ANNUAL PROFESSIONAL PERFORMANCE REVIEW (APPR)

Overall Rating (Original)

Teacher Name: PETER RICE Teacher ID: 1517022
School Year: 2015-2016 School DBN: 75Q721—John F. Kennedy Jr. School
OVERALL AND SUBCOMPONENT RATINGS:
The overall APPR rating is based on the sum of three subcomponent scores: Measures of Teacher Practice
(60%), State Measures (20%), and Local Measures (20%).
Measures of Teacher Overall Rating
State Measures Local Measures
Practice
0 - 60 points: 0 - 20 points: 0 - 20 points:
52 20 20 0 - 100 points:
92
Effective Highly Effective Highly Effective
HEDI Rating HEDI Rating HEDI Rating Highly Effective
HEDI Rating
For more information about rating calculations, please see the SY 2015-16 Advance Overall Ratings Guide.
Teacher's Signature: Date:
(I have read and received a copy of the above and understand that a copy will be placed in my file.)
Evaluator's Name (print):
Evaluator's Signature: Date:
Confidentiality Notice: This report was produced on 8/31/2016. It contains data that is confidential, private, or sensitive. Please
ensure the appropriate use and security of this report.
Teacher: PETER RICE (1517022)
Understanding Your Ratings:
Measures of Teacher Practice
This page explains how your classroom observations in 2015-2016 were used to calculate your Measures of Teacher Practice. For detailed information on your component scores,
please refer to your 2015-16 completed Evaluator Forms. For additional information on the observation options and the Danielson 2013 Framework for Teaching, please refer to the
resources found on the Advance Intranet.

MOTP Score: 3.02 0-60 HEDI Points: 52 HEDI Rating: Effective

Observation Option: You selected Option 1: 1 Formal, 3 informal observations. You received 4 total observations.

MOTP Calculation MOTP HEDI Conversion Chart

Number Weighted Teacher 0 - 60 HEDI
Component HEDI Rating
Domain Component of Times ⨯ Weight = Component MOTP Score Points
Average
Rated Average 1.00 - 1.75 0 - 38 Ineffective
Planning and Preparation 1a: Demonstrating Knowledge of Content and Pedagogy 4 2.75 ⨯ 0.05 = 0.1375 1.76 - 2.50 39 - 44 Developing
1e: Designing Coherent Instruction 4 3.00 ⨯ 0.05 = 0.1500 2.51 - 3.25 45 - 54 Effective
Classroom Environment 2a: Creating an Environment of Respect and Rapport 4 3.50 ⨯ 0.17 = 0.5950 3.26 - 4.00 55 - 60 Highly Effective
2d: Managing Student Behavior 4 2.75 ⨯ 0.17 = 0.4675
3b: Using Questioning and Discussion Techniques 3 3.00 ⨯ 0.17 = 0.5100
Instruction 3c: Engaging Students in Learning 4 3.00 ⨯ 0.17 = 0.5100
3d: Using Assessment in Instruction 4 2.75 ⨯ 0.17 = 0.4675
Professional Responsibilities 4e: Growing and Developing Professionally 3 3.67 ⨯ 0.05 = 0.1835
MOTP Score (Sum of the Weighted Component Averages, Rounded to Nearest Hundredth) = 3.02

Comparing your Component Averages from 2013-14 to 2015-16

2015-16

Component
Confidentiality Notice: This report was produced on 8/31/2016. It contains data that is confidential, private, or sensitive. Please ensure the appropriate use and security of this report. Page 2 of 6
Teacher: PETER RICE (1517022)

Understanding Your Ratings:

State Measures of Student Learning
This page provides details about the measure(s) that made up your State Measures of Student Learning. Your Grade/Subjects are based on STARS information. The Assessments are
selected from the approved list of allowable assessments for Advance. Measures can be based on the students you teach in your classroom (Individual or Linked Target Populations) or
groups of students in your school (Grade or School Target Populations). There is also the choice of Measurement: Growth Model or Goal-Setting. The growth model compares how
similar students perform on End Of Year (EOY) Assessments and calculates student growth percentiles (SGPs). Your HEDI Points are based on the average of your students' growth
percentiles, the Mean Growth Percentile, and the corresponding Confidence Range. Goal-Setting uses the percentage of students who met their goals to calculate your HEDI Points.
The conversion from HEDI Points to your HEDI Rating is available in the chart below.

0-20 HEDI Points: 20 HEDI Rating: Highly Effective

2015-16 Number of Mean Growth % Met HEDI

Grade/Subject Assessment Target Population Measurement Student Percentile HEDI Rating
School DBN Goal Points
Scores [Confidence Range]
75Q721 Alternate Assessment Students State–NYSAA Individual Goal-Setting 8 100% 20 Highly Effective

The table above shows all of the specific measures included in your State Measure. In general, each measure above was Measure Conversion Table
selected for you based on the grade-subject(s) you taught (according to STARS information), the selections your principal made HEDI Points HEDI Rating
for each grade/subject, and the 50% rule. These measures were calculated as selected.
0 – 12 Ineffective
13 – 14 Developing
15 – 17 Effective
For more information about how your measures are calculated, please see the AdvanceOverall Ratings Guide . 18 – 20 Highly Effective

The following page(s) contain student information used to calculate your individual and/or linked state measures.

