Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
SHERWYN SCHWARTZ, M.D., PHILIP RASKIN, M.D., VIVIAN FONSECA, M.D., AND JANE F. GRAVELINE, M.S.,
FOR THE TROGLITAZONE AND EXOGENOUS INSULIN STUDY GROUP*
T
REATMENT for patients with non-insu-
From the Diabetes and Glandular Diseases Clinic, San Antonio, Tex.
lin-dependent (type II) diabetes mellitus (S.S.); the University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas (P.R.);
consists of reducing hyperglycemia through the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences and John L. McClellan Me-
diet, exercise, and therapy with drugs or morial Veterans’ Hospital, Little Rock (V.F.); and Sankyo U.S.A., New York
(J.F.G.). Address reprint requests to Ms. Graveline at Sankyo U.S.A., 780
insulin.1 The longer diabetes has been present, the Third Ave., Suite 4700, New York, NY 10017.
more likely patients are to require insulin to control *The other members of the Troglitazone and Exogenous Insulin Study
their hyperglycemia.2,3 Despite insulin treatment, Group are listed in the Appendix.
26-week double-blind, randomized comparison of troglitazone forward to impute missing values. The safety analyses also in-
and placebo. Patients could enter the trial if they met the fasting cluded all patients.
serum glucose and glycosylated hemoglobin criteria on either of Statistical analyses were performed with SAS software, version
two assessments during the screening period. Patients were given 6.09. The homogeneity of treatment groups was assessed with
recommendations for a weight-maintenance diet during this pe- Cochran–Mantel–Haenzsel and Fisher’s exact tests and F tests as
riod. After completing the base-line period, the patients were ran- appropriate. Changes from base line (the average of the five meas-
domly assigned to receive placebo, 200 mg of troglitazone, or urements during the eight-week base-line period) in glycosylated
600 mg of troglitazone, each given once daily. The investigators hemoglobin values and fasting serum glucose, total cholesterol,
were instructed not to change the insulin doses unless patients HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and triglyceride concentra-
had a fasting serum glucose concentration below 90 mg per dec- tions were analyzed by analysis of covariance with treatment and
iliter (5.0 mmol per liter) at one office visit, a concentration of study center as factors and the base-line value as the covariate. We
90 to 109 mg per deciliter (5.0 to 6.1 mmol per liter) on two compared each troglitazone group with placebo at the midpoint
consecutive office visits, or a concentration of less than 100 mg of the study (average of weeks 10 and 12) and at the completion
per deciliter (5.6 mmol per liter) on two consecutive days during of the study (average of weeks 24 and 26) by performing step-
self-monitoring at home. Investigators could then change insulin down tests for linear trend.19 Similarly, average daily insulin doses
doses according to their clinical judgment. during the last two weeks of the base-line period were compared
with the average daily doses between weeks 10 and 12 and weeks
Dietary Recommendations 24 and 26. Statistical tests for glycemic end points, lipid measure-
ments, and insulin doses were two-sided. Exploratory analyses to
Dietary recommendations, provided by a registered dietitian, investigate the effect of age, sex, and race were also conducted
were based on the Harris–Benedict equation for calculating basal with analysis of covariance, with center and treatment as factors
energy expenditure in kilocalories per day16 and were consistent and the base-line value as the covariate.
with the recommendations of the American Diabetes Associa-
tion.17 The recommended caloric intake was 1.3 times the basal
energy expenditure. In calculating this value for patients with a
RESULTS
body-mass index of more than 24 (expressed as the weight in kil- Characteristics of the Treatment Groups
ograms divided by the square of the height in meters), an adjust-
ed body weight ([actual weight ideal weight] 0.25 ideal The base-line demographic and disease-related
weight) was used. Dietary compliance was assessed during the characteristics and the degree of glycemic control
study by interviews with the patients.
were similar in the three treatment groups (Table 1).
