SR Reddy, Cfo Archana Reddy, Flat 501, a5 (84 Ellora Heights Buldg, Plot 36, Sector-6A, To alislé ‘Kamothe, Navi Mumbai- 410 209 Central Information Commission New Dethi Date: 14.10.2018 Respected Sir, ‘Sub: Contempt of Hon'ble CIC Decisions in CICISB/A/2018/900313 dtd 16.2.17 and request to expedite - Reg. Please refer to Contempt petition dtd 09.04.2017 for not honouring above Decision anid addendum letter dtd 24.11.2017 elucidating the derogatory remarks of FAA over it and also my request letter dtd 21.05.18 to expedite. Iti also requested to cause update my correspondence address as above. 2. Leek eave submit the flowing facts as > Hon'ble CIC vide above Decision had diece to provide the requisite information. > But information for some points was not provided under te pretext that He sume ae not available inthe led for some pins info was itor false or insuciont as ctl ny leer and thercky afer ving due asic CPIOIFAA, T wa compelled to fle Contempt petition before Hon'ble CIC vide my ltr cd 094.2017 for taldag appropriate action, > Thereafter scare eflos were made to gt info as per above CIC decision, but Fit pelle ‘Authoriy (RTD Siri Rav Renan Adel Commr of Customs, showed is despa atude denigrating the Hon'ble CIC an testy Iwas compli infor his alos stad ough CCPGRAM of PM Ofice (as desled in my addendum leer dd 24.11.17) wit routed 0 cause to provide nf sersted ty Tonle CIC since it was crucial fo prove my iamcene in sy De Inquiry proesdingr which was maisiousy trust ypon me at he bees ecules by Stl APS Sart, then Commissioner, CSI Airport and now Chief Commr of same Axor Isto inform tat sed onthe copy of file notns of my vigilance fle provided ex por above CIC decison in RT, Thnd exposed th aide ction of Shri APS Suit my victiminton and illegal protctinlshsding of actual culprits caught re-haned in CCTV and there Dept has opened a viglane cae aginst Shri Sarit whose probes going on for monthyeas. 1s ofr tht sed on RT info and info gated fom reliable infor [had eased to open one more viiace case agxinst Shri APS Suri fr his apparent involvement in sting sgleresoitesin a masiveamogging case salle, wren there appears be sound 300400 Kg god has ben sgl but no acton/probe agaist involved ocr whereas Sh Surbassupended 16 Loner eae Officers (sper RT info) even on small misakes and mos ot imsy grounds and in my case I vat suspended for 9 month without any evidence end thereby deprived of my 2" promotion and that too ignoring my impeccable track record and several cies in my ore for whic I vas svar with Commendation Cerf by Se [APS Sur himself. And now Lam retiring in 8 months with 1 prmetinin 3097 of tv 4°! Revinfomaton also eveaed tat Shi APS Suis lo facing t more vg cae fo i parent ~~ misuse of Adjudication powers on a complaint filed by affected courier M/s Bombino Courier. > T may point out that: sq Rule 19 (7) of RTT Act, 2005, states thet “the Decision of CIC shall be. NOT inaing” ana hence the CPIO/PAA/Dept, must provide information, since ibe ‘+ ora Decision has been accepted by Appropriate authority. 22 FLY As per Rule 20 1), a penalty ean be imposed for not providing information i> Z wEX % As per Rule 20 2), a disciplinary action can be initiated against CPIO. Of (3A Place: Navi Mumbai Signature oF 46/Applicant. Date: 14.10.2018, (AGILI RAJAGOPAL REDDY) \Q\,conrte:1.c#10 gen, fe Comme of sons C5 Aion Saas Mc! 400 089. \ A: FAA RTD, Oo Commr of Customs, CSI Airport, Sahar, Mumbai 400 099. CPi! ‘3. Hon’ble Chairman, CBIC, North Block, New Delhi 110 001 v : Depot Rees, Nor Blk New Da 110001 Cy PR oy acd oe yoy Cetra cy) Maei wr) brs 199799 /F € oa ol en r C/o Archana Reddy, Flat 501, Hn Highs Bile Hot 36 Sear 6A To Kamothe, Navi Mumbai- 410 209 Central