Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 43

BIBLIOGRAPHY ON INTELLECTUAL HISTORY METHODOLOGIES

Compiled by Mikkel Thorup (August 2016)

Please feel free to circulate.

Any corrections or suggestions to the list can be made to idemt@cas.au.dk.

The principle for inclusion on the list is texts dealing with methodological aspects of intellectual
history and/or intellectual historians. The principle of presentation is chronology.

Journals

 Lychnos. An annual for history of ideas and science, 1936-


 Journal of the History of Ideas, 1940-
 Intellectual History Newsletter, 1979-2002
o (volumes 1985-1999 online at https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/002535665)
 History of European Ideas, 1980-
 Slagmark – tidsskrift for idéhistorie, 1983-
 ARR, 1989-
 Intellectual History Review, 1996-
 The European Legacy, 1996-
 Redescriptions, 1997-
 History of Intellectual Culture, 2001-
 Partial Answers. Journal of Literature and the History of Ideas, 2003-
 Modern Intellectual History, 2004-
 Contributions, 2005-
 Ideas in History, 2006-
 Zeitschrift für Ideengeschichte, 2007-
 Journal of Interdisciplinary History of Ideas, 2012-

1
 Erudition and the Republic of Letters, 2015-
 Intelligere: Revista de História Intelectual, 2015-

Literature

 Arthur O. Lovejoy, The Great Chain of Being. A Study of the History of an Idea, Cambridge,
Mass. & London: Harvard University Press 1936
 Arthur O. Lovejoy, “The Historiography of Ideas”, Proceedings of the American Philosophical
Society, vol. 78, no. 4, 1938, pp. 529-543
 R.G. Collingwood, An Autobiography, Oxford: Oxford University Press
 Arthur O. Lovejoy, “Reflections on the History of Ideas”, Journal of the History of Ideas, vol.
1, no. 1, 1940, pp. 3-23
 Leo Spitzer, “History of Ideas Versus Reading of Poetry”, South Review, vol. 6, no. 3, 1941, pp.
586-604
 R.G. Collingwood, The Idea of History, Oxford: Oxford University Press 1946
 Franklin L. Baumer, “Intellectual History and its Problems”, Journal of Modern History, vol.
21, no. 3, 1949, pp. 191-203
 John Higham, “The Rise of American Intellectual History”, American Historical Review, April,
1951, pp. 453-471
 George Boas et.al., Studies in Intellectual History, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press
1953
 Richard Wohl, “Intellectual History: An Historian’s View”, The Historian, vol. 16, pp. 62-77
 John Higham, “Intellectual History and its Neighbours”, Journal of the History of Ideas, vol. 15,
1955, pp. 339-347
 Henry Lee Swint, “Trends in the Teaching of Social and Intellectual History”, Social Studies,
vol. 46, 1955, pp. 243-51
 John C. Greene, “Objectives and Methods in Intellectual History”, Mississippi Valley Historical
Review, vol. 44, no. 1, 1957, pp. 58-74
 Peter Laslett, “Introduction”, in John Locke, Two Treatises of Government, Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press 1960

2
 John Higham, “American Intellectual History, a Critical Appraisal”, American Quarterly, vol.
13, no. 2, 1961, pp. 219-233
 Crane Brinton, “Introduction”, in Brinton, Ideas and Men. The Story of Western Thought,
Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall 1963, 2. ed.
 John Herma Randall, “Arthur O. Lovejoy and the History of Ideas”, Philosophy and the
Phenomenological Research, vol. 23, no. 4, 1963, pp. 475-479
 Maurice Mandelbaum, “The History of Ideas, Intellectual History, and the History of
Philosophy”, History and Theory, 1965, pp. 33-66
 Rush Welter, “The History of Ideas in America: An essay in Redefinition”, Journal of American
History, vol. 51, no. 4, 1965, pp. 599-614
 R.S. Crane, “Philosophy, Literature, and the History of Ideas”, in Crane, The Idea of the
Humanities and other Essays Critical and Historical, vol. 1, Chicago & London: University of
Chicago Press 1967
 Peter Gay, “The Social History of Ideas: Ernst Cassirer and After”, in Kurt H. Wolff &
Barrington Moore (eds.), The Critical Spirit. Essays in Honor of Herbert Marcuse, Boston:
Beacon Press 1967
 Quentin Skinner, “The Limits of Historical Explanation”, Philosophy, vol. 46, 1967, pp.
 Hajo Holborn, “The History of Ideas”, American Historical Review, vol. 73, no. 3, 1968, pp.
683-695
 Louis O. Mink, “Change and Causality in the History of Ideas”, Eighteenth-Century Studies,
1968, pp. 7-25
 Johannes Sløk, Hvad er idehistorie? Et programskrift, København: Gyldendal 1968
 John Dunn, “The Identity of the History of Ideas”, Philosophy, April 1968, pp. 85-103
 Johannes Sløk, Fylde eller tomhed, København: Gyldendal 1968
 Georg Boas, The History of ideas. An Introduction, New York: Charles Schribner’s Sons
 Klaus von Beyme, Politische Ideengeschichte. Probleme eines interdisziplinären
Forschungsbereiches, Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck) 1969
 Hayden White, “The tasks of intellectual history”, The Monist, vol. 53, no. 4, 1969, pp. 606-630
 John Higham, “Part II: Polarities in Intellectual History, chap. 2. Intellectual History and its
Neighbors; 3. The Study of American Intellectual History”, in Higham, Writing American
History. Essays on Modern Scholarship, Bloomington & London: Indiana University Press
1970

3
 Robert Darnton, “In search of enlightenment: recent attempts to create a social history of ideas”,
Journal of Modern History, vol. 43, no. 1, 1971, pp. 113-132
 Felix Gilbert, “Intellectual History: Its Aims and Methods”, in Gilbert & Stephen R. Graubard
(eds.), Historical Studies Today, New York: W.W. Norton & Co 1972
 Reinhart Koselleck, “Einleitung”, in Otto Brunner, Werner Conze & Reinhart Koselleck (eds.),
Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe. Historisches Lexicon zur politisch-sozialen Sprache in
Deutschland, vol. 1, Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta 1972
 Hayden White, The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Europe, Baltimore &
London: Johns Hopkins University Press 1973
 Charles D. Tarlton, “Historicity, Meaning and Revisionism in the Study of Political Thought”,
History and Theory, vol. 12, no. 3, 1973, pp. 307-328
 Arthur A. Ekirch, American Intellectual History: the Development of the Discipline,
Washington: American Historical Association Pamphlets, no. 102, 1973
 Philip P. Wiener, “Towards Commemorating the Centenary of Arthur O. Lovejoy’s Birthday
(October 10, 1873)”, Journal of the History of Ideas, vol. 34, no. 4, 1973, pp. 591-598
 Bhikhu Parekh & R.N. Berki, “The History of Political Ideas: A Critique of Q. Skinner’s
Methodology”, Journal of the History of Ideas, vol. 34, no. 2, 1973, pp. 163-184
 Philip P. Wiener, “Preface”, in Wiener (ed.), Dictionary of the History of Ideas, New York:
Charles Schribner 1973
 F. E. L. Priestly, “Mapping the World of Ideas. Review of the Dictionary of the History of
Ideas”, Journal of the History of Ideas, vol. 35, 1973, pp. 527-537
 Gordon J. Schochet, “Quentin Skinner’s Method”, Political Theory, vol. 2, no. 3, 1974, pp. 261-
276
 Quentin Skinner, “Some Problems in the Analysis of Political Thought and Action”, Political
Theory, vol. 2, no. 3, 1974, pp. 277-303
 B.A. Haddock, “The History of Ideas and the Study of Politics”, Political Theory, vol. 2, no. 4,
1974, pp. 420-431
 Masao Maruyama, Studies in the Intellectual History of Tokugawa Japan, Princeton University
Press 1974 [1940-44], “Introduction”
 Gerald Izenberg, “Psychohistory and Intellectual History”, History and Theory, vol. 14, 1975,
pp. 139-155

4
 Hajime Nakamura, ”Introductory Remarks” in A Comparative History of Ideas, Delhi: Motilal
Banarsidass Publishers 1975
 Jaako Hintikka, “Gaps in the Great Chain of Being: An Exercise in the Methodology of the
History of Ideas”, Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, vol.
49, 1975-6, pp. 22-38
 Helmut Berding, “Begriffsgeschichte und Sozialgeschichte”, Historische Zeitschrift, no. 233,
1976, pp. 98-110
 Arnaldo Momigliano, “A Piedmontese View of the History of Ideas”, in Momigliano, Essays in
Ancient and Modern Historiography, Oxford: Basil Blackwell 1977
 Michel Foucault, “History of Systems of Thought”, in Donald F. Bouchard (ed.), Michel
Foucault. Language, Counter-Memory, Practice. Selected Essays and Interviews, Ithaca & New
York: Cornell University Press 1977
 Paul K. Conkin, “Intellectual History: Past, Present and Future”, chapter 5 in Charles F. Delzell
(ed.), The Future of History, Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press 1977
 Sande Cohen, “Structuralism and the Writing of Intellectual History”, History and Theory, vol.
17, no. 2, 1978, pp. 175-206
 James Sheehan, “Begriffsgeschichte: Theory and Practice”, Journal of Modern History, vol. 50,
1978, pp. 312-319
 Hayden White, Tropics of Discourse. Essays in Cultural Criticism, Baltimore & London: Johns
Hopkins University Press 1978
 Leonard Krieger, “The Autonomy of Intellectual History”, in Georg G. Iggers & Harold T.
Parker (eds.), International Handbook of Historical Studies, Westport, Ct.: Metheuen 1979
 Andrew Lockyer, “Traditions as contexts in the history of political theory”, Political Studies,
vol. 27, 1979, pp. 201-217
 John Higham & Paul K. Conkin (eds.), New Directions in American Intellectual History,
Baltimore & London: Johns Hopkins University Press 1979
 Laurence Veysey, “Intellectual History and the New Social History”
 Gordon S. Wood, “Intellectual History and the Social Sciences”
 David A. Hollinger, “Historians and the Discourse of Intellectuals”
 Rush Welter, On Studying the National Mind”
 Sacvan Bercovitch, “New England’s Errand Reappraised”
 Henry F. May, “Intellectual History and Religious History”

5
 Dorothy Ross, “The Liberal Tradition Revisited and the Republican Tradition
Addressed”
 Thomas L. Haskell, “Deterministic Implications of Intellectual History”
 Murray G. Murphey, “The Place of Beliefs in Modern Culture”
 David D. Hall, “The World of Print and Collective Mentality in Seventeenth-
Century New England”
 Thomas Bender, “The Cultures of Intellectual Life: The City and the
Professions”
 Neil Harris, “Iconography and Intellectual History: the Half-Tone Effect”
 Warren I. Susman, “’Personality’ and the Making of Twentieth-Century Culture”
 John Dunn, “The Identity of the History of Ideas”, in Dunn, Political Obligation in its
Historical Context. Essays in Political Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1980
 Daniel J. Wilson, Arthur O. Lovejoy and the Quest for Intelligibility, N.C: Chapel Hill 1980
 Robert Darnton, “Intellectual and Cultural History”, chap. 14 in Michael Kammen (ed.), The
Past Before Us. Contemporary Historical Writing in the United States, Ithaca & London:
Cornell University Press 1980
 William J. Bouwsma, “Intellectual History in the 1980s: From the History of Ideas to the
History of Meaning”, Journal of Interdisciplinary History, vol. 12, no. 2, 1981, pp. 279-291
 J.G.A. Pocock, “The Reconstruction of Discourse: Towards the Historiography of Political
Thought”, Modern Language Notes, vol. 96, no. 5, 1981, pp. 959-980
 Michel Foucault, “The Order of Discourse”, in Robert Young (ed.), Untying the Text: A Post-
Structuralist Reader, Boston, London & Henley: Routledge & Kegan Pail 1981
 Joel Colton, “Intellectual History in the 1980s: The Case for the Defense”, Journal of
Interdisciplinary History, vol. 12, no. 2, 1981, pp. 293-298
 J.G.A. Pocock, “Afterword: The Machiavellian Moment Revisited: A Study in History and
Ideology”, Journal of Modern History, vol. 53, 1981, pp. 49-72
 Ernst Schulin, “German ‘Geistesgeschichte’, American ‘Intellectual History’ and French
‘Historie des Mentalités’ since 1900. A Comparison”, History of European Ideas, vol. 1, no. 3,
1981, pp. 195-214
 John G. Gunnell, “Interpretation and the History of Political Theory: Apology and
Epistemology”, American Political Science Review, vol. 76, 1982, pp. 317-327

