Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS
4. OTHER CASES
TRILLANES VS. PIMENTEL 556 SCRA 471
BIRAOGO VS. PHIL TRUTH 637 SCRA 78 (2010)
BOCEA VS. TEVES 661 SCRA 589 (2011)
(C) When things seized are within plain view of a searching party
ABENES VS. CA 515 SCRA 690 (2007)
ESQUILLO VS. PEOPLE 629 SCRA 370 (2010)
PEOPLE VS. MARTINEZ 637 SCRA 791 (2010)
(G) Exigency
PEOPLE VS. DE GRACIA, 233 SCRA 716 (1994)
4. Wire tapping
REP. ACT NO. 4200
GAANAN VS. IAC, 145 SCRA 112 (1986)
A. Exclusionary rule
Art. III sec. 3(2)
STONEHILL VS. DIOKNO, 20 SCRA 383 (1967)
Waiver – PASTRANO VS. CA 281 SCRA 254 (1997)
C. Content-based Restrictions
D. Content-neutral restrictions
2. Freedom of Assembly
LAW - BP Blg. 880 (Public Assembly Act of 1985)
CASES – BAYAN VS. ERMITA 488 SCRA 226 (2006)
IBP VS. ATIENZA 613 SCRA 518 (2010)
3. Freedom of association and the right to strike
in the public sector
Art. III, sec. 8
Art. IX, sec. 2(5)
Art. XIII, sec. 3, par. 2
CASE - GSIS VS. KAPISANAN NG MGA MANGGAGAWA
510 SCRA 622 (2006)
GSIS VS. VILLAVIZA 625 SCRA 669 (2010)
4. Movies Censorship
CASE - GONZALES VS. KALAW KATIGBAK, 137 SCRA 356 (1985)
IGLESIA NI CRISTO VS. CA 259 SCRA 529 (1996)
5. Radio broadcast
CASE - EASTERN BROADCASTING CORP. (DYRE) VS. DANS,
137 SCRA 647 (1985)
g. Freedom of Information
Art. III, sec. 7
CASES - NERI VS. SENATE 564 SCRA 152 (2008)
CPEG VS. COMELEC 631 SCRA 41 (2010)
E. Academic Freedom
CASES - GARCIA VS. FACULTY OF ADMISSION, 68 SCRA 277
(1975)
ANNOTATION – 313 SCRA 428
DLSU VS. CA 541 SCRA 22 (2007)
CSC VS. SOJOR 554 SCRA 160 (2008)
MERCADO VS. AMA 618 SCRA 218 (2010)
A. Non-establishment Clause
The establishment clause prohibits (1) excessive governmental
entanglement with religious institutions and (2) government endorsement or
disapproval of religion.
3. Tax exemption
Art. VI, sec. 28(3)
CASES - BISHOP OF NUEVA SEGOVIA VS. PROVINCIAL BOARD,
51 Phil. 352 (1927)
TOLENTINO VS. SECRETARY, 235 SCRA
632 (1994)
1. Flag salute
CASE - Ebralinag vs. Division Sup’t of Schools,
219 SCRA 256 (1993)
8. Exclusionary rule
Art. III, sec. 12 (3)
CASES - PEOPLE VS. ANDAN 269 SCRA 95 (1997)
MARCELO VS. SANDIGANBAYAN 302 SCRA 102 (1999)
PEOPLE VS. JANSON 400 SCRA 584 (2003)
2. Presumption of innocence
CASES - BIRAOGO VS. PHIL TRUTH 637 SCRA 78 (2010)
LEJANO VS. PEOPLE 638 SCRA 104 (2010)
DEL CASTILLO VS. PEOPLE 664 SCRA 450 (2012)
ANNOTATION – 569 SCRA 903
9. Trial in absentia
Rule 115, sec. 1 (c)
CASES - GIMENEZ VS. NAZARENO 160 SCRA 1 (1988)
PARADA VS. VENERACION 269 SCRA 371 (1997)
BERNARDO VS. PEOPLE GR 166980 April 4, 2007
a. Transactional Immunity
Art. XIII, sec. 18(8)
Rep. Act No. 1379, sec. 8
3. Acts which when done were innocent (Ex Post Facto Laws)
Art. III, sec. 22
CASES - KAY VILLEGAS KAMI, 35 SCRA 429 (1970)
SALVADOR VS. MAPA 539 SCRA 37 (2007)
PEOPLE VS. CASTA 565 SCRA 341 (2008)
NASI-VILLAR VS. PEOPLE 571 SCRA 202 (2008)
1. Involuntary servitude
Art. III, sec. 18(2)
Case – SARMIENTO VS. TUICO 162 SCRA 676 (1988)
2. Excessive fines
Art. III, sec. 19(1)
CASES - PEOPLE VS. DELA CRUZ, 92 Phil. 906 (1953)
PEOPLE VS. DACUYCUY, 173 SCRA 901 (1989)
AGBANLOG VS. PEOPLE, 220 SCRA 530 (1993)
FIRST JEOPARDY MUST FIRST JEOPARDY MUST SECOND JEOPARDY MUST BE FOR THE SAME
HAVE ATTACHED PRIOR HAVE BEEN VALIDLY OFFENSE OR FOR THE SAME ACT
TO THE SECOND TERMINATED
When first jeopardy When first jeopardy When 2nd jeopardy for When 2nd jeopardy for
attached? terminated? the same offense? the same act?
OTHER CASES :
IVLER VS. MODESTO-SAN PEDRO 635 SCRA 191 (2010)
YSIDORO VS. LEONARDO-DE CASTRO 665 SCRA 89 (2012)
BAUTISTA VS. CUNETA-PANGILINAN 684 SCRA 521 (2012)
E. Affirmative rights