROBE
Inc., Chicago) a flat plate is placed a distance h below the rods1 this
plate may b~ the heat transfer surface in an oven. We consider the point
to be the center of a right handed cartesian coordinate system where the
x-axis is normal to the plane. A negative high voltage is applied to the
J;X>int. The discharge is a ne<;:::ltive corona discharge of the "Trichel-type",
5
in atmospheric air
4. MEASUREMENTS
~l~c!r~c~l_m~a~uEe~ents. Figure 2 shows the current drawn to the rods
versus the negative voltage applied to the point. The voltage current
6
characteristic follows the well known empirical formula
(2)
I is the current to the rods, V is the voltage applied to the point,
V is the corona starting voltage and K1 is a constant with dimensions
s_2
AV When a grounded heat transfer plate is placed some distance below
the rods and the current, 1 , drawn to this surface is measured we
2
observe that:
I «I and (3), (4)
2 1
1 13
-1
K2 is a constant with dimensions AV The current 12 is small which
indicates that almost all ions reach the grounded rods. This is also
confirmed by the hot-wire anernometry measurements.
~i!o!-!u~e_m~a~uEe~e~t~. The velocity of the corona wind is determined
by measuring the pressure difference in accordance with Bernoulli's
equation:
2
6p = ipu , ( 5)
because the hot air camming from the heated point is concentrated in the
center of the jet.
Artifici~1_m!5!. We also used a mist produced by solid COto visualize
2
the air flow in an electric wind system. Photograph 2 shows a picture
where the mist is introduced downward into the electric wind system
through 11 small holes in the wall of a tube parallel to the rods. From
the artificial mist experiments we obtained the following conclusions:
- the velocity profile has a small diameter (~ 35 rnrn)
- the flow is stationary within two seconds after the application of
the negative high voltage.
- the generated jet has a much more laminar character than a jet
originating from an orifice.
This last conclusion is in full agreement with the results from Schlieren
and anemometer measurements. A difficulty in the comparison of an "orifice
jet" and a corona wind jet is the question which parameter should be the
same in both jets. Nevertheless the conclusion is quite general, since a
longer reach, a smaller spread and a lower turbulence was seen in all
measurements on corona wind jets.
~e~t_t~a~s!e~ ~eas~r~~n!s~ Figure 4 shows some results of heat transfer
measurements on a heated horizontal copper plate with dimensions 220 x
170 mm. The electric wind system used here consists of 75 discharge points
as in Fig. 1, arranged in five rows of 15 teeth parallel to the rods. The
temperature rise ~T with a heating input of 44 W decreases by a factor
two after the electric wind system has been energized. The electric power
input to the corona dischars~ is 5.4 W. This observed increase in the heat
transfer coefficient is in this case only a factor two, because the free
natural convection upward from the horizontal plate is app~eciable.
the longer reach of the corona wind jet. The negative ions cannot con-
tribute significantly to the heat transfer since very few ions reach the
heat transfer surface.
REFERENCES
Robinson, M.
MOVEMENT OF AIR IN THE ELECTRIC WIND OF THE CORONA DISCHARGE.
ALEE Trans., Part 1, Vol. 80(1961) (=Conunun. & Electron., No. 54), p. 143-150.
Stuetzer, O.M.
ION DRAG PRESSURE GENERATION.
J. Appl. Phys., Vol. 30{l959), p. 984-994.
Kulacki, F.A.
ELECTROHYDRODYNAMIC ENHANCEMENT OF CONVECTIVE HEAT AND MASS THANSFER.
In: Advancf!s ill Transport Proce~ses. Vol. 2. Ed. by A.S. Mujumd;:lr ilnd R.A. Mashelkar.
New Delhi: Wiley t;<.Ist",rn, 1987. P. 105-147.
Bradshaw, P.
AN INTRODUCTION '1'0 TURBULENCE AND ITS MEASUREMENT.
Oxfor:d: Pergamon, 1971.
Commonwealth and international library: Th,,-'rrnodyn<lffilCS and fluid mechanics. ChapteJ: 5.
Merzkirch, W.
FLOW VlSUALI~l\TION.
New York: Academic Pr:ess, 1974. Chapter J.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The authors gratefully acknowledge the enthusiastic technical support by
rnr. P.F.M. Gulickx and the cooperation of the group Transport Physics of
the Physics Department with the Schlieren measurements. The heat transfer
measurements were carried out in Dar es Salaam with the assistance of
rnr. B.M.M. Mwinyiwiwa. These investigations have been financially sup-
ported by NUFFIC, as a part of the collaboration of the universities at
Eindhoven and Dar es Salaam.