6
 Ian Shapiro, ”Realism in the Study of the History of Ideas”, History of Political Thought, vol. 3,
no. 3, 1982, pp. 535-578
 Dominick LaCapra & Steven L. Kaplan (eds.), Modern European Intellectual History.
Reappraisals and New Perspectives, Ithaca & London: Cornell University Press 1982
 Roger Chartier, “Intellectual History or Sociocultural History? The French
Trajectories”
 Dominick LaCapra, “Rethinking Intellectual History and Reading Texts”
 Martin Jay, “Should Intellectual History Take a Linguistic Turn? Reflections on
the Habermas-Gadamer Debate”
 Hans Kellner, “Triangular Anxieties: The Present State of European Intellectual
History”
 Mark Poster, “The Future According to Foucault: The Archeology of Knowledge
and Intellectual History”
 E.M. Henning, “Archeology, Deconstruction, and Intellectual History”
 Keith Michael Baker, “On the Problem of the Ideological Origins of the French
Revolution”
 Peter Jelavich, “Popular Dimensions of Modernist Elite Culture: The Case of
Theater in Fin-de-Siècle Munich”
 David James Fisher, “Reading Freud’s Civilization and Its Discontents”
 Hayden White, “Method and Ideology in Intellectual History: The Case of Henry
Adams”
 Dominick LaCapra, Rethinking Intellectual History. Texts, Contexts, Language, Ithaca &
London: Cornell University Press 1983
 Dominick LaCapra, “Intellectual History and Defining the Present as ‘Postmodern’”, in Ihab
Hassan & Sally Hassan (eds.), Innovation/Renovation. New Perspectives on the Humanities,
Madison: University of Wisconsin Press 1983
 Stefano Collini, Donald Winch & John Burrow, “The Governing Science: Things Political and
the Intellectual Historian”, in Collini, Winch & Burrow, That Noble Science of Politics. A Study
in Nineteenth-Century Intellectual History, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1983
 Preston King (ed.), The History of Ideas. An Introduction to Method, London & Canberra:
Croom Helm 1983
 Preston King, “Introduction”

7
 Preston King, “Thinking Past a Problem”
 Michael Oakeshott, “The Activity of Being an Historian”
 Preston King, “Michael Oakeshott and Historical Particularism”
 R.G. Collingwood, “The Historical Logic of Question and Answer”
 Leo Strauss, “On Collingwood’s Philosophy of History”
 A.O. Lovejoy, “The Study of the History of Ideas”
 Maurice Mandelbaum, “On Lovejoy’s Historiography”
 Leo Strauss, “Political Philosophy and History”
 John G. Gunnell, “The Myth of the Tradition”
 Quentin Skinner, “Conventions and the Understanding of Speech Acts”
 Preston King, “The Theory of Context and the Case of Hobbes”
 John Patrick Diggins, “The Oyster and the Pearl: The Problem of Contextualism in Intellectual
History”, History and Theory, vol. 23, no. 2, 1984, pp. 151-169
 Iain Hampsher-Monk, “Political Languages in Time: The Work of J.G.A. Pocock”, British
Journal of Political Science, vol. 14, 1984, pp. 159-174
 Richard Rorty, “The Historiography of Philosophy: Four Genres”, in Rorty, J.B. Schneewind &
Quentin Skinner, Philosophy in History, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1984
 Peter L. Janssen, “Political Thought as Traditionary Action: The Critical Response to Skinner
and Pocock”, History and Theory, vol. 24, 1985, pp. 115-146
 David Boucher, Texts in Context. Revisionist Methods for Studying the History of Ideas,
Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 1985
 Conal Condren, The Study and Appraisal of Classic Texts. An Essay on Political Theory, Its
Inheritance, and the History of Ideas, Princeton: Princeton University Press 1985
 Rolf Reichardt, “Einleitung”, in Reichardt & Eberhard Schmitt (eds.), Handbuch politisch-
sozialer Grundbegriffe in Frankreich 1680-1820, München: R. Oldenbourg Verlag 1985
 Michael Ermarth, “Mindful Matters: The Empire’s New Codes and the Plight of Modern
European Intellectual History”, Journal of Modern History, vol. 57, no. 3, 1985, pp. 506-527
 Stefano Collini, “What is Intellectual History?”, History Today, October 1985, pp. 46-48
 Michael Biddiss , “What is Intellectual History?”, History Today, October 1985, pp. 49-50
 Quentin Skinner, “What is Intellectual History?”, History Today, October 1985, pp. 50-52
 J.G.A. Pocock, “What is Intellectual History?”, History Today, October 1985, pp. 52-53
 Bruce Kuklick, “What is Intellectual History?”, History Today, October 1985, pp. 53

8
 Michael Hunter, “What is Intellectual History?”, History Today, October 1985, pp. 53-54
 J.G.A. Pocock, “Introduction: The State of the Art”, in Pocock, Virtue, Commerce, and History.
Essays on Political Thought and History, Chiefly in the Eighteenth Century, Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press 1985
 David A. Hollinger, In the American Province. Studies in the History and Historiography of
Ideas, Bloomington: Indiana University Press 1985
 Reinhart Koselleck, “Sozialgeschichte und Begriffsgeschichte”, in Wolfgang Schieder & Volker
Sellin (eds.), Sozialgeschichte in Deutschland, vol. 1, Göttingen: Vandenhoek & Ruprecht 1986
 Melvin Richter, “History (Begriffsgeschichte) and Political Theory”, Political Theory, vol. 14,
no. 4, 1986, pp. 604-637
 Donald R. Kelley, “Horizons of Intellectual History: Retrospect, Circumspect, Prospect”,
Journal of the History of Ideas, vol. 48, no. 1, 1987, pp. 143-169
 Dietrich Busse, Historische Semantik. Analyse eines Programms, Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta 1987
 P. & m. Kuntz (eds.), The Great Chain of Being after Fifty Years, New York
 Daniel J. Wilson, “Lovejoy’s The Great Chain of Being after Fifty Years”, Journal of the
History of Ideas, 1987, pp. 187-205
 Gladys Gordon-Bournique, “A.O. Lovejoy and the ‘History of Ideas’”, Journal of the History of
Ideas, 1987, pp. 207-210
 Edward P. Mahoney, “Lovejoy and the Hierarchy of Being”, Journal of the History of Ideas,
1987, pp. 211-230
 Francis Oakley, “Lovejoy’s Unexplored Option”, Journal of the History of Ideas, 1987, pp.
231-245
 John E. Toews, “Intellectual History after the Linguistic Turn: The Autonomy of Meaning and
the Irreducibility of Experience”, American Historical Review, vol. 92, 1987, pp. 879-907
 Hayden White, The Content of the Form. Narrative Discourse and Historical Representation,
Baltimore & London: Johns Hopkins University Press 1987
 Martin Jay, “Two Cheers for Paraphrase: The Confessions of a Synoptic Intellectual Historian”,
in Jay, Fin de Siècle Socialism and other essays, New York & London: Routledge 1988
 Anthony Pagden, “Rethinking the Linguistic Turn: Current Anxieties in Intellectual History”,
Journal of the History of Ideas, vol. 49, no. 3, 1988, pp. 519-529
 Stefano Collini, “Discipline History and Intellectual History. Reflections on the Historiography
of the Social Sciences in Britain and France”, Revue de Synthèse, no. 3-4, 1988, pp. 387-399

9
 Michel de Certeau, The Writing of History, New York: Columbia University Press 1988
 Roger Chartier, Cultural History. Between Practices and Representations, Cambridge: Polity
Press 1988
 James Tully (ed.), Meaning and Context. Quentin Skinner and his Critics, Cambridge: Polity
1988
 James Tully, “The Pen is a Mighty Sword: Quentin Skinner’s Analysis of
Politics”
 Quentin Skinner, “Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas”
 Quentin Skinner, “Motives, Intentions and the Interpretation of Texts”
 Quentin Skinner, “’Social Meaning’ and the Explanation of Social Action”
 Quentin Skinner, “Some Problems in the Analysis of Political Thought and
Action”
 Quentin Skinner, “Language and Social Change”
 Martin Hollis, “Say It with Flowers”
 Keith Graham, “How do Illocutionary Descriptions Explain?”
 Joseph V. Femia, “An Historicist Critique of ‘Revisionist’ Methods for
Studying”
 Kenneth Minogue, “Method in Intellectual History: Quentin Skinner’s
Foundations”
 Nathan Tarcov, “Quentin Skinner’s Method and Machiavelli’s Prince”
 John Keane, “More Theses on the Philosophy of History”
 Charles Taylor, “The Hermeneutics of Conflict”
 Quentin Skinner, “A Reply to my Critics”
 Reinhart Koselleck, “Linguistic Change and the History of Events”, Journal of Modern History,
vol. 61, December 1989, pp. 649-666
 Lloyd S. Kramer, “Literature, Criticism, and Historical Imagination: The Literary Challenge of
Hayden White and Dominick LaCapra”, in Lynn Hunt (ed.), The New Cultural History,
Berkeley: University of California Press 1989
 Quentin Skinner, “Language and Political Change”, in Terence Ball, James Farr & Rusell L.
Hansen (eds.), Political Innovation and Conceptual Change, Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press 1989

10
 Manfred Hahn, “Auseinandergehende Verständnisse der Ideengeschichte”, Dialektik, 2000, pp.
198-221
 Melvin Richter, “Conceptualizing the Contestable: ‘Begriffsgeschichte’ and Political Concepts”,
pp. 135-143 in G. Scholtz (ed.), Interdiscziplinarität der Begriffsgeschichte, Hamburg: Felix
Meiner Verlag 2000
 James Farr, “Understanding Conceptual Change Politically” ”, in Terence Ball, James Farr &
Rusell L. Hansen (eds.), Political Innovation and Conceptual Change, Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press 1989
 Dominick LaCapra, “Intellectual History and Critical Theory”, in LaCapra, Soundings in
Critical Theory, Ithaca & London: Cornell University Press 1989
 Kack Liveley & Andrew Reeve, “General Introduction”, in Liveley & Reeve (eds.), Modern
Political Theory from Hobbes to Marx. Key Debates, London & New York: Routledge 1989
 David Harlan, “Intellectual History and the Return of Literature”, American Historical Review,
vol. 94, 1989, pp. 581-609
 Keith Tribe, “The Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe Project: From History of Ideas to Conceptual
History. A Review Article”, Comparative Studies in Society, vol. 31, 1989, pp. 180-184
 Reinhart Koselleck, ”Social History and Conceptual History”, International Journal of Politics,
Culture and Society, vol. 2, no. 3, 1990, pp. 308-325
 Reinhart Koselleck, “Sprogændring og begivenhedshistorie”, Den jyske historiker, vol. 50,
1990, pp. 121-135
 Robert Darnton, The Kiss of Lamourette. Reflections on Cultural History, New York & London:
W.W. Norton & Co 1990
 Lars-Henrik Schmidt, “Den interpreterende konstruktion”, Den Jyske Historiker, no. 50, 1990,
pp. 55-64
 Fritz Ringer, ”The Intellectual Field, Intellectual History, and the Sociology of Knowledge”,
Theory & Society, vol. 19, 1990, pp. 269-294
 Charles Lemert, “The Habits of Intellectuals. Response to Ringer”, Theory & Society, vol. 19,
1990, pp. 295-310
 Martin Jay, “Fieldwork and Theorizing in Intellectual History. A Reply to Fritz Ringer”, Theory
& Society, vol. 19, 1990, pp. 311-321
 Fritz Ringer, “Rejoinder to Charles Lemert and Martin Jay”, Theory & Society, vol. 19, 1990,
pp. 323-334

