Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Sample description
2.2.2.3 Sample labelling with assay definition, i.e. MS run / data set together with reporting Sample BB94 was labelled with: Lysine-13C614N2 / Arginine-13C615N4
ion mass, reagent or isotope labelled amino acid Sample CTRL was labelled with: Lysine-12C615N2 / Arginine-13C614N4
3. Input data — Description and reference of the dataset used for quantitative analysis: type, format and availability of the data. No actual values are requested here.
Prior to the analysis by mass spectrometry, both BB94 and CTRL samples were
fractionated in 20 bands by using a 1D-gel. Each individual band was
subsequently digested and submitted to a second chromatography-based
3.3. Input data merging
fractionation step before the analysis into the mass spectrometer. Finally, the
searches for the 20 individual bands were merged in a unique compilation list
by using ProteinScape 2.0 software, before the quantification analysis.
4. Protocol —Description of the software and methods applied in the quantitative analysis (including transformation functions, aggregation functions and statistical calculations).
4.1. Quantification software name, version and manufacturer WARP-LC 1.2 / ProteinScape 2.0 (Bruker)
Features (EICs) were selected by applying a m/z and retention time window of
4.2. Description of the selection and/or matching method of features, together with the
0.05 Da and 60 sec, respectively. Signals from +2, +3 and +4 species were added
description of the method of the primary extracted quantification values
to each peptide EIC. The values used for quantitation were obtained by
determination for each feature and/or peptide integrating the chromatographic peak of each EIC.
4.3. Confidence filter of features or peptides prior to quantification A FDR <4% is applied (Described in MIAPE-MSI xx).
4.4.1. Missing values imputation and outliers removal Outliers are automatically removed by WARP-LC 1.2 software.
The heavy/light ratios (H/L) of each peptide were calculated by dividing the
4.4.2. Quantification values calculation and / or ratio determination from the intensities of the EICs corresponding to the heavy and light versions of each
primary extracted quantification values peptide.
A coefficient of variation (CV) was calculated and only proteins with CV<30%
4.5. Description of methods for (statistical) estimation of correctness
were accepted.
5. Resulting data —Provide the actual quantification values resulting from your quantification software together with their estimated confidence. Depending of the quantification technique
or even of the quantification software, only some of the following items could be satisfied (e.g., for spectral counting, only quantification values at protein level can be provided)
5.1 Quantification values at peptide and/or feature level: Actual quantification values achieved for each peptide and/or, in case of feature-based quantification, for the corresponding features
(mapped back from each peptide), together with their estimated confidence.
5.1.1 Primary extracted quantification values for each feature (e.g. area, height, etc.), with
N/A
their statistical estimation of correctness
http://proteo.cnb.csic.es/downloads/miape-
5.1.2 Quantification values for each peptide as a result of the aggregation of the values of
the previous section (5.1.1), with their statistical estimation of correctness quant/Peptides_SILAC_VH.xls
5.2 Quantification values at protein level: Actual quantification values achieved for each protein and for each protein ambiguity group, together with the confidence in the quantification
value.