Evaluation of Efficacy Eighty-seven percent of the patients were taking in-
termediate-acting and short-acting insulin twice dai-
Glycosylated hemoglobin and fasting serum glucose, total cho-
lesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, low-density
ly. Eighty-five percent of the patients took their as-
lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, and triglycerides were measured at signed study medication for 24 or more weeks of the
5 visits during the base-line period and 10 visits during the treat- planned 26-week study. A total of 314 of the 350
ment period. Glycosylated hemoglobin was measured by high- patients (90 percent) completed the study.
performance liquid chromatography with the Bio-Rad Variant an-
alyzer with an intraassay coefficient of variation of 1.2 percent Glycemic Control
(normal range, 4.3 to 6.1 percent). Fasting serum glucose was
measured by the hexokinase method with a Boehringer Mann- The mean glycosylated hemoglobin values, fasting
heim Hitachi automated analyzer. Serum total cholesterol and tri- serum glucose concentrations, and daily insulin dos-
glycerides were measured by enzymatic methods with the same es during the study are shown in Figures 1, 2, and
automated analyzer. Serum HDL cholesterol was isolated by
chemical precipitation and then measured in the same way as total 3, respectively. In the troglitazone groups, the gly-
cholesterol. Serum LDL cholesterol was calculated (when the tri- cosylated hemoglobin values reached a nadir at about
glyceride value was less than 400 mg per deciliter [4.5 mmol per 16 weeks (Fig. 1), whereas fasting serum glucose
liter]) with the equation of Friedewald et al.18 All analyses were values reached a nadir at 4 to 8 weeks (Fig. 2). The
performed at a central laboratory.
All patients received a Life-Scan One-Touch II glucose meter
decreases in glycosylated hemoglobin values, fasting
and were asked to measure fasting capillary-blood glucose at least serum glucose concentrations, and insulin doses were
three times per week and when they had symptoms of hypogly- dose-related and were statistically significant for both
cemia. The results were stored in the meter and downloaded at troglitazone groups as compared with the placebo
each visit. The patients recorded the time, amount, and type of group (P0.001) at both the midpoint and the end
each insulin dose on diary cards.
of the study (Table 2). The reductions in glycosylat-
Safety Evaluations ed hemoglobin values and fasting serum glucose
concentrations in the troglitazone groups occurred
Safety was monitored by assessing symptoms, changes in find-
ings on physical examination (performed by the investigators),
while insulin doses were decreasing. In contrast, the
12-lead electrocardiograms, and the results of clinical laboratory insulin dose in the placebo group did not change
tests (hemogram, serum-chemistry panel including liver-function (Fig. 3). The dose-related effect of troglitazone was
tests, and urinalysis) during the base-line period and at each fol- similar in men and women and among patients of
low-up visit. different ages and racial or ethnic groups (data not
Statistical Analysis shown).
The analyses of efficacy were performed according to the in- Serum Lipid Concentrations
tention-to-treat method and included all patients who received
at least one dose of troglitazone or placebo and had at least one Serum total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and
follow-up visit. The last observations for patients were carried HDL cholesterol concentrations increased slightly
862 Ma r ch 2 6 , 1 9 9 8
10.2
9.0
200 mg of troglitazone
8.6
8.2
7.8
600 mg of troglitazone
7.4
8 6 4 2 0 1 2 4 8 10 12 16 20 24 26
Base-Line Week Treatment Week
Figure 1. Mean Glycosylated Hemoglobin Values in Patients with Type II Diabetes during the Base-Line
Period and during Treatment with Troglitazone or Placebo.
230 Placebo
Fasting Serum Glucose
210
(mg/dl)
200 mg of troglitazone
190
170
600 mg of troglitazone
150
8 6 4 2 0 1 2 4 8 10 12 16 20 24 26
Base-Line Week Treatment Week
Figure 2. Mean Serum Glucose Concentrations during Fasting in Patients with Type II Diabetes during
the Base-Line Period and during Treatment with Troglitazone or Placebo.
To convert values for glucose to millimoles per liter, multiply by 0.056.
80 Placebo
Daily Insulin
70
Dose (U)
200 mg of troglitazone
60
600 mg of troglitazone
50
40
6 2 o
2
o
6 10 14 18 22 26
to t o 0t 4t 8t
o t o to t o t o
8 4 12 16 20 24
Base-Line
Weeks Treatment Weeks
Figure 3. Mean Daily Insulin Dose in Patients with Type II Diabetes during the Base-Line Period and
during Treatment with Troglitazone or Placebo.
