13/2/2018 Hydrate Inhibition | Campbell Tip of the Month

Hydrate Inhibition
The best way to prevent hydrate formation (and corrosion) is to keep the pipelines, tubing and equipment dry of liquid water.
There are occasions, rightly or wrongly, when the decision is made to operate a line or process containing liquid water. If this
decision is made, and the process temperature is below the hydrate point, inhibition of this water is necessary. Many
materials may be added to water to depress both the hydrate and freezing temperatures. For many practical reasons, an
alcohol or one of the glycols is injected as an inhibitor, usually methanol, diethylene glycol (DEG) or ethylene glycol (EG). All
may be recovered and recirculated, but the economics of methanol recovery may not be favorable in many cases. Total injection rate is
that needed to provide the necessary inhibitor concentration in the liquid water plus that inhibitor which enters the vapor and
hydrocarbon liquid phases. Any inhibitor in the vapor phase or liquid hydrocarbon phase has little effect on hydrate formation conditions.
Determination of the amount and concentration of inhibitors and their distribution in different phases are very important for practical
purposes and industrial applications. Therefore, in order to determine the required amount and concentration of these inhibitors, several
thermodynamic models for hand and rigorous calculations have been developed and incorporated into the computer software.

In this Tip of the Month, we will demonstrate the effect of total inhibitor circulation rate on hydrate depression in a sales gas dew point
correction plant. Let’s consider the process flow diagram shown in Figure 1. The feed composition and conditions are shown in Table 1.
The wet gas analysis was used in this study.

It is desired to process this feed gas to produce a sales gas with a dew point of -5˚F (-20.6˚C) at 990 psia (6.826 MPa) The feed gas is
mixed with recycle gas from the NGL/Glycol separator, compressed and cooled to 120˚F (48.9˚C) and 1000 psia (6.895 MPa), and EG
lean solution and then cooled in the HTX-1, and finally in the HTX-2 to -5˚F (-20.6˚C) before entering the separator at 990 psia (6.826
MPa). For the sake of simplicity, the refrigeration cycle for HTX-2 system is not shown in the above process diagram. Figure 2
represents the feed phase envelope, its hydrate curve, sales gas envelope and the cooling path. As seen in this figure, the gas
temperature drops below the hydrate formation temperature of about 65˚F (18.3˚C) in the HTX-1 and to -5˚F (-20.6˚C) in HTX-2.
Therefore; to prevent the hydrate formation in the HTX-1 and HTX-2, it is decided to inject an 80 weight percent lean EG solution to the
gas stream. The concentration of rich inhibitor solution can be calculated by the shortcut method of Hammerschmidt [1] as described
in Chapter 6, Volume 1 of Gas Conditioning and Processing [2] or using rigorous thermodynamic models. The required circulation
rate is then determined by material balance and phase equilibrium calculations.

In order to show the effect of EG solution circulation rate on the depression of the hydrate formation temperature, the whole process
shown in Figure 1. Figure 3 shows how the hydrate formation temperature in HTX-2 drops with increasing total inhibitor circulation rate.
The corresponding calculated weight percent of EG in rich solution is also shown as a function of circulation rate. The concentration of
EG in the rich inhibitor solution increases with the increase in the inhibitor solution circulation rate. Figure 3 indicates that for a 10˚F
(5.6˚C) depression, or the hydrate formation temperature of -15˚F (-26.1˚C), a circulation rate of 975 lbm/hr (442 kg/h) is required. At this
circulation rate the corresponding weight percent of EG in rich solution drops to 74.

http://www.jmcampbell.com/tip-of-the-month/2006/03/hydrate-inhibition/ 1/4
13/2/2018 Hydrate Inhibition | Campbell Tip of the Month
To learn more about similar cases and how to find the optimum inhibitor circulation rate and concentration for prevention of hydrate
formation, we suggest attending our G4 and G5 courses.

Dr. Mahmood Moshfeghian

References:

1. Hammerschmidt, E.G., “Formation of gas hydrates in natural gas transmission lines,” Ind. & Eng. Chem., Vol. 26, p. 851, 1934
2. Campbell, J. M., “Gas Conditioning and Processing, Vol. 1, the Equipment Modules, 8th Ed., J. M. Campbell and Company,
Norman, Oklahoma, 2001

http://www.jmcampbell.com/tip-of-the-month/2006/03/hydrate-inhibition/ 2/4
13/2/2018 Hydrate Inhibition | Campbell Tip of the Month

Did you enjoy this post? Do you have a question?

Leave us a Comment below!

Want to read more articles like this?

Subscribe to our RSS Feed or visit the Tip of the Month Archivesfor past articles.

Posted on March 1, 2006 at 10:53 am

http://www.jmcampbell.com/tip-of-the-month/2006/03/hydrate-inhibition/ 3/4
13/2/2018 Hydrate Inhibition | Campbell Tip of the Month
2 comments

Categories: Gas Processing, Process Facilities

Recieve new post updates: Entries (RSS)

Recieve follow up comments updates: RSS 2.0

Written by Dr. Mahmood Moshfeghian

DR. MAHMOOD MOSHFEGHIAN is a Senior Technical Advisor and Senior Instructor. He is the author of most Tips of the Month and
develops technical software for PetroSkills. He has 40 years teaching experience in universities as well as for oil and gas industries. Dr.
Moshfeghian joined JMC in 1990 as a part time consultant and then as full time instructor/consultant in 2005. Moshfeghian was
Professor of Chemical Engineering at Shiraz University. Dr. Moshfeghian is a senior member of AIChE and has published more than 125
technical papers on thermodynamic properties and Process Engineering. Dr. Moshfeghian has presented invited papers in international
conferences. He is a member of the Editorial Board for the International Journal of Oil, Gas, and Coal Technology and a member of the
GPSA Technical Committee Group F. He holds B.S. (74), M.S. (75) and and PhD (78) degrees in Chemical Engineering, all from
Oklahoma State University.

http://www.jmcampbell.com/tip-of-the-month/2006/03/hydrate-inhibition/ 4/4