Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
0968-0896/$ - see front matter 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2007.02.041
3202 W. Rzeski et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. 15 (2007) 3201–3207
2.1. Biology
Figure 4. Effect of FABT on migration of tumor cells. Wounded monolayers of tumor cells (C6, A549) were incubated for 24 h alone or in the
presence of FABT (5 lM). Tumor cells, which migrated to the wound area, were counted (a). Micrographs show wound assay of glioma C6 cells;
wound (b), cell migration after 24 h in control culture (c) and following exposure to 5 lM FABT (d). Magnification 40·. The results are expressed as
the mean number of cells migrated per field of the wound area ±SEM of 50 measurements; ***, +++ at least p < 0.001 versus control, Student’s t test.
presence of 10% FBS and 0.01% DNase I (Sigma). The and 2.5 · 105 (Fao). Next day the culture medium
cells were then sieved through the 40 lM cell strainer was removed and the cells were exposed to FABT
(Falcon, Becton Dickinson Labware, Franklin Lakes, (5–100 lM) for 48 h. Astrocytes and Fao cells were
New Jersey, USA), centrifuged at 800 rpm for 10 min, incubated in the medium containing 2% of FBS.
and plated at 5 · 105 cells/mL density on poly-L -lysine Viability was assessed by means of MTT method.
(MW 70,000–150,000) coated 96-multiwell plates (Nunc,
Roskilde, Denmark). The culture medium consisted of In neuroprotection experiments, neurons were exposed
B-27 supplemented Neurobasal Medium (Life Technol- to serum deprivation (SD—Neurobasal medium with-
ogies) which eliminates glial growth, 0.5 mM L -gluta- out B-27 supplement) and glutamate (500 lM) alone
mine, and 1% of antibiotic-antimycotic solution (Life and combined with FABT (10 and 25 lM). Cell viability
Technologies). For the initial plating the culture med- was assessed after 48 h by means of MTT method.
ium was supplemented with 25 lM glutamate. Incuba-
tion was carried out at 37 C in humidified 95% air 4.6. Proliferation assay
and 5% CO2 atmosphere. The culture medium was chan-
ged every 3 days, until the culture reached 14 days. Neu- Cells were plated on 96-well microplates (Nunc) at a
ronal identity was confirmed by positive staining with density of 1 · 104 (C6) and 2 · 104 (A549). Next day
the mouse anti-neuron specific enolase cc monoclonal the culture medium was removed and the cells were
antibody (Chemicon International, Inc., Single Oak exposed to serial dilutions of FABT in a fresh medium.
Drive, Temecula, CA, USA). Antibody detection and Cell proliferation was quantified after 48 h by measure-
antigen visualization were performed by using Streptavi- ment of BrdU incorporation during DNA synthesis
din HRP Kit (STAR 2004) (Serotec Ltd, Oxford, UK). (Cell Proliferation ELISA BrdU, Roche Diagnostics
GmbH, Penzberg, Germany). Tumor cells were incu-
4.4. Glial cell culture bated with 10 lM BrdU for 2 h. The cells were subse-
quently incubated with the FixDenat solution for
The primary mixed glial cell culture was initially estab- 30 min and then exposed to monoclonal anti-BrdU anti-
lished according to the same protocol used for neurons. bodies conjugated to peroxidase. Color reaction was
The cells were inoculated (15 · 106) into 75 cm2 TC developed by adding the TMB substrate solution and
flasks and left for 48 h at 37 C in 5% CO2 incubator. terminated by addition of 1 M H2SO4. The absorbance
Culture medium (1:1 mixture of DMEM and Ham was measured at 450 nm wavelength using E-max
F-12 nutrient mixture supplemented with 10% FBS, Microplate Reader.
100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 lg/mL streptomycin) was
changed daily until the culture reached confluency 4.7. Cytotoxicity assay
(7–10 days). The flasks were shaken overnight in the
orbital shaker at 210 rpm in order to remove less adher- A cytotoxicity detection kit based on measurement of
ent cells (neurons, microglia, and oligodendroglia). lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity was applied
Following this shaking procedure, the culture became (Tox-7, Sigma). The assay is based on the reduction of
enriched with flat cells displaying typical astrocyte NAD by the action of LDH released from damaged
morphology. Immunostaining with a primary antibody cells. The resulting NADH is utilized in stoichiometric
for glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP, polyclonal, conversion of a tetrazolium dye. The resulting colored
DAKO, Denmark) revealed that astrocytes accounted compound is measured spectrophotometrically. Human
for 95% of the cells in the culture. skin fibroblasts (HSF) were plated on 96-well micro-
plates at a density of 1 · 105. Next day the culture med-
4.5. Viability assay ium was removed and the cells were subjected to the
tested compound (5–100 lM) diluted in a fresh culture
Tumor cells were plated on 96-well microplates (Nunc) medium with reduced amount of FBS (2%). Culture
at a density of 0.5 · 104 (C6), 1 · 104 (TE671, A549), supernatants were collected after 24 h and incubated
and 3 · 104 (HT-29, SK-N-AS). Next day the culture with substrate mixture for 30 min at room temperature
medium was removed and the cells were exposed to in the dark. At the end, the reaction was terminated
serial dilutions of FABT in a fresh medium. Cell prolif- by the addition of 1 N HCl and the color product was
eration was assessed after 96 h by using the MTT meth- quantified spectrophotometrically at 450 nm wavelength
od (Cell proliferation kit I, Boehringer Mannheim, using E-max Microplate Reader.