864 Ma r ch 2 6 , 1 9 9 8
DISCUSSION
TABLE 2. ADJUSTED MEAN CHANGES FROM BASE LINE
IN GLYCOSYLATED HEMOGLOBIN VALUES, FASTING SERUM Chronic hyperglycemia in patients with type II
GLUCOSE CONCENTRATIONS, AND DAILY INSULIN DOSE diabetes occurs because of resistance to the action of
AFTER 24 TO 26 WEEKS OF TROGLITAZONE THERAPY
insulin and decreases in insulin secretion. Insulin re-
IN PATIENTS WITH TYPE II DIABETES.*
sistance is a prominent feature, if not the primary
defect, in these patients; in some of them insulin-
600 mg OF stimulated uptake of glucose is decreased by 60 to
200 mg OF TROGLITA-
VARIABLE TROGLITAZONE ZONE PLACEBO 80 percent.20 The results of prospective epidemio-
logic studies indicate that insulin resistance is detect-
Glycosylated hemoglobin 0.8† 1.4† 0.1
(percentage points) able before glucose tolerance deteriorates.21-26
Fasting serum glucose (mg/dl)‡ 35† 49† 0.8 Patients with type II diabetes are often treated ac-
Daily insulin dose (% change) 11† 29† 1 cording to a stepped progression, starting with a
regimen of nutrition and exercise and progressing
*Values were adjusted for study center and base-line value.
to therapy with a sulfonylurea drug, metformin, or
†P0.001 for the comparison with placebo.
acarbose, alone or in combination. These therapies
‡To convert values for glucose to millimoles per liter, multiply by 0.056.
are often ineffective, and up to 60 percent of pa-
tients eventually require insulin,2 often in high doses.
In our study of patients with poorly controlled
type II diabetes who were receiving insulin therapy,
TABLE 3. MEAN SERUM CHOLESTEROL AND TRIGLYCERIDE
CONCENTRATIONS AT BASE LINE AND AFTER 24 TO 26 WEEKS OF
troglitazone resulted in a significant dose-related de-
TROGLITAZONE THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH TYPE II DIABETES.* crease in glycosylated hemoglobin values and fasting
serum glucose concentrations. The effect of trogli-
tazone on fasting serum glucose concentrations was
600 mg OF
200 mg OF TROGLITA- evident within 4 weeks after treatment was begun
VARIABLE TROGLITAZONE ZONE PLACEBO and its effect on glycosylated hemoglobin values was
Serum cholesterol (mg/dl)
maximal at 16 weeks, and the improvement was sus-
Base line 21738 20840 21056 tained for the remainder of the study. This improve-
End of study 22445† 22052† 21040 ment occurred despite decreases in the insulin dose
Serum LDL cholesterol (mg/dl)
Base line 13534 12534 12248 of 11 percent in the group given 200 mg of trogli-
End of study 14438† 13938† 12551 tazone and 29 percent in the group given 600 mg
Serum HDL cholesterol (mg/dl) of troglitazone. Our study, as well as smaller studies
Base line 399 389 389
End of study 4110 4111‡ 389 of patients with type II diabetes treated with trogli-
Serum triglycerides (mg/dl) tazone alone, thus demonstrates a significant antihy-
Base line 222112 239175 263364
End of study 209141 203150 240183
perglycemic effect of troglitazone.14,15 The 1.4 per-
cent absolute decline in glycosylated hemoglobin
*Values are means SD. To convert values for cholesterol to millimoles values in the group treated with 600 mg of troglita-
per liter, multiply by 0.026. To convert values for triglycerides to millimoles
per liter, multiply by 0.011.
zone represents a decline of approximately 15 per-
†P0.05 for the comparison with base line.
cent from the base-line value. If we assume that data
‡P0.001 for the comparison with base line.
from the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial
(DCCT) are applicable to patients with type II dia-
betes, this 15 percent decline translates to a reduc-
tion in the risk of progression of diabetic retinopa-
Withdrawal Due to Adverse Events thy of approximately 60 percent.27
Five patients in the placebo group, one in the We did not study the possibility that an increase
group given 200 mg of troglitazone, and six in the in the insulin dose or a change in the insulin regi-
group given 600 mg of troglitazone were withdrawn men to multiple injections of insulin (as in the
from the study because of adverse events. The causes intensive treatment regimen used in the DCCT)
of withdrawal were stroke, metabolic myopathy, un- would have improved glycemic control in these pa-
intended pregnancy, transient ischemic attack, and tients. However, in most patients in the United
exacerbation of depression in the placebo group; States with type II diabetes who are treated with in-
myocardial infarction two days before drug treat- sulin, the disease remains uncontrolled despite the
ment was begun in the group given 200 mg of tro- use of large insulin doses.2
glitazone; and myocardial infarction, coronary ar- Troglitazone was well tolerated, and most adverse
tery disease, congestive heart failure, forgetfulness events were considered to be related to the underly-
and lack of concentration, exacerbation of gastric re- ing diabetes. Several patients had abnormalities in
flux, and jaundice and hyperbilirubinemia in the liver function, but therapy was permanently discon-
group given 600 mg of troglitazone. tinued for this reason in only one patient.