Confidentiality Notice: This report was produced on 8/31/2016. It contains data that is confidential, private, or sensitive. Please ensure the appropriate use and security of this report. Page 3 of 6
Teacher: PETER RICE (1517022)
Understanding Your Ratings:
Students Contributing to State Measures of Student Learning
This page provides details about the students you taught for each grade/subject.

SY 2015-16 Number of Mean Growth % Met HEDI

Grade/Subject STARS Course-Sections Assessment Student Percentile HEDI Rating
School DBN Goal Points
Scores [Confidence Range]
75Q721 Alternate Assessment Students State–NYSAA 8 100% 20 Highly Effective

Goal-Setting Results for NYSAA Grades 9-12 (Alternate):

EOY Student
Student
Last Name First Name Assessment Goal Met
OSIS
Score Goal?
233570233 Ahmed Mahfuz 3.5 2.75 Y
274684711 Aziz Afchana 3 1 Y
275151736 Chowdhury Nahim 3.5 1 Y
235533692 Chowdhury Nedal 3.5 1 Y
274850924 Diaz Angel 3.25 1 Y
222506297 Khan Mohammad 3.5 1.75 Y
218815033 Park Steve 3 1 Y
274489889 Tanfia Farkunda 3 1 Y

Confidentiality Notice: This report was produced on 8/31/2016. It contains data that is confidential, private, or sensitive. Please ensure the appropriate use and security of this report. Page 4 of 6
Teacher: PETER RICE (1517022)

Understanding Your Ratings:

Local Measures of Student Learning
This page provides details about the measure(s) that made up your Local Measures of Student Learning. Your Grade/Subjects are based on STARS information. The Assessments are
selected from the approved list of allowable assessments for Advance. Measures can be based on the students you teach in your classroom (Individual or Linked Target Populations) or
groups of students in your school (Grade or School Target Populations). There is also the choice of Measurement: Growth Model or Goal-Setting. The growth model compares how
similar students perform on End Of Year (EOY) Assessments and calculates student growth percentiles (SGPs). Your HEDI Points are based on the average of your students' growth
percentiles, the Mean Growth Percentile, and the corresponding Confidence Range. Goal-Setting uses the percentage of students who met their goals to calculate your HEDI Points.
The conversion from HEDI Points to your HEDI Rating is available in the chart below.

0-20 HEDI Points: 20 HEDI Rating: Highly Effective

2015-16 Number of Mean Growth % Met HEDI

Grade/Subject Assessment Target Population Measurement Student Percentile HEDI Rating
School DBN Goal Points
Scores [Confidence Range]
*S 75Q721 Alternate Assessment Students State–NYSAA Individual: Lowest Goal-Setting 3 100% 20 Highly Effective
Performing Third

The table above shows all of the specific measures included in your Local Measure. In general, each measure above was Measure Conversion Table
selected for you based on the grade-subject(s) you taught (according to STARS information) and selections for each HEDI Points HEDI Rating
grade/subject as determined by your School Local Measures Committee and principal.
0 – 12 Ineffective
13 – 14 Developing
*S: A subgroup was applied to this measure to differentiate it from an otherwise identical measure within your State
15 – 17 Effective
Measures.
18 – 20 Highly Effective

For more information about how your measures are calculated, please see the AdvanceOverall Ratings Guide .

The following page(s) contain student information used to calculate your individual and/or linked local measures.

Confidentiality Notice: This report was produced on 8/31/2016. It contains data that is confidential, private, or sensitive. Please ensure the appropriate use and security of this report. Page 5 of 6
Teacher: PETER RICE (1517022)
Understanding Your Ratings:
Students Contributing to Local Measures of Student Learning
This page provides details about the students you taught for each grade/subject.

SY 2015-16 Number of Mean Growth % Met HEDI

Grade/Subject STARS Course-Sections Assessment Student Percentile HEDI Rating
School DBN Goal Points
Scores [Confidence Range]
75Q721 Alternate Assessment Students State–NYSAA 3 100% 20 Highly Effective

Goal-Setting Results for NYSAA Grades 9-12 (Alternate):

EOY Student
Student
Last Name First Name Assessment Goal Met
OSIS
Score Goal?
233570233 Ahmed Mahfuz 3.5 2.75 Y
235533692 Chowdhury Nedal 3.5 1 Y
274489889 Tanfia Farkunda 3 1 Y

Confidentiality Notice: This report was produced on 8/31/2016. It contains data that is confidential, private, or sensitive. Please ensure the appropriate use and security of this report. Page 6 of 6