Germany) in which the yellow tetrazolium salt (MTT)
is metabolized by viable cells to purple formazan 4.8. Cell migration assessment
crystals. Tumor cells were incubated for 4 h with MTT
solution (5 mg/mL). Formazan crystals were solubilized Tumor cell migration was assessed in the wound assay
overnight in SDS buffer (10% SDS in 0.01 N HCl) and model. Tumor cells (C6, A549) were plated at 1 · 106
the product was quantified spectrophotometrically by cells on 4-cm culture dishes (Nunc). Next day, the cell
measuring absorbance at 570 nm wavelength using monolayer was scratched by the pipette tip (P300), the
E-max Microplate Reader (Molecular Devices Corpora- medium and dislodged cells were aspirated, and the
tion, Menlo Park, CA, USA). plates rinsed twice with PBS. Next, the fresh culture
medium was applied and the number of cells migrated
Normal cells were plated on 96-well microplates (Nunc) into the wound area after 24 h was estimated in the
at a density of 5 · 105 (neurons), 2 · 105 (astrocytes), control and the cultures treated with FABT (5 lM).
W. Rzeski et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. 15 (2007) 3201–3207 3207
The plates were stained with the May-Grünwald–Giem- 17. Engstrom, P. F.; Ryan, L. M.; Falkson, G.; Haller, D. G.
sa method. The observation was performed in Olympus Am. J. Clin. Oncol. 1991, 14, 33–35.
BX51 System Microscope (Olympus Optical CO., LTD, 18. Asbury, R. F.; Blessing, J. A.; DiSaia, P. J.; Malfetano, J.
Tokyo, Japan) and the micrographs were prepared in Am. J. Clin. Oncol. 1989, 12, 375–377.
19. Vergne, F.; Bernardelli, P.; Lorthiois, E.; Pham, N.;
analySIS software (Soft Imaging System GmbH, Mün-
Proust, E.; Oliveira, Ch.; Mafroud, A.-K.; Royer, F.;
ster, Germany). Cells migrated to the wound area were Wrigglesworth, R.; Schellhaas, J. K.; Barvian, M. R.;
counted on micrographs and results expressed as a mean Moreau, F.; Idrissi, M.; Tertre, A.; Bertin, B.; Coupe, M.;
cell number migrated to the selected 50 wound areas Berna, P.; Soulard, P. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2004, 14,
taken from four micrographs. 4607–4613.
20. Jung, K.-Y.; Kim, S.-K.; Gao, Z.-G.; Gross, A. S.;
4.9. Computational methods Melman, N.; Jacobson, K. A.; Kim, Y.-Ch. Bioorg.
Med. Chem. 2004, 12, 613–623.
The compound was built with a standard bond length 21. Bhattacharya, P.; Leonard, J. T.; Roy, K. Bioorg. Med.
and angles using the PC SPARATN Pro Ver 1.08 molec- Chem. 2005, 13, 1159–1165.
ular modelling program.37 The energy was minimized by 22. Fontanini, G.; Lucchi, M.; Vignati, S.; Mussi, A.; Ciardi-
ello, F.; De Laurentis, M.; De Placido, S.; Basolo, F.;
the molecular mechanic methods and then by the Har-
Angeletti, C. A.; Bevilacqua, G. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1997,
tree–Fock method at 6-31G**. Charge of atoms from 89, 881–886.
the electrostatic potential distribution was determined.38 23. Kawaguchi, T.; Yamamoto, S.; Kudoh, S.; Goto, K.;
Heat of formation was calculated using the PM3 Wakasa, K.; Sakurai, M. Anticancer Res. 1997, 17, 3743–
method. 3746.
24. Chou, J. Y.; Lai, S. Y.; Pan, S. L.; Jow, G. M.; Chern, J.
W.; Guh, J. H. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2003, 66, 115–124.
References and notes 25. Matysiak, J.; Niewiadomy, A. Synthetic Commun. 2006,
36, 1621–1630.