Most of the patients were obese, with a base-line 6. Stevenson RW, Hutson NJ, Krupp MN, et al. Actions of novel antidia-
betic agent englitazone in hyperglycemic hyperinsulinemic ob/ob mice. Di-
mean body-mass index of about 35. The troglita- abetes 1990;39:1218-27.
zone-treated patients had small dose-related increas- 7. Lee MK, Miles PDG, Khoursheed M, Gao KM, Moossa AR, Olefsky
es in body weight. They were instructed to follow JM. Metabolic effects of troglitazone on fructose-induced insulin resistance
in the rat. Diabetes 1994;43:1435-9.
a weight-maintenance diet, rather than a weight- 8. Khoursheed M, Miles PDG, Gao KM, Lee MK, Moossa AR, Olefsky
reduction diet, so that any improvement in glycemic JM. Metabolic effects of troglitazone on fat-induced insulin resistance in
the rat. Metabolism 1995;44:1489-94.
control induced would not be confounded by the 9. Tominaga M, Igarashi M, Daimon M, et al. Thiazolidinediones
effects of weight loss. (AD-4833 and CS-045) improve hepatic insulin resistance in streptozoto-
The ratio of serum HDL cholesterol to total cho- cin-induced diabetic rats. Endocr J 1993;40:343-9.
10. Stevenson RW, McPherson RK, Genereux BE, Danbury BH, Kreutter
lesterol, a marker of cardiovascular risk, did not DK. Antidiabetic agent englitazone enhances insulin action in nondiabetic
change in the patients — the troglitazone-associated rats without producing hypoglycemia. Metabolism 1991;40:1268-74.
increase in serum HDL cholesterol concentrations 11. Suter SL, Nolan JJ, Wallace P, Gumbiner B, Olefsky JM. Metabolic ef-
fects of new oral hypoglycemic agent CS-045 in NIDDM subjects. Diabe-
offset an increase in serum total cholesterol concen- tes Care 1992;15:193-203.
trations. Serum triglyceride concentrations decreased 12. Nolan JJ, Ludvik B, Beerdsen P, Joyce M, Olefsky J. Improvement in
glucose tolerance and insulin resistance in obese subjects treated with tro-
slightly in the patients who were treated with tro- glitazone. N Engl J Med 1994;331:1188-93.
glitazone. 13. Antonucci T, Whitcomb R, McLain R, Lockwood D. Impaired glu-
We conclude that the administration of troglita- cose tolerance is normalized by treatment with the thiazolidinedione tro-
glitazone. Diabetes Care 1997;20:188-93.
zone results in sustained improvement in glycemic 14. Kuzuya T, Iwamoto Y, Kosaka K, et al. A pilot clinical trial of a new
control when given as an adjunct to insulin therapy oral hypoglycemic agent, CS-045, in patients with non-insulin dependent
in patients with type II diabetes. These results are diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 1991;11:147-53.
15. Iwamoto Y, Kuzuya T, Matsuda A, et al. Effect of new oral antidiabetic
consonant with the findings of physiologic studies agent CS-045 on glucose tolerance and insulin secretion in patients with
that troglitazone increases the sensitivity of periph- NIDDM. Diabetes Care 1991;11:1083-6.
16. Howard LJ. Parenteral and enteral nutrition therapy. In: Wilson JD,
eral tissues to insulin. Braunwald E, Isselbacher KJ, et al., eds. Harrison’s principles of internal
medicine. 12th ed. Vol. 1. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1991:427-34.
17. Nutritional recommendations and principles for individuals with dia-
Supported by Sankyo U.S.A., New York, and Parke-Davis Pharmaceutical
betes mellitus. Diabetes Care 1991;14:Suppl 2:20-7.