11
 Melvin Richter, “Reconstructing the History of Political Languages: Pocock, Skinner, and the
Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe”, History and Theory, vol. 29, no. 1, 1990, pp. 38-70
 Donald R. Kelley, “What is Happening to the History of Ideas?”, Journal of the History of
Ideas, vol. 51, no. 1, 1990, pp. 3-25
 Donald R. Kelley, The History of Ideas. Canon and Variations, Rochester: University of
Rochester Press 1990
 Donald R. Kelley, “Introduction: Reflections on a Canon”
 Arthur O. Lovejoy, “Reflections on the History of Ideas”
 Frederick J. Teggart, “A Problem in the History of Ideas”
 Leo Spitzer, “Geistesgeschichte vs. History of Ideas as Apllied to Hitlerism”
 Arthur O. Lovejoy, “Reply to Professor Spitzer”
 Theodore Spencer, “Lovejoy’s ‘Essays in the History of Ideas’”
 Arthur O. Lovejoy, “Historiography and Evaluation: A Disclaimer”
 Abraham Edel, “Levels of Meaning and the History of Ideas”
 Paul O. Kristeller, “The Philosophical Significance of the History of Thought”
 Philip P. Wiener, “Logical Significance of the History of Thought”
 Joseph Anthony Mazzeo, “Some Interpretations of the History of Ideas”
 Leonard Krieger, “The Autonomy of Intellectual History”
 Daniel J. Wilson, “Arthur O. Lovejoy and the Moral of ‘The Great Chain of
Veing’”
 Kathleen E. Duffin, “Arthur O. Lovejoy and the Emergence of Novelty”
 Daniel J. Wilson, “Lovejoy’s ‘The Great Chain of Being’ after Fifty Years”
 Edward P. Mahoney, “Lovejoy and the Hierarchy of Being”
 Francis Oakley, “Lovejoy’s Unexplored Option”
 Johann Huizinga, “History Changing Form”
 Joseph Katz, “A Reply to J. Huizinga on the Form and Function of History”
 Calvin G. Rand, “Two Meanings of Historicism in the Writings of Dilthey,
Troeltsch, and Meinecke”
 Nils B. Kvastad, “Semantics in the Methodology of the History of Ideas”
 Paul O. Kristeller, “’Creativity’ and ‘Tradition’”
 Lester G. Crocker, “Interpreting the Enlightenment: A Political Approach”

12
 Patrick H. Hutton, “The Art of Memory Reconceived: From Rhetoric to
Psychoanalysis”
 Donald R. Kelley, “Horizons of Intellectual History: Retrospect, Circumspect,
Prospect”
 Richard Tuck, “History of Political Thought”, in Peter Burke (ed.), New Perspectives on
Historical Writing, Cambridge: Polity Press 1991
 Henry F. May, “Religion and American Intellectual History, 1945-1989: Reflections on an
Uneasy Relationship”, chap. 1 in May, The Divided Heart. Essays on Protestantism and the
Enlightenment in America, New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press
 Russel Jacoby, “A New Intellectual History?”, American Historical Review, April 1992, pp.
405-424
 Dominick LaCapra, “Intellectual History and Its Ways”, American Historical Review, April
1992, pp. 425-439
 Mark Bevir, “The Errors of Linguistic Contextualism”, History and Theory, vol. 31, 1992, pp.
276-98
 J.G.A. Pocock, ”A discourse of sovereignty: observations on the work in progress”, in Nicholas
Phillipson & Quentin Skinner, Political Discourse in Early Modern Britain (essays in honor of
J.G.A. Pocock), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1993
 Gerald N. Izenberg, ”Text, Context, and Psychology in Intellectual History”, chap. 3 in Henry
Kozicki (ed.), Developments in Modern Historiography, Houndmills & London: Macmillan
 Frans Gregersen & Simo Køppe, “Indledning til idehistorien”, in Gregersen & Køppe,
Idehistorie, vol. 1, Amanda 1994
 Robert Castel, ”’Problematization’ as a Mode of Reading History”, chap. 13 in Jan Goldstein
(ed.), Foucault and the Writing of History, Oxford & Cambridge: Blackwell 1994
 Hartmut Rosa, ”Ideengeschichte und Gesellschaftsgeschichte: Der Beitrag der ’Cambridge
School’ zur Metatheorie”, Politische Vierteljahresschrift, vol. 35, 1994, pp. 197-223
 Robert Mayhew, ”Contextualizing Practice in Intellectual History”, Journal of Historical
Geography, vol. 20, no. 3, 1994, pp. 323-328
 Lennart Olausson (ed.), Idéhistoriens egenheter. Teori- och metodproblem inom idéhistorien,
Stockholm: Brutus Östlings Bokförlag 1994
 Lennart Olausson, ”Från text till text”
 Bernt Skovdahl, “Idéhistoria och källkritik”

13
 Staffan Carlshamre, ”Sant eller intressant? Filosofi och idéhistoria”
 Jonas Anshelm & Martin Kylhammar, ”Om behovet av samverkan mellan
idéhistoria och litteraturvetenskap”
 Bosse Holmqvist, ”Om relativism”
 Lennart Olausson, ”Kunnskapssociologi och idéhistoria”
 Tomas Jonsson, “Et antinomiskt ideologibegrepp”
 Knud Haakonssen, “The History of Ideas”, in Haakonssen, Natural Law and Moral Philosophy
from Grotius to the Scottish Enlightenment, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1995
 Suzanne Marchand, “Problems and Prospects for Intellectual History”, New German Critique,
vol. 65, 1995, pp. 87-96
 Max Edling & Ulf Mörkenstam, “Quentin Skinner: From Historian of Ideas to Political
Scientist”, Scandinavian Political Studies, vol. 18, no. 2, 1995, pp. 119-132
 Melvin Richter, The History of Political and Social Concepts. A Critical Introduction, New
York & Oxford: Oxford University Press 1995
 James D. Faubion (ed.), Michel Foucault. Essential Works of Foucault 1954-1984, vol. 2:
Aesthetics (part 2: Methodology and Epistemology), London: Penguin 1996
 John Dunn, “The History of Political Theory”, chap. 2 in Dunn, The History of Political Theory
and other Essays, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1996
 Günther Lottes, “’The State of the Art’. Stand und Perspektive der ‘intellectual history’”, pp.
27-46 in F-L Kroll (ed.), Neue Wege der Ideengeschichte. Festschrift für Kurt Kluxen zum 85.
Geburtstag, Paderborn: Schöningh Verlag 1996
 Uffe Østergård & Jan Ifversen (eds.), Begreb og historie, Aarhus: Aarhus Universitet 1996
 Jan Ifversen, ”Hvordan analysere demokrati i tale?”
 Uffe Østergaard & Jan Ifversen, ”Europæisk civilisation, begrebshistorie og
diskursanalyse”
 Hartmut Lehmann & Melvin Richter, The Meaning of Historical Terms and Concepts. New
Studies on Begriffsgeschichte, Washington: German Historical Institute 1996
 Melvin Richter, “Appreciating a Contemporary Classic: The Geschichtliche
Grundbegriffe and Future Scholarship
 James van Horn Melton, “Otto Brunner and the Ideological Origins of
Begriffsgeschichte”
 Donald R. Kelley, “On the Margins of Begriffsgeschichte”

14
 Gabriel Motzkin, “On Koselleck’s Intuition of Time in History”
 J.G.A. Pocock, “Concepts and Discourses: A Difference in Culture? Comment
on a Paper by Melvin Richter”
 Reinhart Koselleck, “A Response to Comments on the Geschichtliche
Grundbegriffe”
 Intellectual News, no. 1, 1996
 Susanna Åkermann, A View from Afar
 Michael Fend, Intellectual Histories of Music
 Thomas Frangenberg, Art History and Intellectual History
 Marina Frasca-Spada, Notes on Intellectual History, History of Philosophy and
the History of Ideas
 Michael Hunter, Intellectual History: Biographical and Archival Sources
 Nicholas Jardine, Intellectual History and Philosophy of Science
 David Katz, Intellectual History and Religious History
 Donald R. Kelley, Prolegomena to the Study of Intellectual History
 John Christian Laursen, Intellectual History in Political Theory
 Christopher Ligota, Topics in the History of Scholarship
 Anthony Pagden, The Rise and Decline of Intellectual History
 Wilhelm Schmidt-Biggemann, Was ist "Intellectual History"?
 Ulrich Johannes Schneider, Intellectual History and the History of Philosophy
 Edoardo Tortarolo, Intellectual History and Historiography
 Vladimír Urbánek, Comenius Studies and Intellectual History in the Czech
Republik
 Theo Verbeek, Intellectual History and Dutch Cartesianism
 Françoise Waquet, Histoire des relations intellectuelles dans la République des
Lettres
 Charles Webster, Medicine and Intellectual History
 Iain Willison, Intellectual History and the History of the Book
 Donald R. Kelley, What is happening to the History of Ideas?
 Reinhart Koselleck, “The Temporalisation of Concepts”, Redescriptions. Finnish Yearbook of
Political Thought, 1997, pp. 16-24

15
 William W. Fisher, “Texts and Contexts: The Application to American Legal History of the
Methodologies of Intellectual History”, Stanford Law Review, vol. 49, no. 5, 1997, pp. 1065-
1110
 Robert W. T. Martin, “Context and Contradiction: Toward a Political Theory of Conceptual
Change”, Political Research Quarterly, vol. 50, no. 2, 1997, pp. 413-436
 Jay M. Smith, “No More Language Games: Words, Beliefs, and the Political Culture of Early
Modern France”, American Historical Review, vol. 102, no. 5, 1997, pp. 1413-1440
 Kari Palonen, ”Quentin Skinner’s Rhetoric of Conceptual Change”, History of the Human
Sciences, vol. 10, no. 2, 1997, pp. 61-80
 Kari Palonen, “An Application of Conceptual History to Itself”, Redescriptions, 1997, pp. 39-69
 Michael Freeden, “Editorial: Ideologies and conceptual history”, Journal of Political Ideologies,
vol. 2, no. 1, 1997, pp. 3-11
 Gad Prudovsky, “Can We Ascribe to Past Thinkers Copncepts They Had no Linguistic Means
to Express?”, History and Theory, vol. 36, no. 1, 1997, pp. 15-31
 Mark Bevir, “Mind and Method in the History of Ideas”, History and Theory, vol. 36, no. 2,
1997, pp. 167-189
 Roger Chartier, On the Edge of the Cliff. History, Language and Practices, Baltimore &
London: Johns Hopkins University Press 1997
 D.R. Woolf, “The Writing of Early Modern European Intellectual History, 1945-1995”, in
Michael Bentley (ed.), Companion to Historiography, London & New York: Routledge 1997
 J. Gunnell, “Time and Interpretation: Understanding Concepts and Conceptual Change”,
History of Political Thought, vol. 19, 1998, pp. 641-658
 Iain Hampsher-Monk, Karin Tilmans & Frank van Vree (eds.), History of Concepts –
Comparative Perspectives, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press 1998
 Iain Hampsher-Monk, Karin Tilmans & Frank van Vree , ”A Comparative
Perspective on Conceptual History – An Introduction”
 Pim den Boer, “The Historiography of German Geistesgeschichte and the Dutch
Project of Conceptual History”
 Reinhart Koselleck, “Social History and Begriffsgeschichte”
 Iain Hampsher-Monk, “Speech Acts, Languages or Conceptual History?”
 Hans Erich Bödeker, “Concept – Meaning – Discourse. Begriffsgeschichte
Reconsidered”

16
 Maurizio Viroli, “The Origin and the Meaning of the Reason of State”
 Terence Ball, “Conceptual History and the History of Political Thought”
 Bernhard F. Scholz, “Conceptual History in Context: Reconstructing the
Terminology of an Academic Discipline”
 Willem Frijhoff, “Conceptual History, Social History and Cultural History: The
test of ‘Cosmopolitism’”
 Hans-Jürgen Lüsebrink, “Conceptual History and Conceptual Transfer: The Case
of ‘Nation’ in Revolutionary France and Germany”
 Bram Kempers, “Words, Images and All the Pope’s Men. Raphael’s Stanza della
Segnatura and the Synthesis of Divine Wisdom”
 Eddy de Jongh, “Painted Words in Dutch Art of the Seventeenth Century”
 Rolf Reichardt, “Historical Semantics and Political Iconography: The case of the
Game of the French Revolution (1791/92)”
 Martin van Gelderen, “Between Cambridge and Heidelberg: Concepts,
Languages and Images in Intellectual History”
 Martin Jay, “European Intellectual History and the Specter of Multiculturalism”, in Jay,
Cultural Semantics. Keywords of Our Time, Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press 1998
 Terence Ball, “Political Argument and Conceptual Change”, in Ball, Transforming Political
Discourse. Political Theory and Critical Conceptual History, Oxford: Basil Blackwell 1998
 Jerry Z. Muller, “Begriffsgeschichte: Origins and Prospects”, History of European Ideas, vol.
25, 1999, pp. 3-7
 Hayden White, “Literary Theory and Historical Writing”, in White, Figural Realism. Studies in
the Mimesis Effect, Baltimore & London: Johns Hopkins University Press 1999
 Hayden White, “Historical Emplotment and the Problem of Truth in Historical Representation”,
in White, Figural Realism. Studies in the Mimesis Effect, Baltimore & London: Johns Hopkins
University Press 1999
 Hayden White, “Formalist and Contextualist Strategies in Historical Explanation”, in White,
Figural Realism. Studies in the Mimesis Effect, Baltimore & London: Johns Hopkins University
Press 1999
 Mark Bevir, The Logic of the History of Ideas, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1999
 James Schmidt, “How Historical is Begriffsgeschichte?”, History of European Ideas, vol. 25,
1999, pp. 9-14