1 16
I (~A)
Y
rO
z II (rods)
20
:7 1"
x
rods 10
~ . - - -
12 (plate)
1 2 '4---- Y direction
~T
( °C)
60 without
1
z direction i corona wind
40 with
o 10 20 ~
distance (mm)
Fig. 3 Average wind velocity ver-
sus the y and z coordinates;
Sl = d = h = 30 rnm, V = -16 kV. o 1.10 3 2.10 3 3.10 3 t (s)
-->
Temperature rise of a horizontal
plate after the heating elements
have been switched on; with and without
the corona wind. 51 = 33 mrn, d = 25 rom,
h = 40 mm and V = -20 kV.
[ 2] Newton, I.
DPTICKS.
London, 1718. New York: Dover, 1979. P. 315-316.
[12J Senftleben, H.
DI EEl NW IRKUNG ELEKTR ISCHER UNO MAGNET 15CHEI< FELDER AUF DAS WARMELE IT-
VERMDGEN VON GASEN.
Phys. Z., Vol. 32(1931), p. 550.
[19J McDermott, J.
HIGH-VOLTAGE IONIC DISCHARGES PROVIDE SILENT, EFFICIENT COOLING.
Electron. Des., Vol. 19, No. 20(30 Sept. 1971), p. 22-24.
[22] Asakawa, Y.
PROMOTION AND RETARDATION OF HEAT TRANSFER BY ELECTRIC FIELDS.
Nature, Vol. 261(1976), p. 220-221.
[27J Blomgren, Jr., O.C. and O.c. Blomgren, Sr., S.R. Griffiths, Jr., LG. Munck
HEAl CONTROL DEVICE AND METHOD.
US Patent 3,224,485. 155ue date 21 Dec. 1965.
[28J Blomgren, Jr., D.C. and D.C. Blomgren, Sr., S.R. Griffiths, Jr., E.C. Munck
METH 0 AND APPARATUS ;-()R LOWERING THE TEMPERATURE OF A HEATED BODY.
US Patent 3,224,497. Issue GaLe 21 Dec. 1965.
[31J Blomgren, O.
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR REMOVING HEAT FROM WITrllN A VACUUM AND FROM
WITHIN A MASS.
US Patent 3,735,175. I ssue date 22 May 1973.
[32J 250~kO, F.
ING APPARATUS.
US Patent 3,747,284. Issue date 24 July 1973.
[33J Blol1\gren, O.
LOW CURRENT ELECTROSTATIC COOLING METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR ELECTRIC ARC
WELDING UTILIZING HIGH VOLTAGE.
US Patent 3,757,079. Issue date 4 Sept. 1973.
119
[34J Blomgren, Jr., D.C. and D.C. Blomgren, Sr., F.J. Lyczko
COOLING APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR HEAT EXCHANGERS.
US Patent 3,872,917. Issue date 2S March 1975.
[35J Rhodes, I.
PROCESSES OF COOLING FOODS AND APPARATUS THEREFOR.
US Patent 4,072,762. Issue date 7 Febr. 1978.
[36J Rhodes, I.
BAiITfij"C OVENS, British Patent 1,122,514. Issue date 7 April 1966. And:
PROCESSES OF COOKING FOODS, AND APPARATUS THEREFOR. Can. Patent 783,385.
Issue date 23 April 196B.
[37J Velkoff, H.R. and F.A. Kulacki
ELECTROSTATIC COOLING.
ASME Paper No. 77-0E-36. Design Engineering Conf. and Show, Chicago, 9-12 May 1977.
New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1977.
[42J Prandtl, L.
UBER FLUSSIGKEITSBEWEGUNG BEl SEHR KLEINER REI BUNG.
In: Proc. 3rd Int. Mathematical Congress, Heidelberg, 1904. P. 484-491.
[45J Nasser, E.
FUNDAMENTALS OF GASEOUS IONIZATION AND PLASMA ELECTRONICS.
New York: Wiley, 1971.
Wiley series in physics. P. 332-354.
[ 53] Hartmann, G.
THEORETICAL EVALUATION OF PEEK'S LAW.
IEEE Trans. Ind. Ap~l., Vol. IA-20(1984), p. 1647-1651.
[ 55]
[ 56]
[ 57] J.J. and G.P. Thomson
ON OF ELECTRICITY THROUGH GASES. V::Jl. 2: Ionisation by collision
and the gaseous discharge.