Information Commission New Delhi Date: 4.102018 Respected Sir, : Cae Sub: Contempt of Hon'ble CIC Decisions in ay CIC/SB/A/2015/900313 did 16.2.17 and request to expedite - Ref. )) Please refer to Contempt petition dtd 09.04.2017 for not honouring above Decision aid Ay 7 isiendum leer dtd 24.11.2017 elucidating the derogatory remrks of FAA over it nd also my request fetter dtd 21.05.18 to expedite It is also requested to cause update my correspondence address as above. ee dl Tseekleave to submit the following facts as: Hon'ble CIC vide above Decson had directed to provide the requisite information. But information for some points was not provided under the pretext tt the same are not available in the Bile and for some points ine was ether false or insufficient a5 dtd in my leer and thereby ater giving doe notice to CPIO/FAA, I was compelled to Mle Contempt petition before Hobe CIC vide my leer dd 094.2017 for taking appropriate action Thereafer sincere efforts were made to gs nfo as pr above CIC deision, but Fist Appellate ‘Autor (RTI) Shi Rajiv Ranjan Addl Commr ‘of Customs, showed his despotic aitude denigrating the Hon'ble CIC and rey Twas compelled to inform hs ellos ate through CCEGRAM of PM fie (as detailed in my addendum leer dtd 24.11.17) with a requested to EOS, fold pease to provide info as directed B57 Hon" bie CIC; snes W-was eral to prove my innocence in Vere tM “my Dept Inquiry proceedings which was maliciously thrist upon me at the behest acral culprits OAZink ex by hr APS Suri then Commissioner CSI Air and now Chief Comr of ame Apert rk I is to inform that based on the copy of file notings of ry vigilance file, provided as per above USS Irawr™! crc decison in RTL, Thad exposed the malate action of Shri APS Surin my vitmisaton and er yt pA A+~ illegal protection/shielding of actual culprits caught red-handed in CCTV and thereby Deptt has {nee pened vigilance case against Shi Sui, but whose poe is going on for monthshyear. > Isto nfo that based on RT nfo and info gathered from reliable informers, I bad caused 19 open one more vigilance case aginst Shi APS Suri for his apparent involvement in aiding 7 sonugler/essocites in a massive snuggling case ws alleged, wherein there appears tobe sun a EX *EZ-00 1 400K gold has ben smuggled but no action probe enna involved ofcrs whereas Shi ARK Suri tas suspended 16 Lower cadre Officers (as per RTT info) even on small mistakes and mostly Po ‘on flimsy grounds and in my case I was suspended for 9 months without any evidence and LA\ 7° thereby deprived of my 2© premotion and that too ignoring my impoceable tack record and SAAN several seizures in my cet for which I was avarded with a Commendation Ceticate by Shi ‘APS Sui himself And nw Tam rng in 8 months wth 1 promotion in 30 yr of service >IT information also revealed tht Shri APS Suri ie alo facing I mare vig case fr his apparent imine of Adjudication powers on a conplain ied by afted courier M/s Bin Courier. vy ~ COR Tay point out th te ¥) "“v Rale 19 (7) of RTT Act, 2005, states that “the Decision of CIC shall be ining” and hese the CIOIFANDept, must provide information, since te said Decision has been accepted by Appropriate authority Q aye As per Rule 20 (1), a penalty can be imposed for not providing information 6 ¥ Asper Rule 20 2) a disciplinary ation ean be initiated agninst CP1O. 3. In view of the above itis humbly requested to take appropriate action as deemed fit. \S ay % Place: Navi Mumbai ignature ofA Applicant. an Ppa atacon (SAGILI RAJAGBPAL REDDY) Cony 1. CP10 er, Oe Com ef Cons SI Apa Saar, Mun 40069 eRe 2 aa cet, ro Comm of Cats CS Apr Sahar, Mumba 0009. WwW (SHow ble Chair ‘New Delhi 110001 tere Comme Cupdony Cr) PVC ad Oty C Cle elm H, ') x