Research, Division of Warner-Lambert, Ann Arbor, Mich. Drs. Schwartz,
18. Friedewald WT, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS. Estimation of the concen-
Raskin, and Fonseca have served as consultants for Parke-Davis.
tration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the
preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem 1972;18:499-502.
APPENDIX 19. Tukey JW, Ciminera JL, Heyse JF. Testing the statistical certainty of a
response to increasing doses of a drug. Biometrics 1985;41:295-301.
In addition to the authors, the Troglitazone and Exogenous Insulin
20. Saltiel AR, Olefsky JM. Thiazolidinediones in the treatment of insulin
Study Group includes the following investigators: T. Blevins, Austin, Tex.;
resistance and type II diabetes. Diabetes 1996;45:1661-9.
J. Blodgett, San Antonio, Tex.; P. Dandona, Buffalo, N.Y.; B. Draznin,
21. Lillioja S, Mott DM, Spraul M, et al. Insulin resistance and insulin
Denver; J. Drucker and S. Plevin, Palm Harbor, Fla.; L. Fish, Minneapolis;
secretory dysfunction as precursors of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mel-
B. Francis, Seattle; R. Guthrie, New Orleans; B. Haag, Springfield, Mass.;
litus: prospective studies of Pima Indians. N Engl J Med 1993;329:1988-
B. Henson, Kansas City, Mo.; J. Levine, Nashville; W. Mitchell, Albuquer-
92.
que, N.M.; W. Nicholas, Jackson, Miss.; M. Nolte, San Francisco; S. Pek,
22. Vaag A, Henriksen JE, Madsbad S, Holm N, Beck-Nielsen H. Insulin
Ann Arbor, Mich.; A. Peters and M. Davidson, Los Angeles; P. Ross, Fair-
secretion, insulin action, and hepatic glucose production in identical twins
fax, Va.; R. Suwannasri, St. Louis; and R. Teague, Birmingham, Ala.
discordant for non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. J Clin Invest 1995;
95:690-8.
REFERENCES 23. Eriksson J, Franssila-Kallunki A, Ekstrand A, et al. Early metabolic de-
fects in persons at increased risk for non-insulin-dependent diabetes melli-
1. American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care for patients tus. N Engl J Med 1989;321:337-43.
with diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 1997;20:Suppl 1:S5-S13. 24. Warram JH, Martin BC, Krolewski AS, Soeldner JS, Kahn CR. Slow
2. Klein R, Klein BE, Moss SE, Cruickshanks KJ. The medical manage- glucose removal rate and hyperinsulinemia precede the development of
ment of hyperglycemia over a 10-year period in people with diabetes. Di- type II diabetes in the offspring of diabetic parents. Ann Intern Med 1990;
abetes Care 1996;19:744-50. 113:909-15.
3. Henry RR, Gumbiner B, Ditzler T, Wallace P, Lyon R, Glauber HS. In- 25. Pimenta W, Korytkowski M, Mitrakou A, et al. Pancreatic beta-cell
tensive conventional insulin therapy for type II diabetes: metabolic effects dysfunction as the primary genetic lesion in NIDDM: evidence from stud-
during a 6-mo outpatient trial. Diabetes Care 1993;16:21-31. ies in normal glucose-tolerant individuals with a first-degree NIDDM rel-
4. Fujita T, Sugiyama Y, Taketomi S, et al. Reduction of insulin resistance ative. JAMA 1995;273:1855-61.
in obese and/or diabetic animals by 5-[-4-(1-methylcyclohexyl- 26. O’Rahilly S, Turner RC, Matthews DR. Impaired pulsatile secretion of
methoxy)benzyl]-thiazolidine-2,4-dione (ADD-3878, U-63,287, ciglita- insulin in relatives of patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes. N Engl
zone), a new antidiabetic agent. Diabetes 1983;32:804-10. J Med 1988;318:1225-30.
5. Fujiwara T, Yoshioka S, Yoshioka T, et al. Characterization of new oral 27. The absence of a glycemic threshold for the development of long-term
antidiabetic agent CS-045: studies in KK and ob/ob mice and Zucker fatty complications: the perspective of the Diabetes Control and Complications
rats. Diabetes 1988;37:1549-58. Trial. Diabetes 1996;45:1289-98.
866 Mar ch 2 6 , 1 9 9 8