1. Sporn, M. B. Lancet 1996, 347, 1377–1381. 26. Matysiak, J.; Opolski, A. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2006, 14,
2. Vijayakumar, S.; Hellman, S. Lancet 1997, 349, S1–S3. 4483–4489.
3. Workman, P.; Kaye, S. Trends Mol. Med. 2002, 8, 1–9. 27. Watkins, J. C.; Evans, R. H. Ann. Rev. Pharmacol.
4. Chabner, B. A.; Roberts, T. G. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2005, 5, Toxicol. 1981, 21, 165–204.
65–72. 28. Lee, J. M.; Zipfel, G. J.; Choi, D. W. Nature 1999, 399,
5. Hussain, M.; Wozniak, A. J.; Edelstein, M. B. Crit. Rev. A7–A14.
Oncol. Hematol. 1993, 14, 61–75. 29. McNamara, J. O. Nature 1999, 399, A15–A22.
6. Komarov, P. G.; Komarova, E. A.; Kondratov, R. V.; 30. Price, D. L. Nature 1999, 399, A3–A5.
Christov-Tselkov, K.; Coon, J. S.; Chernov, M. V.; 31. Turski, L.; Cavalheiro, E. A.; Schoepp, D. D.; IOS Press:
Gudkov, A. V. Science 1999, 285, 1733–1737. Amsterdam, 2001.
7. Reddy, A. T.; Witek, K. Curr. Neurol. Neurosci. Rep. 32. Rzeski, W.; Turski, L.; Ikonomidou, C. Proc. Natl. Acad.
2003, 3, 137–142. Sci. U.S.A. 2001, 98, 6372–6377.
8. Rzeski, W.; Pruskil, S.; Macke, A.; Felderhoff-Mueser, U.; 33. Stepulak, A.; Sifringer, M.; Rzeski, W.; Endesfelder, S.;
Reiher, A. K.; Hoerster, F.; Jansma, C.; Jarosz, B.; Gratopp, A.; Pohl, E.; Bittigau, P.; Felderhoff-Mueser, U.;
Stefovska, V.; Bittigau, P.; Ikonomidou, C. Ann. Neurol. Kaindl, A. M.; Bücher, C.; Hansen, H. H.; Stryjecka-
2004, 56, 351–360. Zimmer, M.; Turski, L.; Ikonomidou, C. Proc. Natl. Acad.
9. Nolte, W.; Ramadori, G. Der Onkologe 2005, 11, 785–792. Sci. U.S.A. 2005, 102, 15605–15610.
10. Gujral, M. S.; Patnaik, P. M.; Kaul, R.; Parikh, H. K.; 34. deStevens, G.; Eager, M.; Tarby, C. Heterocycles 1993, 35,
Conradt, C.; Tamhankar, C. P.; Daftary, G. V. Cancer 763–765; Newton, C. G.; Ramsden, C. A. Tetrahedron
Chemother. Pharmacol. 2001, 47, S23–S28. 1982, 38, 2965–3011; Remko, M.; Walsh, O. A.; Richards,
11. Stockler, M. R.; Wilcken, N. J. C.; Coates, A. Breast W. G. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2001, 336, 156–162.
Cancer Res. Treat. 2003, 81, 49–52. 35. Rı́os, M. A.; Rı́os, M. C. J. Phys. Chem. A 1998, 102,
12. Foroumadi, A.; Soltani, F.; Moallemzadeh-Haghighi, H.; 1560–1567; Forés, M.; Duran, M.; Solà, M.; Orozco, M.;
Shafiee, A. Arch. Pharm. 2005, 338, 112–116. Luque, F. J. J. Phys. Chem. A 1999, 103, 4525–4532;
13. Nelson, J. A.; Rose, L. M.; Bennett, L. L. Cancer Res. Matysiak, J. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2006, 14, 2613–2619.
1976, 36, 1375–1378. 36. Rzeski, W.; Kocki, T.; Dybel, A.; Wejksza, K.; Zdzis-
14. Mastrolorenzo, A.; Scozzafava, A.; Supuran, C. T. Eur. ińska, B.; Kandefer-Szerszeń, M.; Turski, W. A.; Okuno,
J. Pharm. Sci. 2000, 11, 325–332. E.; Albrecht, J. J. Neurosci. Res. 2005, 80, 677–682.
15. Senff-Ribeiro, A.; Echevarria, A.; Silva, E. F.; Veiga, S. S.; 37. PC SPARTAN Pro user’s Guide, Wavefunction Inc.:
Oliveira, M. B. Anticancer Drugs 2004, 15, 269–275. California, 1999.
16. Asbury, R. F.; Blessing, J. A.; Moore, D. Am. J. Clin. 38. Singh, U. C.; Kollman, P. A. J. Comput. Chem. 1984, 5,
Oncol. 1996, 19, 400–402. 129–145.