17
 Janet Coleman, “The Practical Use of Begriffsgeschichte”, Redescriptions, vol. 3, 1999, pp. 28-
40
 Kari Palonen, “Rhetorical and Temporal Perspectives on Conceptual Change. Theses on
Quentin Skinner and Reinhart Koselleck”, Redescriptions, vol. 3, 1999, pp. 41-59
 Quentin Skinner, “Rhetoric and Conceptual Change”, Redescriptions, vol. 3, 1999, pp. 60-73
 David Armitage, “Answering the Call: The History of Political and Social Concepts in English”,
History of European Ideas, vol. 25, 1999, pp. 15-22
 Daniel Gordon, “Modernity and its Discontents: Some Critical Thoughts on Conceptual
History”, History of European Ideas, vol. 25, 1999, pp. 23-29
 Melvin Richter, “Reply to Comments”, History of European Ideas, vol. 25, 1999, pp. 31-37
 P.J. Kelly, “Contextual and Non-Contextual Histories of Political Thought”, in Jack Hayward,
Brian Barry & Archie Brown (eds.), The British Study of Politics in the Twentieth Century,
Oxford: Oxford University Press 1999
 Nils Andersson & Henrik Björck (eds.), Vad är idéhistoria? Perspektiv på ämnets identitet
under sextio år, Stockholm: Brutus Östlings Bokförlag 1999
 Siep Stuurman, ”The Canon of the History of Political Thought: Its Critique and a Proposed
Alternative”, History and Theory, vol. 39, 2000, pp. 147-166
 Janet Coleman, “Introduction” in Coleman, A History of Political Thought from Ancient Greece
to Early Christianity, Oxford: Blackwell 2000
 Christoff Dipper, ”Die ’Geschichtlichen Grundbegriffe’. Von der Begriffsgeschichte zur
Theorie der historischen Zeichen”, Historische Zeitschrift, no. 270, 2000, pp. 281-308
 Stefan Collini, “Introduction”, in Stefan Collini, Richard Whatmore & Brian Young (eds.),
History, Religion and Culture. British Intellectual History 1750-1950, Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press 2000
 Mark Bevir, “The Logic of the History of Ideas”, Rethinking History, vol. 4, no. 3, 2000, pp.
295-300
 Kari Palonen, “Logic or Rhetoric in the History of Political Thought? Comments on Mark
Bevir”, Rethinking History, vol. 4, no. 3, 2000, pp. 301-310
 Siep Stuurman, “On Intellectual Innovation and the Methodology of the History of Ideas”,
Rethinking History, vol. 4, no. 3, 2000, pp. 311-319
 F.R. Ankersmit, “Comments on Bevir’s The Logic of the History of Ideas”, Rethinking History,
vol. 4, no. 3, 2000, pp. 321-331

18
 Allan Megill, “Imagining the History of Ideas”, Rethinking History, vol. 4, no. 3, 2000, pp. 333-
340
 Mark Bevir, “Philosophy, Rhetoric, and Power: A Response to Critics”, Rethinking History, vol.
4, no. 3, 2000, pp. 341-350
 Mark Bevir and Frank Ankersmit, “Exchanging Ideas”, Rethinking History, vol. 4, no. 3, 2000,
pp. 351-372
 Mark Bevir, “Begriffsgeschichte”, History and Theory, vol. 39, no. 2, 2000, pp. 273-284
 Erland Mårald, “Idéhistoria ur ett världshistoriskt perspektiv”, i Mohammad Fazlhashemi,
Anders Öckerman & Ronny Ambjörnsson (eds.), Vidgade vyer. Globalt perspektiv på
idéhistoria, Lund: Studentlitteratur 2000
 Mark Bevir, “The Text as a Historical Object”, Redescriptions. Finnish Yearbook of Political
Thought, 2000, pp. 201-222
 Timothy Bahti, “Literary Criticism and the History of Ideas”, in Christa Knellwolf &
Christopher Norris (eds.), Literary Criticism, vol. 9, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
2001
 Slagmark – tidsskrift for idéhistorie, no. 33, 2001: Quentin Skinner og intellektuel historie
 Tore Eriksen & Peter C. Kjærgaard, ”Quentin Skinner – fra idéhistorie til
intellektuel historie”
 Quentin Skinner, ”Moralske principper og social forandring”
 Anthony Pagden, ”Intellektuel historie”
 Tore Frängsmyr, ”Idéhistorie eller idéernes funktion i historien”
 Thomas Krogh, ”Quentin Skinner og problemer i at skrive den politiske
tænknings historie”
 Hans-Jørgen Schanz, ”Intellektuel historie som genre og disciplin”
 Victoria Höög, ”Historiens tvetydighed: Quentin Skinner og problematiseringen
af traditionen”
 Duncan Forbes, “Aesthetic thoughts on doing the history of ideas”, History of European Ideas,
vol. 27, 2001, pp. 101-113
 Günther Lottes, “Begriffsgeschichte, Diskursgeschichte”, pp. 345-379 in U. Daniel (ed.),
Kompendium Kulturgeschichte. Theorien, Praxis, Schlüsselwörter, Frankfurt am Main: Verlag
Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht

19
 Peter J. Boettke, “F.A. Hayek as an intellectual historian of economics”, chap. 7 in Steven G.
Medema & Warren J. Samuels (eds.), Historians of Economics and Economic Thought, London
& New York: Routledge 2001
 Geoffrey Gilbert, “Donald Winch as intellectual historian”, chap. 18 in Steven G. Medema &
Warren J. Samuels (eds.), Historians of Economics and Economic Thought, London & New
York: Routledge 2001
 Duncan Bell, “The Cambridge School and world politics: critical theory, history and conceptual
change”, 2001, www.theglobalsite.ac.uk
 Eckhart Hellmuth & Christoph von Ehrenstein, “Intellectual History Made in Britain: Die
Cambridge School und ihre Kritiker”, Geschichte und Gesellschaft, vol. 27, 2001, pp. 149-172
 Daniel Wickberg, “Intellectual History vs. the Social History of Intellectuals”, Rethinking
History, vol. 5, no. 3, 2001, pp. 383-395
 Dominick LaCapra, Writing History, Writing Trauma, Baltimore & London: Johns Hopkins
University Press 2001
 David Runciman, “History of Political Thought: The State of the Discipline”, British Journal of
Politics and International Relations, vol. 3, no. 1, 2001, pp. 84-104
 Iain Hampsher-Monk, “The History of Political Thought and the Political History of Thought”,
in Dario Castiglione & Iain Hampsher-Monk, The History of Political Thought in National
Context, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2001
 Melvin Richter, “A German Version of the ‘Linguistic Turn’: Reinhart Koselleck and the
History of Political and Social Concepts (Begriffsgeschichte)”, in Dario Castiglione & Iain
Hampsher-Monk, The History of Political Thought in National Context, Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press 2001
 Quentin Skinner, “The Rise of, Challenge to and Prospects for a Collingwoodian Approach to
the History of Political Thought”, in Dario Castiglione & Iain Hampsher-Monk, The History of
Political Thought in National Context, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2001
 Donald R. Kelley, “Eclecticism and the History of Ideas”, Journal of the History of Ideas, vol.
62, no. 4, 2001, pp. 577-592
 F. Oz-Salzberger, “Intellectual History”, in Neil J. Smelser (ed.), International Encyclopedia of
the Social and Behavioral Sciences, Amsterdam & New York: Elsevier 2001, pp. 7605-7612
 Trond Berg Eriksen & Øystein Sørensen, ”Redaktørenes forord”, in Eriksen & Sørensen (eds.),
Norsk Idéhistorie, vol. 1, Oslo: Aschehoug 2001

20
 Trond Berg Eriksen & Øystein Sørensen, ”Tusen års tankeliv”, in Eriksen & Sørensen (eds.),
Norsk Idéhistorie, vol. 6, Oslo: Aschehoug 2001
 Jason David BeDuhn, “The historical assessment of speech acts: clarification of Austin and
Skinner for the study of religions”, Method and Theory in the Study of Religion, vol. 14, 2002,
pp. 84-113
 Donald R. Kelley, The Descent of Ideas. The History of Intellectual History, Aldershot: Ashgate
2002
 Joachim Eibach & Günther Lottes (eds.), Kompass der Geschichtswissenschaft, Göttingen:
Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht 2002
o Günther Lottes, “Neue Ideengeschichte”
o Luise Schorn-Schütte, “Neue Geistesgeschichte”
o Raingard Esser, “Historische Semantik”
o Iain Hampsher-Monk, “Neuere angloamerikanske Ideengeschichte
o Robert Jütte, ”Diskursanalyse in Frankreich”
 O. Asbach, “Von der Geschichte der politischen Ideen zur ‘History of Political Discourses’?
Skinner, Pocock und die ‘Cambridge School”, Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft, vol. 12, 2002,
no. 2, pp. 637-667
 History of European Ideas, vol. 28, no 1-2, 2002: Mark Bevir and the Logic of the History of
Ideas: A Symposium
o Robert Stern, “History, meaning and interpretation: a critical response to Bevir”, pp. 1-
12
o Hugh Rayment-Pickard, “Derrida and fidelity to history”, pp. 13-20
o James Martin, “The political logic of discourse: a neo-Gramscian view”, pp. 21-31
o Melissa Lane, “Why the History of Ideas at all?”, pp. 33-41
o Alun Munslow, “Objectivity and the writing of history”, pp. 43-50
o R.M. Burns, “Language, tradition, and self in the generation of meaning”, pp. 51-75
o Jane Garnett, “Whose logic? Reflections on gender in the history of ideas”, pp. 77-82
o Mark Bevir, “Clarifications”, pp. 83-100
o Brian Yong, “The tyranny of the definite article: Some thoughts on the art of intellectual
history”, 101-117
 Reinhart Koselleck, The Practice of Conceptual History. Timing History, Spacing Concepts,
Stanford: Stanford University Press 2002

21
 Peter Burke, “Context in Context”, Common Knowledge, vol. 8, no. 1, 2002, pp. 152-177
 Kari Palonen, “The History of Concepts as a Style of Political Theorizing. Quentin Skinner's
and Reinhart Koselleck's Subversion of Normative Political Theory”, European Journal of
Political Theory, vol. 1, no. 1, 2002, pp. 91-106
 Sandro Chignola, “History of political thought and the history of political concepts: Koselleck's
proposal and Italian research”, History of Political Thought, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 517-541
 Petri Koikkalainen & Sami Syrjämäki, “Interview: Quentin Skinner on Encountering the Past”,
Redescriptions. Finnish Yearbook of Political Thought, no. 6, 2002, pp. 34-63
 Donald R. Kelley, “Intellectual History and Cultural History: The Inside and the Outside”,
History of the Human Sciences, vol. 15, no. 2, 2002, pp. 1-19
 Quentin Skinner, Visions of Politics, vol. 1: Regarding Method, Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press 2002
 Hans Erich Bödeker (ed.), Begriffgeschichte, Diskursgeschichte, Metapherngeschichte,
Göttingen: Wallstein 2002
 Hans Erich Bödeker, “Ausprägungen der historischen Semantik in den
historiscen Kulturwissenschaften”
 Reinhart Koselleck, “Hinweise auf die temporalen Strukturen
begriffsgeschichtlichen Wandels”
 Ulrich Ricken, “Zum Verhältnis vergleichender Begriffsgeschichte und
vergleichender Lexikologie”
 Hans Erich Bödeker, ”Reflexionen über Begriffsgeschichte als Methode”
 Jacques Guilhaumou, “L’historie linguistique des usages conceptuels à l’épreuve
des événements linguistiques”
 Mark Bevir, “The Role of Contexts in Understanding and Explanation”
 Rüdiger Zill, “Substrukturen des Denkens. Grenzen und Perspektiven einer
Metapherngeschichte nach Hans Blumenberg”
 Lutz Danneberg: ”Sinn und Unsinn einer Metapherngeschichte”
 Richard Macksey, “The History of Ideas at 80”, Modern Language Notes, vol. 117, no. 5, 2002,
pp. 1083-1097
 Sandro Chignola, “History of Political Thought and the History of Political Concepts.
Koselleck’s Proposal and Italian Research”, History of Political Thought, vol. 23, no. 3, 2002,
pp. 517-541