Cambridge University Press, 1933. New York: Dover 1969. P. 552.
[ 58] Henson, B. L.
A SPACE-CHARGE REGION MODEL FOR MICROSCOPIC STEADY CORONAS FROM POINTS.
J. Appl. Phys., Vol. 52(1981), p. 709-715.
[ 60] Warburq, E.
UBER DIE STILLE ENTLADUNG IN GASEN.
In: Handbuch der Phy~ik, Vol. 14. Herausgegeben von H. Geiger und K. Scheel.
Berlin: Springer, 1927. P. 149-170.
[ 65] Schlichting, H.
BOUNDARY-LAYER THEORY. 7th ed.
London: McGraw-Hill, 1979.
McGraw-Hill series in mechanical engineering. P. 179-181.
[68] Jonas, P.
THE CHANGES PRODUCED IN AN AIR STREAM BY WIRE GAUZE.
Eng. Dig., Vol. 18, No. 5(May 1957), p. 191-193. English Abstract from:
Czech. J. Phys., Vol. 7, No. 2(1957), p. 202-212.
[ 71] Bradshaw, P.
AN INTRODUCTION TO TURBULENCE AND ITS MEASUREMENT.
Oxford: Pergamon, 1971.
Commonwealth and international library: Thermodynamics and fluid mechanics.
P. 112-117 and p. 119-123.
[73J Merzkirch, W.
FLOW VISUALIZATION.
New York: Academic Pre~~~ 1974. P. 86-100.
[74J Schardin, H.
DIE SCHLIERENVERFAHREN UNO IHRE ANWENDUNGEN.
In: Ergebnisse der exakten Naturwissenschaften. Band 20. Herausgegeben von
S. ~lugge et a1.
Ber in: Springer, 1942. P. 303-439.
[ 75] Adachi, T.
~WINO IN THE ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATION: Experimental treatment by
Schlieren method.
Electr. Eng. Japan, Vol. 93, No. 4(1973), p. 43-49. Transl. from: Denki
Gakkai Ronbunshi, Vol. 93B, No. 7(July 1973), p. 273-280.
[76] Moore, C.J.
THE ROLE OF SHEAR-LAYER INSTABILITY WAVES IN JET EXHAUST NOISE.
J. Fluid Mech., Vol. 80(1977), p. 321-367.
[ 77 J Heavens, S.N.
VISUALIZATION OF UNSTEADY JETS ANO AERODYNAMIC NOISE FIELDS.
In: Proc. 13th InL. Congre:;s on Hiqh Speed Pholoyraphy and Photonics,
Tokyo, 20-25 August 1978. Ed. by Shin-;chi HYJ~O'
Tokyo: Japan Society of Precision Engineering ellingham, Wash.: Society of
Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers, 1978.
Proceedings SPIE, Vol. 189. P. 676-683.
[92 ] Rajaratnam, N.
TURBULENT JETS
Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1976.
Developments in water science, Vol. 5. P. 27-49.
STANDARD HANDBOOK FOR ELECTRICAL ENGINEERS. 10th ed. Ed. by D.G. Fink
and J.M. Carroll.
New York: McGraw-Hill, 1968. P. 3-248, tab. 3.11.
[95 ] ~aYEe, T.F.
CR EN CONTROLLED CORONA DEVICE (SCOROTRON) ,OR CHARGING IN A XEROGRAPHIC
COPIER.
IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., Vol. IA-12(1976), p. 63-67.
[100J Gross, B. and J.A. Giacometti, C.F. Leal Ferreira, C.N. Oliveira, Jr.
toNSTANT CURRENT CORONA CHARel NG OF PVf, .
J. Appl. Phys., Vol. 56(19B4), p. 1487-1491.
[108J Weber, E.
ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS: Theory and applications. Vol. 1: Mapping of fields.
New York: Wiley/London: Chapman & Hall, 1950. P. 291-297.
[109J Langmuir, I.
THE EFFECT OF SPACE CHARGE AND RES[DUAL GASES ON THERMION[C CURRENTS [N
HIGH VACUUM.
Phys. Rev., Vol. 2(1913), p. 450-486.
124
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
125
AUTOBIOGRAPHY
(I H \l Zh" Y»-C" ,
()N '1'111': ]\(HINIJ:, "I' TilE M[,IJI':I,I 1N,; 1';lIi,vH:i 1)1-" 1\I.I\(·K-l\'J.~ r'~IM" 'I'HI\N~,I'EH FUW''l'10N E~;T)MATES.