22
 Annabel Brett, “What is Intellectual History Now?”, in David Cannadine (ed.), What is History
Now?, Houndsmill: Palgrave Macmillan 2002
 Duncan S.A. Bell, “Language, Legitimacy, and the Project of Critique”, Alternatives, vol. 27,
2002, pp. 327-350
 Jan Ifversen, “Text, Discourse, Concept: Approaches to Textual Analysis”, Kontur, no. 7, 2003,
pp. 60-69
 Lutz Raphael, “Mentalitäten, Begriffe und politische Sprachen: Wege der Kultur- und
ideengeschichtlichen Forschung”, chap. 9 in Raphael, Geschichtswissenschaft im Zeitalter der
Extreme. Theorien, Methoden, Tendenzen von 1900 bis zur Gegenwart, München: C.H. Beck
2003
 Jussi Kurunmäki & Kari Palonen (eds.), Zeit, Geschichte und Politik. Time, History and
Politics. Zum achtzigsten Geburtstag von Reinhart Koselleck, Jyväskylä: University of
Jyväskylä Press 2003
o Wolf-Dieter Narr und Kari Palonen, ”Zeit, Zeitlichkeit und Geschichte – sperrige
Reflexionen. Reinhart Koselleck im Gespräch”
o Patricia Springborg, ”What can we say about history? Modernity and historical
consciousness”
o Björn Wittrock, “Cultural crystallisation and conceptual change. Modernity, axiality and
meaning in history”
 Melvin Richter, ”Toward a Lexicon of European Political and Legal Concepts: A Comparison
of Begriffsgeschichte and the ‘Cambridge School’”, Critical Review of International Social and
Political Philosophy, vol. 6, no. 2, 2003, pp. 91-120
 Herfried Münkler, “Politische Ideengeschichte”, in Münkler (ed.), Politikwissenschaft. Ein
Grundkurs, Hamburg: Rohwolt 2003
 Kari Palonen, Quentin Skinner – History, Politics, Rhetoric, Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press 2003
 David Boucher & Paul Kelly, “Introduction”, in Boucher & Kelly (eds.), Political Thinkers
from Socrates to the Present, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2003
 Jan Ifversen, “Om den tyske begrebshistorie”, Politologiske Studier, no. 1, 2003, pp. 18-34
 Per Mouritsen, ”Hvorfor idéhistorie – og hvordan?”, Politologiske Studier, no. 1, 2003, pp. 8-17
 Trond Berg Eriksen, Hva er Idéhistorie, Oslo: Universitetsforlaget 2003

23
 Sven Arntzen & Otto M. Christensen (eds.), Hvor kommer idéhistorien fra? Tematiske og
teoretiske brytninger i idéhistoriefaget, Kristiansand: HøyskoleForlaget 2003
 Sven Arntzen & Otto M. Christensen:,“Hvor kommer idéhistorien fra”
 Dorthe Jørgensen, ”Hvad er idéhistorie?”
 Trond Berg Eriksen, ”Hvad kan idéhistorikere si om Norge?”
 Nils Gilje, ”Idéhistorie og folkekultur i den tidlig moderne perioden”
 Knut Ove Eliassen, ”En lav opplysning?”
 Sverre Bagge, ”Fra jordlapp og pengestykke til mentalitet og diskurs. Historiens
forhold til idéhistorien”
 Victoria Höög, ”Idéhistoria och den klassiska bildungstraditionen. Refleksioner
över humanioras framtid i det senmoderna samhället”
 Sven Arntzen, ”Arthur O. Lovejoy og idéhistorien”
 Arthur O. Lovejoy, ”Studiet av idéhistorien”
 Alan Finlayson, “Political Science, Political Ideas and Rhetoric”, Economy and Society, vol. 33,
no. 4, 2004, pp. 528-549
 “Editorial”, Modern Intellectual History, vol. 1, no. 1, 2004, pp. 1-2
 Marcus Llanque, ”Alte und neue Wege der politischen Ideengeschichte”, Neue politische
Literatur, vol. 49, 2004, pp. 34-51
 Kjetil Jakobsen, “Intellektuel historie og de intellektuelles historie”, ARR, no. 4, 2004, pp. 15-25
 Thomas Krogh, ”Idéhistorien og andre historier”, ARR, no. 4, 2004, pp. 27-33
 H.O. Christophersen, ”Noen bemerkninger om idéhistoriens innhold og metode”, ARR, no. 4,
2004, pp. 39-45
 Ingrid Markussen, ”På sporet af ideer”, ARR, no. 4, 2004, pp. 83-91
 Lloyd Kramer, “Intellectual History and Philosophy”, Modern Intellectual History, vol. 1, no. 1,
2004, pp. 81-95
 Carolyn Dean, “Intellectual History and the Prominence of Things that Matter”, Rethinking
History, vol. 8, no. 4, 2004, pp. 537-547
 Elizabeth A. Clark, “The New Intellectual History” + “Texts and Contexts, chaps. 6-7 in Clark,
History, Theory, Text. Historians and the Linguistic Turn, Cambridge, Mass. & London:
Harvard University Press 2004
 Reinhart Koselleck, Futures Past, New York: Columbia University Press 2004

24
 Sverker Sörlin, “Världens ordning”, in Sörlin, Världens ordning. Europas idéhistoria 1492-
1918, Stockholm: Natur och Kultur 2004
 Vidar Enebakk, ”Den norske idéhistoriens idéhistorie”, Nytt Norsk Tidsskrift, no. 3, 2005, pp.
271-286
 Donald R. Kelley, “Intellectual History in a Global Age”, Journal of the History of Ideas, 2005,
pp. 155-167
 Allan Megill, ”Globalization and the History of Ideas”, Journal of the History of Ideas, 2005,
pp. 179-187
 Joseph M. Levine, “Intellectual History as History”, Journal of the History of Ideas, 2005, pp.
189-200
 Allan Megill, “Intellectual History and History”, Rethinking History, vol. 8, no. 4, 2004, pp.
549-557
 Rafael Major, ”The Cambridge School and Leo Strauss: Texts and Context of American
Political Science”, Political Research Quarterly, vol. 58, no. 3, 2005, pp. 477-485
 Niklas Olsen, “Historien om de historiske grundbegreber”, www.historie-nu.dk, August 2005
 Jeppe Nevers, Kildekritikkens begrebshistorie. En undersøgelse af historiefagets metodelære,
Odense: Syddansk Universitetsforlag 2005
 Renée Jeffery, “Tradition as Invention: the ‘traditions tradition’ and the history of ideas in
international relations”, Millennium, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 57-84
 Kari Palonen, ”The Politics of Conceptual History”, Contributions, vol. 1, no. 1, 2005, pp. 37-
50
 Andreas Schinkel, “Imagination as a Category of History: An Essay concerning Koselleck’s
Concepts of Erfahrungsraum and Erwartungshorizont”, History and Theory, vol. 44, 2005, pp.
42-54
 Richard Macksey, “History of Ideas”, in Michael Groden, Martin Kreiswirth & Imre Szeman
(eds.), The Johns Hopkins Guide to Literary Theory and Criticism, 2. ed., Baltimore & London:
Johns Hopkins University Press 2005
 Melvin Richter, “More than a Two-Way Traffic: Analyzing, Translating, and Comparing
Political Concepts from Other Cultures”, Contributions, vol. 1, no. 1, 2005, pp. 7-20
 Robert Darnton, “Discourse and Diffusion”, Contributions, vol. 1, no. 1, 2005, pp. 21-28
 Quentin Skinner, “On Intellectual History and the History of Books”, Contributions, vol. 1, no.
1, 2005, pp. 29-36

25
 Martin J. Burke, “Conceptual History in the United States: A Missing “National Project””,
Contributions, vol. 1, no. 2, 2005, pp. 127-144
 Sandro Chignola, “Redescribing Political Concepts: History of Concepts and Politics”,
Contributions, vol. 1, no. 2, 2005, pp. 245-251
 Maryanne Cline Horowitz, “Preface”, in Horowitz (ed.), New Dictionary of the History of Ideas,
New York: Charles Schribner’s Sons 2005
 Donald R. Kelley, “Ideas, History of”, in Horowitz (ed.), New Dictionary of the History of
Ideas, vol. 3, New York: Charles Schribner’s Sons 2005
 Reinhart Koselleck, Begriffsgeschichten. Studien zur Semantik und Pragmatik der politischen
und sozialen Sprache, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp 2006
 Pasi Ihalainen, ”Between historical semantics and pragmatics: Reconstructing past political
thought through conceptual history”, Journal of Historical Pragmatics, vol. 7, no. 1, 2006, pp.
115-143
 Harald Bluhm & Jürtgen Gebhardt, eds., Politische Ideengeschichte im 20. Jahrhundert, Baden-
Baden: Nomos 2006
o Harald Bluhm, ”Politische Ideengeschichte im 20. Jahrhundert. Einleitung”
o Reinhard Mehring, “Begriffssoziologie, Begriffsgeschichte, Begriffspolitik. Zur Form
der Ideengeschichtsschreibung nach Carl Schmitt und Reinhart Koselleck”
o Marcus Llanque, “Geschichte politischen Denkens oder Ideenpolitik: Ideengeschichte
als normative Traditionsstiftung”
o Rainer Schmidt, ”Ideengeschichte und Institutionentheorie. Begriffe, Diskurse und
institutionelle Mechanismen als Bausteine für ein Modell der
Ideengeschichtsschreibung”
o Matthias Bohlender, ”Michel Foucault – Für eine Geschichte und Kritik der politischen
Vernunft”
o Thilo Raufer, ”Ideengeschichte als Wirklichkeitswissenschaft”
o Clemens Kauffmann, “Anti-Traditionalismus: Die ‘ideengeschichtliche Programmatik’
von Leo Strauss”
o Grit Strassenberger, “Neoaristelismus und narravitische Wendungen politischer Theorie.
Hannah Arendt, Michael Walzer und Martha Craven Nussbaum”
o Alfons Söllner, “Die Emigration im Kontext – Eine Skizze zur politischen
Ideengeschichte des 20. Jahrhunderts”

26
o Harald Bluhm, “Totalitarismus und antibürgerlicher Affekt. Furets Geschichte der
kommunistischen Idee im 20. Jahrhunderts”
o Martin Nonhoff, ”Politische Ideengeschichte und politische Hegemonie – Anmerkungen
zum ’Battle of the Books’ an den amerikanischen Colleges”
o Jürgen Gebhardt, “Politische Ideengeschichte im Zeichen des Methodenstreits – Eine
kritiske Bestandaufnahme”
 J.G.A. Pocock, “Theory in History: Problems of Context and Narrative”, in John S. Dryzek,
Bonnie Honig & Anne Phillips (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Political Theory, Oxford: Oxford
University Press 2006
 James Farr, “The History of Political Thought as Disciplinary Genre”, in John S. Dryzek,
Bonnie Honig & Anne Phillips (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Political Theory, Oxford: Oxford
University Press 2006
 Annabel Brett & James Tully (eds.), Rethinking the Foundations of Modern Political Thought,
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2006
 Mark Goldie, “The Context of The Foundations”
 Holly Hamilton-Bleakley, “Linguistic Philosophy and The Foundations”
 J.G.A. Pocock, “Foundations and Moments”
 Marco Geuna, “Skinner, Pre-Humanist Rhetorical Culture and Machiavelli”
 Warren Boutcher, “Unoriginal Authors: How to Do Things with Texts in the
Renaissance”
 Cathy Curtis, “’The Best State of the Commonwealth’: Thomas More and
Quentin Skinner”
 H.M. Höpfl, “Scholasticism in Quentin Skinner’s Foundations”
 Annabel Brett, “Scholastic Political Thought and the Modern Concept of the
State”
 Martin van Gelderen, “’So merely humane’: Theories of Resistance in Early-
Modern Europe”
 Richard Tuck, “Hobbes and Democracy”
 Kinch Hoekstra, “A Lion in the House: Hobbes and Democracy”
 David Armitage, “Hobbes and the Foundations of Modern International
Thought”
 Quentin Skinner, “Surveying The Foundations: A Retrospect and Reassessment”

27
 Jonathan Israel, ”Historians and the Writing of ‘Intellectual History’”, in Israel, Enlightenment
Contested. Philosophy, Modernity, and the Emancipation of Man 1670-1752, Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press 2006
 Richard Whatmore & Brian Yong (eds.), Palgrave Advances in Intellectual History,
Houndsmills: Palgrave Macmillan 2006
 John W. Burrow, “Intellectual History in English Academic Life”
 Brian Young, “Intellectual History in Britain”
 Abigail Williams, “Literary and Intellectual History”
 Lucy Hartley, “Intellectual History and the History of Art”
 Mishtooni Bose, “The Intellectual History of the Middle Ages”
 Richard Whatmore, “Intellectual History and the History of Political Thought”
 James Livesey, “Intellectual History and the History of Science”
 Deborah Madden, “Medicine, Science and Intellectual History”
 Brian Cowan, “Intellectual, Social and Cultural History: Ideas in Context”
 Rachel Foxley, “Gender and Intellectual History”
 Duncan Kelly, “The Politics of Intellectual History in Twentieth-Century
Europe”
 Terence Ball, “Must Political Theory Be Historical?”, Contributions, vol. 2, no. 1, 2006, pp. 7-
18
 Bo Stråth, “Ideology and History”, Journal of Political Ideologies, vol. 11, no. 1, 2006, pp. 23-
42
 Rudolf Valkhoff, ”Some Similarities between Begriffsgeschichte and the History of Discourse”,
Contributions, vol. 2, no. 1, 2006, pp. 83-98
 Javier Fernández Sebastián & Juan Francisco Fuentes, “Conceptual History, Memory and
Identity: An Interview with Reinhart Koselleck”, Contributions, vol. 2, no. 1, 2006, pp. 99-127
 Robert Burns (red.), Historiography. Critical Concepts in Historical Studies, vol. 3: Ideas,
London & New York: Routledge 2006
 Stefano Collini et. al., “What is Intellectual History?”
 Maurice Mandelbaum, “The History of Ideas, Intellectual History, and the
History of Philosophy”
 Ben Rogers, “Review Article: Philosophy for Historians: The Methodological
Writings of Quentin Skinner”

28
 Melvin Richter, “Begriffsgeschichte and the History of Ideas”
 David Harlan, “Intellectual History and the Return of Literature”
 Joyce Appleby, “One Good Turn Deserves Another: Moving Beyond the
Linguistic: A Response to David Harlan”
 Fritz Ringer, “The Intellectual Field, Intellectual History, and the Sociology of
Knowledge”
 Robert M. Burns, “Language, Tradition, and the Self in the Generation of
Meaning”
 Donald R. Kelley, Frontiers of History. Historical Inquiry in the Twentieth Century, New
Haven & London: Yale University Press 2006
 Emma Rotschild, “Arc of Ideas. International History and Intellectual History”, in Gunilla
Budde, Sebastian Conrad & Oliver Janz (eds.), Transnationale Geschichte. Themen, Tendenzen
und Theorien, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht 2006
 J.G.A. Pocock, Gordon Schochet & Lois G. Schwoerer, “The History of British Political
Thought: A Field and its Futures”, in David Armitage (ed.), British Political Thought in
History, Literature and Theory, 1500-1800, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2006
 Richard E. Flathman, “Here and Now, There and Then, Always and Everywhere: Reflections
Concerning Political Theory and the Study/Writing of Political Thought”, in David Armitage
(ed.), British Political Thought in History, Literature and Theory, 1500-1800, Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press 2006
 Slagmark – tidsskrift for idéhistorie, no. 47, 2006: Hans Blumenberg
 Hans Blumenberg: ”En antropologisk tilnærmelse til retorikkens aktualitet”
 Odo Marquard, ”Aflastning fra det absolutte – In memorian”
 Manfred Sommer, ”Beskrivelse af mennesket – Interview med Manfred
Sommer”
 Kasper Lysemose, ”Balancen mellem Husserl og Heidegger – den tidlige
Blumenbergs iagttagelser af fænomenologien”
 Ulrik Houlind Rasmussen, ”Metaforiseret kosmologi – eller hvordan Kopernikus
stillede et metaforisk potentiale til rådighed for det moderne menneskes
selvforståelse”
 Frank Beck Lassen, ”Hvad var det vi ville vide? – Hans Blumenbergs
metaforologi som læsestrategi”

29
 Anthony Grafton, “The History of Ideas: Precepts and Practice, 1950-200 and Beyond”, Journal
of the History of Ideas, 2006, pp. 1-32
 John Patrick Diggins, “Arthur O. Lovejoy and the Challenge of Intellectual History”, Journal of
the History of Ideas, 2006, pp. 181-208
 Robert Darnton, “’What is the History of Books’ Revisited”, Modern Intellectual History, vol.
4, no. 3, 2007, pp. 495-508
 Jason Edwards, “The Ideological Interpellation of Individuals as Combatants: An Encounter
Between Reinhart Koselleck and Michel Foucault”, Journal of Political Ideologies, vol. 12, no.
1, 2007, pp. 49-66
 Girt Strassenberger & Herfried Münkler, “Was das Fach zusammenhält. Die Bedeutung der
Politischen Theorie und Ideengeschichte für die Politikwissenschaft”, pp. 45-79 in Hubertus
Buchstein & Gerhard Göhler (eds.), Politische Theorie und Politikwissenschaft, Wiesbaden: VS
Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften 2007
 Gerhard Göhler, “Theorie als Erfahrung. Über den Stellenwert von politischer Philosophie und
Ideengeschichte für die Politikwissenschaft”, pp. 80-104 in Hubertus Buchstein & Gerhard
Göhler (eds.), Politische Theorie und Politikwissenschaft, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für
Sozialwissenschaften 2007
 Peter Thiergen, “Probleme russischer Begriffsgeschichte”, Studia Slavica, vol. 52, no. 1-2,
2007, pp. 403-412
 Emmanuelle Tricoire & Jacques Lévy, “Interview with Quentin Skinner: Concepts only have
histories”, 2007, www.espacestemps.net/document3692.html
 Allan Megill, Historical Knowledge, Historical Error: A Contemporary Guide to Practice,
Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007
 Roger Chartier, “The Order of Books Revisited”, Modern Intellectual History, vol. 4, no. 3,
2007, pp. 509-519
 David D. Hall, “What was the History of Book? A Response”, Modern Intellectual History, vol.
4, no. 3, 2007, pp. 537-544
 Jotham Parsons, “Defining the History of Ideas”, Journal of the History of Ideas, vol. 68, no. 4,
2007, pp. 683-699
 Branko Mitrovic, “Intellectual History, Inconceivability, and Methodological Holism”, History
and Theory, vol. 46, 2007, pp. 29-47
 Terence Ball, “Professor Skinner’s Visions”, Political Studies Review, vol. 5, 2007, pp. 351-364

30
 Victoria Fareld, “Contexts in Flux: Textual Concerns for the Historian of Ideas”, Ideas in
History, vol. 2, no. 3, 2007
 Slagmark – tidsskrift for idéhistorie, no. 48, 2007: Begrebshistorie
 Reinhart Koselleck, ”Dannelsens antropologiske og semantiske struktur”
 Hans Ulrich Gumbrecht, ”Åndens pyramider – om den begrebshistoriske
bevægelses hastige fremkomst, dens usynlige dimensioner og pludselige aftagen”
 Jan Ifversen, ”Begrebshistorien efter Reinhart Koselleck”
 Niklas Olsen, ”En partisan i kamp for historier i flertal – Reinhart Kosellecks
alternativ til historiefilosofien”
 Jeppe Nevers, ”Spørgsmålets politik – Kari Palonen og den nyere
begrebshistorie”
 Frank Beck Lassen, ”Tyveri! – til sekulariseringens semantik”
 Stine Grumsen & Hans Henrik Hjermitslev, ”Institut for Idéhistorie 1967-2004. Et studie af
institutionens oprettelse, udvikling og afvikling”, Slagmark – tidsskrift for idéhistorie, no. 50,
2007, pp. 96-124
 Jens Busck, Jeppe Nevers & Niklas Olsen (eds.), Reinhart Koselleck: Begreber, tid og erfaring,
København: Hans Reitzel 2007
 Javier Fernández Sebastián, ”Intellectual History, Liberty and Republicanism: An Interview
with Quentin Skinner”, Contributions to the History of Concepts, vol. 3, 2007, pp. 103-123
 Emile Perreau-Saussine, “Quentin Skinner in Context”, Review of Politics, vol. 69, 2007, pp.
106-122
 John E. Toews, “Integrating Music Into Intellectual History: Nineteenth-Century Art Music as a
Discourse of Agency and Identity”, Modern Intellectual History, vol. 5, no. 2, 2008, pp. 309-
331
 Marcus Llanque, “Einleitung: Ideengeschichte als Gewebe politischer Diskurse”, pp. 1-11 in
Llanque, Politische Ideengeschichte, München & Wien: Oldenbourg Verlag 2008
 Stefan Collini: “Intellectual History”, 2008,
www.history.ac.uk/makinghistory/resources/articles/intellectual_history.html
 Andrew Sartori, Bengal in Global Concept History, Chicago & London: University of Chicago
Press, chap. 1
 Mark Bevir, “What is Genealogy?”, vol. 2, 2008, pp. 263-275

31
 Ryan Walter, “Reconciling Foucault and Skinner on the State: The Primacy of Politics?”,
History of the Human Sciences, vol. 21, no. 3, 2008, pp. 94-114
 John Pocock, “Historiography and Political Thought”, Ideas in History, vol. 3, no. 3, 2008, pp.
81-100
 Kari Palonen, “John Pocock and Quentin Skinner. The Machiavellian and the Weberian
Moment”, Ideas in History, vol. 3, no. 3, 2008, pp. 61-79
 Thomas Krogh, “Time in History and in Politics – a Prominent Theme in the Works of John
Pocock”, Ideas in History, vol. 3, no. 3, 2008, pp. 33-59
 Danny Millum: “Making History Interview with Quentin Skinner”, April 2008,
http://www.history.ac.uk/makinghistory/resources/interviews/Skinner_Quentin.html
 Laszlo Kontler, “Translation and Comparison II: A Methodological Inquiry into Reception in
the History of Ideas”, Contributions, vol. 4, no. 1, 2008, pp. 27-56
 João Feres, “Taking Text Seriously: Remarks on the Methodology of the History of Political
Thought”, Contributions, vol. 4, no. 1, 2008, pp. 57-80
 Luca Scuccimarra, “Semantics of Time and Historical Experience: Remarks on Koselleck’s
Historik”, Contributions, vol. 4, no. 2, 2008, pp. 160-175
 Vicente Oieni & João Feres, “Conceptual History and Translation: An Interview with Melvin
Richter”, Contributions, vol. 4, no. 2, 2008, pp. 226-238
 Jouni-Matti Kuukkanen, “Making Sense of Conceptual Change”, History and Theory, vol. 47,
2008, pp. 351-372
 Niklas Luhmann, “Ideengeschichte in soziologischer Perspektive”, in Luhmann, Ideenevolution,
Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp 2008 [1981]
 Günther Nonnenmacher, “Ideengeschichte zwischen Un-Sinn und Unmöglichkeit”, Politische
Vierteljahresschrift, vol. 22, 1981, pp. 423-431
 Alister Chapman, John Coffey & Brad S. Gregory, eds., Seeing Things Their Way. Intellectual
History and the Return of Religion, Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press 2009
 Ian Ward, “Helping the Dead Speak: Leo Strauss, Quentin Skinner and the Arts of Interpretation
in Political Thought”, Polity, vol. 41, no. 2, 2009, pp. 235-255
 Pasi Ihalainen & Kari Palonen, “Parliamentary Sources in the Comparative Study of Conceptual
History: Methodological Aspects and Illustrations of a Research Proposal”, Parliaments,
Estates & Representation, vol. 29, 2009, pp. 17-34

32
 Dominick LaCapra, “Articulating Intellectual History, Cultural History, and Critical Theory”, in
LaCapra, History and its Limits. Human, Animal, Violence, Ithaca & London: Cornell
University Press 2009
 Dominick LaCapra, “Tropisms of Intellectual History”, in LaCapra, History and its Limits.
Human, Animal, Violence, Ithaca & London: Cornell University Press 2009
 Colin Tyler, “Performativity and the Intellectual Historian’s Re-Enactment of Written Words”,
Journal of the Philosophy of History, vol. 3, 2009, pp. 167-186
 Jan-Werner Müller, “The triumph of what (if anything)? Rethinking political ideologies and
political institutions in twentieth-century Europe”, Journal of Political Ideologies, vol. 14, no.
2, 2009, pp. 211-226
 Donald Winch, “Intellectual History and the History of Economic Thought: A Personal View”,
History of Economics Review, 2009, pp. 1-16
 Chris Goto-Jones, “The Kyoto School, the Cambridge School, and the History of Political
Philosophy in Wartime Japan”, Positions, vol. 17, no. 1, 2009, pp. 13-42
 Toby Reiner, “Texts as Performances: How to Reconstruct Webs of Beliefs from Expressed
Utterances”, Journal of the Philosophy of History, vol. 3, 2009, pp. 266-289
 J.G.A. Pocock, Political Thought and History. Essays on Theory and Method, Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press 2009
 A.P. Martinich, “Four Senses of ‘Meaning’ in the History of Ideas: Quentin Skinner’s Theory of
Historical Interpretation”, Journal of the Philosophy of History, vol. 3, 2009, pp. 225-245
 Robert Lamb, “Recent Developments in the Thought of Quentin Skinner and the Ambitions of
Contextualism”, Journal of the Philosophy of History, vol. 3, 2009, pp. 246-265
 Mark Bevir, “Contextualism: From Modernist Method to Post-Analytic Historicism”, Journal of
the Philosophy of History, vol. 3, 2009, pp. 211-224
 Alexander Gallus, “’Intellectual History’ mit Intellektuellen und ohne sie. Facetten neuerer
geistesgeschichtliche Forschung”, Historische Zeitschrift, vol. 288, no. 1, 2009, pp. 139-150
 Richard Fisher, “How to Do Things with Books: Quentin Skinner and the Dissemination of
Ideas”, History of European Ideas, vol. 35, 2009, pp. 276-280
 Mikkel Thorup & Frank Beck Lassen (eds.), Quentin Skinner: Politik og Historie, København:
Hans Reitzel 2009

33
 Markku Hyrkkänen, “All History Is, More or Less, Intellectual History: R.G. Collingwood’s
Contribution to the Theory and Methodology of Intellectual History”, Intellectual History
Review, vol. 19, no. 2, 2009, pp. 251-263
 Sonja Asal, Frank Druffner & Valentin Groebner, ”Wie frei sind wir wirklich? Fragen an
Quentin Skinner”, Zeitschrift für Ideengeschichte, no. 2, 2009, pp. 5-21
 William Walker, “J.G.A. Pocock and the History of British Political Thought: Assessing the
State of the Art”, Eighteenth-Century Life, vol. 33, no. 1, 2009, pp. 83-96
 Robert Lamb, “Quentin Skinner’s Revised Historical Contextualism: A Critique”, History of the
Human Sciences, vol. 22, no. 3, 2009, pp. 51-73
 Hubert Locher, “Denken in Bildern. Reinhart Kosellecks Program Zur politischen Ikonologie”,
Zeitschrift für Ideengeschichte, no. 4, 2009, pp. 81-96
 Elías José Palti, “From Ideas to Concepts to Metaphors: The German Tradition of Intellectual
History and the Complex Fabric of Language”, History and Theory, vol. 49, 2010, pp. 194-211
 Stefan-Ludwig Hoffmann, “Koselleck, Arendt, and the Anthropology of Historical Experience”,
History and Theory, vol. 49, 2010, pp. 212-236
 Daniel Schulz & Alexander Weiss, “Introduction: Approaches in the History of Political
Thought”, European Political Science, vol. 9, 2010, pp. 283-290
 Ulrike Höppner, “Thinking in Turbulent Times: On the Relevance of Sixteenth-Century
Political Thought”, European Political Science, vol. 9, 2010, pp. 291-302
 Efraim Podoksik, “How is Modern Intellectual History Possible? ”, European Political Science,
vol. 9, 2010, pp. 304-315
 Uffe Jakobsen, “Inventions and Developments of Democracy: the Approach of Conceptual
History”, European Political Science, vol. 9, 2010, pp. 316-327
 Sudipta Kaviraj, ”Said and the History of Ideas”, in Sugata Bose & Kris Manjapra (eds.),
Cosmopolitan Thought Zones, Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan 2010
 Mikkel Thorup & Frank Beck Lassen, “Tekstfortolkeren. Interview med Quentin Skinner”,
Slagmark – tidsskrift for idéhistorie, no. 57, 2010, pp. 171-189
 Timo Pankaloski, ”Conflict, Context, Concreteness: Koselleck and Schmitt on Concepts”,
Political Theory, vol. 38, no. 6, 2010, pp. 749-779
 David A. Hollinger, “American Intellectual History, 1907-2007”, in James M. Banner (ed.), A
Century of American Historiography, Boston & New York: Bedford/St. Martin’s 2010

34
 J.G.A. Pocock, “Historiography as a Form of Political Thought”, History of European Ideas,
vol. 37, 2010, pp. 1-6
 Barbara Stollberg-Rilinger, ed., Ideengeschichte, Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag 2010
o Barbara Stollberg-Rilinger: ”Einleitung”
o Arthur O. Lovejoy, ”Die Beschäftigung mit der Ideengeschichte
o Quentin Skinner, ”Bedeutung und Verstehen in der Ideengeschichte”
o John G.A. Pocock, ”The Concept of a Language and the métier d’historien: some
considerations on practice”
o Reinhart Koselleck, “Begriffsgeschichte und Sozialgeschichte”
o Thomas S. Kuhn, “Die Struktur wissenschaftlicher Revolutionen”
o Georges Duby, “Mentalitätengeschichte”
o Michel Foucault, “Die Ordnung des Diskurses”
o Niklas Luhmann, “Gesellschaftliche Struktur und semantiche Tradition”
 Riccardo Bavaj, “Intellectual History”, 2010, http://docupedia.de/zg/Intellectual_History
 George Klosko, ed., The Oxford Handbook of the History of Political Philosophy, Oxford:
Oxford University Press 2011
o Mark Bevir, “The Contextual Approach”
o Catherine Zuckert, “The Straussian Approach”
o Joshua Foa Dienstag, “Postmodern Approaches to the History of Political Thought”
o Terence Ball, “The Value of the History of Political Philosophy”
o John Gunnell, “History of Political Philosophy as a Discipline”
 Pierre Force, “The Teeth of Time: Pierre Hadot on Meaning and Misunderstanding in the
History of Ideas”, History and Theory, vol. 50, 2011, pp. 20-40
 Javier Fernández Sebatián (ed.), Political Concepts and Time. New Approaches to Conceptual
History, Santander: Cantabria University Press & McGraw-Hill Interamericana de España
o Javier Fernández Sebastián, “Introduction: the relevance of conceptual history”
o Hans Erich Bödeker, “Begriffsgeschichte as the history of theory: the history of theory
as begriffsgeschichte: an essay”
o Elías José Palti, “From ideas to concepts to metaphors: the german tradition of
intellectual history and the complex fabric of language”
o Michael Freeden, “Ideology and conceptual history: the interrelationship between
method and meaning”

35
o Peter Burke, “The cultural history of intellectual practices: an overview”
o Alexandre Escudier, “’Temporalization’ and political modernity: a tentative
systematization of the work of Reinhart Koselleck”
o Kari Palonen, “Contingency, political theory and conceptual history”
o Pim den Boer, “National cultures, transnational concepts: begriffsgeschichte beyond
conceptual nationalism”
o Joâo Feres Júnio, “With an eye on future research: the theoretical layers of conceptual
history”
o Jörn Leonard, “Language, experience and translation: towards a comparative dimension”
o Christian Meier, “Reinhart Koselleck. A commemorative speech”
o European Conceptual History Project. Mission Statement
 Roger Chartier, “History, Time, and Space”, Republics of Letters, vol. 2, no. 2, 2011, pp.1-13
 Jan-Werner Müller, “European Intellectual History as Contemporary History”, Journal of
Contemporary History, vol. 46, no. 3, 2011, pp. 574-590
 Petri Koikkalainen, “Contextualist dilemmas”, History of European Ideas, vol. 37, 2011, pp.
315-324
 Martin Saar, “Relocating the Modern State: Governmentality and the History of Ideas”, in
Ulrich Bröckling, Susanne Krasmann & Thomas Lemke (eds.), Governmentality. Current Issues
and Future Challenges, London & New York: Routledge 2011
 Naja Vucina, Claus Drejer & Peter Triantafillou, “Histories and freedom of the present:
Foucault and Skinner”, History of the Human Sciences, vol. 25, no. 5, 2011, pp. 124-141
 Martin Jay, “Historical Explanation and the Event: Reflections on the Limits of
Contextualization”, New Literary History, vol. 42, 2011, pp. 557-571
 Allan Megill, “Five Questions on Intellectual History”, Rethinking History, vol. 15, no. 14,
2011, pp. 489-510
 Reinhart Koselleck, “Introduction and Prefaces to the Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe”,
Contributions, vol. 6, no. 1, 2011, pp. 1-37
 Nikolay Koposov, “Collective Singulars. A Reinterpretation”, Contributions, vol. 6, no. 1,
2011, pp- 39-64
 Jan Ifversen, “About Key Concepts and How to Study Them”, Contributions, vol. 6, no. 1,
2011, pp. 65-88

36
 “The European Conceptual History Project (ECHP): Mission Statement”, Contributions, vol. 6,
no. 1, 2011, pp. 111-116
 Peter Ghosh, “Hugh Trevor-Roper and the history of ideas”, History of European Ideas, vol. 37,
2011, pp. 483-505
 Teresa Bejan, “Interview: Quentin Skinner on Meaning and Method”, The Art of Theory, 2011,
http://www.artoftheory.com/quentin-skinner-on-meaning-and-method/
 Teresa Bejan, “Interview: Quentin Skinner in Context”, The Art of Theory, 2011,
http://www.artoftheory.com/quentin-skinner-in-context/
 Symposium on Quentin Skinner, from Method to Politics, , Journal of the History of Ideas, vol.
73, no. 1, 2012
o Melissa Lane, “Doing Our Own Thinking for Ourselves: On Quentin Skinner’s
Genealogical Turn”
o Bryan Garsten, “Liberalism and the Rhetorical Vision of Politics”
o Nadia Urbinati, “Republicanism after the French Revolution: The Case of Sismonde
Sismondi”
o Philip Petitt, “Freedom in Hobbes’s Ontology and Semantics: A Comment on Quentin
Skinner”
o Quentin Skinner, “On the Liberty of the Ancients and the Moderns: A Reply to My
Critics”
 Forum on the Present and Future of American Intellectual History, Modern Intellectual History,
vol. 9, no. 1, 2012, pp. 149-248
o Thomas Bender: “Forum: the Present and Future of American Intellectual History,
Introduction”
o Leslie Butler: “From the History of Ideas to Ideas in History”
o David A. Hall: “Backwards to the Future: the Cultural Turn and the Wisdom of
Intellectual History”
o David A. Hollinger: “What is Our ‘Canon’? How American Intellectual Historians
Debate the Core of their Field”
o James T. Kloppenberg: “Thinking Historically: A Manifesto of Pragmatic
Hermeneutics”
o Joan Shelley Rubin: “Nixon’s Grin and other Keys to the Future of Cultural and
Intellectual History”

37
o Jeffrey Sklansky: “The Elusive Sovereign: New Intellectual and Social Histories of
Capitalism”
 “Forum: History of Political Thought”, German History, vol. 30, 2012, no. 1, pp. 75-99
 Jeffrey Edward Green, “On the Difference Between a Pupil and a Historian of Ideas”, Journal
of the Philosophy of History, vol. 6, 2012, pp. 84-110
 Margrit Pernau, “Whither Conceptual History? From National to Entangled Histories”,
Contributions, vol. 7, no. 1, 2012, pp. 1-11
 Myoung-Kyu Park, “Conceptual History in Korea: Its Developments and Prospects”,
Contributions, vol. 7, no. 1, 2012, pp. 36-50
 David Armitage, ”What’s the Big Idea? Intellectual History and the Longue Durée”, History of
European Ideas, vol. 38, no. 4, 2012, pp. 493-507
 Mikkel Thorup: ”Intellektuel historie”, Temp, no. 4, 2012, pp. 177-189
 “Symposium: Assessing and Extending The Logic of the History of Ideas”, Journal of the
History of Ideas, vol. 73, no. 4, 2012
o Daniel I. O’Neill, “Revisiting the Middle Way: The Logic of the History of Ideas after
More Than a Decade”
o Martyn P. Thompson, “The Logic of the History of Ideas: Mark Bevir and Michael
Oakeshott”
o A. P. Martinich, “A Moderate Logic of the History of Ideas”
o Sara R. Jordan & Cary J. Nederman, ” The Logic of the History of Ideas and the Study of
Comparative Political Theory”
o Amit Ron, “The Logic of the Historian and the Logic of the Citizen”
o Mark Bevir, “Post-Analytic Historicism”
 Hans-Jørgen Schanz, ”Hvorfor er idéhistorie vigtig?”, November 2012,
http://baggrund.com/hvorfor-er-idehistorie-vigtig/
 Frank Beck Lassen, “Afselvfølgeliggørelse – idéhistoriens raison d’etre”,. November 2012,
http://baggrund.com/afselvfolgeliggorelse-idehistoriens-raison-detre/
 Mikkel Thorup, ”Intellektuel historie – idéhistorien i dag”, November 2012,
http://baggrund.com/intellektuel-historie-idehistorien-i-dag/
 Christopher Fear, ”The question-and-answer logic of historical context”, History of the Human
Sciences, vol. 26, no. 3, 2013, pp. 68-81

38
 Stefanie Gänger & Su Lin Lewis, “Forum: a world of ideas: new pathways in global intellectual
history, c. 1880-1930”, Modern Intellectual History, vol. 10, no. 2, 2013, pp. 347-351
 Andreas Busen & Alexander Weiss, eds., Ansätze und Methoden zur Erforschung politischen
Denkens, Baden-Baden: Nomos 2013
o Andreas Busen & Alexander Weiss, ”Einleitung”
o Andreas Busen & Alexander Weiss, ”Ansätze und Methoden zur Erforschung
politischen Denkens: The State of the Art?”
o Jens Olesen, “Quentin Skinners Methode – Zwischen Intentionen und Konventionen”
o Katharina Schneider, “Arnold Ruges doppeltes Spiel. Zu Möglichkeiten und Grenzen
der methode Quentin Skinners in der Analyse zensurflüchtiger Schriften”
o David Egner, ”Begriffsgeschichte und Begriffssoziologie. Zur Methodik und Historik
Carl Schmitts und Reinhart Kosellecks”
o Rieke Schäfer, “Politische Metaphern und Bedeutungswandel”
o Johannes Thumfart, “Ideengeschichte – Archäologie – Topik. Von der Methodendebatte
Skinners und Foucaults zurück zu den Ideen”
o Robert Feustel, “Intervention als Methode. Zum Verhältnis von Diskursanalyse und
politischer Ideengeschichte”
o Daniel Kuchler, ”Bedingt Analytischer Textzentrismus. Eine Kritik an Skinners
Kontextualismus”
o Ulf Bohmann, ”Charles Taylors Mentalitätsgeschichte als kritische Genealogie”
o Jörn Knobloch, “Die Kultur politischer Ideen. Methodische Implikationen einer
politischen Praxeologie”
o Maike Weisspflug, “Tigersprung ins Vergangene. Aktualisierung und Kritik als Problem
der politischen Ideengeschichte”
o Veith Selk, ”Angst und Methode in der Sozialwissenschaft. Konsequenzen für die
Politische Theorie und Ideengeschichte”
o Jörg Probst, ”Politik der Bilder. Franz Josef Strauss, Heinrich Wölfflin und die
Ikonologie der Ideengeschichte”
o Holger Zapf, ”Kultur als Konstrukt? Methoden einer transkulturell orientierten
Politischen Theorie”
o Martin Saar, ”Nachwort: Text, Interpretation, Diskontinuität. Methodenprobleme der
politischen Ideengeschichte”

39
 Mikkel Thorup, Morten Haugaard Jeppesen & Frederik Stjernfelt (eds.), Intellectual History. 5
Questions, Copenhagen: Automatic Press 2013
 Samuel Moyn & Andrew Sartori (eds.), Global Intellectual History, New York: Columbia
University Press 2013
o Samuel Moyn & Andrew Sartori, “Approaches to Global Intellectual History”
o Siep Stuurman, “Common Humanity and Cultural Difference on the Sedentary –
Nomadic Frontier: Herodotus, Sima Qian, and Ibn Khaldun”
o Sheldon Pollock, “Cosmopolitanism, Vernacularism, and Premodernity”
o Vanessa Smith, “Joseph Bank’s Intermediaries: Rethinking Global Cultural Exchange”
o Andrew Sartori, “Global Intellectual History and the History of Political Economy”
o Christopher L. Hill, “Conceptual Universalization in the Transnational Nineteenth
Century”
o Cemil Aydin, “Globalizing the Intellectual History of the Idea of the ‘Muslim World’”
o Samuel Moyn, “On the Nonglobalization of Ideas”
o Mamadou Diouf & Jinny Prais, “’Casting the Badge of Inferiority Beneath Black
Peoples’ Feet’: Archiving and Reading the African Past, Present, and Future in World
History
o Janaki Bakhle, “Putting Global Intellectual History in Its Place”
o Duncan Bell, “Making and Taking Worlds”
o Frederick Cooper, “How Global Do We Want Our Intellectual History to Be?”
o Sudipta Kaviraj, “Global Intellectual History: Meanings and Methods”
 David Armitage, “The international turn in intellectual history”, chap. 1 in Foundations of
modern international thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2013
 Kenneth Sheppard, “Telling Contested Stories: JGA Pocock and Paul Ricoeur”, History of
European Ideas, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 879-898
 Allan Megill and Xupeng Zhang, “Questions on the history of ideas and its neighbours”
Rethinking History, 2013, pp. 1-21
 Brian Kjær Olesen, Jonas Gerlings, Kaarlo Havu, Daniel Knegt, Matti La Mela & Thomas Ø.
Wittendorff, “Doing things with intellectual history: Interview with Martin van Gelderen”,
Zeitenblicke, vol. 12, no. 1, 2013, www.zeitenblicke.de/2013/1/Gelderen
 Slagmark, no. 67, 2013: Ny idéhistorie
o Frank Beck Lassen, “Afselvfølgeliggørelse – idéhistoriens raison d’etre”

40
o Roger Chartier, ”Historien – eller om at læse tiden”
o David Dunér, ”Den kognitiva vändningen”
o Mikkel Thorup, ”Taget ud af sammenhæng – om kontekst i idéhistorie”
o Mark Bevir, ”Kontekstualisme – fra modernistisk metode til post-analytisk
historicisme?”
o David Armitage, ”Hvad er den store idé? – intellektuel historie og longue durée”
 Cesare Cuttica, ”Eavesdropper on the Past: John W. Burrow (1935-2009), Intellectual History
and Its Future”, History of European Ideas, vol. 40, no. 7, 2014, pp. 905-924
 Sarah Hutton, “Intellectual History and the History of Philosophy”, , History of European Ideas,
vol. 40, no. 7, 2014, pp. 925-937
 David Garland, “What is a ‘history of the present?’ On Foucault’s genealogies and their critical
preconditions”, Punishment & Society, vol. 16, no. 4, 2014, pp. 365-384
 Andreas Mahler & Martin Mulsow, eds., Texte zur Theorie der Ideengeschichte, Stuttgart:
Reclam 2014
o Andreas Mahler & Martin Mulsow, “Einleitung: die Vielfalt der Ideengeschichte”
o Wilhelm Dilthey, “Archive der Literatur/Die Typen der Weltanschauung und ihre
Ausbildung in den metaphysischen Systemen”
o Max Weber, “Die Objektivität sozialwissenschaftlicher und sozialpolitischer
Erkenntnis”
o Ernst Cassirer, ”Das Erkenntnissproblem in der Philosophie und Wissenschaft der
neueren Zeit”
o Karl Mannheim, ”Ideologische und soziologische Interpretation der geistigen Gebilde”
o Arthur O. Lovejoy, ”Die Beschäftigung mit der Ideengeschichte”
o Quentin Skinner, ”Bedeutung und Verstehen in der Ideengeschichte”
o Michel Foucault, ”Archäologie des Wissens”
o Reinhart Koselleck, “Begriffsgeschichte und Sozialgeschichte”
o Hans Blumenberg, “Ausblick auf eine Theorie der Unbegrifflichkeit”
o Niklas Luhmann, “Gesellschaftliche Struktur und semantische Tradition”
o Richard Rorty, “Vier Formen des Schreibens von Philosophiegeschichte”
o John G.A. Pocock, “Der Begriff einer ‘Sprache’ und das métier d’historien: Einige
Überlegungen zur Praxis”
o Roger Chartier, “Kulturgeschichte zwischen Repräsentationen und Praktiken”

41
o Ian Hacking, ”Historische Ontologie”
o Christopher Bayly, ”Globale Intellektualgeschichte”
o Peter Burke, ”Die Kulturgeschichte intellektueller Praktiken”
 Ralph Weber & Martin Beckstein, Politische Ideengeschichte. Interpretations-ansätze in der
Praxis, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht 2014
 Darrin McMahon & Samuel Moyn (eds.), Rethinking Modern European Intellectual History,
Oxford: Oxford University Press 2014
o Darrin McMahon & Samuel Moyn, “Introduction: Interim Intellectual History”
o Darrin McMahon, “The Return of the History of Ideas?”
o Peter E. Gordon, “Contextualism and Criticism in the History of Ideas”
o Antoine Lilti, “Does Intellectual History Exist in France? The Chronicle of a
Renaissance Foretold”
o Jan-Werner Müller, “On Conceptual History”
o Judith Surkis, “Of Scandals and Supplements: Relating Intellectual and Cultural
History”
o Samuel Moyn, “Imaginary Intellectual History”
o Suzanne Marchand, “Has the History of Disciplines Had its Day?”
o John Tresch, “Cosmologies Materialized: History of Science and History of Ideas”
o Tracie Matysik, “Decentering Sex: Reflections on Freud, Foucault, and Subjectivity in
Intellectual History”
o Marci Shore: “Can We See Ideas?: On Evocation, Experience, and Empathy”
o John Randolph, “The Space of Intellect and the Intellect of Space”
o David Armitage, “The International Turn in Intellectual History”
o Shruti Kapila, “Global Intellectual History and the Indian Political”
o Warren Breckman, “Intellectual History and the Interdisciplinary Ideal”
 Glenda Sluga, “Turning International: Foundations of Modern International Thought and New
Paradigms for Intellectual History, History of European Ideas, vol. 41, no. 1, 2015, pp. 103-115
 Petri Koikkalainen, “The Politics of Contextualism. Normativity and the New Historians of
Political Thought”, Journal of the Philosophy of History, vol. 9, 2015, pp. 347-371
 Thomas Krogh, “History of Ideas: An Idea and its History”, pp. 83-106 in Jan Eivind Myhre
(ed.), Boundaries of History, Oslo: Scandinavian Academic Press 2015
 Richard Whatmore, What is Intellectual History?, Cambridge: Polity 2016

42
 Richard Whatmore & Brian Yong (eds.), A Companion to Intellectual History, Malden &
Oxford: Wiley Blackwell 2016
o Brian Yong, “Introduction”
o Stefan Collini, “The Identity of Intellectual History”
o Brian Young, “Intellectual History and Historismus in Post-War England”
o Cesare Cuttica, “Intellectual History in the Modern University”
o Edward Baring, “Intellectual History and Poststructuralism”
o Keith Tribe, “Intellectual History as Begriffsgeschichte”
o Jacob Soll, “Intellectual History and History of the Book”
o Michael Drolet, “Michel Foucault and the Genealogy of Power and Knowledge”
o Richard Whatmore, “Quentin Skinner and the Relevance of Intellectual History”
o Kenneth Sheppard, “JGA Pocock as an Intellectual Historian”
o Leo Catana, “Intellectual History and the History of Philosophy: Their Genesis and
Current Relationship”
o Duncan Kelly, “Intellectual History and the History of Political Thought”
o John FM Clark, “Intellectual History and the History of Science”
o Donald Winch, “Intellectual History and the History of Economics”
o Katharina Lorenz, “Art History and Intellectual History”
o Andrew Sartori, “Intellectual History and Global History”
o John W. Cairns, “Intellectual History and Legal History”
o Peter E. Gordon, “The Idea of Secularisation in Intellectual History”

43